Harry lawyers must disclose ‘payment' documents in Mail publisher case
They have accused the publisher of conducting or commissioning unlawful activities such as hiring private investigators to tap phones, 'blagging' private records, and burglaries to order.
The group also includes actress Sadie Frost, campaigner Baroness Doreen Lawrence and politician Sir Simon Hughes.
ANL denies the allegations and is defending the legal action, previously describing the claims as 'lurid' and 'simply preposterous'.
At a hearing in May, lawyers for ANL asked the court in London to order the group's legal team to 'search for and disclose any documents that relate to payments, royalties or inducements paid, provided or offered, or any demands or threats made, in order to obtain documents, information or other co-operation'.
Antony White KC, for ANL, said a limited number of documents had been disclosed, which showed that 'payments were made or offered' to 'procure evidence and invoices'.
In a ruling handed down on Friday, Mr Justice Nicklin said: 'I am satisfied that documents held by the claimants that can support a case that a witness has been paid or offered other inducement for their evidence, whether directly or indirectly, should be disclosed.
'That is because there is a real prospect that Associated will be able to rely upon this evidence to attack the credibility of such witnesses.
'Ultimately, the issue of whether the payment or inducement does affect the credibility of any witness is a matter to be resolved at trial.'
He added: 'In this case, the stance adopted by the claimants has been undermined by their inconsistent and incoherent approach to disclosure of documents relating to payments to potential witnesses and/or other inducements.'
Mr Justice Nicklin also ordered that lawyers for the claimants should conduct searches to identify and hand over documents ANL could rely on 'in advancing a case that potential witnesses have been given or offered financial incentives to provide information or evidence in support of allegations' of unlawful information gathering (UIG).
The group bringing the case had asked the judge to order ANL to unredact some of the documents the company had provided for the legal proceedings.
Mr Justice Nicklin ordered that 'targeted' un-redactions be made where necessary to assess whether certain journalists had a pattern of engaging in UIG.
He said: 'In my judgment, considering Associated's denials of wrongdoing, the claimants are entitled to explore whether they can advance a case, with a real prospect of success, that the pleaded journalists have a propensity to engage in UIG.'
A trial of the claims is expected to start in January and last for nine weeks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fresh royal family row as King's cousin launches astonishing attack on his 87-year-old mother and accuses her of being 'lazy': RICHARD EDEN'S DIARY
Lord Ivar Mountbatten seems to have taken a leaf out of Prince Harry 's book. For the television personality has chosen to attack his family in public. Lord Ivar, 62, who became the first member of the extended Royal Family to enter into a same-sex union in 2018, has given an astonishing interview in which he admits he does not like his mother, the Marchioness of Milford Haven, whom he accuses of being 'lazy'.
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
Misper review – mystery, melancholy and murder in a faded seaside town
Here is a solid first feature debut from director Harry Sherriff, an atmospheric crime drama set in a gloomy, decaying seaside town, with an eerie depiction of grief experienced by those who exist within the margins of the life of a murdered girl. The film follows Leonard (Samuel Blenkin), a meek hotel concierge who has a boyish crush on his charming 25-year-old colleague Elle (Emily Carey). Dressed in a red raincoat with short dark hair and a wry smile, Elle's character is very much reminiscent of Jordana Bevan in Richard Ayoade's 2010 film Submarine, as is the dry sardonic humour peppered into the script. Leonard and Elle's exchanges are awkward yet sweet, teetering on the edge of a true connection. That is, until Elle doesn't show up to work one day and reports of a missing person trickle through the town. The hotel staff are rattled by Elle's disappearance and when news breaks that her body has been found, this chilling bereavement subtly upends their lives. Misper (an abbreviated term used by the police to refer to a missing person) is stylistically compelling in its atmosphere building. There is an unsettling sense of staleness that runs throughout the film, characterised by the beige, stained walls of the old-timey, mostly vacant hotel, and Leonard's expression, which is permanently set in a sunken, shell-shocked gaze. 