A member of Congress made a surprise visit to Krome. What she saw left her concerned
'It's wall to wall people here and it's very troubling,' U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat who represents parts of Broward Country, said after emerging from a three-hour visit Thursday inside the detention facility.
Wasserman Schultz said the detention center, which made headlines recently after two men in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody died inside, was built to hold 882 people. On Thursday, there were 1,111 detainees. There were two tents on the property to accommodate overflow.
'This is not a nice place. There's no one in your family that you would ever want to be here, not only because you wouldn't want your family detained, but because you wouldn't want anyone that you care about to be in the conditions that these people are being held in,' she said. 'They have people who are being held and are forced to sleep on cots in between the bunks.'
As part of President Donald Trump's mass deportation plans, the Department of Homeland Security has been ramping up arrests. The expansion has worried immigration advocates and members of Congress like Wasserman Schultz who have been increasingly concerned following the two deaths at the Krome detention center and another of a Haitian woman at the Broward Transitional Center.
While the Miami-Dade Medical Examiner's Office ruled that the two men at Krome died of 'natural' causes, a Miami Herald investigation found evidence of what experts described as questionable medical care for the two immigrants.
Wasserman Schultz said while she could not say that cruelty was taking place inside Krome or that immigrants' were being denied due process — she saw rooms where they could meet with lawyers — the conditions were nevertheless disturbing.
That includes hearing from migrants how sometimes there are plans to move them away despite an upcoming hearing. She saw multiple small cells, she said, where between 25 and 35 men are held 'for upwards of 48 hours.'
'The consensus was that they are there in those rooms with all of those other men, eating, sleeping and going to the bathroom in that room … sleeping on the floor, having to urinate and defecate in front of other people in that in that small room,' the congresswoman said.
Even when they shower there is no privacy, the men complained.
'The two constituents I spoke to definitely described conditions that were extremely unpleasant, not conditions that you would want anyone you care about to be subjected to,' she said.
Wasserman Schultz arrived at the facility after 3 p.m. The staff was surprised by her unannounced visit, she said, but she was allowed in without incident after having to wait for about 20 minutes. There was some chatter about whether she could speak to detainees, but she pushed back and was able to talk to two detainees — a Cuban national and Jamaican national — who lived in her district.
The reason she was able to show up unannounced is because of a 2020 law she helped write that prevents DHS from interfering in congressional oversight, she said.
'I can tell you that some of the things I saw would not have looked like that if I had given them notice,' she said.
Still, as she walked the facility, she 'got inconsistent answers depending on who I was speaking to and asking the question to and from the leadership that was walking me through, to the personnel that I was talking to.' This was the case, she said, when she inquired about the two detainees' deaths.
Wasserman Schultz said her concerns about the conditions of detainees in custody are fueled by a number of factors. One is the push by the Trump administration to allocate $45 billion in the federal budget to expand immigrant detention facilities and services. The 'big, ugly bill,' she said, was 'rammed through last week in the middle of the night by one vote,' and the administration is going to attempt to ramp up and process even more detainees.
'When they do that, you start to fill up even more facilities like Krome,' the congresswoman said. 'Then the conditions are going to get decidedly worse.'
Wasserman Schultz, who represents the largest district of Venezuelan-American voters in the country, said another concern she has is the administration's track record on immigration.
'The administration is lying when they say that they're really only prioritizing criminals. I am getting calls from constituents who say, U.S. citizen children have been deported along with their undocumented parents,' she said. 'Trump has absolutely no regard for the law. He is the most anti-immigrant president in American history, and he is hell bent on essentially bleaching, bleaching out the United States.'
