Energy budget: revenue first, reform later
An 18 percent sales tax on imported solar panels is the most consequential step. Imports of solar panels crossed $2 billion last year, and this new measure is expected to generate a hefty Rs110–130 billion in additional revenue. That's a sizeable chunk, especially as the government eyes solar not just for green credentials but also as a tool to ease grid pressure and lower average tariffs in the long run. This is less about slowing the solar boom and more about monetising it smartly—provided it doesn't dampen momentum.
Meanwhile, the budget also quietly confirms the removal of the ceilingon the Debt Service Surcharge (DSS), previously capped at 10 percent of the national average electricity tariff. With the government doubling down on additional bank borrowingto tackle the mounting circular debt stock, electricity consumers are now locked into paying the DSS for at least six more years—and not just at 10 percent, but potentially more, if required. It's a stealth tax that refuses to go away, now permanently baked into monthly bills. Some may still call it reform. But it is anything but.
On the subsidy front, power sector allocations have been trimmed modestly, down from Rs1.19 trillion to Rs1.03 trillion. It's aligned with IMF conditionalities and hints at an upcoming base tariff hike in July, given the reduced inter-DISCO tariff differential.
But there's a rub: the budget includes a Rs400 billion lump sum power subsidy, the same as last year. That raises questions about how the government intends to continue the Rs1.71/unit relief throughout FY26, which in FY25 was only covered for three months. Unless there's a mid-year revision, the math doesn't add up.
One possible answer? The Petroleum Levy (PL). Budgeted at Rs1.47 trillion, it's up by Rs207 billion. Historically, the government has linked PL proceeds to funding power subsidies, and on paper, the math could work. But it's an optimistic call.
The new Carbon Levy—Rs2.5/litre on petrol, diesel, and furnace oil—might fetch around Rs50 billion at best. That leaves the bulk of the PL target dependent on keeping petrol and HSD levies around Rs87–88/litre on average through the year. That's ambitious, if not outright risky, especially with oil markets as volatile as ever. A mid-year downward revision, like the Rs120 billion cut last year, is not off the table.
Zooming out, the budget reveals the continued tilt toward consumption-based taxation, with energy at the centre. From taxing solar to squeezing PL harder, the budget leans more on revenue extraction than structural fixes. The former may be justifiable; the latter, if pushed too far, could backfire.
Fiscal discipline is a fine goal. But as ever, execution, external prices, and policy coherence will decide whether these bets pay off—or unravel midway.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Scheduled disasters
This year's monsoon has reiterated the 'preconceived notion' that our government has historically let every problem go under the carpet. The floods of 2022 caused unprecedented damage; a stark manifestation of deforestation, mismanagement, and a clear lack of resource allocation. Despite the devolution of the Disaster Management Authorities post the 18th Amendment to the provinces, there has been little or no contingency planning for rain-induced disasters. Those who credited good governance for the last two years' calm may want to reconsider; it was luck, not leadership that spared us. A lack of precipitation simply left our fragile contingency systems unexposed till the worst came. Alas! If only adding words to the Constitution could alleviate the plight of citizens. Article 9-A which was added in October 2024 to the Constitution, was supposed to provide every Pakistani with a 'clean and healthy environment.' Things have shaped up differently though, and the numbers tell a very different tale, with 645 dead and over 900 injured nationwide in monsoon-related disasters since June 26, including 327 deaths in KP alone over the past week. The NDMA's 2025 Monsoon Infrastructure Guidelines were released on schedule, emphasizing pre-disaster planning. These protocols just seem like a duplication, mimicking guidelines issued from 2022, which themselves echoed 2020's version. One might conclude that disaster management, like much else, has merely been reduced to an annual copy-paste exercise. Supreme Court Justice Mansoor Ali Shah said in July that delays in climate reforms endanger citizens' fundamental rights under Article 9-A, noting that climate finance is essential to upholding rights to life and dignity. Parliament had already responded by passing Article 9-A. The floods arrived anyway apparently unaware of their 'unconstitutionality'. So unconstitutional, in fact, that they claimed even those attempting rescue operations—a government helicopter crashed in Mohmand during relief efforts, killing five crew members. A day of mourning was announced for those who died trying to save others from our scheduled catastrophes. In May this year, the IMF approved a $1.4 billion climate loan to help Pakistan build resilience to natural disasters through 'strengthening public investment processes' and 'improving coordination'. Interestingly, just two months after the loan's approval, tourists were being swept away on Babusar Road in July. As of now, there have been five dead, fifteen missing after a cloudburst that everyone saw coming except those responsible for seeing it coming. The search for missing tourists along the Babusar Highway concluded after fourteen days with funeral prayers held in absentia, proving that our rescue operations, like our monsoons, operate on their own precarious schedules. The coordination between the loan's approval and its implementation appears to have encountered familiar delays. As of Aug 16, 2025, no funds under the IMF's climate facility have been disbursed; the May release was from the EFF, not the RSF. For those seeking more tangible evidence of our progress, consider the multi-million-dollar early warning system installed in the Bagrot Valley under the UNDP-funded GLOF-II Project. On August 2nd, when a glacier burst killed a 10-year-old boy and injured his father, the system reiterated the government's inefficiency and played its part by remaining silent, according to local reporting; official confirmation is pending. The Shishper Glacier, apparently unimpressed by our warning systems, produced its most