Planning bill is sowing division, says Tory MP
Mid Bedfordshire MP Blake Stephenson said Labour's Planning and Infrastructure Bill was a "government narrative of builders v blockers - I think that's putting the back up of communities".
The bill was introduced in March to help fulfil a promise of building 1.5 million homes in England in the next five years.
Rachel Hopkins, Labour MP for Luton South and South Bedfordshire, said local people would "have their say" over planned development.
The two MPs spoke to the BBC Politics East programme from London Luton Airport, after the government gave the go-ahead for expanding the terminal earlier this year.
It is a part of the region where the challenges of growth and a changing economy are big talking points.
Car maker Stellantis closed the town's Vauxhall factory in March, but over towards Bedford, Universal plans to open a giant theme park and the construction of East West rail promises to pave the way for more housebuilding.
Stephenson welcomed plans for the Universal theme park and the need for new homes, but added: "We do need to take communities along with us.
"We need the right types of house in the right places."
He continued: "If people know the infrastructure is there as their communities expand they are going to get on board.
"The builders v blockers argument may well set the government back on its target to build 1.5 million homes."
Hopkins responded: "We need to make sure there is a local contribution and people have their say but ultimately we need the homes and we need to build them and that will support our economic growth with investment in construction, good jobs [and] skills training.
"And we need to get on with it."
The airport falls inside Hopkins's constituency, and she said the aviation hub would help support a growing population: "Luton airport is a part of the growth of Bedfordshire as a destination.
"Luton has brilliant transport links that are going to be further improved."
East West Rail's director of external affairs, Natalie Wheble, said its plan for a train line between Cambridge and Oxford - going through Bedfordshire - would provide an "efficient and sustainable" transport link for people.
Rob Brighouse, director of business investment company Luton Rising, said Luton was yet to "achieve its potential" due to its location in the centre of the "Oxford-Cambridge-London triangle".
Angelina Aziz, the co-founder of an artificial intelligence company in Luton, said more investment was needed to support start-up companies and new high-tech firms in the area.
"A lot of our best talent in Luton tends to move to London. We need more investment," she said.
The airport plans have been controversial and opposed by the Stop Luton Airport Expansion group (SLAE).
Peter White, of SLAE, has been sceptical about the number of jobs the airport says the expansion will create.
He has previously told the BBC the "quality of life" of people who live near the airport will be damaged by the project.
Lord John Hutton, chair of the board of London Luton Airport, said: "We've got a once in a generation opportunity to do something pretty amazing here and provide an economic lifeline for the town.
"The airport sustains and supports about 27,000 in the local economy. After expansion that number will be approaching 40,000.
"The whole focus is to get moving on this as quickly as we can to bring the economic and social benefits of expansion to Luton."
BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday 13 July at 10:00 GMT on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC iPlayer.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Plan to make it easier for councils to seize land for housing
Planning reforms will end development chaos, says Rayner
London Luton Airport
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Inter Milan Aims to Land €70M-Rated Arsenal, Tottenham Star With PSG Clause
Earlier this year, PSG sold Xavi Simons to RB Leipzig, and the Dutch midfielder has been drawing interest this summer from several Premier League clubs, including Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur. Fabrizio Romano previously reported that Leipzig paid €80 million for Simons, with €55 million paid upfront. The 22-year-old signed a contract through June 2027, and PSG included a sell-on clause in the deal. CaughtOffside reported Saturday, citing sources, that Simons is available this summer for around €60 million and is open to moving to the Premier League. Early talks have already started about a possible move to London, with Arsenal, Chelsea, and Tottenham Hotspur all being considered as potential destinations for the Netherlands international. Will Inter Milan secure former PSG standout?Tuttomercatoweb's Marco Conterio reported on Monday that Inter Milan are looking for a big signing in attack, and Ademola Lookman of Atalanta is not the only target: there has been direct contact, and talks are still ongoing between sporting director Piero Ausilio and the super agent Ali Barat. Simons' contract expires in two seasons, and RB Leipzig would prefer not to keep him until one year before expiration, so a sale is possible now to avoid losing a valuable asset. On Monday, Sky Sport Germany's Florian Plettenberg shared that Chelsea will hold more talks with Simons' representatives tonight. The club is very interested and eager to secure a verbal agreement. RB Leipzig is open to selling Simons but wants a total package of at least €70 million. Chelsea, meanwhile, hopes to negotiate a lower fee. If the deal with Chelsea falls through, other clubs are ready to make their move.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Archer Aviation Stock Plummeted Today