Wasserman Schultz said she plans to aggressively engage DHS as a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee 'to ensure that we can make conditions better in these facilities and also fight back on their outrageous extreme immigration policy that are not targeting people who are criminals and who are here to do anything other than to make a better way of life for themselves and their families, and have credible fear from countries like Nicaragua, Venezuela, Haiti, Cuba —places that are in no condition to send anyone back to right now.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Amid bitter partisanship, permitting reform is a golden opportunity for bipartisanship
With states now fighting over redistricting maps, America's two political parties will need an opportunity to work together again. Permitting reform is one issue that is just right for this, even amidst an apparent trifecta. Strengthening American energy production has long been a bipartisan issue, as it fosters economic growth, protects national security, and increases the energy supply to drive down or stabilize utility costs for U.S. households in the face of growing demand. There has never been a better time for it. Done right, it secures American global leadership for another century. While recent debates around tax credits have made this issue seem increasingly partisan, reforming our existing energy permitting process is something on which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle largely already agree. Congress should capitalize on consensus to pass comprehensive permitting reform legislation. Debates surrounding energy tax credits in the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, in particular, brought energy production back into the spotlight this year. Reconciliation can leave bitter feelings, but permitting reform has a chance to offer both parties something they dearly want — energy dominance, reduced emissions, fewer arcane rules, and less back and forth political games undermining the development of new energy projects. All energy production would benefit from permitting reform. America's permitting system should be a gateway for energy projects. Right now, it's a bottleneck. Unpredictable processes and delays in approval are bringing new developments to a grinding halt. With the rise of AI and a digital world that increasingly relies on data centers, global energy demand has spiked. Congress is now tasked with ensuring that American energy production can keep pace with this demand and not fall behind foreign adversaries vying for our position as the global leader in innovation and technology. But as of late, lawmakers have remained stagnant on addressing permitting reform. Yet, while demand for all energy production is on the rise, Democrats have a lot less to fear from loosening rules than they may think. The vast majority of projects stuck in grid connection queues are renewable — over 95 percent of proposed new generation capacity is solar or wind. Much-needed reform to the approval process could free up all new projects, strengthen American energy dominance and unleash clean energy all at once. Permitting reform has long been a bipartisan issue. Last year, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), then-ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and then-Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe Manchin ( introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 aimed at streamlining and expediting the approvals process. While this legislation was not ultimately passed, it is a prime example of members reaching across the aisle to drive movement on this front. Most recently, a bipartisan group of governors made an urgent call for permitting reform. 'It shouldn't take longer to approve a project than it takes to build it,' said Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R). He also highlighted the bipartisan nature of the issue, 'Democrats and Republicans alike recognize permitting delays weaken U.S. economic growth, security and competitiveness. Governors from both parties are working together to inject some common sense into our permitting process.' Voters in both parties agree. Recent polling conducted by Cygnal found that two-thirds of respondents agree that Congress should modernize permitting rules to accelerate completion of energy projects and reduce long-term cost pressures. Some conservative stalwarts will never support anything they see as helping clean energy, while some environmental activists are more concerned with punishing fossil fuel companies than they are with actually addressing climate change. These short-sighted visions represent the horseshoe of scarcity, decline and pessimism that has plagued American energy politics for decades. They believe we can succeed only by taking from the other side. America cannot afford delay. A dangerous world requires energy dominance in all industries, including new ones like clean energy. Moreover, Americans deserve to know that they will have reliable, accessible energy needed to power their businesses and residences. Permitting reform will make energy access more reliable, more abundant, cheaper and much cleaner. All Americans, and our planet, will win. The only losers will be those profiteering from political polarization. With some energy tax credits phasing out sooner than originally planned, many energy producers want to act swiftly to get new projects up and running. The permitting process, as it stands, is their biggest obstacle. As we head into the fall, our lawmakers should keep the cross-partisan opportunity on permitting reform top of mind. Liam deClive-Lowe is the co-founder of American Policy Ventures, an organization that builds projects to help policymakers collaborate and get things done.