logo
Fox News Host Rages at Dem After Abruptly Ending Interview

Fox News Host Rages at Dem After Abruptly Ending Interview

Yahoo10 hours ago
Fox News host Will Cain followed up an on-air clash with Texas Democrat James Talarico with an even more heated debate on social media.
The fiery exchange between the pair on TV on Tuesday spilled over onto social media after Talarico claimed their chat was cut short by the Fox News host. Cain labeled the accusation as 'dishonest.'
The state legislator, a fourth-term representative from Austin, is seen as a rising star in the party as he considers a U.S. Senate run against Sen. John Cornyn. His appearance on The Will Cain Show from Illinois, where Texas Democrats are racking up fines as they fight new legislative maps that would give Republicans up to five extra seats in Congress, comes after a flurry of interviews, including a sitdown on Joe Rogan's top-rated podcast.
Cain claimed Talarico had 'abandoned' his office and took umbrage at his guest using the phrase 'rigged' to describe the map changes, which would boost the GOP's 2026 midterm election hopes, as the pair often spoke over each other during their 10-minute interview.
At one point, Talarico appeared to stump Cain after asking if he knew how many Republican members of Congress had joined Democrats to vote to ban gerrymandering in Congress. The pair had been debating rule changes that would affect the midterms.
'Which one? I'm sorry, which state did you just refer to?' Cain responded after a pause.
'I'm asking, do you know how many Republicans joined Democrats in the U.S. Congress to ban gerrymandering? All the Democrats voted for it. Zero Republicans voted for it, zero,' Talarico said.
'You can spare me both-sides rhetoric. It's clearly one side that is trying to rig the rules in the middle of the game... We don't accept cheating in politics and in our relationships. We shouldn't accept cheating it in our elections... We should stand up to politicians that don't want to face accountability at the ballot box. That's what's happening here.'
Cain acknowledged he was 'unfamiliar' with the details of the vote, which took place in 2021.
At another point, Talarico appeared to stump Cain by asking him, 'If Republican policies are popular, why do they need to redraw these maps, why can't they run on their policies?
Cain did not answer the question, instead signaling that he was being told to cut the interview. 'I'm getting wrapped on time,' he said. 'I'm enjoying this conversation. I apologize.'
The Fox News host still managed to get another question in before inviting Talarico into the studio for a future interview and bonding over breakfast tacos.
The Texas legislator posted on X after the appearance and claimed the Fox host had 'cut the interview early.
'I just went on Fox News to tell the truth about the redistricting power grab in Texas,' Talarico wrote. After mentioning the question on Republican policies that stumped Cain, he added that the host had 'refused to answer—and cut the interview early."
Cain took to his X account to clap back on Talarico's claim. 'Oh James. Trolls distorting the interview is one thing, but you were there. I respectfully gave you ten minutes, an eternity in cable news. And in all that time you had no answer as to why you've abandoned your job. You can take a flag to IL but you still cut and run from Texas.'
He added, 'And your dishonesty in suggesting I cut your interview short perfectly illustrates the honesty of your run away from TX. I always welcome honest debate but it's clear that's not who you are. Stay in Illinois little Jimmy. Better fit for you than TX.'
The Daily Beast has contacted Talarico and Fox News for additional comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A strange GOP divide is forming over Trump's gerrymandering plans
A strange GOP divide is forming over Trump's gerrymandering plans

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A strange GOP divide is forming over Trump's gerrymandering plans