'I feel like I'm in a horror film,' he says, as he attempts to schedule an appointment with a therapist over the phone. This empty hotel is a prime site for horror and although Misper dabbles in the genre with some nightmarish flashes of Elle haunting Leonard after her death, it doesn't go all the way. Nor does it follow the pathway of a crime drama, refusing to offer up the salacious details of Elle's death in the true crime manner (though there a brief yet frightening visit by a 'fan' of the dead girl). The nature of Elle's murder and the profile of her killer are pushed into the periphery. What is at the forefront is the bafflement, melancholy and looming sense of dread that the hotel staff are faced with as they attempt to grapple with a return to normality. In the film's final moments, a crew is shooting a crime drama series based on the events of Elle's death and disappearance, six months after it happened. The bleak misery remains but drifts into the eeriness of the uncanny. Misper screened at the Edinburgh film festival
Edinburgh Live
18 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Prince Philip's 'four brutal words' to Queen at Harry and Meghan's wedding
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Prince Philip didn't mince his words following Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's nuptials, a fresh publication has claimed. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex tied the knot in a lavish affair at Windsor Castle in May 2018, witnessed by the entire Royal Family, including the late monarch and her consort. The service at St George's Chapel featured all the traditional elements of a Royal ceremony, enhanced by a gospel choir's rendition of Stand By Me and Bishop Michael Curry's lengthy 14-minute address. Following the conclusion of the service, the newly-married couple embarked on a carriage procession through Windsor whilst the remaining royals departed the chapel to make their way to the castle for an official reception. Former Royal butler Grant Harrold claims that as they exited the church, Harry's grandfather Philip remarked to the Queen: "Thank f*** that's over", reports the Mirror. His assertion appears in his forthcoming publication, due for release later this month. Harrold served King Charles at his Highgrove residence for seven years spanning 2004 to 2011. During the wedding day, Harrold had been offering commentary for a television network before meeting up with his partner, Jack Stooks, who had received an invitation to observe the Royal party's departure from the chapel and brought the former Royal employee as his companion. The Telegraph reports that in his upcoming memoir, titled The Royal Butler: My remarkable life of Royal Service, he documents: "Once all the formalities were over, we watched as the happy couple, and then the other members of the Royal family, filed out of the chapel. "When Prince Philip came out, he turned to the Queen and said, 'Thank f*** that's over.'". In the lead-up to Harry and Meghan's nuptials, the former Duke of Edinburgh underwent a hip replacement operation. It was reported at the time that he was adamant about not missing their special day and set himself the goal of being mobile by then. Meanwhile, during his tenure at Highgrove, Harrold became acquainted with both Princes William and Harry, who were in their late teens and early 20s. (Image: 2015 Max Mumby/Indigo) (Image: Getty Images) In a fresh interview, the ex-butler also discloses that he first met Harry when he was 19, with their initial encounter occurring when Harry struck him with a water balloon during a playful skirmish. He recounts that they even shared a takeaway before the Duke of Sussex departed for Sandhurst Military Academy. Harrold's stint at Highgrove also overlapped with the period when Charles and Camilla announced their engagement and subsequently tied the knot. In his explosive memoir Spare, Harry revealed how he and his now estranged brother William pleaded with their father not to wed his current wife. He wrote: "We support you, we said. We endorse Camilla, we said. 'Just please don't marry her. Just be together, Pa.' He didn't answer. But she answered. Straight what he witnessed was a stark contrast to what Harry penned in his memoir. He told The Telegraph: "The four of them, I promise you, got on so well. And that's why I don't understand what Harry's said, I really don't understand. "We support you, we said. We endorse Camilla, we said. 'Just please don't marry her. Just be together, Pa.' He didn't answer. But she answered. Straight he says what he saw was a far cry from what Harry wrote in his memoir. He told The Telegraph: "Because I saw them. I saw them having dinners together, I saw them having drinks together, I saw them going to parties together. "He also remembers witnessing "no animosity" amongst the royals, adding: "The King used to do things to make them [William and Harry] laugh and giggle."
