logo
What would happen if the Earth continues to spin faster? Stronger hurricanes, disastrous earthquakes and catastrophic flooding, expert says

What would happen if the Earth continues to spin faster? Stronger hurricanes, disastrous earthquakes and catastrophic flooding, expert says

Daily Mail​11-07-2025
Scientists have warned that this summer could include some of the shortest days of your entire life.
On July 22 and August 5, experts predict the day will be 1.38 and 1.51 milliseconds shorter than average, respectively.
This is because the planet's rotation has entered an unexpected period of acceleration, shaving a millisecond or so off the length of a solar day.
But what would happen if the world just kept getting faster?
Given that a blink takes 100 milliseconds, you are unlikely to notice any big changes for a long time.
However, scientists say that unchecked acceleration would eventually lead to disastrous consequences.
If Earth were spinning just 100 miles per hour faster than it does now, the world would be hit by stronger hurricanes, catastrophic flooding, and the collapse of satellite networks.
And, if the world were to double its speed, it would likely be the end of life as we know it.
One mile per hour faster
On average, it takes the planet 24 hours, or 86,400 seconds, to complete one full rotation, which is called a solar day.
Small fluctuations like the location of the moon or volcanic eruptions can shift this around a millisecond in either direction, but the rotation is generally fairly stable.
Because the Earth is a sphere, its circumference is smaller near the poles than at the equator, so the planet's surface moves faster the further you get from the poles.
Someone standing at the equator is rotating in space at around 1,037 mph (1,668 kmph) while somebody in London is only moving at about 646 mph (1,041 kmph).
Compared to these speeds, an increase of just one mile per hour might not seem like a big difference.
The days would be about a minute and a half shorter overall, which our body clocks probably wouldn't notice right away.
Witold Fraczek, an analyst at ESRI, a mapping software firm, told Popular Science: 'It might take a few years to notice it.'
However, an unexpected effect is that satellites in orbit would soon be knocked out of sync.
Some satellites are 'geosynchronous', meaning they move at the same speed as Earth's rotation to stay over the same location.
If the Earth speeds up, those satellites will lose their position and navigation, communication, and weather monitoring services would start to fail.
However, some satellites carry fuel to adjust their orbit, and others could be replaced, so the results should not be disastrous.
Mr Fraczek says: 'These could disturb the life and comfort of some people, but should not be catastrophic to anybody.
The bigger impact is that water would start to move from the poles to the equator due to the increased centrifugal forces.
Even at just one mile per hour, this would cause sea levels to rise by a few inches around the equator.
For cities already at or very near sea level, this could lead to devastating flooding.
100 miles per hour faster
If the Earth kept accelerating until it was moving 100 miles per hour faster at the equator, this would start to trigger seriously dangerous consequences.
Rather than rising by a few inches, these speeds would start to drown the equator as water rushed down from the poles.
Mr Fraczek says: 'I think the Amazon Basin, Northern Australia, and not to mention the islands in the equatorial region, they would all go under water.
'How deep underwater, I'm not sure, but I'd estimate about 30 to 65 feet.'
For anyone who survived the flooding, the world would start to become a much more hostile place.
The solar day would now only last 22 hours, knocking our circadian rhythms out of their natural balance.
The effect would be like setting your body clock back two hours every day without being given a chance to adjust.
Could the world keep getting faster?
It is extremely unlikely that the world will start to spin faster.
In fact, the world is actually slowing down over time.
About 4.4 billion years ago, the planet was spinning so fast that days lasted four minutes.
But this slowed down after a large object hit Earth and created the moon.
The only way Earth could speed up is if a large object hits at just the right angle.
But this would likely liquify the planet's crust, so no humans would survive to see the results.
Studies have shown that changes like daylight saving lead to increased rates of heart attacks, strokes, and driving accidents - this would be even more severe.
Additionally, Earth's weather would start to become more extreme.
NASA astronomer Dr Sten Odenwald says: 'Temperature difference is still going to be the main driver of winds.
However, at these speeds, Dr Odenwald says that 'hurricanes will spin faster, and there will be more energy in them.'
This is due to something called the Coriolis effect, which gives hurricanes their rotational energy.
If the Earth didn't spin, winds would blow down from the North Pole to the equator in a straight line. But as the Earth rotates, the wind becomes deflected eastward, and this is what gives a hurricane its spin.
If the world starts to spin faster, the winds would be deflected more, and the Coriolis effect would become stronger.
Dr Odenwald says: 'That effectively makes the rotation more severe.'
1,000 miles per hour faster or more
At 1,000 miles per hour faster, Earth would be rotating roughly twice as fast as it does today, with disastrous consequences.
Mr Fraczek says: 'It would clearly be a disaster.'
The centrifugal forces would pull hundreds of feet of water towards the equator.
'Except for the highest mountains, such as Kilimanjaro or the highest summits of the Andes, I think everything in the equatorial region would be covered with water,' says Mr Fraczek.
At 1,000 miles per hour faster, the centrifugal forces generated by spinning would also be much stronger.
This would make it easier for water to escape the force of gravity and evaporate up into the atmosphere.
The already flooded regions of the equator would experience near-constant rain and would be constantly shrouded in fog and mist.
At really extreme speeds of around 17,000 miles per hour (27,350 kmph), 17 times faster than normal, the centrifugal forces would be powerful enough to overwhelm gravity.
Anyone at the equator would become weightless as centrifugal force counteracted gravity, and you might even start to get 'reverse rain' as water falls up into the atmosphere.
However, it is unlikely that there would be anyone around to see this since the equator would have long since become uninhabitable.
Mr Franczek says: 'If those few miserable humans would still be alive after most of Earth's water had been transferred to the atmosphere and beyond, they would clearly want to run out of the equator area as soon as possible.'
Finally, once the planet started to reach speeds of about 24,000 miles per hour (38,600 kmph) at the equator, life as we know it would pretty much be over.
The centrifugal forces would now be so strong that they would start to flatten out the Earth like a spinning ball of clay.
The tectonic plates would shift and the Earth's crust would crack, leading to catastrophic results.
Mr Franczek says: 'We would have enormous earthquakes. The tectonic plates would move quickly and that would be disastrous to life on the globe.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Startling immune hack that makes tumors disappear could unlock a universal cancer vaccine
Startling immune hack that makes tumors disappear could unlock a universal cancer vaccine

