Even Your Hobbies Aren't Safe From Trump's Tariff Chaos
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
Perhaps you're tired of the nonstop flow of bad news since President Donald Trump's second inauguration, and you're unplugging a little with some hobbies. That might mean reading more novels or comics, collecting vinyl records or Blu-Rays, getting into knitting or art, or finally cracking that Wingspan board game that's been gathering dust on your shelf.
Sadly, I have bad news: Even your hobbies can't escape global politics.
Trump has been quite erratic in his trade wars with Canada, Mexico, and China this year. Yet even with all the confused delays and exemptions, the fact remains that the tariffs he's imposing on those three countries are universal. These import taxes are meant to attack every single product that originates from our bordering neighbors and our East Asian rival. Yes, there are loopholes, but the overall effect is clear: These countries are to be punished, and our dependence upon them means we'll be shouldering lots of pain as well. Our politicians are straight-up admitting that!
Most urgently, the constant wavering on tariffs fosters a climate of uncertainty, anxiety, and scrambling that makes it so much harder for smaller businesses and more precarious industries to navigate the chaos. Plenty of attention has rightly been paid to the most necessary goods that reside in the crosshairs (fresh and frozen foods, energy, toilet paper, apparel). Less noticed are the resultant impacts on everything that gives joy and fulfillment: physical pages, artistic recordings, objects for creation and play.
If you work in those very sectors, you've likely been on edge for a while now. Jim Henderson, a co-founder of the iconic California record store Amoeba Music, told me that he and his fellow indie-chain executives had been 'dreading Trump's tariff bonanza' since the 2024 election. Amoeba is best known for its ample vinyl and CD stocks, but its three locations sell a little bit of everything: books, DVDs and Blu-Rays, audiophile gear, and customized merchandise.
'Several vendors—from turntable manufacturers to apparel companies, on through some of our label partners—have either posted price increases or warned us of their imminence,' Henderson wrote in an email. 'With the doubling of the China tariffs, we can count on them revisiting the new cost and pricing structures that were presented.'
Executives aren't the only ones feeling the peril. Scour the online spaces where niche hobbyists gather to chatter about their interests, and you'll find months' worth of casual questions and creeping fears. One Blu-ray forum post from the day after the election asked whether enthusiasts should 'Start hoarding now?' Reddit's vinyl community featured a postelection question about the 'potential tariff effect on vinyl,' which earned a grim reply: 'If tariffs are instituted on a grand scale in the States, you likely won't have money for hobbies anyway.'
Blogs devoted to tabletop games have long been fretting about the tariffs, with one executive straight-up telling the media last month that 'board games are about to get more expensive.' (Grim timing, since we're coming off a couple of boom years for that sector.) The CEO of Blick Art Materials told Hyperallergic that the company had 'purchased more inventory than normal for a few product lines to hedge against higher costs,' such as paints, inks, and utensils.
Bleeding Cool founder Rich Johnston has likewise been documenting comics-industry jitters for months on end. These have manifested in publishers' proclamations that cheap single-issue comic books are a thing of the past, as well as in a panic-sales spike for a new Brian K. Vaughan graphic novel that occurred just before the original tariffs were set to go into effect in February.
The tariffs come during a rough patch for the comics industry in particular. Johnston told me in a phone conversation that late last year, the comics industry had mostly been 'reliable' and that 'people were very happy' with how things were chugging along—until Diamond Comic Distributors, once the top comics distributor in the world, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January. Publishers hurried to switch distribution systems and request emergency donations from concerned fans, while others (like the famed imprint Dark Horse) chose to preemptively cut costs through mass layoffs. Now the tariffs threaten to exacerbate these issues even further.
'Usually it's those component parts that go bust: the actual printers, the actual distributors,' said Johnston. 'The delay has helped, especially since the biggest publisher, Canada's Transcontinental,' has offered to absorb the cost burden of the tariffs instead of surcharging its clients.
Part of the reason these tariffs hit these industries the hardest is because Canada is a leading supplier of paper products. 'It's not down to paying Canadians less or slave labor or having different governmental incentives,' said Johnston. 'It's literally cheaper to cut down a tree and turn it into print, because they've got huge forests that are very easy to access, and they have a lot more experience and skills.'
There are American printing presses, of course, but those 'only have so much capacity, which makes their prices already higher,' Johnston explained. 'But now the Canadian advantage is being tariffed away, and it's all more expensive.' (And yes, the printing extends far beyond comics or even standard bestsellers. As Johnston cheekily informed me: 'Canada prints a lot of Bibles.')
For Amoeba, the physical media industry has already been weathering headwinds, as media companies like Sony decide to stop producing blank minidiscs and Blu-Rays for personal recordings altogether, and studios like Warner Bros. dump a bunch of back catalog on YouTube instead of prepping any new video releases. The tariffs have not helped, due to the fact that both vinyl and video discs tend to be pressed and processed in bulk from Mexico, with the plastic boxes for DVD and Blu-ray sets manufactured in China.
