Stocks usually rise by 10% a year. Those days may be over.
Americans are wise to invest in the stock market, we are told, because stocks have yielded historical gains of about 10% a year.
But not, perhaps, this year.
Many analysts predict that the S&P 500 index will end 2025 essentially flat, or with only meager gains.
In one June 25 roundup, Yahoo Finance charts several strategists with year-end projections that put the benchmark S&P index between 5,600 and 6,100. Those figures fall below, or only slightly above, where the S&P started the year, around 5,900.
Some forecasts range higher, and forecasters have been growing more bullish about American stocks in 2025. But anyone who predicts double-digit returns this year risks being branded an outlier.
If big investment firms expect the stock market to finish 2025 more or less where it started, how should armchair investors react? Is the investment landscape shifting beneath our feet?
First, let's explore the reasoning behind those gloomy forecasts.
Stocks opened high in 2025. Maybe too high.
The stock market opened strong in 2025. The broad S&P index sat near its all-time high, following two years of conspicuous growth.
That growth spurt, alone, was enough to seed caution in forecasters. A surging S&P means stock prices are relatively high. Some stocks are overpriced. Bargains are fewer. The index may not have that much room to grow.
'I believe that, given the strong returns over the past two years, some lower returns are expected,' said Eric Teal, chief investment officer at Comerica Bank.
Comerica's own projections call for the S&P 500 to end the year at 6,400, a number toward the high end of forecasts.
Wall Street prognosticators have been bearish on stocks in 2025 because of one overarching theme: uncertainty.
'It's all the volatile actors in our current economy,' said Catherine Valega, a certified financial planner near Boston. 'It's like you don't know from one day to the next: Do we have tariffs? Do we not have tariffs?'
It's hard to predict how President Trump's import taxes will affect prices, and thus, inflation. The trade war, coupled with Trump's immigration crackdown, could slow economic growth. Recession fears are heightened. The Federal Reserve may or may not ease interest rates in response.
'We're assuming that we sidestep a recession, that interest rate cuts are on the horizon, but not immediate,' Teal said, reflecting a common view on Wall Street. 'And so, there is an element of cautious optimism that I think is in the market, but a high degree of uncertainty and macro policy unknowns that will keep markets contained.'
Stock forecasters don't want to be wrong
There's another big reason, analysts say, why year-end forecasts for the S&P 500 are trending low: Forecasters tend to err on the conservative side.
'The analysts have historically kind of underestimated S&P 500 returns,' said Kristy Akullian, head of iShares investment strategy, Americas, at BlackRock. 'People don't want to stick their necks out with a bold prediction and be wrong.'
That impulse, she said, also explains why stock forecasts tend to bunch together. No one wants to stand out.
'It's hard being an outlier,' said David Meier, a senior analyst at Motley Fool.
Meier cites yet another reason why stock forecasters tend to aim low: 'Being negative, let's call it bearish, tends to get more clicks,' he said. Readers gravitate to distressing news about stocks.
So, stocks are having an off year. What can I do?
Now, let's move on to the practical question: If the S&P 500 might not gain much ground in 2025, what should ordinary investors do about it?
The easy answer, of course, is to do nothing.
Stock market projections for next month, or next year, shouldn't matter much to an investor who is in for the long haul, advisers say.
And that advice applies to just about everyone: If you aren't in for the long haul, experts advise, stocks might not be for you.
'If you need funds soon, don't have it invested,' said Randy Bruns, a certified financial planner in Naperville, Illinois. 'If you don't need the funds for 15 years, stop looking at the volatility.'
Market downturns tend to be brief. Recessions are shorter than they seem. Anyone who is saving for retirement, or for other long-term goals, can generally ride them out.
'If you have the luxury of being a long-term investor, be one,' Akullian said.
There is, however, a longer and more nuanced answer to the question of how to respond to those conservative projections for stocks in 2025.
A gloomy forecast for 2025 -- and for 2035
It involves this complicating factor: Stock market forecasts are also surprisingly conservative for 2035.