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hundreds of West Virginia National Guard members will deploy across the nation's capital as part of the Trump administration's effort to overhaul policing in the District of Columbia through a federal crackdown on crime and homelessness. Gov. Patrick Morrisey, announced Saturday that he was sending a contingent of 300 to 400 to nearby Washington at the Republican administration's request. They will arrive in the district along with equipment and specialized training services, his office said in a statement. 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital,' Morrisey said. 'The men and women of our National Guard represent the best of our state, and this mission reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America.' The move comes as federal agents and National Guard troops have begun to appear across the heavily Democratic city after Trump's executive order Monday federalizing local police forces and activating about 800 D.C. National Guard troops. Maj. Gen. James Seward, West Virginia's adjutant general, said in a statement that members of the state's National Guard 'stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region' and that the Guard's 'unique capabilities and preparedness make it an invaluable partner in this important undertaking.' Federal agents have appeared in some of the city's most highly trafficked neighborhoods, garnering praise, pushback and alarm from local residents and leaders across the country. City leaders, who are obliged to cooperate with the president's order under the federal laws that direct the district's local governance, have sought to work with the administration though have bristled at the scope of the president's takeover. On Friday the administration reversed course on an order that aimed to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an 'emergency police commissioner' after the district's top lawyer sued to contest. After a court hearing, Trump's attorney general, Pam Bond, issued a memo that directed the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. District officials say they are evaluating how to best comply. In his order Monday, Trump declared an emergency due to the 'city government's failure to maintain public order.' He said that impeded the 'federal government's ability to operate efficiently to address the nation's broader interests without fear of our workers being subjected to rampant violence.' In a letter to city residents, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, wrote that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now." She added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy -– even when we don't have full access to it.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Blue states plan new tax hikes on wealthy residents in response to Trump's federal tax legislation
Blue states around the U.S. are planning tax hikes on wealthy residents to bring in additional revenue through a variety of proposals, including one state's so-called "Taylor Swift tax." The moves come after the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) by President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress, which permanently extended many of the 2017 tax cuts and included other new tax relief provisions as well as spending cuts to programs such as Medicaid. Democrats argue these tax hike proposals are needed to help plug gaps in state budgets and offset any lost federal dollars for Medicaid and other programs. The state of Rhode Island enacted a new tax this summer that will impose a special levy on vacation homes valued at $1 million or more, which has become known as the "Taylor Swift tax" due to the music star owning a home in an affluent part of Westerly, Rhode Island, The Wall Street Journal reported. Taylor Swift: Here's How The Pop Superstar Achieved Billionaire Status Rhode Island's "Taylor Swift tax" imposes a tax of $2.50 for every $500 of assessed value above $1 million, which a analysis estimated would result in an additional $136,000 in property taxes on her luxury home in the Watch Hill neighborhood that's valued at $17 million. Read On The Fox Business App Montana wants to increase property taxes on non-primary residences, adopting a new reform that will reduce property tax rates for owner-occupied primary homes while hiking the rate to 1.9% for second homes or short-term rentals, with industrial properties also set to face higher levies. Lawmakers want to provide not only a tax break to about 230,000 homeowners, but incentivize owners of vacation properties or second homes to sell those properties to inject more inventory into a tight real estate market, reported. Mamdani's Rise In Nyc Mirrors Economic Flight To The South, Study Shows This spring, Maryland enacted a new tax policy that raises income tax rates on residents earning over $500,000 a year to narrow the state's budget deficit. Another state in the Northeast is also mulling a tax hike on wealthy residents, with lawmakers in Connecticut considering legislation that would raise income tax rates on individuals earning $250,000 or more, or twice that amount for couples, to help offset an anticipated decrease in federal funding. How Much Can People Save On Taxes By Moving To Florida? The state of Washington this spring passed a budget that will raise its capital gains tax from 7% to 9%, though the tax's structure excludes real estate sales and focuses on other transactions like those involving stocks, bonds or business interests. Washington doesn't have an income tax, and the state constitution prohibits one. Washington has in the past seen wealthy residents depart the state to avoid the high tax burden, such as when Amazon founder Jeff Bezos left for low-tax Florida. That phenomenon has occurred in other high-tax states, such as California, New York, New Jersey and Illinois, which have seen wealthy residents and corporations leave in favor of states with lower article source: Blue states plan new tax hikes on wealthy residents in response to Trump's federal tax legislation Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data