There are, however, some local saviors for music and movies. 'Over the last few years, a little bit more of our new vinyl has been pressed in the United States because of a few pressing plants that have opened,' said Jim Henderson. 'But by and large, so much of what we get from the labels is being pressed outside of the states.'
With only a few major pressing plants out there for both discs and vinyl, and with all sorts of tangled relationships between labels and manufacturers and suppliers and distributors, it's also hard for Amoeba to change things up preemptively in anticipation of cross-border tariffs. (One hedge available to Amoeba: the used and secondhand vinyl and movies markets, on which the tariffs have little impact.)
However, even if the temporary tariff reprieves may soften the blows, there is still the major question of China, where so much manufacturing of cheap goods and materials is based: toys, component bits, machinery, colors, and more. One raw-materials retailer told Hyperallergic that certain pigments, colors, and brushes that are offered for a wide variety of crafts, much like musical instruments, are largely sourced from China and will be subject to the price hikes. Tabletop gaming enthusiasts who want to use 3D printers to home-manufacture minis and figurines may find themselves stymied by the fact that 3D printers are largely produced in China, which also provides us with the large majority of our board games.
When it comes to yarn and textiles you can use to knit and sew your own clothes, forget about it; China has even that on lock. Craft retailers stateside that already started to phase out China-made goods since the tariffs from Trump's first term and Biden's succeeding one may just be encouraged to further embrace that trend, though they won't be able to replicate China's manufacturing prowess by any means.
The overall effects won't be limited to just these four countries, either. Since 'a lot of goods come to the world from America and then get distributed elsewhere,' Rich Johnston said, Canada might be inclined to set up its own global export facilities in order to get around the inevitable tariff—which will, of course, force a rethinking of Canadian trade relations with other nations, for all kinds of products. Mexico, the largest exporter to the U.S., will be eyeing such diversion tactics as well. Perhaps they'll both look to China as an example, which has long outsourced certain factories and parts to Southeast Asian countries (Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia) in order to sidestep other nations' trade barriers.
At the heart of it, though, what worries Jim Henderson most is that 'all this noise around tariffs has created an economic reaction and tension that is not easily unwound,' he wrote to me. 'People start talking/tweeting/commenting and hearing about inflation and the price of eggs or whatever and it causes many to pause or scale back on recreational spending, and that ripples on through retail and restaurants and all the different ways one would expect it to.' In lean times, 'people turn to selling more of their collections and private items' to stores like Amoeba—instead of buying more from them.
Put it another way: Even with the delays, the damage has been done. Trump can pull back his tariff orders altogether, but consumers are already feeling the instability and distrust in the broader economy.
If there's one bit of relief from the storm clouds, it's that these businesses have a deep and passionate community to lean on. 'We generally tend to try to accentuate the positive as well as the deep variety we have,' Henderson explained. 'People come to Amoeba for a variety of reasons: We do live shows, and we have sales and community events.' Everything's going to become a little more local, now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
28 minutes ago
- UPI
Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers
President Donald Trump congratulates a cadet at the United States Military Academy graduation ceremony in Michie Stadium at West Point, New York, on May 24, and will review the Army's 250th birthday parade on June 14. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Army celebrates its 250th birthday on June 14th in the nation's capital, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and will be marked by a parade that may include tanks, rocket launchers and more than 100 military vehicles. With the two birthdays occurring on the same day, the previously scheduled parade that was intended as a relatively small event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., has grown in size and cost. Up to 300 soldiers and civilians, the U.S. Army Band and four cannons were initially slated to honor the Army's 250th birthday, with seating available for 120 attendees, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Army leaders last year sought a permit for the event, but Trump's election victory has changed its scope, while doubling as an unofficial celebration of the president's birthday. Axios reported the parade will live up to Trump's request for a showcase the U.S. miliatary's might, with dozens of tanks, rocket launchers, missiles and more than 100 other military aircraft and vehicles participating. About 6,600 Army troops will participate, and the Army is paying to house them in area hotels. The parade route has been moved to the northwest portion of Constitution Avenue and will include a flyover of F-22 fighter jets, World War II planes and Vietnam-era aircraft. The event is scheduled to start at 6:30 p.m. EDT at 23rd Street and continue along Constitution Avenue N.W. to 15th Street. Trump will review the parade on the Ellipse. The event has an estimated cost of nearly $45 million, including more than $10 million for road repairs after the heavy military equipment passes over. The parade's estimated cost has Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., skeptical about its benefits. "I would have recommended against the parade," Wicker told an interviewer on Thursday, but the Department of Defense wants to use it as a recruiting tool. "On the other hand, [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force," Wicker said. "So, we'll see."


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Drama Between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk
The failed friendship between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk continues, Bill Maher has some advice for the Democratic party, and social media drama between gold medalist Simone Biles and Riley Gaines. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit


Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.
