‘Freedom of expression is sacrosanct': Michael McGrath on his role as EU commissioner
Emmanuel Macron
's state visit and summit in London, separate, much quieter talks were due to take place in Westminster on Thursday that could be almost as crucial for UK relations in the
European Union
.
Yvette Cooper, the British government's home secretary, was due to break away from the Anglo-French summit to meet
Michael McGrath
, the European Commission's justice commissioner and the Republic's former minister for finance.
'I'm the first justice commissioner to visit Britain since Brexit came into effect in 2020,' he told The Irish Times at his Westminster hotel on Thursday morning.
While McGrath may be softly spoken, he carries a big stick.
READ MORE
In December the EU filed legal action against the UK in the European Court of Justice for allegedly failing to protect the rights of some of the six million EU citizens in Britain. Some EU citizens complained they had been denied entry by UK border officials after returning from visits to their home countries on holidays or to see family.
The issue caused friction behind the scenes of British prime minister
Keir Starmer
's much-vaunted 'reset' of relations with the EU. A resolution may be near, however. McGrath flew in for talks on the issue, before heading to Manchester for an event for EU citizens.
'Commitments were provided for as part of [Britain's] withdrawal agreement. [However] there have been challenges,' said McGrath.
'But we do now appear to be making progress. I will be raising this issue of EU citizen rights in the UK as a political priority for us. Those who left the UK for a while – we have to get their status regularised. But we also have to make sure EU states reciprocate.'
As well as Cooper, McGrath was due to speak to Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary. He was also due to meet Peter Kyle, the UK's science secretary, to discuss new British laws passed in June that shook up restrictions on the transfer of digital data.
'We have to assess this new Act to enable data flows to continue between the EU and UK,' said McGrath, who added it was crucial for co-operation on criminal matters as well as for business.
Later in the day, he would head northwest for the fourth annual EU Citizen's Gathering, the first time the event has been held outside London.
McGrath said it would be a 'coming together' of Europeans living in the area, politicians and community groups. Andy Burnham, the pro-Europe mayor of Manchester who is seen by many as a future Labour Party leader and possible prime minister, was also due to contribute.
As well as justice, McGrath's sprawling commission brief includes overseeing the rule of law in the EU and consumer protection. He also spearheads a commission project to establish a 'democracy shield' to prevent states such as Russia from interfering in elections in Europe by flooding them with disinformation.
McGrath said the initiative will involve schemes to support independent media and boost media literacy among European citizens. But will it also involve censorship? The EU, after all, has already banned some foreign media outlets such as Russia Today.
'If we get this right it will be the opposite of censorship. It will be about protecting the freedom of expression of EU voters at the ballot box, and keeping them protected from undue influence and interference.'
He said freedom of expression is 'sacrosanct', but suggested the EU should regulate the algorithms of social media platforms to prevent them from boosting disinformation from states such as Russia.
'The issue is with the algorithms,' he said. If it is not addressed, he added, the 'blatant lies' of Russia will be allowed to spread farther.
McGrath's brief also includes ensuring EU member states accept the 'primacy of EU law'.
Viktor Orban
's Hungary, he said, isn't doing that, and so up to €18 billion in EU funding has been withheld from the central European country.
'We hear them [Hungary] openly criticise
European Court of Justice
judgments. It is a fundamental obligation of EU membership that you respect the primacy of EU law and the ECJ. They [Hungary] seem to have a difficulty with that.'
On consumer protection, McGrath's attention has turned to the stratospheric growth in Europe of Chinese online retail platforms such as Shein and Temu, which ship millions of small-value packages into the bloc each year.
McGrath said he is concerned over the safety of many products sold on such platforms. He suggested the EU could adjust customs duty thresholds to make the small purchases more expensive for EU consumers.
He said 12 million small retail packages per day are imported into the European Union, more than 90 per cent of which come from China. Europe's 'system', he suggested, was struggling to cope with the volume and he alleged that European retailers were being put at a competitive disadvantage.
