
‘Blackhawks hit a home run': Why Jon Cooper thinks Jeff Blashill will succeed in Chicago
Jeff Blashill and Jon Cooper had been friends for years — Cooper still remembers thinking he had made a unique connection the first time they met in 2001 — but they had never worked together. Their paths had always crossed in different ways.
When Blashill wasn't kept on by the Detroit Red Wings as their head coach in 2022, Cooper posed the possibility of Blashill joining his Tampa Bay Lightning staff as an assistant. Cooper thought it could benefit both of them.
Advertisement
'I think there was opportunities to be head coaches in other leagues at other levels,' Cooper recalled Tuesday. 'But my thought at the time was, you know, you have an opportunity to stay in the league and be with a group that you're close with, especially me, that we can grow together and if you learn a little bit, good on you, but at least you're staying in the league. And, yeah, fortunately for us, he did, and he was like fabulous for us.'
Jeff Blashill is here pic.twitter.com/Z7udJYzM0J
— Scott Powers (@ByScottPowers) May 27, 2025
Blashill spent three seasons with Cooper and the Lightning. When Blashill was officially introduced as the Chicago Blackhawks' new head coach Tuesday, he explained why those seasons were so important and influential on him as a coach.
'I think the three years couldn't have worked out better … for me (and) for my own experience,' Blashill said. 'If this (Blackhawks) opportunity came along after year one, I'm not sure. But after year three, I've just had a long time to be down there to see the inner workings. And certainly, Coop is one of the best coaches in the NHL. He's been a good friend of mine for a long time. But I never coached with him, so it was good to get with him, watch him do his work, but also Jeff Halpern and Rob Zettler. All the group down there, just really smart coaches, got to learn a ton from them. … I had a chance to see a team that had just won two Stanley Cups, been to a third Final, what a championship teams looks like, how they play, how they practice, what their approaches are.'
Cooper put Blashill in charge of the Lightning's penalty kill, which finished fifth and sixth in the NHL the past two seasons, but he also sought to empower Blashill as an assistant. Cooper learned a long time ago that he shouldn't be the only voice his players hear and the only person who's responsible for anything.
Advertisement
'So when I first came into this league, I did everything,' Cooper said. 'I did all the pre-scouts. I was the only one that basically talked to the team ever. When I went from probably being an OK coach to a good coach is when I found great assistants and gave them autonomy. I don't want to make it sound like they can just run rogue. Everything we talk about, it's literally talked about beforehand and stuff like that, but, yeah, I'm a believer in you got to try and bring in people smarter than myself and you got to let them do their jobs. And so, it's a little bit of empowering for everyone. And I think when I speak, it probably holds even a little bit more weight than what it used to just because of the fact that there are different voices.'
Blashill closely watched how Cooper interacted with everyone.
'Coop has a unique way about him that I've really enjoyed the last three years being able to observe and see the connection he has with his players,' Blashill said. 'It was a reminder to me that that's when I'm at my best, with that same kind of connection with players.'
In having Blashill on his staff, Cooper got to know his friend even better. There became a deeper understanding of Blashill as a person and as a coach.
'The biggest thing about Jeff Blashill is he cares,' Cooper said. 'And you match a guy that truly, truly cares about not only winning, but the players, the players' best interests, the organization's best interests, like, there's a care factor there. And he's got like an unparalleled work ethic. So, that's a really good combination to have. Blash is one of those guys, he's got charisma, he's engaging, he can read the room.
'I think his time in Detroit was a learning experience. It was humbling for him. I think coming to us and experiencing winning like he did earlier in his career, because he'd been in one organization for a long time, not that it was better or worse anywhere else, but it's just somewhere he got to experience something different and take a step back, learn from what he thought he did well and some of his mistakes.'
Advertisement
The Lightning also presented Blashill with an opportunity to coach an abundance of top players in various stages of their development.
'He's sat in the room now with Nikita Kucherov, Hall of Famer, Andrei Vasilevskiy, Hall of Famer, Victor Hedman, Hall of Famer, Steven Stamkos, Hall of Famer,' Cooper said. 'You go through the group of players that he's been able to surround himself with. Some of them were older, yes, but you look at Conor Geekie, a high first-round pick who came into the league at 20 years old and watching him develop and how we did things. So I think it's a pretty good education on both sides of the fence.'
Blashill noted that education during his introductory press conference.
'You get a chance to work with elite great players, every elite player I've worked with is unique,' Blashill said. 'They all kind of have their own different ways. So you get to learn from coaching a Nikita Kucherov, coaching a Steven Stamkos, a Victor Hedman, an Andrei Vasilevskiy, all the guys down there, in their own ways, Brayden Point, I can just keep going on and on. They're all different. They all take a little bit different approaches to try to connect with them, but the key is learning ways to connect with them, so you're working toward the same goal. That's helping them become the very best version of themselves, no matter what age they are, if they're young or they're a veteran in the league, and then helping them work together to bring the team toward the best goal and the greatest heights we can work to. It's really been a great experience.'