severe outburst since 2018 on August 11th, giving communities a preview of worse to come. Opposition leaders, ever ungrateful, have alleged 'large-scale corruption' in such protection projects, which brings to light why we installed this expensive system in the first place? District Disaster Management Authorities, according to recent reports, remain 'inactive or under-resourced until emergencies strike.' They operate, it seems, on an as-needed basis; the need being determined by media attention a lot more than weather forecasts. When floods arrive, meetings are convened, leaves are cancelled, and officials coordinate rescue efforts from their offices. In Buner district, where Pishwanay village was 'almost entirely wiped out', according to officials, the coordination presumably happened after the wiping out was complete. In Layyah, our revered engineering feats have set new records, albeit in the wrong direction. A newly-constructed bridge embankment, engineered to modern standards, surrendered to a mere ~300,000 cusecs of water. Local residents vividly recalled how the same area weathered ~800,000 to 1,000,000 cusecs in 2010 without incident. Progress, it appears, flows backward in Punjab. Thousands have relocated to what a report delicately termed 'under the sky'; our most democratic housing scheme yet. Punjab allocated Rs 795 billion for 'Climate Resilient' infrastructure. Gilgit-Baltistan has already accumulated Rs 20 billion in damages; an impressive national return on investment by any standard. The KP government has now allocated Rs 1.5 billion for rescue and relief, plus another Rs 1.5 billion for infrastructure restoration—money that will presumably prepare us for next year's scheduled surprise. The Prime Minister visited the National Emergencies Operation Centre. Conferences, as usual, were held. Amid this red tap-ism, the Babusar cloudburst destroyed a wheat depot, a girls' school, four bridges, and two mosques. The Met Department continues issuing warnings about heavy rains triggering floods in areas where heavy rains have always triggered floods. They've now warned Balochistan to prepare for monsoon rains from August 18-22, giving authorities ample time to not prepare. Local authorities monitor low-lying areas for potential urban flooding, though the monitoring rarely translates into prevention. Our cities' drainage systems, designed for smaller populations and simpler times, remain overwhelmed by entirely predictable monsoon patterns. The pattern of development continues unabated. Houses are built in riverbeds, environmental assessments are circumvented, and natural waterways are treated as prime real estate. When the inevitable occurs, we discuss the unprecedented nature of these very precedented disasters. In Hassanabad, where residents dismantled 10 houses pre-emptively to save them from glacial floods, we've achieved a new milestone: citizens conducting their own disaster management through architectural self-destruction. The Tarbela Dam situation illustrates our approach perfectly. Water levels approaching capacity are treated as breaking news rather than basic hydrology. We await flood waves with the surprise of those who've never consulted a calendar, despite monsoons arriving with metronomic regularity. Pakistan has become remarkably efficient at securing international assistance for disasters we're remarkably inefficient at preventing. Of the $10.99 billion pledged after the 2022 floods, we've received only $2.8 billion; just enough to ensure we'll need more pledges after the next scheduled catastrophe. Pakistan has entered 24 IMF arrangements since 1958. At current rates, we may soon have more climate loans than climate policies, more disaster frameworks than functional drains, more constitutional articles than rescued citizens. The poor, as always, bear the highest cost. They build where they can afford to build, knowing the risks because they have no alternatives. When floods come, they lose what little they have while committees debate what went wrong; the same things that went wrong last time, and the time before. In Mansehra's Dehri Haleem village, 27 souls discovered this truth when a cloudburst arrived precisely where cloudbursts have always arrived. Real solutions exist but require what we seem incapable of: sustained attention beyond crisis cycles, enforcement of existing laws, and recognition that annual disasters treated annually as surprises are neither natural nor inevitable. They are choices, made repeatedly, with predictable consequences. Our new constitutional right to a clean and healthy environment currently includes the right to drown in predictable floods, collapse with substandard housing, and wait for rescue operations that begin after the damage is done. The environment may not be clean or healthy, but it is certainly constitutional. Perhaps next year will be different. Perhaps the guidelines will be implemented, the drains will be cleared, and the warnings will be heeded. Or perhaps we'll reconvene to discuss the unprecedented nature of the monsoon that arrives, as it always has, right on schedule. With the PMD continuing to forecast heavy rainfall across the upper and central regions, one suspects divine intervention may be our most reliable disaster management strategy yet. After all, in Pakistan, some traditions are worth preserving. Even the deadly ones. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
CPEC debt relief: No free pass
The fate of the Rs1,275 billion power sector circular debt settlement—through refinancing the amount by 18 banks to disburse to the companies in the power sector chain, including Chinese IPPs—is contingent upon Chinese government approval. Authorities are hoping the PM will get the green light during his upcoming visit to China. The plan has been approved by the IMF on the assumption that all Late Payment Surcharges (LPS) will be waived. One of the reasons the Fund approved the plan is that it includes a form of rescheduling (or reprofiling) of the power sector debt within CPEC. However, if the Chinese do not agree, chances are the IMF may not entertain any revised plan that excludes the waiving of Chinese LPS. The Chinese may be reluctant to accept this based on optics. If they allow CPEC loans to be altered, it could set a precedent for the 50-odd other countries under the BRI to ask for relief. Some people say the Chinese may do it for us, as they have done some reprofiling in the case of nuclear