
Nuclear tech key to ensure countries achieve energy security: S African Minister at G20 meet
Johannesburg: The use of
nuclear technology
in a country's energy mix is key to its
energy security
, South African Minister for Electricity and Energy Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa said at the second
G20 Energy Transitions Working Group
meeting in Cape Town. The meeting on Wednesday is part of a number of events ahead of the G20 Summit of global leaders later this year to be hosted by South Africa, which holds the G20 Presidency for 2025.
"In the wake of the world aiming to reach net zero by 2050, there has been a return to realism where it is globally accepted that nuclear technology has a huge role to play in the energy mix as a key source to ensure countries achieve their energy security, energy sovereignty, and energy justice in the transition," Ramokgopa said.
The minister said South Africa was giving consideration to reviving its mothballed nuclear energy programme.
"The expansion of the nuclear programme gives South Africa energy security and sovereignty that enables the country to move its economy into a digital era, engage in new research frontiers and take its rightful place amongst leading nations," he said.
Ramokgopa said he is consulting with global experts for advice on reviving South Africa's nuclear build programme amid the global trend for more countries to include nuclear power in their energy mix as they transition to green energy sources. Information gathered would be presented to the South African government.
Ramokgopa said the need for nuclear in South Africa is not an issue, but funding it is.
"There has not been an issue around the need for nuclear, issue is affordability and financial muscle to pay for the upfront capital cost. So, [these experts] will help me answer that question on pace and scale," he said, as he thanked the International Atomic Energy Agency (
IAEA
) for the assistance that they had provided in identifying the global experts.
Ramokgopa admitted that the estimated R60 billion (USD 3.5 billion) required for the revival of nuclear energy in South Africa was unlikely to come from government funds.
He said there was interest though from entities in the US and China to assist in this regard.
IAEA said on its website that this was the second year that it was participating in G20 discussions on nuclear energy after first doing so when Brazil had the presidency in 2024.
"The IAEA engagement this year will include publications tailored to inform the group on topics such as the prospects for nuclear power in Africa and repurposing coal-fired plants with nuclear power such as small modular reactors, as well as participation in the G20 Ministerial Meeting on Energy, set for 23-26 September," the international agency said.
"At a time when energy access and security of supply are issues of global concern, the role of nuclear energy in low carbon, resilient and affordable energy systems remains indispensable," IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said.
"Continuing the work that the IAEA began under the presidency of Brazil, we are now looking forward to working with South Africa," he added.
South Africa has consistently noted that it will champion the cause of the African continent during this year as the first African country to assume the G20 presidency.
"South Africa is pursuing an Africa-wide approach emphasising energy security, a just and inclusive clean energy transition and regional energy cooperation. While South Africa remains the only country on the continent to have nuclear power and aims to expand its programme, several African countries have expressed interest in or are embarking on its introduction," IAEA said.
"Egypt is building four large reactors, and other countries such as Ghana and Kenya are working with the IAEA to establish the necessary infrastructure for a nuclear power programme," it added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Crippled by Op Sindoor strikes, Pak eyeing Germany for air defence upgrades
Rattled by the devastating impact of BrahMos missile strikes during India's Operation Sindoor, Pakistan is now exploring the procurement of a new air defence system to counter future to sources, Islamabad is actively considering the purchase of the IRIS-T SLM air defence system from Germany in a bid to strengthen its aerial shield against India's supersonic cruise missiles, particularly the move comes after Pakistan's existing Chinese-origin air defence systems, including the HQ-9 and HQ-16, failed to detect or intercept Indian missile attacks during the operation. In contrast, the IRIS-T SLM system has demonstrated significant effectiveness in recent combat situations. In Ukraine, where several units were redirected from Egypt due to the ongoing war, the German-made system has reportedly shot down over 60 aerial targets since its deployment last it was said to have successfully intercepted Russian Oniks missiles, which are similar in profile to India's by Diehl Defence, the IRIS-T SLM is known for its modular and compact architecture. Each unit, estimated to cost around USD 200 million, includes radar, an operations centre, and launchers, all mounted on a 20-foot interest in the system highlights its urgent push to rebuild and upgrade its air defence network, particularly after key air bases were damaged by Indian missiles during Operation grappling with a severe economic crisis, Pakistan has raised its defence budget by 18 per cent this year while simultaneously scrapping domestic development