Agricultural items will be part of tariff talks: Seoul
'Talks between Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo and his counterpart, US Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer, are now underway, and agricultural products are included in the list of items that are now being negotiated,' Kim Yong-beom, director of national policy at the presidential office, told reporters in a briefing Friday. Kim did not elaborate on which of the two countries' agricultural goods could be affected.
Before Friday, South Korea's presidential office had not clarified whether its deal package would include the agricultural sector. When asked if a negotiation involving the agricultural sector would take place alongside tariff talks between South Korea and the US, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung on Wednesday declined to answer the question, instead saying Seoul was "making its utmost effort to pursue national interest and find the best idea regarding tariff talks."
This comes as Kim announced that President Lee Jae Myung's aides and senior government officials had discussed countermeasures over the outcome of Seoul's ongoing talks with Washington.
Lee's aide Kim said the two countries "reaffirmed the importance of mutual cooperation in strategic manufacturing sectors, including shipbuilding and semiconductors, and decided to specify future cooperation measures," adding that Seoul "strongly requested" that Washington ease tariffs on individual items such as automobiles.
Kim, however, added that he did not know whether a deal could be struck before the Aug. 1 deadline for the US "reciprocal" tariffs, but said that Seoul still considered that the deadline for making a deal.
On Thursday, Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan, Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo and their respective counterparts, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Greer of the USTR, held an 80-minute meeting to discuss tariff issues.
The talks followed US President Donald Trump's announcement Tuesday that the US had reached a deal with Japan. The reciprocal tariffs on Japanese goods including cars, were reduced to 15 percent in return for Japan's $550 billion commitment to invest in the US.
According to Kim, a follow-up negotiation between Industry Minister Kim and Lutnick will take place in the US on Friday, and Seoul will discuss countermeasures again Saturday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
20 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff hike
Auto giants to boost US production, cut costs, shift supply chain to offset tariff burden The reduction of US tariffs on South Korean automobiles to 15 percent offers only limited relief for Hyundai Motor Group, which faces mounting challenges in the world's second-largest car market. Stripped of its former zero-tariff advantage under the FTA, the automaker is bracing for a tougher fight to maintain its competitive edge. According to Seoul's presidential office, Korea and the US negotiated a 15 percent tariff on Korean-made automobiles on Thursday, lowering the rate from 25 percent. This adjustment addresses item-specific tariffs that were initially imposed to protect strategic US industries alleged to have contributed to trade imbalances. Japan and the EU had previously faced a 2.5 percent tariff on automobile exports to the US before securing their respective 15 percent trade deals. In contrast, South Korean automobiles entered the US tariff-free under the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. Citing this discrepancy, Seoul had pushed for a lower 12.5 percent tariff rate in the latest negotiations. However, Washington rejected the proposal, saying it faced political pressure to apply a uniform 15 percent tariff across all three regions. 'When Japan first secured the 15 percent rate, it had already faced strong backlash from the United Auto Workers and Detroit's Big Three US automakers (General Motors, Ford and Stellantis),' said Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo during a press briefing earlier in the day. Emphasizing that Korea might have risked any chance of tariff reduction if it had insisted on the 12.5 percent levy, Yeo added, 'From the US perspective, maintaining a minimum 15 percent levy was crucial to protect its auto industry and align with the political climate, regardless of (our) FTA status.' Yeo noted that further tariff reductions are unlikely for the time being, given the need of the US to maintain a balance with other partners like Japan and the EU. He emphasized the government's commitment to capitalizing on every chance to lower tariffs 'even if it's by just 1 percent.' Industry insiders indicate that the 15 percent auto tariff represents an 'unsuccessful bargain' for Korea, as it loses the advantage it had over Japan, the EU and other competitors under the FTA-based zero tariff benefits it previously held. 'While Korea, Japan and the EU are now subject to the same 15 percent auto tariff, Korea must address the additional costs brought on by losing the 2.5 percent tariff advantage it previously held over the other two regions under the FTA,' said Kim Pil-su, an automotive engineering professor at Daelim University. 