Vanguard, the investment firm, predicts the U.S. stock market as a whole will rise by an underwhelming 3.8% to 5.8% a year over the next 10 years. 'Growth' stocks, the likes of Nvidia and Amazon, are projected to rise by only 2.5% to 4.5%: not much faster than inflation.
Those forecasts are based on the idea that many U.S. stocks are overpriced, in essence, and trading above their real value.
In Vanguard's analysis, everyday investors who want the gaudy returns they have come to expect from American growth stocks would do well to look elsewhere: Global stocks. Small-cap American stocks, in companies with a lower market value. 'Value' stocks, trading below their intrinsic worth.
'I would say it's time to have a more balanced allocation,' said Teal of Comerica.
Bruns, the financial planner, suggests average investors should 'diversify across all the broad asset classes that should comprise a textbook portfolio.'
That doesn't mean you should sell all of your Alphabet stocks, experts say. But the time might be right to scrutinize your portfolio. Does it include foreign stocks? Small-cap stocks? Bonds?
If not, then you might consider rebalancing your portfolio to make it more diverse.
'The easiest way to do that, if you are a 401(k) contributor, is to change your future allocations,' Valega said. That way, you don't have to tinker with your current investments.
Not sure how to rebalance?
'Reach out to your adviser,' Valega said. 'That's what we're there for.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
VIG Is a Popular Dividend ETF for Passive Income. But Is It the Best?
With a 1.8% yield, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF isn't the highest-paying dividend ETF. Instead of focusing on stocks with high yields, it focuses on those with extended track records of dividend increases. It could be a great ETF for investors who are more concerned with building their future income streams. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF › The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG), also commonly referred to simply by its ticker symbol, VIG, is an index fund that holds a portfolio of more than 330 dividend-paying stocks. But with dozens of excellent exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on dividend stocks to choose from, is this one the right fit for you? Let's take a closer look at the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF and which types of investors it could be the best dividend stock ETF for. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers index, which includes only stocks with established track records of raising their dividends every year. Unlike some of the other dividend-focused ETFs offered by Vanguard, stocks don't necessarily need to have above-average dividend yields to be included -- just a dividend growth streak of at least 10 straight years. In part for this reason, the ETF has a 1.8% yield. That's more than you'd get from an S&P 500 index fund, but it isn't close to what most "high dividend" ETFs offer. However, it's important to realize that this ETF isn't about creating a large stream of income immediately. In fact, the index that it tracks excludes the highest-yielding 25% of stocks that would otherwise meet its criteria. Though that might seem counterintuitive, there's a logical reason why: Often, a particularly high dividend yield is the result of a plunging stock price. Given that many noteworthy stock declines are triggered by bad news for the underlying business, and that such troubles can make it harder for a company to pay and raise dividends, foregoing the highest-yielding options in the near term can be a smart strategy for achieving reliable payout growth over the long term. The idea is that this fund holds stocks that will be paying significantly more in dividends 10 years from now, 20 years from now, and so on. Like most Vanguard ETFs, the Dividend Appreciation ETF is a low-cost investment vehicle. It has a rock-bottom 0.05% expense ratio, which means that for every $10,000 in invested assets, your annual fee expense will be just $5. (To be clear, this isn't a fee you have to pay -- it will simply be reflected in the fund's performance over time.) As of the latest update, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF owned 337 stocks, and it's a weighted index, so some stocks make up significantly more of the portfolio than others. Top holdings include Broadcom, Microsoft, Apple, Eli Lilly, and JPMorgan Chase. One of the most interesting features of this ETF is that because it doesn't require above-average dividend yields, it includes a lot of high-growth companies that many dividend ETFs exclude. For example, Broadcom -- the largest holding in the fund -- has a dividend yield of just 1% at its current share price. However, that tech company has grown its payouts at a double-digit percentage pace and has increased them for 14 consecutive years. Because it has more growth stock exposure than most dividend ETFs, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has the potential to deliver stronger total returns. There's no such thing as an ideal dividend ETF for everyone -- that's why there are dozens of them to choose from. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF could be an especially great choice for investors who want dividend income in their portfolios but are more concerned with how much they'll be getting paid in the future than the current yields of their stocks. In a nutshell, if you're 70 years old and relying on your portfolio for income today, or if you're preparing to retire within the next few years, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF might not be a great fit for you. On the other hand, if you're still a decade or more away from retirement, it could be an excellent ETF to help you build an income stream for the future without sacrificing growth potential. Before you buy stock in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Matt Frankel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. VIG Is a Popular Dividend ETF for Passive Income. But Is It the Best? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Think Costco Wholesale Is Expensive? This Chart Might Change Your Mind.
