Pakistan Discovers Gold Reserves in Indus River, Valued at 2.65 Billion Kuwaiti Dinars
ISLAMABAD, Mar 6: Pakistan has made a significant discovery of gold deposits in the Indus River, with estimated reserves valued at approximately 2.65 billion Kuwaiti Dinars (KWD). The find, located in the Attock district of Punjab province, was revealed during a government-commissioned survey and is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the country's mining sector. With Pakistan facing economic challenges, this discovery presents an opportunity to boost domestic gold production and reduce reliance on imports.
Government Plans and Mining Prospects
The exploration and future extraction of these reserves are being spearheaded by the state-owned National Engineering Services Pakistan (NESPAK) in collaboration with the Punjab Mines and Minerals Department. Zargham Eshaq Khan, Managing Director of NESPAK, confirmed that the consultancy has signed a contract for "Consultancy Services for Preparing Bidding Documents and Transaction Advisory Services for Nine (09) Placer Gold Blocks along River Indus in District Attock" (Dawn News). This marks a critical step towards formalizing commercial gold mining in the region.
Geologists believe that the Indus River carries gold deposits from the Himalayas, which accumulate in Pakistan in the form of placer gold—small gold particles or nuggets that are rounded due to the river's natural movement. The Indus Valley region has historically been known for its mineral wealth, and this latest find reinforces its potential as a valuable resource hub.
Pakistan's Gold Reserves and Economic Potential
Pakistan has historically maintained low gold reserves compared to other South Asian nations. As per the State Bank of Pakistan, the country's official gold reserves were valued at $5.43 billion as of December 2024 (The Express Tribune). The discovery in Attock could contribute to expanding these reserves and provide a much-needed boost to the national economy.
The government envisions the Attock Placer Gold Project as a step toward reducing dependence on foreign gold imports, strengthening Pakistan's mining sector, and attracting foreign and local investors to support large-scale extraction operations. If successfully managed, the project could provide economic relief at a time when the country faces a struggling economy, dwindling foreign exchange reserves, and a depreciating currency.
Challenges of Illegal Mining and Government Intervention
The possibility of gold deposits in the Indus River had already led to increased illegal mining activity earlier this year, particularly in the foothills near Nowshera in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Reports of potential gold discoveries circulated on social media, prompting an influx of local mining contractors attempting unauthorized extraction. In response, the Punjab provincial government imposed strict restrictions to prevent illegal mining and unauthorized exploitation of resources (The News International).
For Pakistan to capitalize on this discovery effectively, it will need to implement a robust regulatory framework, ensure transparency in the bidding process, and adopt modern mining technologies to maximize extraction efficiency while minimizing environmental impact.
Strategic Importance and Future Prospects
While the discovery is promising, its long-term economic impact will depend on how efficiently the government and private sector collaborate to develop mining infrastructure, attract investments, and ensure compliance with international mining standards. If executed successfully, Pakistan could establish itself as a key player in the regional gold mining industry.
As the country moves forward with its extraction plans, the coming months will be crucial in determining whether this discovery translates into tangible economic gains or remains an untapped resource.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
29-05-2025
- Kuwait Times
India, Pakistan drone battles mark new arms race in Asia
Nuclear rivals to invest large sums in drones NEW DELHI: A little after 8:00 pm on May 8, red flares streaked through the night sky over the northern Indian city of Jammu as its air-defense systems opened fire on drones from neighboring Pakistan. The Indian and Pakistani militaries have deployed high-end fighter jets, conventional missiles and artillery during decades of clashes, but the four days of fighting in May marked the first time New Delhi and Islamabad utilized unmanned aerial vehicles at scale against each other. The fighting halted after the US announced it brokered a ceasefire but the South Asian powers, which spent more than $96 billion on defense last year, are now locked in a drones arms race, according to Reuters' interviews with 15 people, including security officials, industry executives and analysts in the two countries. Two of them said they expect increased use of UAVs by the nuclear-armed neighbors because small-scale drone attacks can strike targets without risking personnel or provoking uncontrollable escalation. India plans to invest heavily in local industry and could spend as much as $470 million on UAVs over the next 12 to 24 months, roughly