Key Points A judge ruled that a shareholder lawsuit related to Archer's SPAC merger will proceed. Stellantis, a major backer of Archer, reported preliminary numbers showing a $2.68 billion loss for the first half of the year. 10 stocks we like better than Archer Aviation › Shares of Archer Aviation (NYSE: ACHR) fell on Monday, finishing the day down 10.9%. The drop came as the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) and Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) both gained modestly. A judge ruled that a lawsuit against the company, which develops electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft, can move forward. At the same time, Stellantis, a major backer of Archer, reported poor preliminary numbers for its upcoming quarter. Archer must face a shareholder suit When Archer went public, it did so using a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC). A lawsuit by shareholders of the company alleges that Archer, investor Ken Moelis, and other architects of the SPAC merger misrepresented the value of shares and misled shareholders as to how far along the company was in developing its aircraft. The Delaware Chancery Court on Monday allowed the suit to continue, and Archer now must defend itself against the allegations. Stellantis is in hot water A major backer of Archer, automotive giant Stellantis, released preliminary numbers ahead of its upcoming earnings report. The company expects a $2.68 billion loss for the first half of the year, and the company maintained its suspension of issuing any guidance, citing tariff uncertainty. The poor numbers peaked investor fear that the company might lose interest in Archer as it attempts to cut costs. While the space Archer is in is fascinating, I think that its competitor, Joby Aviation, is in a much better position to win the race to be first to market. Furthermore, Joby's relationship with Toyota -- a brand known for quality, reliability, and efficiency -- is a major advantage. Should you buy stock in Archer Aviation right now? Before you buy stock in Archer Aviation, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Archer Aviation wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Archer Aviation Stock Plummeted Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Records reveal how Palace tried to secure show of support for a new royal yacht
Backstairs manoeuvring by Buckingham Palace officials as ministers agonised over whether to order a replacement for the Royal Yacht Britannia is laid bare in newly released official files. By 1993 it was apparent that, after 39 years, Britannia was reaching the end of its life, but John Major's Conservative government had yet to decide whether to invest in a new yacht at an estimated cost of £50 million. It was widely thought Queen Elizabeth II strongly favoured the commissioning of a new yacht but the royal family could not afford to be seen to be trying to influence political decision-making. However files released by the National Archives at Kew, west London, show that senior courtiers privately approached No 10 to see if the prime minister would make a Commons statement stressing Britannia's 'inestimable value' to the nation. But the plan – which amounted to a thinly veiled show of support for a new yacht – was scotched by the Cabinet Office, which warned that any such comments would be highly 'prejudicial'. One senior official noted caustically that a claim by the Palace that the Queen was 'indifferent' as to the outcome of a review of the yacht's future 'hardly rings true'. The issue of a new yacht came at an extremely difficult time for the government and for the Palace, with support for the royals at a low ebb. There had been an angry public backlash the previous year when ministers announced the taxpayer would pick up the bill – which eventually ran to £36 million – for the restoration of Windsor Castle following a catastrophic fire. In the aftermath of her 'annus horribilis' – which also saw the separation of Charles and Diana – the Queen agreed that she would for the first time pay taxes. With Mr Major due to announce the historic move in a statement to parliament, the Queen's private secretary Sir Robert Fellowes saw an opportunity to secure what would amount to a show of support for a new yacht. He asked the prime minister's principal private secretary Alex Allan if Mr Major would insert a passage referring to the importance of Britannia as well as the Queen's flight and the royal train. He suggested the prime minister should tell MPs that it was not just a question of cost 'but also the style in which we wish our head of state and members of the royal family to represent us' in their public duties. 'It is always difficult to put a price on prestige but I have no doubt that over the years these items have been of inestimable value to this country.' Sir Robin's proposed addition to Mr Major's statement went on: 'I would also like to make clear that there is not, and never has been, any pressure from the Queen to build a replacement for HMY Britannia. 'Should the government decide it is in the national interest for the yacht to be replaced that would be of course another matter.' However, Nicolas Bevan, the official heading the working group set up to consider the future of the yacht, warned that the proposed remarks could be 'prejudicial' to any future decisions. 'For example to say that the royal yacht has been of inestimable value to this country will not be a helpful remark if ministers in due course decide not to replace Britannia,' he said. 'Equally it hardly rings true to suggest that it is a matter of complete indifference to the Queen as to whether Britannia is replaced or not.' Despite the palace's protestations of neutrality, the files suggest courtiers were involved in what amounted to some none too subtle lobbying on behalf of a new yacht. On May 13 1993, senior government officials, led by the cabinet secretary Sir Robin Butler, were invited to a 'splendid lunch' on board Britannia where they were regaled by the former lord mayor of London, Sir Hugh Bidwell, and the Earl of Limerick, a senior banker, on the value of the yacht to UK business. Expressing his thanks afterwards to the master of the Queen's household, Major General Sir Simon Cooper, Sir Robin noted that the setting had 'brought home the issues to those involved in a unique way'. However, when news of the meeting leaked out, government press officers were instructed to impress upon journalists – unattributably – that the Queen and royal family were 'not fighting any kind of rearguard action on the yacht'. Despite misgivings over the costs, the Major government finally announced in January 1997 that they would build a replacement yacht if they were returned to power in the general election later that year. The move was however widely interpreted as a desperate attempt to shore up support among wavering Tory voters, and when Labour was swept to power in a landslide they promptly reversed the decision. When Britannia was finally decommissioned – after returning the last governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten, following the handover to China – the Queen, who rarely displayed any emotion in public, was seen to shed a tear.