'Although 15 percent is better than the previous 25 percent, it's not a win for Korea,' Kim added. Kim Tae-hwang, an international trade professor at Myongji University, echoed that view and noted, 'Even if Korea had granted the US full access to its rice and beef markets, Donald Trump wouldn't have allowed a single-digit tariff on Korean automobiles, citing the need for fairness with other car exporters. From the start, it was a losing game for Korea.' According to NH Investment & Securities, under the 15 percent levy, Hyundai's annual tariff burden is projected to be approximately 2.6 trillion-2.7 trillion won ($1.87 billion-$1.94 billion) annually. Samsung Securities estimates Kia's annual tariff impact to be 2.3 trillion won. Hyundai Motor and Kia already experienced the impact of 25 percent US tariffs in the second quarter. Despite a surge in sales revenue, Hyundai and Kia's operating profit declined on-year by 15.8 percent to 3.6 trillion won and 24.1 percent to 2.8 trillion won, respectively. The combined negative effect of tariffs on the two carmakers totaled 1.6 trillion won. Kim, the engineering professor, stated that Hyundai Motor Group's key strategy would involve fast-tracking its production in the US while expanding its presence in other key auto markets such as Europe. On March 24, Hyundai Motor Group Chair Chung Euisun announced a $21 billion investment over four years in the US, focusing on achieving an annual production capacity of 1.2 million vehicles. In its second-quarter earnings conference call, Hyundai Motor said it plans to implement flexible pricing strategies and cost-saving measures and bolster production in the US, including local sourcing of auto parts. Kia vowed to redirect approximately 25,000 vehicles produced at its Georgia plant toward the US market. In response to the finalized tariffs, Hyundai Motor Group stated, 'We extend our deepest gratitude to the government departments and the National Assembly for their dedicated efforts in resolving the tariff issues with the US.' 'Hyundai Motor and Kia plan to pursue diverse strategies to minimize the impact of tariffs while further strengthening their competitiveness through enhanced quality, stronger brand positioning and technological advancements.'
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul downplays US claim it will take 90% of Korean investment fund profits
South Korea's presidential office on Thursday sought to downplay remarks by US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick that '90 percent of the profits' from Korea's investment into the US will go to the American people, saying it understood the figure as part of a 'reinvestment concept.' Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced that the US and Korea have established a 'full and complete' trade deal, saying that Korea pledges to invest $350 billion into sectors 'owned and controlled by the United States' and selected by Trump. Regarding this trade deal, the Korean government stated that $150 billion has been assigned for shipbuilding cooperation, while investments in chips, batteries, biotechnology and nuclear energy cooperation accounted for the remaining $200 billion. Adding on to Trump's announcement, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wrote on X that "90 percent of the profits" will be 'going to the American people.' He claimed that the recent trade deals 'reflect the clear understanding that President Trump's tariff and trade agenda has the power to reshape global commerce.' When asked about Lutnick's comments, presidential chief of staff for policy Kim Yong-beom told reporters that it is "difficult to discuss further details.' 'We have documented the matter slightly differently in a memorandum, but we are unable to disclose everything,' said Kim, adding that the US side is fully aware of the understanding and expectations of the Korean side. Kim added that the split between the 90 percent and the 10 percent appeared to mirror phrasing previously used during trade negotiations between the US and Japan back on July 23. 'We don't have any intentions to argue over expressions, but the deal is not being negotiated that way,' Kim added. During the presidential office's press briefing, Kim pointed out that the official text issued by the US reads 'retain 90 percent of the profits from this investment,' which, according to Kim, makes it difficult to interpret exactly what Washington intends. 'Since it's not yet clear who will invest how much and where, it's difficult to infer precisely what the US is thinking,' said Kim. 'Our interpretation here is that it essentially refers to reinvestment — that instead of profits immediately leaving as dividend outflows, they will remain in the US.' The presidential chief of staff added that Korea was open to the arrangement if it ensured long-term benefits. 'If the US recommends truly good business opportunities, provides purchase guarantees and ensures our firms remain firmly involved, that would be fine,' Kim said. Mentioning that further discussions regarding investments are still rolling, Kim added that Korea expects to have opportunities to voice its opinion, 'to ensure that the fund operates in a way that doesn't harm (Korea's) interests.' Comparing Korea's trade deal with Japan's earlier agreement with Washington, Kim noted that Korea's $350 billion fund is significantly smaller than Japan's $550 billion pledge, despite both countries recording similar trade surpluses with the US in 2024 — $66 billion for Korea and $68.5 billion for Japan. 'Excluding the $150 billion shipbuilding fund led by Korea, (Korea's) investment fund amounts to just 35 percent of Japan's,' Kim said, emphasizing that 'more safeguards were built into (Korea's negotiations).'
