Unity government not a threat to Islam or Malays, says Umno sec-gen
He said Islam continues to flourish under the administration, with strong support from government allocations.
Asyraf Wajdi said this figure excludes allocations for Islamic programmes and efforts to uplift Malay education and economy through agencies such as the Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) and the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development (KKDW).
'In the 30 months since Umno joined the Unity Government, the Deputy Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi) and cabinet ministers have worked hard to uphold the Islamic agenda,' he added.
Asyraf Wajdi, who is also MARA chairman, said this at the opening of the Hulu Terengganu Umno division delegates meeting 2025 in Jenagor, near here, today.
Also present was Terengganu Umno chairman Datuk Rozi Mamat.
Asyraf Wajdi reminded Umno delegates and members to counter such slander to prevent unhealthy sentiment among Malaysia's multiracial society.
'This is part of the ongoing narrative used by those envious of Umno's role in the Unity Government,' he said. — Bernama
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
Unfair to make Umno repay RM16mil SRC Int'l donation, High Court hears
KUALA LUMPUR: Umno received RM16mil 10 years ago as a donation and contribution from a subsidiary of SRC International Sdn Bhd but had no prior knowledge of what transpired in the company, the High Court here heard. Lawyer Mohamed Shahrul Fazli Kamarulzaman, who appeared for Umno, said in his submission that the party did not have the requisite knowledge that the money received from Jendela Pinggiran Sdn Bhd (JPSB) was the result of a breach of duty or trust by the company's former directors, particularly SRC's former chief executive officer Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil. ALSO READ: RM16mil donation was for Umno party activities, charity programmes, says witness "Umno was a bona fide recipient of the RM16mil, and the said sum was spent and utilised for activities and programmes that were CSR (corporate social responsibility) in nature. "It is unjust to allow for restitution against Umno and (the party) will suffer injustice if it is called upon to repay the said sum to the plaintiffs," the lawyer said on Monday (July 28). Shahrul also argued that the claim against Umno was time-barred by the statute of limitations provided under Section 6(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1953. He said Umno received the RM16mil in April 2015, and the plaintiffs contend that the purported wrongful disbursement of the sum was only discovered by the new management in 2019. However, there was no evidence to substantiate the claim, he added. ALSO READ: Former SRC director signed blank cheques, not knowing they were for Umno Meanwhile, lawyer Razlan Hadri Zulkifli submitted that Umno had not proven its case that the monies were indeed used for political reasons, as there was no evidence to support the claim. He said evidence before the court showed that the source of the money was SRC, and that Umno was not entitled to it. In May 2021, SRC and its subsidiaries JPSB and Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd (GMSB) filed two separate lawsuits against Umno and Selangor Umno. In the lawsuit against Umno, the plaintiffs are seeking RM16mil, which they claim was wrongfully transferred to the political party, asserting that it had no basis to receive the funds. The second lawsuit involves a claim for RM3.5mil against Selangor Umno, which is also alleged to have received the funds improperly. The hearing continues before Justice Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan on Wednesday (July 30).


Malay Mail
39 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Ex-CJ Tengku Maimun says Federal Court was free of pressure during her tenure, dissenting decisions as proof
PUTRAJAYA, July 28 — Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat today dismissed the idea that she had influenced Federal Court decisions during her six-year tenure as the country's top judge. The recently retired judge pointed to her own dissenting judgments in constitutional cases as proof that judges had decided cases independently. 'For the past six years, the Federal Court had decided 19 cases involving various issues of constitutional law,' she said at the Palace of Justice here, after the swearing-in ceremony of Datuk Abu Bakar Jais and Datuk Azizah Nawawi as the president of the Court of Appeal and te chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak respectively. 'And out of that 19 cases, I was dissenting in five cases. So I think statistically, five out of 19 represents about 25 per cent of the dissenting judgments.' Tengku Maimun said this showed judges were free from pressure, including from herself when she was chief justice. 'So I think that fact alone would manifest that judges decided independently without fear or favour, without external or internal pressure. 'Because if I had any influence on their decisions, then surely I would not be dissenting in five out of 19 cases involving especially constitutional law.' YAA Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebli is pictured during the swearing-in ceremony as a new Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak at Palace of Justice in Putrajaya January 17, 2023. Picture by Yusof Mat Isa Tengku Maimun was asked about a recent speech by Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli who recently retired as chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak and had alleged interference in a Federal Court case involving constitutional issues. 'Let's not make it a contest of words between two people or more than two people. Perhaps I can just share some facts,' she replied. Tengku Maimun retired earlier this month after serving as the first woman chief justice in Malaysia. She said her retirement has been peaceful. 'Alhamdulillah, feeling very free, enjoying quiet moments,' she said. She also congratulated those appointed to new roles in the judiciary today.


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Court dismisses lawsuit by sisters seeking declaration they were never Muslim
KUALA LUMPUR, July 28 — The High Court in Shah Alam here has dismissed a lawsuit from twin sisters contesting their conversions to Islam. Judicial Commissioner Rozi Bainun ruled that the matter of religious status falls under the jurisdiction of the Shariah Court, Free Malaysia Today reported. She noted that the sisters had already initiated proceedings in the Shariah Court to determine their status but later withdrew the case. Rozi said the case should not have been withdrawn and urged the pair to present witnesses and evidence to support their claims of forced conversion. The sisters, now 26 years' old, alleged that they were compelled to convert to Islam at the age of 14 by their biological mother. Their mother, who had embraced Islam after remarrying a Muslim man, brought them to the Muslim Welfare Organisation Malaysia (Perkim) office in 2013. There, the twins said they were made to recite the 'kalimah shahada', the Islamic declaration of faith, without understanding its meaning and later received conversion certificates. They claimed they have never practised Islam, continued observing Taoist beliefs, and sought a court declaration that they were never Muslims, naming the Selangor government and Islamic council as defendants.