logo
UK to keep pushing for deal after Trump imposes 10% tariff

UK to keep pushing for deal after Trump imposes 10% tariff

BBC News02-04-2025

The government will keep pushing for a deal to avoid a "trade war" after US President Donald Trump imposed new tariffs globally, the UK business secretary has said.Trump announced fresh levies on goods coming into his country including 10% on all UK imports and 20% on those from the European Union.The UK has spent weeks working on a trade deal with the US to avoid the full impact of the level of tariffs introduced on countries such as Canada and China.A Downing Street source said the UK's lower tariff "vindicates" the government's plans, because "the difference between 10% and 20% is thousands of jobs".
Responding to the new tariffs, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the government remained "fully focused on negotiating an economic deal with the US that strengthens our existing fair and balanced trading relationship"."We have a range of tools at our disposal and we will not hesitate to act," he said."Nobody wants a trade war and our intention remains to secure a deal. But nothing is off the table and the government will do everything necessary to defend the UK's national interest."
The US plan sets a baseline tariff on all imports of at least 10%, with items from countries that the White House described as the "worst offenders" facing far higher rates for what Trump said was payback for unfair trade policies.His move breaks with decades of American policy embracing free trade, and analysts said it was likely to lead to higher prices in the US and slower growth in the US and around the world.A Downing Street source told the BBC: "We don't want any tariffs at all, but a lower levy than others vindicates our approach. It matters because the difference between 10% and 20% is thousands of jobs."We will keep negotiating, keep cool and keep calm. We want to negotiate a sustainable trade deal, and of course to get tariffs lowered. Tomorrow we will continue with that work."Reynolds has previously said weeks of talks between government officials and the Trump administration meant the UK was in the "best possible position of any country" to have tariffs reversed.Diplomatic efforts are still ongoing, and as part of the efforts to get a deal, Lord Mandelson, the UK ambassador, has had meetings in the White House with JD Vance, the vice-president, and Susie Wiles, the president's chief of staff.At 10% the tariff will still bite into the UK economy, but it is considerably softer than those on some other major economies, including the 34% placed on China and 26% on India.For the moment, the UK says it will not be "jumping into a trade war" with retaliatory tariffs Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said - a repeat of the response to Trump's earlier tariffs on steel and aluminium.Sir Keir told his cabinet this week he was "keeping all options on the table" to respond to the tariffs, which economists have warned could damage the UK economy and increase the cost of living.Inside government officials hope that Wednesday's announcement sets a "ceiling" on negotiations, not the final price, and can be talked down.The government's approach has been backed in some of the early responses from the UK business sector.The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said the government "has rightfully tried to negotiate a carveout" and businesses need a "measured and proportionate approach".Rain Newton-Smith, chief executive of the CBI said in a statement: "Business has been clear: there are no winners in a trade war. "Today's announcements are deeply troubling for businesses and will have significant ramifications around the world."
But Conservative shadow trade secretary Andrew Griffith accused Labour of "failing to negotiate with President Trump's team" in time."Sadly, it is British businesses and workers who will pay the price for Labour's failure," he said."The silver lining is that Brexit - which Labour ministers voted against no less than 48 times - means that we face far lower tariffs than the EU: a Brexit dividend that will have protected thousands of British jobs and businesses."
Government sources believe talks with the US administration on an economic deal have made good progress, but have been derailed by Trump's public comments.At different times, statements by Trump about his tariffs are said to have differed from what his negotiating team had previously understood his position to be.The deal would be broader than just reducing tariffs, focusing on technology but also covering elements of trade in goods and services as well as agriculture - a controversial area in previous unsuccessful US-UK trade talks.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has suggested the UK could change its taxes on big tech firms as part of a deal to overturn US tariffs.The digital services tax, introduced in 2020, imposes a 2% levy on tech firms, including big US firms such as Amazon, bringing in about £800m in tax per year.The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has warned tariffs could wipe billions off economic growth and all but eliminate Reeves's £9.9bn buffer against her self-imposed rules on spending and borrowing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%
World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%

Leader Live

time27 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%

Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' but without mentioning Mr Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the US economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4%) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8%). That marks a downgrade from the 2.3% US growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January. The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing' – slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain – it appeared headed for just six months ago. 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Mr Gill wrote. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'

Greta Thunberg says she was kidnapped by Israeli forces in international waters
Greta Thunberg says she was kidnapped by Israeli forces in international waters

BreakingNews.ie

time35 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Greta Thunberg says she was kidnapped by Israeli forces in international waters