President Donald Trump's campaign against two of the planet's best-known universities is laying bare just how unprepared academia was to confront a hostile White House. Schools never imagined facing an administration so willing to exercise government power so quickly — targeting the research funding, tax-exempt status, foreign student enrollment and financial aid eligibility schools need to function. That's left them right where the president wants them. Even as Ivy League schools, research institutions, and college trade associations try to resist Trump's attacks in court, campus leaders are starting to accept they face only difficult choices: negotiate with the government, mount a painful legal and political fight — or simply try to stay out of sight. Groundbreaking scientific research, financial aid for lower-income students and soft power as an economic engine once shielded schools' access to federal funds. Trump has now transformed those financial lifelines into leverage. And the diversity and independence of U.S. colleges and universities — something they've seen as a source of strength and competition — is straining efforts to form a singular response to the president. 'Perhaps it's a failure of imagination on the part of universities,' said Lee Bollinger, the former president of Columbia University. 'It feels now like there has been a naïveté on the part of universities. There's been no planning for this kind of thing.' Schools are accustomed to tension with their faculty, governing boards, legislatures and governors. But punishments for resisting the Trump administration plumbed untested levels of severity this week when the president issued an executive order to bar foreign students from entering the country to study at Harvard University as his administration threatened Columbia's academic accreditation. Even though Project 2025 — The Heritage Foundation's roadmap for a second Trump administration — previewed some of the tactics the administration would use, many school leaders may have underestimated the president's determination. 'It just seemed inconceivable that we would be in this position of having massive amounts of federal funding withheld, threats to have legislation that attacks your tax status, and now these new issues with international students,' Bollinger said. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday night that blocked Trump's directive to restrict Harvard's access to international students. But the administration is brandishing its response to Harvard's resistance as a warning to other schools who might resist, as federal officials pressure schools to negotiate the terms of a truce over the administration's complaints about campus antisemitism, foreign government influence and its opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. 'We've held back funding from Columbia, we've also done the same thing with Harvard,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told House lawmakers this past week. 'We are asking, as Columbia has done, to come to the table for negotiations,' she said, just hours before telling the school's accreditor it was violating federal anti-discrimination laws. 'We've also asked Harvard. Their answer was a lawsuit.' A Harvard spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. 'What we've seen so far when it comes to Harvard is the playbook for holding these radical schools accountable is way deeper than anyone anticipated or expected,' a senior White House official told POLITICO. 'You're starting to get to the bone, so to speak, of holding these people accountable,' said the official, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss White House strategy. 'Harvard knows they cannot endure this for long, they just can't. They're going to have to come to the table, and we'll always be there to meet them. But this was a test case of what to do.' The university described Trump's latest foreign student order this week as 'yet another illegal retaliatory step.' A federal judge in May blocked a separate administration attempt to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. Harvard is still locked in a legal fight over more than $2 billion in federal grants the White House blocked after the school refused to comply with demands to overhaul its admissions and disciplinary policies. Trump announced plans to cancel Harvard's tax-exempt status in early May, then later floated redistributing billions of dollars in university grants to trade schools. 'It is not our desire to bring these schools to their knees. The president reveres our higher educational facilities. He's a product of one,' the White House official said. 'But in order to hold these people accountable, we will be unrelenting in our enforcement of the law and hitting them where it hurts, which is their pocketbook.' Many institutions have chosen a more muted response following months of conflict, including major public institutions in states that have also grown reliant on the full-freight tuition paid by international students. 'Universities don't have as many degrees of freedom, at least in the public sector, as you might think they do,' said Teresa Sullivan, the former president of the University of Virginia. 'One reason they seem to be relatively slow to act is there's a certain disbelief — can this really be happening?' 'We seem to be in uncharted territory, at least in my experience,' Sullivan said. 'All of a sudden, the rules don't seem to apply. I think that's disconcerting. It shakes the ground beneath you, and you don't necessarily know what to do next.' Still, some higher education leaders are trying to confront the government. More than 650 campus officials have so far signed onto a joint statement that opposes 'the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' Sullivan and a group of other former presidents used an op-ed in The Washington Post to argue the Trump administration's offensive 'won't be confined to Harvard University.' Trade associations including the American Council on Education, Association of American Universities, and Association of Public and Land-grant Universities have joined schools in a lawsuit to block some of Trump's research funding cuts. The Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a collective of school leaders, has also sued to challenge the Trump administration's attempts to target the legal status of thousands of foreign students. 'Your first obligation as president is you don't want to hurt the institution you represent,' Sullivan said of the relative silence coming from non-Ivy League institutions. 'These days it's hard to tell what hurts and what doesn't. I think that's the motive. The motive is not cowardice.' Schools still face a choice between negotiating with the government — and risk compromising on their principles — or inviting Trump's rage by putting up a fight. 'Every school has had an option to correct course and work with the administration, or stand firm in their violations of the law,' the administration official said. 'They have an option, they know very well what to do.' The real question, according to Bollinger, the former Columbia president, is how far the White House will go and how much resistance the schools are willing to put up. 'The power of government is so immense that if they want to destroy institutions, they can,' he said. 'What you do in that kind of environment is you stand on principle.'