Costco stock has delivered a 2,320% total return over the past 15 years. The company keeps growing its cash profits while earning increasingly strong returns on its business investments. Costco's ROIC even beats Amazon's in the asset-light e-commerce sector. 10 stocks we like better than Costco Wholesale › Warehouse retailer Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) may sell goods at affordable prices, but the stock is pretty expensive. Costco investors have pocketed a total return of 2,320% over the last 15 years, leaving the S&P 500 index far behind at a 663% gain. The stock traded at a luxurious 55.8 times trailing earnings on June 26, or 59.6 times free cash flow. So you wouldn't be the first investor to call Costco's stock "expensive." But you might change your mind when you look at the chart below. I'm about to show you a rare combination. Costco has a long-standing habit of growing its cash profits, while also making better and better use of the new capital over time. Free cash flow is the profit that's left over after paying off operating expenses and capital expenses. This capital can be used to finance dividend payouts, execute share buybacks, acquire smaller rivals, or boost the balance sheet's cash reserves. It's a measure of real cash profits, rather than the tax accounting construct you know as net profit or earnings. And Costco earns a lot of cash profits. Return on invested capital (ROIC) measures how effectively a company puts its profits to work. Costco's ROIC is nearly double the figures you see for Walmart (NYSE: WMT) or Target (NYSE: TGT) nowadays, and even exceeds Amazon's (NASDAQ: AMZN) ROIC in the asset-light e-commerce industry. The company also delivers consistently wider ROIC margins over time, while most retailers struggle to keep ROIC stable. As Costco pairs richer ROIC readings with growing cash flows, it keeps feeding a flywheel of constant business improvements. That's an incredibly shareholder-friendly combination. Before you buy stock in Costco Wholesale, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Costco Wholesale wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Amazon and Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Costco Wholesale, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Think Costco Wholesale Is Expensive? This Chart Might Change Your Mind. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate Republicans make steep cuts to wind and solar in updated megabill text
Senate Republicans released updated megabill text late Friday that would make sharp cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act's solar and wind tax credits after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives. The text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the law's clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service by the end of 2027 — significantly more restrictive than an earlier proposal by the Senate Finance Committee that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. The changes came after Trump urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to crack down on the wind and solar credits and align the measure more closely with reconciliation text, H.R.1, that passed the House, as POLITICO reported earlier on Friday. The changes are likely to put some moderate GOP senators, who have backed a slower schedule for sunsetting those incentives, in a tough position. They'll be forced to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects and job losses in their states — something renewable energy advocates are also warning about. The revised text would retain the investment and production tax credits for baseload sources, such as nuclear, geothermal, hydropower or energy storage, as proposed in the Finance Committee's earlier proposal. But it would make other significant changes, including extending a tax credit for clean hydrogen production until 2028. The panel's earlier proposal would have eliminated the credit after this year. And despite vocal lobbying by the solar industry, the proposal would maintain abrupt cuts to tax incentives supporting residential solar power. The committee's earlier proposal would have eliminated that credit six months after the enactment of the bill; now the updated draft proposes repealing it at the end of this year. It would also deny wind and solar leasing arrangements to residential customers from accessing the climate law's clean electricity investment and production tax credits. And it would move up the timeline for certain rules barring foreign entities of concern from accessing those credits. The bill would move up the termination date for electric vehicle tax credits to Sept. 30, compared to six months after enactment in the earlier Finance text. The credit for EV chargers would extend through June 2026. The new text also provides a bonus incentive for advanced nuclear facilities built in communities with high levels of employment in the nuclear industry. And the bill makes metallurgical coal eligible for the advanced manufacturing production tax credit through 2029.