President Donald Trump's aggressive redistricting push is sparking public concern from an unusual mix of Republicans. Resistance to mid-decade redraws is running the ideological gamut and cutting across levels of government. While many are backing Trump's gambit to protect the GOP's House majority in the midterms, a growing number of Republican lawmakers are airing concerns — a list that spans lawmakers from swing districts in blue states to safe territory in ruby-red Florida. Trump and his team have convinced once-wary Texas Republicans to draw a new House map and lobbied the GOP governors of Missouri and Indiana to at least 'seriously' consider following suit, but the Republican governor of New Hampshire has ruled out pursuing any changes because 'the timing is off.' And GOP state lawmakers across the country — who hold the power to redraw lines in several of the states at the forefront of what's becoming a nationwide redistricting arms race — are finding themselves similarly split. These strange divisions underscore the complex political dynamics of the president's latest power play. It's become a loyalty test that could boost Republicans' chances of keeping their trifecta in Washington, but one that also carries significant electoral risk for several of their own members in Congress and potential for broader voter backlash. Trump's team is barreling forward, bullish about having more opportunities to redraw maps across the states than Democrats and brushing off concerns as primarily coming from members whose seats are at risk. Administration officials and allies are working to fire up his base by noting that Democrats have already gerrymandered several states in their favor and have limited moves left to play. And MAGA online influencers like Steven Bannon and Charlie Kirk are encouraging their fans to jam Greg Abbott's phone lines so the Texas governor ratchets up pressure on quorum-breaking Democrats to return and let Republicans pass a new congressional map. But even that is showing some limits. 'Redistricting is not really an ideological exercise as much as a self-interest exercise,' California-based GOP strategist Rob Stutzman said. 'The safer you are and enjoy being in the majority, the more your self interest is 'lets see Texas get scrambled and if we sacrifice some colleagues from blue states, in California and New York, so be it.'' But for those more vulnerable Republicans, 'this poses a substantial risk to your career,' Stutzman said. And that's why some are reflecting at least a 'growing private sentiment of 'is this really worth it?'' A person familiar with the White House's thinking on redistricting and granted anonymity to describe it said 'we expect to have great success everywhere' if California Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democratic governors attempt to retaliate. 'All of these members, they should just remain calm because they'll still be members,' the person said of the Republican lawmakers airing concerns. In Congress, House GOP leaders are trying to bridge the divide between the White House's 'maximum pressure' campaign to pad their majority, and the swath of GOP members who fear the gambit may backfire. Senior House Republicans have advised some rank and file GOP members to keep their concerns to private conversations, and not air criticisms in public. Speaker Mike Johnson and other House GOP leaders have repeatedly said in public they prefer to leave redistricting decisions up to individual states. Johnson and his leadership circle have been wary of crossing the White House on the issue, and won't put any bill on the floor that would contradict Trump's push, despite private urgings from some GOP members, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter. Inside the House GOP conference, Republicans are keenly aware that Trump has been fixated for months on keeping his House majority in the upcoming midterms. Many in deep-red districts are openly supportive of the effort to give Republicans an edge. But some senior GOP members of the impacted state delegations are quietly raising concerns about the fallout, though they ultimately fear crossing the president. Other Republicans — particularly those in blue states — are increasingly vocal about the potential fallout as Democratic governors threaten to redraw or outright erase their already difficult-to-win districts in retaliation for Trump's plan. New York Rep. Mike Lawler blasted the Trump-driven effort in Texas as 'wrong,' while California Rep. Doug LaMalfa warned Texas' gambit 'is going to start a grass fire across the country.' Another New York Republican, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, said she's 'not somebody who's supportive of any type of gerrymandering.' House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, the Maryland delegation's lone Republican, cautioned that 'we should probably shy away from mid-cycle redistricting' but also told reporters last week that it's 'pretty hypocritical of Democrats to complain' and if they 'want to roll the dice in Maryland, let them roll the dice. … I look forward to more Republican colleagues.' Qualms are cropping up in other corners. Utah Rep. Blake Moore, the vice chair of the House Republican Conference who previously co-chaired the anti-gerrymandering group Better Boundaries, called mid-decade redistricting 'a step too far.' A Utah district judge is poised to rule on a redistricting lawsuit that could force the GOP-controlled Legislature to redraw its congressional boundaries. And Florida Rep. Randy Fine, who Trump boosted to office in a special election earlier this year, is questioning whether the process is even possible in his state given voters approved a measure prohibiting lawmakers from redrawing districts to help incumbents or a particular party. 'I don't understand how Florida does a mid-decade redistricting,' Fine, who previously served as vice-chair of the state House's redistricting committee, said in an interview. But Fine said he could support redistricting if there was a new Census ahead of 2030 — and has already filed a bill calling for one that would not include people who are in the country illegally. California Rep. Kevin Kiley, who is spearheading the seemingly dead-on-arrival legislation to ban mid-decade redistricting, insisted there's a 'very strong majority for taking our foot off the accelerator on this' as states race to counter each other. 'It's just going to be this sort of trench warfare where you're not really gaining much ground either way,' Kiley said in an interview. Redistricting is proving divisive among Republicans elsewhere. In Indiana, Gov. Mike Braun has been noncommittal since meeting with Vice President JD Vance and other top Trump officials about it last week. The lieutenant governor, Micah Beckwith, has called to 'fight fire with fire.' Rep. Victoria Spartz, while not explicitly backing the effort, posted on X that it 'seems hypocritical that Democrats often complain about wanting to make all congressional districts more competitive … yet they do not want all nine in Indiana to become more competitive.' Yet former Gov. Mitch Daniels slammed the effort as 'just wrong.' And several Republican state lawmakers have voiced opposition, including hard-right state Rep. Jim Lucas, who panned it as 'politically optically horrible.' Still, Trump's team is confident it can steamroll over any criticism to get Republicans to fall in line. That's in part because Republicans appear to hold the advantage on the redistricting battlemap. The GOP is angling to pick up up to 10 seats across Ohio, Texas, Missouri and Indiana through newly drawn seats. Florida could give the GOP even more, though any new map would not be ready in time for the 2026 election. Democrats, meanwhile, are looking at forcing up to five additional Democratic seats in California — including destroying Kiley's and LaMalfa's even as they face significant financial and legal hurdles. And Trump's pressure campaign, for the most part, appears to be working. While GOP New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte rebuffed calls to redistrict, Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe appears to be taking steps toward it, including convening the state's top legislative leaders for a private discussion on the matter earlier this month. Several of the GOP members of Missouri's congressional delegation are publicly on board and in some cases outright championing the effort, with Rep. Bob Onder casting it as the difference between 'two more years of pursuing President Trump's pro-America … agenda' and 'two years of impeachment hearings.' 'It is all but a fait accompli at this point," Missouri-based GOP strategist Gregg Keller said, 'that it passes both the House and the Senate and is signed by Gov. Kehoe.' Gary Fineout and Jordan Wolman contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store