logo
India and Pakistan exchange captured soldiers after ceasefire deal

India and Pakistan exchange captured soldiers after ceasefire deal

Independent14-05-2025

India and Pakistan exchanged a prisoner each on Wednesday, days after the South Asian nuclear powers walked away from the brink of war.
Pakistan returned a Border Security Force personnel who had inadvertently gone over the border in northern Punjab state last month.
Constable Purnam Kumar Shaw was returned after three weeks in Pakistani custody. He had been detained for crossing into Pakistani territory while on operational duty in the Ferozepur area on 23 April, the BSF said.
His 'repatriation' became possible due to the 'consistent efforts of BSF through regular flag meetings with Pakistan Rangers and through other communication channels".
The BSF said the constable from West Bengal state was handed over at around 10.30am local time at the joint check post on the Attari border near Amritsar. The "handover was conducted peacefully and in accordance with established protocols'.
The constable's family said his return was a "great relief". "The past two weeks have been filled with sleepless nights and uncertainty for us. We were worried about his well-being," a member of his family was quoted as saying by India Today.
In exchange for the constable, India returned Muhammadullah of Punjab Rangers who had reportedly crossed into India on 3 May.
For four days last week, India and Pakistan engaged in the most intense fighting in decades that killed at least 75 people before a ceasefire was reached over the weekend.
The conflict ensued after India, in an overnight attack last Wednesday, struck nine alleged militant hideouts in Pakistan. The airstrikes, dubbed "Operation Sindoor", were conducted in retaliation for the killing of 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists, in a terror attack in Kashmir on 22 April.
New Delhi accused Pakistan of backing the gunmen who carried out the massacre. Islamabad denied the charge and sought an independent investigation.
In the wake of the attack, the two countries expelled each other's diplomats, suspended visas and closed airspaces and land borders. India also suspended a crucial treaty on river water sharing.
The Indian strikes escalated the tensions into a military conflict as the two sides exchanged heavy fire along their de facto border in the restive Kashmir region as well as missile and drone strikes on military installations.
The Indian military claimed to have killed nearly 100 militants with its overnight strikes and 35-40 personnel of Pakistan's armed forces in subsequent action along the de facto border.
The Pakistani army said on Tuesday that the clash with India had left 11 soldiers and 40 civilians dead. A Pakistani minister last week claimed their armed forces had killed 40-50 Indian soldiers.
Both India and Pakistan claimed to have downed each other's fighter jets in a dogfight that reportedly involved over 125 aircraft, making it the largest aerial battle since the Second World War.
Both nations also claimed victory in the overall fighting, which was halted after US president Donald Trump announced a ceasefire on Saturday afternoon.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bangladesh's elections to be held in first half of April 2026, says de facto PM Yunus
Bangladesh's elections to be held in first half of April 2026, says de facto PM Yunus

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

Bangladesh's elections to be held in first half of April 2026, says de facto PM Yunus

NEW DELHI, June 6 (Reuters) - Bangladesh's national elections will be held in the first half of April 2026, the country's de facto prime minister, Muhammad Yunus, said on Friday. "The Election Commission will provide you with a detailed roadmap for the elections at an appropriate time," said Nobel peace laureate Yunus, who took over as interim head of the South Asian nation of 173 million last August after a student-led uprising forced then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to flee to India.

Poll of the week: Should Ukraine accept the terms of Putin's ceasefire agreement?
Poll of the week: Should Ukraine accept the terms of Putin's ceasefire agreement?

Telegraph

time13 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Poll of the week: Should Ukraine accept the terms of Putin's ceasefire agreement?

Vladimir Putin laid out his demands for both a ceasefire and ending the war in Ukraine in a meeting between the countries in Istanbul on Monday. As part of the demands, Russia would see that Ukraine curbs the size of its military and recognises Russian as an official language. This week we asked readers: Should Ukraine accept the terms of Putin's ceasefire agreement? A resounding 92 per cent of more than 20,000 respondents said no. Telegraph readers reasoned that what Putin had put forward were not terms for peace but 'demands for complete capitulation and subjugation'. Here's why you are against a ceasefire on Putin's terms. 'These are not terms for peace' For many readers, agreeing to terms that include international recognition of Russian sovereignty over four eastern regions of Ukraine would undermine the bravery and determination of Ukrainians, who have fought against Russia's invasion. Indeed, countless readers say the West should continue to bolster Ukraine's military efforts. John Hughes, for example, believes the West needs 'to reward the Ukrainians for their incredible tenacity and flood the country with as much and as potent weaponry as possible, as quickly as possible.' Likewise, reader Hel Han says 'the West must back Ukraine to the hilt with weapons and political support', or the alternative 'is bleak'. And Damian McDonald says: 'The West and Trump in particular should put an end to this farce once and for all. Arm Ukraine to the hilt and let them finish the job!' 'These are not terms for peace,' Stephen Bell asserts. 'They are demands for complete capitulation and subjugation. Time to stop listening to Putin and apply the severest sanctions.' 'The Russians are embarrassed and stalling for time' Many readers perceive Putin's peace terms appear to be an act of desperation, and indicate that Russia is backed into a corner. Mr Hughes believes that 'the Russians are embarrassed and stalling for more time'. Nick Matthews speculates it is 'negotiation tactics 101' on Russia's part. 'Make the most ludicrous demands in the hope that you can negotiate down to something that suits you,' he explains, and suggests: 'Ukraine should reply in kind.' Similarly, Hel Han suggests 'Russia seems to be in an increasingly tenuous situation regarding making any demands.' The reader requests that 'the arbitrators of the peace talks need to remind them that they are in no position whatsoever to make any demands. 'Russia is the aggressor and must withdraw and pay massive reparations.' 'Ukraine should be granted Nato membership' In response to Putin's demands, readers also questioned Russia's opposition to Ukraine joining Nato, a decision that lies with Ukraine and Nato members. 'It seems to me that Ukraine has made concessions while Russia has made none,' an anonymous reader says. 'If the invasion was all about the expansion of Nato, and Ukraine cannot join, why is that not enough concession?' Reader Bernie Thompson is unsurprised 'at the intransigence of Putin and his henchmen'. He argues: 'They should be granted Nato membership. This is the only language that Putin is prepared to understand, even if he says he doesn't.' He continues that as 'Russia violated the Budapest Memorandum in 2014, Ukraine should have the nukes that they surrendered returned to them.' Donald Trump, the US president, previously said Ukraine joining Nato was 'not on the table'.

Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump warns Putin's revenge for drone attack ‘not going to be pretty'
Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump warns Putin's revenge for drone attack ‘not going to be pretty'

The Independent

time17 hours ago

  • The Independent

Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump warns Putin's revenge for drone attack ‘not going to be pretty'

Donald Trump has warned that Vladimir Putin 's response to a signifiant Ukrainian drone attack on Russian airfields will 'not be pretty'. The US President said that Mr Putin had told him in a phone call on Thursday that Moscow would strike back following Operation Spiderweb, which targeted Russia 's nuclear-capable long-range bombers. 'They went deep into Russia and he [Putin] actually told me we have no choice but to attack based on that, and it's probably not going to be pretty,' he said. 'I don't like it, I said don't do it, you shouldn't do it, you should stop it.' Mr Trump added that there was 'a lot of hatred' between Ukraine and Russia but that he remained hopeful that a ceasefire agreement could be reached to 'stop the bloodshed'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store