McGrath said the EU would soon publish the results of an online 'safety sweep' of products sold on sites such as
Shein
and
Temu
. The commission used software to 'scrape' the sites for data to analyse.
'My view is the commission needs to be given stronger investigative and enforcement powers in relation to consumer protection and product safety.'
He will, we can assume, probably advocate, in his own calm, inimitable way, for more powers behind the scenes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Discriminations by AC Grayling: A simple take on the culture wars
Discriminations: Making Peace in the Culture Wars Author : AC Grayling ISBN-13 : 978-0861549962 Publisher : Oneworld Guideline Price : £12.99 In Discriminations, AC Grayling essentially suggests that respect for human rights and commitment to reasoned debate are the antidotes to the poisonous state of politics. A simple solution. The title, Discriminations, plays with two meanings. Firstly, there is discrimination in the sense of sexism, racism and other prejudices which Grayling positions himself as firmly against, taking the side of social justice and defending those pilloried as 'woke'. Secondly, there is discrimination in the sense of making subtle distinctions – between rights and interests, between free-speech and hate-speech, for instance. Grayling offers a historical perspective on cancel culture, stretching the term to include collective cancelling, for example the crusade against Albigensian heretics in 13th century France, or individual cancelling, such as the pillory of Oscar Wilde. He argues that tactics such as 'no-platforming' or 'cancelling' are rarely justified, and that abandoning the principle of free speech to the right is a mistake by the left, feminists or the 'woke'. READ MORE Aside from how far-fetched these historical comparisons appear, the main thrust of the book is that the current poisonous state of the culture wars is created by all participants, left, right or otherwise. Grayling suggests that the left must examine its tactics and respect free speech, and that the right must respect human rights as distinct from interests – the maintenance of advantages. Along the way, he drifts into 'both-sides' style equations of the hard left and hard right. The extremes are the problem; those in the centre hold the answers. Supposedly rising above the 'culture war', Grayling proposes liberal solutions: rights, debate, freedom. These are hard to disagree with but obviously these are widespread, even dominant ideas of the last century. Grayling admonishes everyone to return to these principles, which should deliver a harmonious political debate – full of difference and disagreement but civil. Today, when authoritarian populists and neoliberals are the champions of free speech, this is insufficient. With a schoolmasterly tone – though often implausible, ' ... reflection will suggest, fundamentally, morality is a matter of good manners ...' – Grayling's book is almost endearingly nostalgic. The simple solution of reasonable arguments countering problematic views is alluring, but hardly tenable now. Effectively, the culture wars means that what counts as problematic or reasonable is now essentially contested. Even where his diagnosis is apt, his solutions seem implausible.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
NI community projects fear closure after US and UK funding reportedly pulled from peace organisation
A number of community and peacebuilding projects supported by the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) fear they will close due to the reported loss of vital funding from the US . It also emerged this week that the UK government had pulled a promised £1 million , citing budgetary pressures. However, multiple organisations told The Irish Times their 'bigger concern' was the halting of the US contribution to the peacebuilding and reconciliation body. The IFI said it had received financial support from 'a range of international donors including the US government' and was seeking clarity and support from its US partners. READ MORE The peacebuilding organisation was established by the British and Irish governments in 1986 to promote economic and social development and bring together nationalist, unionist and cross-Border communities. Since then, the IFI has spent €974 million supporting more than 6,000 projects, including efforts to remove peace walls and to prevent young people from being recruited or attacked by paramilitaries. The US government has traditionally been the IFI's largest funder. According to the IFI's accounts, its donations last year came from two sources, €2.5 million from the US and €5.5 million from the Irish Government. USAid, which administers foreign aid for the US government, was closed by president Donald Trump earlier this year. [ Senator George Mitchell: Northern Ireland's peace must evolve. And if it is here to stay it must be shared Opens in new window ] In February, Donald Trump's administration cut USAid jobs. Photographer: Pete Kiehart/Bloomberg via Getty Images It is not yet clear precisely how this will impact the IFI, but groups which deliver its projects in Ireland fear their funding will not be renewed at the end of this financial year. 