three times pre-conflict levels, said Smit Shah of Drone Federation India, which represents over 550 companies and regularly interacts with the government. The previously unreported forecast, which came as India this month approved roughly $4.6 billion in emergency military procurement funds, was corroborated by two other industry executives. The Indian military plans to use some of that additional funding on combat and surveillance drones, according to two Indian officials familiar with the matter. Defense procurement in India tends to involve years of bureaucratic processes but officials are now calling drone makers in for trials and demonstrations at an unprecedented pace, said Vishal Saxena, a vice president at Indian UAV firm ideaForge Technology The Pakistan Air Force, meanwhile, is pushing to acquire more UAVs as it seeks to avoid risking its high-end aircraft, said a Pakistani source familiar with the matter. Pakistan and India both deployed cutting-edge generation 4.5 fighter jets during the latest clashes but cash-strapped Islamabad only has about 20 high-end Chinese-made J-10 fighters compared to the three dozen Rafales that Delhi can muster. Pakistan is likely to build on existing relationships to intensify collaboration with China and Turkey to advance domestic drone research and production capabilities, said Oishee Majumdar of defense intelligence firm Janes. Islamabad is relying on a collaboration between Pakistan's National Aerospace Science and Technology Park and Turkish defense contractor Baykar that locally assembles the YIHA-III drone, the Pakistani source said, adding a unit could be produced domestically in between two to three days. Pakistan's military declined to respond to Reuters' questions. The Indian defense ministry and Baykar did not return requests for comment. India and Pakistan 'appear to view drone strikes as a way to apply military pressure without immediately provoking large-scale escalation,' said King's College London political scientist Walter Ladwig III. 'UAVs allow leaders to demonstrate resolve, achieve visible effects, and manage domestic expectations — all without exposing expensive aircraft or pilots to danger,' he added. But such skirmishes are not entirely risk-free, and Ladwig noted that countries could also send UAVs to attack contested or densely populated areas where they might not previously have used manned platforms. Drone swarms and vintage guns The fighting in May, which was the fiercest in this century between the neighbors, came after an April 22 militant attack in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly Indian tourists. Delhi blamed the killings on 'terrorists' backed by Islamabad, which denied the charge. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowed revenge and Delhi on May 7 launched air strikes on what it described as 'terrorist infrastructure' in Pakistan. The next night, Pakistan sent hordes of drones along a 1,700-kilometer (772-mile) front with India, with between 300 and 400 of them pushing in along 36 locations to probe Indian air defences, Indian officials have said. Pakistan depended on Turkish-origin YIHA-III and Asisguard Songar drones, as well as the Shahpar-II UAV produced domestically by the state-owned Global Industrial & Defense Solutions conglomerate, according to two Pakistani sources. But much of this drone deployment was cut down by Cold War-era Indian anti-aircraft guns that were rigged to modern military radar and communication networks developed by state-run Bharat Electronics, according to two Indian officials. A Pakistan source denied that large numbers of its drones were shot down on May 8, but India did not appear to sustain significant damage from that drone raid. India's use of the anti-aircraft guns, which had not been designed for anti-drone-warfare, turned out to be surprisingly effective, said retired Indian Brig Anshuman Narang, now an UAV expert at Delhi's Centre for Joint Warfare Studies. 'Ten times better than what I'd expected,' he said. India also sent Zionist HAROP, Polish WARMATE and domestically-produced UAVs into Pakistani airspace, according to one Indian and two Pakistan sources. Some of them were also used for precision attacks on what two Indian officials described as military and militant infrastructure. The two Pakistani security sources confirmed that India deployed a large number of the HAROPs - a long-range loitering munition drone manufactured by Israel Aerospace Industries. Such UAVs, also known as suicide drones, stay over a target before crashing down and detonating on impact. Pakistan set up decoy radars in some areas to draw in the HAROPs, or waited for their flight time to come towards its end, so that they fell below 3,000 feet and could be shot down, a third Pakistani source said. Both sides claim to have notched victories in their use of UAVs. India successfully targeted infrastructure within Pakistan with minimal risk to personnel or major platforms, said KCL's Ladwig. For Pakistan's military, which claimed to have struck Indian defense facilities with UAVs, drone attacks allow it to signal action while drawing less international scrutiny than conventional methods, he noted. Cheap but with Achilles heel Despite the loss of many drones, both sides are doubling down. 