projects valued at 1,000 billion Pakistani the past month, the country has secured financial assistance totalling USD 1.8 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to address its fiscal Germany's Diehl Defence, the maker of the IRIS-T SLM, is also involved in a major Indian defence initiative. The company is collaborating with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems on Project 75I, a Rs 70,000 crore programme to build six submarines for the Indian Indian-German collaboration also includes the development of the Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS), which will be integrated into the India's Reliance Defence has announced a partnership to manufacture Vulcano 155mm precision-guided artillery shells domestically. The initiative is expected to generate revenues of approximately Rs 10,000 crore, with over 50 per cent of the components to be produced indigenously.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
City to host national mayoral summit in Oct
Gandhinagar: Ahmedabad will host a 'National Urban Conclave and Mayoral Summit' in mid-Oct this year, where various subjects related to governance of urban local bodies will be discussed by about 150 mayors of the country, along with experts in urban management subjects. State govt sources said that the summit is being organized on Oct 15 and 16 to commemorate the 150th birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, who served as president of the Ahmedabad municipality over a century ago. The conclave will be themed on 'Let us Unite Together to Innovate, Lead and Transform', sources said. Sources involved in planning of the event said that sessions of the conclave will include rethinking planning and governance frameworks, encouraging climate resilient development, catalysing digital urban features, main-streaming women and youth in urban development, redefining city investment and climate finance. Sources said that over the recent past, Ahmedabad has implemented modernisation projects while maintaining its cultural legacy. Major projects such as the Sabarmati Riverfront development, multimodal transport hub (BRTS, AMTS and Metro), Smart City initiatives, urban greening, sports and cultural activities, and high-quality infrastructure, have been undertaken, sources said. Ahmedabad also hosted the sixth cycle of Urban 20 (U20) 2023, one of the 11 engagement groups under G20. During India's G20 presidency, U20 India collaborated with global cities to create a roadmap for transformative urban impact and narrowing gaps between policy and implementation across governance levels. During the U20 Mayoral Summit, the state govt released the Ahmedabad Climate Resilient City Action Plan: Towards a Net Zero Future by 2070. A heritage walk, visit to the Sabarmati Riverfront and Atal Bridge, and a visit to GIFT City are also being planned as part of the two-day conclave, sources said.


The Wire
5 hours ago
- The Wire
Eight Times Trump Made Claims that Undermined India But Wasn't Really Rebutted by New Delhi
In recent weeks, United States president Donald Trump has made statements that have either contradicted Indian interests or caused embarrassment for prime minister Narendra Modi, particularly in the context of India's sensitive positions on Kashmir, dealing with Pakistan, trade and economic sovereignty. They have either gone against core Indian diplomatic positions or publicly undermined Modi by undercutting his narratives of strength and sovereignty, fuelling domestic criticism and opposition's demands for accountability. 1) Trump's public claim of mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire and Kashmir issue On May 10, he posted on Truth Social: 'After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE. Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' On May 11, he posted on Truth Social: 'I will work with you both to see if, after a 'thousand years,' a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir.' Context: India has long rejected any third-party mediation on Kashmir, considering it a strictly bilateral issue with Pakistan. Trump's repeated public claims of US mediation and willingness to 'work with both' on Kashmir directly contradict India's stated position and diplomatic red lines. These statements made Modi appear weak and being pressured into a ceasefire, in contrast with India's historic resistance to outside intervention under previous prime ministers. 2) Trump's boast about using trade pressure to force India's hand On May 12, 2025, Trump said: 'I said, come on we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys. So, stop it. Stop it and we'll do trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade. Suddenly, they said, ok, we're going to stop. And they have. They did it for a lot of reasons. But trade is a big one. No one has used trade the way I have.' Context: Trump's claim that he used trade threats to force India and Pakistan into a ceasefire portrays Modi as susceptible to US pressure, undermining his image of a strong leader who will stand up for India's strategic autonomy. In the MEA briefing on the following day, the spokesperson when asked about Trump's 'trade assertion' said that till the understanding on cessation of firing and military action on May 10, there were conversations between Indian and US leaders on the evolving military situation and 'the issue of trade did not come up in any of these discussions.' This did not stop Trump from making similar assertions again. 