'Since Donald Trump removed the USAid ... they've been more or less telling us we don't have any funding,' said a representative of one community organisation, who asked to remain anonymous so as not to jeopardise their contract. 'We've been told we should look for other funding if we want to keep the project going.' Conal McFeely, of Creggan Enterprises, which has previously received IFI funding, said: 'We've been told the reason the IFI are now considering withdrawing is because they've been choked of this funding from USAid, and they're out telling groups they're not going to continue their funding'. Emphasising the 'highly significant' role the body had played, he said it was 'instrumental in bedding down the peace here and attempting to contain and settle the conflict. They're a key player'. But he said 'a number of programmes, particularly in the Derry area, including here in Creggan, have been informed it's likely their programmes will not be funded beyond the current term, and they've been told to consider winding the projects down. 'There is a complete lack of alternative funders willing to take a risk ... lots of those initiatives will unfortunately fall by the wayside,' he added. Mr McFeely added it was 'extremely disappointing' the UK government was 'withholding its last [£1 million] phase of funding, and that will have a detrimental impact on the ground here in terms of marginalised communities that are still dealing with the fallout from the conflict. 'If the Irish Government is still prepared to put in money, why is the British government not matching that money? It's scandalous,' he said. In a statement, the IFI said that it 'has received financial support from a range of international donors including the US government, the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. 'We are grateful for the long-standing support from all our partners, including the bipartisan support under various US administrations,' it said. 'We are continuing to engage with our US partners to seek clarity around support from the US government which will play a key role in the delivery of the IFI's programmes into the future.' It said all projects currently funded by the IFI 'remain unaffected and their funding is secure as per their letters of offer'. 'Support from the US and others remains critical in our ability to deliver peace and reconciliation initiatives in Northern Ireland and the southern border counties,' the body said.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Release of hostages will play ‘no part' in UK plan to recognise Palestine
British families of hostages taken by Hamas say they have been told that the release of those still held would 'play no part' in the UK's plans to recognise Palestine and urged the prime minister Keir Starmer to change course. Mr Starmer announced earlier this week that the UK would take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of the UN General Assembly unless Israel meets certain conditions. Members of four British families met foreign office officials on Thursday night seeking clarification on whether conditions would also be placed on Hamas, their lawyers said in a statement. 'However, it was clear from the meeting last night that the British Government's policy will not help the hostages, and could even hurt them,' they said. READ MORE 'We do not say this lightly, but it was made obvious to us at the meeting that although the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed 'in the round' in late-September, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations. 'In other words, the 'vision for peace' which the UK is pursuing ... may well involve our clients' family members continuing to rot in Hamas dungeons.' Mr Starmer had said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza , stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. While he also called for Hamas to immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', he did not explicitly say these would factor into whether recognition would go ahead. The families have a range of views on what the future political settlement should look like but their priority is to keep the hostages 'above political games', their lawyers said. They are now urging the prime minister to 'change course before it is too late'. 'At a minimum, the British hostage families request that the government confirm that without the hostages being released, there can be no peace, and that this will be an important part of its decision as to whether to proceed with recognition and its current plan.' Mr Starmer said that he 'particularly' listens to hostages after criticism of his plans from Emily Damari, a British-Israeli who was held captive by Hamas. The families of Ms Damari and freed hostage Eli Sharabi were among those who met foreign office officials. Also present were relatives of Nadav Popplewell, who died while held captive, as well as those of Oded Lifshitz, who died, and Yocheved Lifschitz, who was released. Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the UK will not get into a 'to and fro' with Hamas over the recognition plans and that 'we don't negotiate with terrorists, Hamas are terrorists'. US president Donald Trump disagrees with Mr Starmer's plans, as well as those of France and Canada, which have also pledged their countries will recognise Palestine. 'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