'We're talking about relatively cheap technology,' said Washington-based South Asia expert Michael Kugelman. 'And while UAVs don't have the shock and awe effect of missiles and fighter jets, they can still convey a sense of power and purpose for those that launch them.' Indian defense planners are likely to expand domestic development of loitering munitions UAVs, according to an Indian security source and Sameer Joshi of Indian UAV maker NewSpace, which is deepening its research and development on such drones. 'Their ability to loiter, evade detection, and strike with precision marked a shift toward high-value, low-cost warfare with mass produced drones,' said Joshi, whose firm supplies the Indian military. — Reuters And firms like ideaForge, which has supplied over 2,000 UAVs to the Indian security forces, are also investing on enhancing the ability of its drones to be less vulnerable to electronic warfare, said Saxena. Another vulnerability that is harder to address is the Indian drone program's reliance on hard-to-replace components from China, an established military partner of Pakistan, four Indian dronemakers and officials said. India continues to depend on China-made magnets and lithium for UAV batteries, said Drone Federation India's Shah. 'Weaponization of the supply chain is also an issue,' said ideaForge's Saxena on the possibility of Beijing shutting the tap on components in certain situations. For instance, Chinese restrictions on the sale of drones and components to Ukraine have weakened Kyiv's ability to produce critical combat drones, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank. A spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry said in response to Reuters' questions that Beijing has always implemented export controls on dual-use items in accordance with domestic laws and regulations as well as its international obligations. 'Diversification of supply chain is a medium to long term problem,' said Shah. 'You can't solve it in short term.'- Reuters
Kuwait Times
19-05-2025
- Kuwait Times
India curbs imports from Bangladesh through land ports
DHAKA: Garment workers sewing clothes at a Snowtex Group textile factory in Dhamrai, a sub-district in Dhaka. - AFP DHAKA: India's commerce ministry announced restrictions on some imports from Bangladesh via its land borders, prompting fears for the South Asian country's export-reliant economy. Relations between the two countries have deteriorated after former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina — a long-term New Delhi ally — was ousted last year, and fled to India where she is currently living in self-imposed exile. New Delhi announced late Saturday that ready-made garments from Bangladesh cannot be imported through land borders, while some other goods — including cotton, processed foods and wooden furniture — have been barred from at least six entry points in northeast India. The announcement came a month after Bangladesh banned yarn imports from New Delhi through the same land routes. The latest move is a 'big threat', Bangladeshi conglomerate Pran-RFL Group, which exports around $60 million of goods annually to India, told AFP. 'India is the largest market for Pran-RFL Group's processed foods, plastic products, furniture, and PVC-finished goods,' director Kamruzzaman Kamal said. 'With the latest restrictions, almost every category of our products are getting affected. This is a big threat for the company and the country as well,' Kamal said, urging a bilateral solution with India. The textile industry would be temporarily affected by the move, said Rakibul Alam Chowdhury of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association. Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association president Mohammad Hatem also denounced the tit-for-tat move by New Delhi, adding that border trade would 'face a blow'. However, he believed that garment exporters 'will be able to cover up the impact'. The government in Dhaka told AFP it had not been officially informed of the latest restrictions. 'We haven't received any official copy of notification. Once we get the documents and then we can come up with our decision after going through it,' said Ministry of Commerce advisor Sheikh Bashir Uddin. Bangladesh imported around $9 billion worth of goods from India in the last 10 months of the 2024 financial year, while exports to India stood at $1.51 billion, according to Bangladesh Bank and Export Promotion Bureau data. At the start of April, India cancelled a 2020 transshipment deal that allowed Bangladesh to export cargo to third countries via Indian land borders. — AFP
Kuwait Times
11-05-2025
- Kuwait Times
Walmart turns to India to avoid high tariffs, but garment workers scarce
