Justice or diversion? Saftu challenges Ramaphosa's inquiry into TRC prosecutions
Image: File
The South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) has criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to establish a new commission of inquiry to investigate why the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) were never implemented.
Saftu views this move as a wasteful and cynical attempt to avoid accountability, branding it 'a bizarre and shameful spectacle of the state appointing a commission to investigate itself for its failure to act on the findings of a previous commission.'
The announcement comes as Ramaphosa moves to establish a Judicial Commission of Inquiry to investigate whether government officials obstructed the investigation or prosecution of apartheid-era crimes.
These cases, referred by the TRC to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), have been a longstanding source of frustration for victims and their families.
Earlier this year, survivors and relatives of apartheid victims, with the backing of the Foundation for Human Rights (FHR), initiated legal proceedings in the Gauteng High Court. They accused senior state officials, including President Ramaphosa, Justice Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, National Prosecuting Authority head Shamila Batohi, and SAPS Commissioner Fannie Masemola, of unlawfully delaying and obstructing justice.
The Presidency on Wednesday, acknowledged that past administrations may have improperly influenced these investigations and stressed that the new inquiry follows extensive settlement discussions.
However, unresolved issues remain, such as the government's potential liability for constitutional damages, which are now expected to be addressed through the commission's terms of reference.
In a statement, Saftu's general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi, condemned what it called a recurring pattern of 'governance by delegation and deferral — not by leadership.'
According to Saftu, the government's response to major national crises has been to appoint commission after commission, yet few recommendations have been acted upon, and accountability remains elusive.
The statement highlights the lack of progress following the Zondo Commission into State Capture, where despite extensive revelations of corruption, 'prosecutions are painfully slow, key enablers remain in office, and billions in stolen public funds have not been recovered.'
Saftu says the same failures are evident in the aftermath of the Marikana Commission, the Life Esidimeni Arbitration, and the Nugent Commission into SARS, each revealing systemic abuse or negligence, followed by minimal consequences.
Even the TRC, Saftu argues, has been betrayed.
'Three decades later, [its recommendations] have been ignored or shelved,' the federation says, adding that apartheid-era criminals who were denied or never sought amnesty remain unprosecuted, while victims and their families continue to suffer in silence.
'This endless cycle of commissions without consequences has become a deliberate strategy of avoidance,' the statement reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Mbeki and Mabandla accept court ruling on TRC case intervention
Former president Thabo Mbeki and ex-Justice minister Brigitte Mabandla were unsuccessful in their bid to intervene in the case brought by survivors and families of victims of apartheid-era atrocities, who are demanding answers on why cases referred to the National Prosecuting Authority and the police by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission were never pursued. Image: DIRCO Former president Thabo Mbeki and ex-justice minister Brigitte Mabandla have accepted the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria judgment on Friday dismissing their application to intervene in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) case. Mbeki and Mabandla approached the high court in a bid to intervene in the application for R167 million in constitutional damages by families of victims of apartheid-era atrocities in their personal capacities. Max Boqwana, chief executive of the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, said they agreed with the judgment that the respondents (survivors and victims of apartheid-era atrocities) cannot rely on allegations from collections of books and journalists' comments and further that they have therefore no direct information to implicate either Mbeki or Mabandla. "The country would have benefited from both the insights of both President Mbeki and Ambassador Mabandla from their direct accounts of what exactly happened. The judge said because of the absence of direct allegations against them except perhaps media sensation there is no need for intervention," Boqwana added. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ He continued: "We fully support the justice process in relation to these cases and we are very interested in the real truth about why there were / are no country and everyone concerned are entitled to truth not fabrications, conjectures and jaundiced allegations." Boqwana said this maybe will be done in the commission inquiry led by retired Constitutional Court Justice Sisi Khampepe. "This painful part of our history must not be exploited for political and financial opportunism," he said. Survivors and victims of apartheid-era atrocities as well as the Foundation for Human Rights want the high court to award R167m in constitutional damages including about R115.3m over five years to enable families and organisations supporting them to advance truth, justice, and closure by assisting in pursuing investigations and research, inquests, private prosecutions, and related litigation. An additional R8m over five years will enable families and organisations supporting them to play a monitoring role in respect of the work of the policing and justice authorities charged with investigating and prosecuting the TRC cases referred to the National Prosecuting Authority. Another R44m over 10 years to enable families and organisations supporting families to pursue commemoration, memorialisation and public education activities around the TRC cases including the holding of public events, publishing of books, and making of documentaries. However, Judge Anthony Millar dismissed Mbeki and Mabandla's application on Friday. "Mbeki and Mabandla have no direct and substantial interest in the granting of any declaratory order against the government respondents and would have no obligation in respect of the granting of that order or any damages awarded in consequence thereof," the judge said. Judge Millar said the appropriate forum for them to "tell their side of the story" is the commission of inquiry established by President Cyril Ramaphosa and will be chaired by retired Constitutional Court Justice Sisi Khampepe. According to the judgment, Mbeki and Mabandla will have an opportunity to address the allegations that the survivors and victims make against them including those that are of a hearsay nature. Mbeki and Mabandla submitted in court that they have a direct and substantial interest sufficient to justify intervention. The survivors and victims opposed the intervention application, arguing that the relief sought in the main application is only against the government parties who are the current state functionaries in their official capacities and not against either Mbeki or Mabandla personally. They also added that no order is sought against either of Mbeki or Mabandla and for that reason, their application for intervention ought to be refused by the court.