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Startling immune hack that makes tumors disappear could unlock a universal cancer vaccine

Scientists may be one step closer to a universal cancer vaccine that could revolutionize how the disease is treated. The vaccine uses mRNA, messenger RNA, the same technology behind the COVID-19 vaccines, which carries instructions for cells to produce specific proteins. However, instead of directing cells to make a protein that triggers an immune response, researchers at the University of Florida used mRNA that acts as a red flag itself, immediately alerting the immune system and prompting a reaction. In their study, mice implanted with human melanoma tumors were treated with the mRNA vaccine alongside immunotherapy drugs, medications designed to harness and boost the immune system, once a week for three weeks. The combination helped immune cells recognize and attack the cancer, leading to tumor shrinkage and, in some cases, complete disappearance. All untreated mice died within 50 days, but among those that received the vaccine and immunotherapy, every mouse survived at least 60 days, and more than half were still alive at day 100 when the experiment ended. The research remains in its early stages and has not yet been tested in humans, but scientists said it offers a promising glimpse into a future where chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery may no longer be necessary in the fight against cancer. Dr Elias Sayor, a pediatric oncologist which led the research, said: 'This paper describes a very unexpected and exciting observation: That even a vaccine not specific to any particular tumor or virus could lead to tumor-specific effects. 'This finding is proof of concept that these vaccines potentially could be commercialized as universal cancer vaccines that might sensitize the immune system against a patient's individual tumor,' she continued. Scientists consider developing a cancer vaccine, targeting one of the leading causes of death, to be a 'holy grail' of medical breakthroughs. There are currently two main approaches in cancer vaccine development, including identifying a common target found in many patients with a particular cancer, or creating a personalized vaccine tailored to an individual's specific tumor. However, the team behind this new research believes their study introduces a promising third approach, one that focuses on stimulating a powerful immune response rather than targeting cancer directly. Dr Duane Mitchell, a neurosurgeon and co-author of the study, explained: 'What we found is by using a vaccine designed not to target cancer specifically, but rather to stimulate a strong immunologic response, we could elicit a very strong anti-cancer reaction. 'This has significant potential to be broadly used across cancer patients, even possibly leading us to an off-the-shelf cancer vaccine.' Each year, about 104,000 Americans are diagnosed with melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer. When caught early, it's often treatable, but if the cancer spreads, the five-year survival rate drops to just 34 percent. In the study, scientists used mRNA derived from mitochondria, the energy-producing structures within cells, which can also trigger a rapid immune response. The researchers tested their new vaccine on several types of cancer in mice, including skin, bone, and brain cancers, and found that in many cases, the tumors shrank or disappeared entirely following treatment. Dr. Elias Sayour, a pediatric oncologist and lead investigator, suggested the vaccine may help activate T cells, immune cells responsible for detecting and destroying threats, which previously failed to respond, prompting them to multiply and attack cancerous cells. Dr. Duane Mitchell added: 'It could potentially be a universal way of waking up a patient's own immune response to cancer. And that would be profound if generalizable to human studies.' While the vaccine is still likely years away from clinical use, the team says they are actively working to advance it into human trials. The research was published in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering.