power plants (K2 and K3 loans). However, that is a different story, as K2 and K3 are not part of CPEC. Thus, the widespread view is that the Chinese may not accept the proposal, based on optics, to avoid setting the wrong precedent for other borrowing countries. However, if we get lucky and China agrees to waive full (or partial) LPS, this may come with new—and perhaps harsher—conditions, IMF-style, which will be non-negotiable in the future. The question is what type of conditions the Chinese may apply, and whether these will be acceptable for us. Sources close to the Chinese say that one requirement could be to open a revolving account for IPPs under CPEC. This would ensure timely payment of all capacity charges going forward, and in case of non-compliance, it might effectively be treated as a default on due payments. This would mean invoices generated for August 2025 payments must be released within October 2025 to avoid any further delay and prevent additional LPS going forward. In effect, no new circular debt would be created in the future. That would be a tough condition, and given history, it is difficult to commit to payments for the next 10–20 years. If that happens, the Chinese may start repatriating dividends in large chunks. That would be different from the current situation, where IPPs get unsecured credit against pending payments. There could also be a second condition on the upfront tariff, as well as requirements to ensure the security of Chinese nationals in Pakistan. Sources say that even with all these conditions, the Chinese may, at best, accept a 50 percent waiver—against the government's wish for 100 percent. And if the government delays any payment in the future, the waived LPS could become part of the due payments. That is a slippery slope, as China must keep the overall BRI in mind during negotiations. There will be no carte blanche. Fingers crossed.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
IMF seeks changes to SBP Act
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has asked Pakistan to remove the finance secretary from the board of the central bank and also recommended amending another law to take away the federal government's authority to order inspections of commercial banks. The global lender has further asked Islamabad to immediately fill two vacant positions of deputy governors at the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). Sources said the IMF has recommended another amendment to the SBP Act to remove the finance secretary from the board of directors. This would be the second attempt to exclude the federal secretary in the past three years. The IMF's recommendations, part of the Governance and Corruption Diagnosis Mission report, appear aimed at completely ending federal government oversight, despite the government being the 100% shareholder of the SBP. In 2022, under IMF pressure, the government gave absolute autonomy to the SBP and removed the finance secretary's voting rights on the board. According to the existing law, the finance secretary is a board member "without the right to vote." Key decisions such as exchange rate determination or interest rate setting are not made by the SBP board but by the monetary policy committee. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said on Monday that the government has no role in setting interest rates, which fall under SBP's mandate. He added that the exchange rate would continue to be determined by the market. The rupee on Monday further appreciated to Rs182 to a dollar. Aurangzeb said the IMF's review mission would soon arrive under the ongoing 37-month programme. The mission is expected in the third week of September for talks on the third loan tranche of $1 billion. The IMF has argued that removing the vote-less secretary from the SBP board would further strengthen independence at an already highly autonomous central bank. However, sources said the government has not yet accepted the IMF's recommendation, and discussions remain open. The SBP board includes the governor and eight non-executive directors, with at least one from each province. The board oversees SBP operations, administration, and management and has full access to the bank's activities. The IMF has also recommended that Pakistan publish the reasons for the removal of governors, deputy governors, non-executive directors, and monetary policy committee members, sources added. The lender has also pressed for immediately filling the two vacant deputy governor posts to ensure collective decision-making at the central bank. Of three sanctioned positions, only one is filled. Saleem Ullah is currently deputy governor for finance, inclusion, and innovation. No regular deputy governor is in place for the most important matters including banking, exchange rate, and monetary policy etc. Former deputy governor Dr Inayat Husain has been serving in an acting capacity since his tenure ended in November last year. His dual nationality has created hurdles in his reappointment. The prime minister has already constituted a committee to explore amending the law to allow dual nationals to serve as deputy governors. The finance ministry had earlier suggested several amendments to the SBP Act, including one allowing dual nationals to be appointed deputy governors. The law ministry has already vetted the proposals. By law, deputy governors must be appointed by the federal government after consultation between the finance minister and the SBP governor, from a panel of three candidates recommended by the governor in order of merit. Sources said the name of Nadeem Lodhi had been finalised for one of the two vacant posts, but cabinet approval has not yet been secured. The SBP law requires that vacancies for governor, deputy governors, non-executive directors, and external members of the monetary policy committee be filled within 30 days. The federal government is in violation of this requirement. The IMF has now recommended that such positions should never remain vacant for extended periods. Sources said the IMF has also suggested amending the Banking Companies Ordinance of 1962 to end the federal government's power to instruct the SBP to inspect commercial banks. The proposal is aimed at ensuring further independence for the central bank. Section 40 of the Banking Companies Ordinance currently states that the SBP may, at any time, and on being directed by the federal government, must inspect any banking company and its accounts.