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff parity
Auto giants to boost US production, cut costs, shift supply chain to offset tariff burden The reduction of US tariffs on South Korean automobiles to 15 percent offers only limited relief for Hyundai Motor Group, which faces mounting challenges in the world's second-largest car market. Stripped of its former zero-tariff advantage under the FTA, the automaker is bracing for a tougher fight to maintain its competitive edge. According to Seoul's presidential office, Korea and the US negotiated a 15 percent tariff on Korean-made automobiles on Thursday, lowering the rate from 25 percent. This adjustment addresses item-specific tariffs that were initially imposed to protect strategic US industries alleged to have contributed to trade imbalances. Japan and the EU had previously faced a 2.5 percent tariff on automobile exports to the US before securing their respective 15 percent trade deals. In contrast, South Korean automobiles entered the US tariff-free under the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. Citing this discrepancy, Seoul had pushed for a lower 12.5 percent tariff rate in the latest negotiations. However, Washington rejected the proposal, saying it faced political pressure to apply a uniform 15 percent tariff across all three regions. 'When Japan first secured the 15 percent rate, it had already faced strong backlash from the United Auto Workers and Detroit's Big Three US automakers (General Motors, Ford and Stellantis),' said Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo during a press briefing earlier in the day. Emphasizing that Korea might have risked any chance of tariff reduction if it had insisted on the 12.5 percent levy, Yeo added, 'From the US perspective, maintaining a minimum 15 percent levy was crucial to protect its auto industry and align with the political climate, regardless of (our) FTA status.' Yeo noted that further tariff reductions are unlikely for the time being, given the need of the US to maintain a balance with other partners like Japan and the EU. He emphasized the government's commitment to capitalizing on every chance to lower tariffs 'even if it's by just 1 percent.' Industry insiders indicate that the 15 percent auto tariff represents an 'unsuccessful bargain' for Korea, as it loses the advantage it had over Japan, the EU and other competitors under the FTA-based zero tariff benefits it previously held. 'While Korea, Japan and the EU are now subject to the same 15 percent auto tariff, Korea must address the additional costs brought on by losing the 2.5 percent tariff advantage it previously held over the other two regions under the FTA,' said Kim Pil-su, an automotive engineering professor at Daelim University. 'Although 15 percent is better than the previous 25 percent, it's not a win for Korea,' Kim added. Kim Tae-hwang, an international trade professor at Myongji University, echoed that view and noted, 'Even if Korea had granted the US full access to its rice and beef markets, Donald Trump wouldn't have allowed a single-digit tariff on Korean automobiles, citing the need for fairness with other car exporters. From the start, it was a losing game for Korea.' According to NH Investment & Securities, under the 15 percent levy, Hyundai's annual tariff burden is projected to be approximately 2.6 trillion-2.7 trillion won ($1.87 billion-$1.94 billion) annually. Samsung Securities estimates Kia's annual tariff impact to be 2.3 trillion won. Hyundai Motor and Kia already experienced the impact of 25 percent US tariffs in the second quarter. Despite a surge in sales revenue, Hyundai and Kia's operating profit declined on-year by 15.8 percent to 3.6 trillion won and 24.1 percent to 2.8 trillion won, respectively. The combined negative effect of tariffs on the two carmakers totaled 1.6 trillion won. Kim, the engineering professor, stated that Hyundai Motor Group's key strategy would involve fast-tracking its production in the US while expanding its presence in other key auto markets such as Europe. On March 24, Hyundai Motor Group Chair Chung Euisun announced a $21 billion investment over four years in the US, focusing on achieving an annual production capacity of 1.2 million vehicles. In its second-quarter earnings conference call, Hyundai Motor said it plans to implement flexible pricing strategies and cost-saving measures and bolster production in the US, including local sourcing of auto parts. Kia vowed to redirect approximately 25,000 vehicles produced at its Georgia plant toward the US market. In response to the finalized tariffs, Hyundai Motor Group stated, 'We extend our deepest gratitude to the government departments and the National Assembly for their dedicated efforts in resolving the tariff issues with the US.' 'Hyundai Motor and Kia plan to pursue diverse strategies to minimize the impact of tariffs while further strengthening their competitiveness through enhanced quality, stronger brand positioning and technological advancements.'