3) Claiming credit for mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire and linking it to trade At the Oval Office of the White House, Trump said during a press conference with the South African president on May 21-22: 'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India. We settled that whole, and I think I settled it through trade.' 'And I said, 'What are you guys doing?' Somebody had to be the last one to shoot. But the shooting was getting worse and worse, bigger and bigger, deeper and deeper into the countries. And we spoke to them, and I think we, you know, I hate to say we got it settled, and then two days later, something happens, and they say it's Trump's fault.' 'But… Pakistan has got some excellent people and some really good, great leader. And India is my friend, Modi… He's a Great guy and I called them both. It's something good.' Context: Trump's repeated public claims of US mediation and linking the ceasefire to trade negotiations directly contradict India's official position and undermine Modi's diplomatic narrative. It negates New Delhi's claim that the ceasefire was negotiated directly between Indian and Pakistani DGMOs. On May 23, the MEA said that it is the government's position that 'any India-Pakistan engagement has to be bilateral' but did not address directly the flaw in Trump's mediation claim. The spokesperson then said: 'At the same time I would like to remind you that talks and terror don't go together. On terrorism itself, as I had said earlier, we are open to discussing the handing over to India of noted terrorists whose list was given to Pakistan some years ago. I would also like to underline that any bilateral discussion on Jammu and Kashmir will only be on the vacation of illegally occupied Indian territory by Pakistan. And on the question of Indus waters treaty, I am again repeating myself, it will remain in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism. As our Prime Minister has said, water and blood cannot flow together; trade and terror also cannot go together. 4) Trump equating India and Pakistan, ignoring terrorism concerns On May 11, Trump said: 'I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great nations.' On May 12-13, in Saudi Arabia, Trump remarked both nations have 'powerful' and 'strong' leaders who might even 'go out and have a nice dinner together.' Context: By publicly equating India and Pakistan and failing to mention the Pahalgam terror attack which India blames on Pakistan, President Trump undermined India's efforts to distinguish itself as a victim of cross-border terrorism. The 'hyphenation' with Pakistan is a diplomatic setback for Modi, since it makes India appear as just another party in a regional dispute rather than a key US partner. Also read: Opp Questions Modi's Silence on US Mediation Claims, Trade Threats in India-Pak Ceasefire 5) Trump again claims credit, equates India and Pakistan On May 22, 2025, Trump said at the Oval Office of the White House: 'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India. We settled that whole, and I think I settled it through trade. And I said, 'What are you guys doing?' Somebody had to be the last one to shoot. But the shooting was getting worse and worse, bigger and bigger, deeper and deeper into the countries. And we spoke to them, and I think we, you know, I hate to say we got it settled, and then two days later, something happens, and they say it's Trump's fault.' 'But… Pakistan has got some excellent people and some really good, great leader. And India is my friend, Modi… He's a Great guy and I called them both. It's something good.' Context: President Trump's continued public credit-taking and his equating of India and Pakistan as 'both great nations with strong leaders' undermined India's efforts to distinguish itself from Pakistan diplomatically and on terrorism issues. 6) Trump's public assertion of India offering zero tariffs under US pressure On May 15, 2025, Trump said during a meeting in Doha: 'It is very hard to sell in India, and they are offering us a deal where basically they are willing to literally charge us no tariffs.' Context: President Trump's public disclosure of India's negotiating position on tariffs, especially the claim of 'literally no tariffs,' puts the Modi government in a difficult spot domestically, as it suggests India is capitulating to US trade demands. 7) Trump publicly opposing Apple's expansion in India On May 15–16, 2025, Trump, in public remarks and during a CNBC interview, said: 'I had a bit of an issue with Tim Cook yesterday. I told, ', you my friend I've treated you very well. You're bringing $500 billion here, but now I hear you're expanding over India I don't want you in India.'' 'We're not interested in you expanding in India; India can handle itself… we want you to produce here.' Context: President Trump's statements criticising Apple's expansion in India and urging the company to manufacture in the US instead of India directly undermine Modi's attempts to position India as a global manufacturing hub, again embarrassing the government's economic strategy. 8) Trump's threat to Apple's 'Make in India' plans On May 23, 2025, Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Context: These remarks directly undermine Modi's flagship 'Make in India' initiative, which aims to attract global manufacturing investment. Trump's threat of a 25% tariff on iPhones made in India for the US market discourages companies from investing in India, undercutting Modi's public claims of success in attracting global manufacturers. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.