Greta Thunberg on Tuesday accused Israel of kidnapping her and her fellow pro-Palestinian activists in international waters, saying she declined to sign a document stating she entered the country illegally prior to being deported. Speaking in the arrivals section of Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport after being deported from Israel, the Swedish activist said she and her team had broken no laws, and called for the immediate release of the activists still in Israel. Advertisement "I was very clear in my testimony that we were kidnapped on international waters and brought against our own will into Israel," she said. She laughed off criticism from US president Donald Trump, who had described her as an angry person, saying: "I think the world needs a lot more young angry women to be honest, especially with everything going on right now." World Greta Thunberg deported from Israel after Gaza-bou... Read More Thunberg (22) arrived in Paris a day after the Israeli navy prevented her and a group of fellow pro-Palestinian activists from sailing to Gaza. Israeli forces boarded the charity vessel as it neared Gaza early on Monday, trying to break through a years-old naval blockade of the coastal enclave, and seized the 12-strong crew, including Thunberg. Thunberg denied her mission to deliver aid to Gaza by breaking through a years-old naval blockade of the coastal enclave was a PR stunt, saying a previous effort in a larger boat was ended after the vessel was bombed. She said she was now in desperate need of a shower and sleep. She admitted it was unclear where she would be heading next, telling reporters it could be Sweden.

There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives
There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives

Telegraph

time38 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives

Britain and the world's views of the rights and wrongs of the Gaza war are so often shaped by what the BBC reports. That's mattered more than ever in recent weeks, amid the feverishly heated coverage of Israel's new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) scheme to deliver aid to the Palestinian people and bypass allegedly Hamas-controlled NGOs. Hamas-linked sources claim Israeli soldiers have repeatedly shot and killed Palestinian civilians waiting for GHF food with their families. Stories bearing the bylines of BBC 'journalists' in Gaza largely tell this version of events, albeit including the denials of the IDF. News organisations using Gazan reporters say they have no choice, given the IDF's refusal to allow in outside journalists. But that's no reason not to exercise care and employ the same editorial standards as they would on any other story. For critics of the BBC, the results have been a disaster for the Corporation and its standards. They point to the stories that have not been told, or have been largely overlooked, by these reporters almost throughout the war: of Hamas's tyranny over the people of Gaza, its torture and murder of opponents, and of the courageous Palestinians who defy its rule. And why is there such scant coverage of Hamas using the civilian population as a human shield by placing tunnels under civilian buildings and military bases in hospital? Where are the stories of Israeli hostages being moved across Gaza? Why is there no footage of Hamas firing rockets or their gunmen on the move? There is an obvious answer: it appears that these reporters are either pro-Hamas, or too afraid of reprisals from terrorist gunmen to tell the truth. It is a charge that BBC Global News Director Jonathan Munro entirely rejects. Almost spluttering in disbelief recently at the suggestion that 'some of the people you're using in Gaza might be under pressure, might be restricted in what Hamas allows them to see,' resulting in a 'partial view', he insisted: 'There's no restriction on what they can see, what they can show and what they can film when they're on location. 'There's no suggestion at all that any of those very brave people are under any political influence.' Munro's denial shows an astonishing disregard for the well-documented reality of life in Gaza. Take a recent report from the well regarded NGO the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). It tears apart the notion that press freedom exists in Gaza. According to the CPJ, journalists there have been subject to 'detentions, assaults, obstruction and raids' going back to the start of Hamas rule almost twenty years ago. While detailing numerous violent assaults on members of the press in Gaza, the analysis warns that violations by Hamas are 'underreported'. Some journalists who have been assaulted are believed to be too afraid to say anything at all; others have gone to the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS) but say they do not want to go public for fear of retaliation. Note that both the CPJ and PJS are the staunchest critics of Israel. There can be no doubting the credibility and accuracy of their accounts on this matter. The picture they paint is light years removed from Munro's suggestion of unencumbered press freedom in Gaza. Some of the journalists in Gaza used by the BBC have been exposed as having deeply hateful views of Israel and Jews, making them entirely unsuitable as journalists. Yet there is a problem that goes far beyond any individual, if Munro and other executives cannot understand the reality of reporting from Gaza. TV producer Leo Pearlman has proposed the solution: 'The BBC make a huge deal of adding to every news script from Gaza by saying that Israel doesn't allow independent access for journalists. 'What it never says – and maybe should start doing – is that no journalist can operate freely in Gaza under Hamas control.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store