IOL News
17 hours ago
- IOL News
Lucky Montana's R15 million tax battle with Sars heats up
Prasa's former chief executive Lucky Montana is facing a R15 million tax bill from the SA Revenue Service. Image: File uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) MP and former Passenger Rail Agency of SA (Prasa) chief executive Lucky Montana faces a tax bill of over R15 million by the SA Revenue Service (Sars). Sars has also launched proceedings to have him sequestrated. The tax collection entity applied to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria last month to strike out several allegations made by Montana. According to Sars, allegations in about seven paragraphs were identified as objectionable matter. A defiant Montana on Saturday said the battle is far from over and is likely to end in the Constitutional Court. "On July 21, I filed an application in the high court to rescind the original default judgement obtained by Sars in 2022, without my knowledge. "This led us to the current situation. In addition, we have taken the decision to appeal the recent judgment. This is but one battle in a much broader legal fight. Until these two matters are finalised by the courts, the battle is not over," Montana explained. In his replying affidavit, Montana accused Sars of arrogant conduct that disregards legitimate objections and denies him constitutional rights to administrative justice and fairness. Judge Etienne Labuschagne found the allegations to be irrelevant and vexatious. Montana also accused Sars of maladministration and abuse of power and of indulging in a witch hunt against him, motivated by a political agenda. In addition, he contended that Sars persisted in pursuing false claims that he bought properties to the value of R36m in order to 'nail' him. He alleged that Sars was part of a dirty campaign of an unidentified Johannesburg firm of attorneys to target persons like him by pursuing false allegations. Other allegations include Sars breaking into his house and acting like a criminal gang. Judge Labuschagne said all these allegations are scandalous and vexatious and were also not relevant. In its response to Montana, Sars argued that it is prejudiced by such allegations and that not only are the allegations scandalous, vexatious or irrelevant, but the entity has no right to respond. Additionally, it faces institutional reputational harm, to the detriment of the tax administration scheme in South Africa if such allegations are not struck out. Sars succeeded in having the allegations struck out, with Judge Labuschagne also awarding the revenue service costs of the strike application out are to be paid on a punitive scale of attorney and client, including the costs of two counsels, where so employed. "I am satisfied that Sars has established a right to strike out the above material identified in its strike out notice. "The allegations are emotive and intemperate, unsupported by facts and constitute gratuitous abuse. They are irrelevant to the issue of whether this court should condone the late filing of an answering affidavit," the judge found. He said while the court is mindful not to stifle robust debate such allegations fall to be deprecated as irrelevant, unhelpful and calculated to harm and that such conduct warrants a punitive cost order. The judge added that Montana's answering affidavit was due in the sequestration proceedings on April 26 last year but since then, he has failed to file it or to indicate in papers when it would be filed.
The Citizen
18 hours ago
- The Citizen
Khampepe Commission is the right platform for Mbeki, Mabandla to tell their story, court rules
The former president and justice minister were unsuccessful in their attempt to join a damages over apartheid-era crimes. Former president Thabo Mbeki and ex-justice minister Brigitte Mabandla have lost a court battle to intervene in a R167 million damages case related to the failure to prosecute apartheid-era crimes. The case was brought by the families of the victims, including the Cradock Four. They argue that the government violated their constitutional rights by failing to implement the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to prosecute those responsible for apartheid-era atrocities. Government dragged to court over TRC prosecutions The families allege that from 1998 to 2017, the government actively blocked investigations into TRC-referred cases. They are asking the courts to award constitutional damages and set up a trust to manage the funds. They also wanted a commission of inquiry into the lack of prosecutions. However, President Cyril Ramaphosa established the commission in late April, before the court heard the damages application. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa launches commission of inquiry into apartheid-era justice delays Retired Constitutional Court (ConCourt) Judge Sisi Khampepe will chair the inquiry, which will focus on events from 2003 to the present day. In response, Mbeki and Mabandla applied to the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to join the damages case. The duo argued that they risk being blamed and having their conduct in office declared wrongful, potentially paving the way for the damages award. High Court judgment But Judge Anthony Millar, in his judgment, dismissed Mbeki or Mabandla's application, stating that the families' court papers made no direct accusations against them. 'It is important to note that besides the fact that there are no direct allegations, the founding affidavit references the fact that the allegations of political interference are denied by Mr Mbeki,' Millar said. 'Neither Mr Mbeki nor Ms Mabandla are specifically named as having directly acted in any way to subvert or prevent the TRC investigations or prosecutions. References to them are by virtue of the offices that they held and by way of inference,' he added. Mbeki and Mabandla told the high court that they had a direct and significant interest in the case, which justified their request to intervene. READ MORE: Mbeki accused of trying to save his reputation by intervening in apartheid lawsuit They argued that the serious allegations made against them were central to the case and would inevitably come up during the proceedings. But the families contended that the damages case did not depend on whether Mbeki or Mabandla personally interfered. That issue, they said, would be dealt with by the Khampepe commission. 'In their view, the application to intervene is made solely to address reputational concerns and 'set the record straight' regarding allegations which if established, would tarnish their reputation but not because there is any legal interest in the relief sought,' the judgment delivered on 1 August reads. Mbeki, Mabandla lose bid to intervene in TRC prosecutions case Millar concluded that the Khampepe commission is the 'appropriate forum' for Mbeki and Mabandla to 'tell their side of the story', since they have 'no direct and substantial interest' in the damages case. The judge, therefore, dismissed their application but made no order for costs. 'Mr Mbeki and Ms Mabandla sought leave to intervene in their personal capacities and although unsuccessful, given the fact that the main application is constitutional in nature, I am of the view that no order of costs should be made.' NOW READ: Apartheid-era survivors demand justice in court