The unexpected nutrient scientists say could cut cognitive issues in old age
The unexpected nutrient scientists say could cut cognitive issues in old age

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

The unexpected nutrient scientists say could cut cognitive issues in old age

Adults who consume more dietary copper tend to perform better on cognitive tests, including memory, attention and language, research has found. In a study of more than 2,400 Americans aged 60 and above, those eating roughly 1.4mg of copper a day scored higher on a number of cognitive assessments than those consuming less than 0.8mg. Copper, though needed in only trace amounts, plays a key role in brain health, helping produce energy in nerve cells, supporting the creation of key neurotransmitters, and bolstering the body's natural antioxidant defences. Shellfish, grains, beans and nuts are good sources of copper, but experts say a balanced diet should provide adequate amounts. Scientists continue to debate, however, whether copper's effects on the ageing brain are overall protective or harmful, as large amounts can cause gastrointestinal issues. The team for this latest research into the benefits of copper asked participants to recall everything they ate on two separate days. They then averaged those figures to estimate each person's daily copper intake. Cognitive abilities were tested with four well-established tasks, including quick symbol-matching and immediate and delayed word-recall, plus an overall 'global' score combining all measures. The results revealed a clear pattern: cognitive performance improved as copper intake rose, peaking at around 1.2 to 1.6 mg per day, depending on the test. Above those levels, benefits levelled off, and scores showed no further gains. Those in the top quarter of copper consumers outscored the lowest quarter by roughly four symbols on the matching test and recalled about half a word more after a delay. People who had previously suffered a stroke appeared to gain even more benefit: high copper consumers in this group had an especially marked boost in their overall cognitive score. While the researchers say this is not enough evidence to suggest that copper intake improves cognitive function, they have argued the link is 'biologically plausible'. 'Dietary copper is crucial for brain health and may confer protective effects on cognitive function through its involvement in antioxidant defence, neurotransmitter synthesis, and energy metabolism,' the report states.

1.5m-year-old ice core to reveal how humans almost died out
1.5m-year-old ice core to reveal how humans almost died out

Times

time6 hours ago

  • Times

1.5m-year-old ice core to reveal how humans almost died out

A n ice core drilled from deep beneath the frozen deserts of Antarctica is likely to be more than 1.5 million years old, with scientists set to unlock the climate secrets hidden inside. It is the oldest ice on Earth, dug out over four Antarctic summers in a glass-like cylinder that is 2.8km long. Some of its segments have now arrived in the UK where researchers at the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge will try to access the trove of information trapped inside. Suspended within the ice are air bubbles. Each acts like a tiny time capsule, having captured a tiny portion of the Earth's atmosphere as it was when the ice first formed. They could contain clues about a period between 900,000 and 1.2 million years ago known as the Mid-Pleistocene Transition when our ancestors may have been pushed to the brink of extinction by a period of extreme cooling, with populations plummeting from 100,000 to just 1,000 individuals. They want to understand why the gap between ice ages lengthened from 41,000 to 100,000 years at around this time. 'It's an amazing achievement,' Professor Carlo Barbante from Ca' Foscari University of Venice told the BBC. 'You have in your hands a piece of ice that is a million years old. Sometimes you see ash layers coming from volcanic eruptions. You see the tiny bubbles inside, some bubbles of air that our ancestors breathed a million years ago.' An ice core drilled from deep beneath the frozen deserts of Antarctica is being cut into one-metre sections to be shipped to scientific institutions around Europe PNRA/IPEV The air and particles trapped in the ice will tell scientists about the composition and temperature of the atmosphere dating back more than a million years. Analysis of previous ice cores helped scientists reach the conclusion that the current rise in global temperatures is being caused by human activity, specifically the burning of fossil fuels. The new ice core is likely to contain ice that is 400,000 years older than a famous core called Epica. The site from which the ice core was drilled is called Little Dome C, at an elevation of around 3,000m on the east of the continent, where workers had to operate at temperatures as low as -35C. The core, nine times the length of the Shard skyscraper in London, is being cut into one-metre sections to be shipped at -50C to institutions around Europe. The team of researchers worked in temperatures as low as -35C PNRA/IPEV 'What they will find is anybody's guess but it will undoubtedly enlarge our window on our planet's past,' said Professor Joeri Rogelj from Imperial College London, who is not part of the research. The project to extract the ice began in 2021. Researchers will test their analytical tools and methods on the younger ice that was closer to the surface. Barbante said at the time: 'With many new PhD students coming online, and new groups getting involved, and new analytical techniques always being developed, we will make good use of the ice younger than 800,000 years. 'We will also use the younger ice to ensure our techniques are working well by the time we get to the deep ice, where we only get one chance to get all the analyses right.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store