American retailers ramp up queries to India apparel hub TIRUPPUR, India/DHAKA, Bangladesh: In a garment hub in south India, R K Sivasubramaniam is fielding requests from Walmart and Costco who want to sidestep higher US tariffs faced by rival Asian suppliers, Bangladesh and China. But rows of idle sewing lines at his factory lay bare his biggest challenge. 'Even if orders come, we need labor. We don't have sufficient labor,' said the managing director of Raft Garments which supplies underwear and t-shirts priced as low as $1 to US brands. Considered India's knitwear capital, Tiruppur city in the southern state of Tamil Nadu accounts for nearly one-third of the country's $16 billion in apparel exports, and is staring at a huge opportunity as US buyers explore ramping up sourcing from India in the face of heftier tariffs on other Asian hubs. US President Donald Trump plans to hit India, the world's sixth largest textile and apparel exporter, with a 26 percent tariff from July, below the 37 percent imposed on Bangladesh, 46 percent on Vietnam and 145 percent on China - all of which are bigger American suppliers. Those tariffs will make apparel from India much more competitive with both Bangladesh and China. But the mood is somber at the Tiruppur textile park as it faces a reality check: India's hopes of capitalizing on its tariff advantage are hindered by a skilled labor crunch, limited economies of scale, and high costs. Raft Garments wants to expand production to tackle new orders but is importing high-end machines to automate some stitching processes, given the business for now heavily depends on migrant labor, which is very tough to find or retain. Garment exporters in India say workers have to be trained and many leave within months to work at smaller, unorganized units that allow longer hours and pay more. The larger manufacturers can't match them due to foreign clients' requirements on cost and workers' conditions, according to Reuters interviews with 10 manufacturers and apparel exporter trade groups representing 9,000 businesses. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has for years courted foreign investors to his 'Make in India' program to turn the South Asian nation into a global manufacturing hub. A shortage of skilled workers in a nation where 90 percent of the labor force operates in the informal sector is seen as a big roadblock, especially in labor-intensive sectors like garments. Tiruppur offers a glimpse of India's labor strain. 'We need at least 100,000 workers,' said Kumar Duraiswamy of the exporters association in Tiruppur, where he said more than 1 million people currently work. Modi's government last year said it was extending a program to specifically train 300,000 people in textile-related skills, including garment making. In the textile hub, some have taken matters into their own hands. Amid a hum of sewing machines at the Cotton Blossom factory, which makes 1.2 million garments a month, including for American sporting goods retailer Bass Pro Shops, Naveen Micheal John said he has set up three centers thousands of miles away to train and source migrant workers. And even then, most return to their home towns after a few months. 'We skill them there for three months, then they are here for seven months. Then they return back,' John said during a tour of his garment unit, adding he wants to look at other states where labor and government incentives both may be better. China's $16.5 billion worth of apparel exports, Vietnam's $14.9 billion and Bangladesh's $7.3 billion made them the three biggest suppliers to America in 2024, when India shipped goods worth $4.7 billion, according to US government data. US companies have for years been diversifying their supply chains beyond China amid geopolitical tensions. And even before the news of tariffs in April, now paused until July, Bangladesh's garment industry began losing its sheen amid political turmoil there. A survey of 30 leading US apparel brands by the United States Fashion Industry Association showed India had emerged as the most popular sourcing hub in 2024, with nearly 60 percent of respondents planning to expand sourcing from there. With the tariffs, India's exports would cost $4.31 per square metre of apparel, compared with $4.24 for Bangladesh and $4.35 for China, a sharp improvement on India's competitiveness without the levies, according to Reuters calculations based on 2024 import data from the US Office of Textiles and Apparel. But it's in the economies of scale where India loses. Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association says an average garment factory there has at least 1,200 workers, whereas in India, according to its Apparel Export Promotion Council, there are only 600 to 800. 'Bangladesh capacities are huge ... We have issues of capacity constraint, lack of economy of scale due to smaller size of factories, labor unavailability during peak seasons,' said Mithileshwar Thakur of the Indian trade group. To address those challenges, garment makers have started to set up factories in states where migrant workers come from, he said. In Tiruppur, its exports association says the largest 100 exporters contributed 50 percent of its $5 billion sales last fiscal year, with the rest from 2,400 units, a telling sign of the fragmented and largely smaller-scale operations. Raft makes 12 million garment pieces a year with a workforce of just 250 people. A US client is close to placing an order for 3 million units, which will stretch the factory to its limit and force it to consider expansion. 'This one order is more than enough for us,' said Sivasubramaniam. – Reuters