The Blackhawks don't have those established stars yet. What they do have is many young, promising players. Cooper thought Blashill would figure out ways to make whatever group he has work.
'Jeff, he's open-minded,' Cooper said. 'I mean, he knows what he wants and I truly believe he knows how to get there, but it's not one of those situations where it's my way or the highway. He has an ability to listen and ability to adapt. So I think with the young group that's in Chicago, the one thing about Jeff, I think he understands accountability, but with growth, you know, how to bring guys along. He's done it in the minors. He's done it in junior. It was just tougher for him in pro because he had an older group when he was in Detroit and he's had a little bit of a younger group with us and being able to see how some of these young guys came up and how we worked with them. So I think that's all just been total growth for him.'
Cooper is happy and sad to see Blashill go.
Advertisement
'I truly believe the Blackhawks hit a home run with this hire,' Cooper said. 'It's tough for me because we're losing one of our aces. Ultimately, this is how it's all supposed to work, and you feel kind of proud when your assistants get to move up to head jobs. You feel like that's, you're doing some good and helping people out and it's all working.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Braves Gave Up A 10-4 Lead In The Ninth, Is This Rock Bottom?
When the ninth inning of Thursday's game in Atlanta began, the Braves, holding a 10-4 lead over the Arizona Diamondbacks, had a 99.77% chance to win. If you had logged on to FanDuel before the first pitch of the ninth, you would have had to have wagered nearly $44,000 to win $1 betting on the Braves. Scott Blewett then struck out Eugenio Suárez leading off the frame. At that moment, the Braves' chances of winning the game went up to 99.96%. So, you are saying there is a chance. The above wager then increased to nearly $227,000. The next batter, Lourdes Gurriel Jr., homered on a 1-0 pitch, making the score 10-5. No matter, the chances still sat at 99.94%. Tim Tawa then walked and advanced to second on defensive indifference. Alex Thomas then laced a homer to right, making the score 10-7. Now things were getting interesting. And yet, even with the fans at Truist Park beginning to hold their collective breath, Atlanta still had better than a 99% chance to win. The next batter, Jose Herrera, walked, and that was that for Blewett (who hadn't quite yet). Corbin Carroll greeted the new pitcher, Raisel Iglesias, with a double, bringing the tying run to the plate. Reminder, there is still only one out. Shockingly, even with all of this activity, the Braves still win this game nearly 93 times out of 100. Ketel Marte followed Carroll's double with an infield single, scoring one run, and putting the tying runs on base. For consistency, at this moment, the win percentage was down to 85.2%. Geraldo Perdomo, having a great season, slashing .275/.373/.422, with 2.1 bWAR about a third of the way through the year, and 1-for-4 on the day with a double and an RBI, popped out to short for the second out. This unproductive at-bat felt like an omen…so close, but just not going to happen. When that second out was recorded, Atlanta moved back above 93% in their chances of winning this game. Just a week after sprinting out of the dugout and colliding with his teammate rounding third to potentially score the winning run in a Triple-A game in Reno, Nevada, Ildemaro Vargas found himself in the batter's box representing the lead run in a wild game. On an 0-1 pitch, Vargas softly lined his first hit of the season into center field, scoring Carroll to make it a one-run game. And yet, Atlanta still had better an almost 87% chance to win. Eugenio Suárez, who you will recall led off this frame with a strike out, stepped to the plate. The tying run was in scoring position, and the lead run, Vargas – no one's great base runner – on first. When the count ran to 2-and-2, the Braves had better than a 9-in-10 chance to win. That dropped to 86.4% when the count went full, as the runners (especially the not-fleet-of-foot Vargas at first) would be running on the pitch. Suárez swung at what appeared to be ball four, an 89 MPH changeup on the inner half, but too close to take. He lined it down the left field line, allowing both runners to score, giving the Diamondbacks an 11-10 lead. Eugenio Suarez may have swung at ball four. -DFF After a walk to Gurriel Jr., Tawa lined out to end the carnage. The Braves got the tying run aboard in the bottom of the ninth (a Matt Olson walk), but the game ended when Marcell Ozuna grounded into a 6-4-3 double play. The Braves had been on a 766-game winning streak in games that they led by at least six runs going into the ninth inning. The Diamondbacks, in their franchise's history, had never won a game in which they trailed by six runs or more going into the ninth inning (0-419). That all changed Thursday after at Truist Park. Atlanta started the season losing their first six games. They have battled to get back into contention, getting over .500 (24-23) about two weeks ago. Since then, they are 3-11, including Thursday's ignominious defeat. There is still a lot of baseball to be played, and the Braves cannot play a lot worse than they have at various times this season. The Phillies have faltered. The Mets are not a juggernaut. Atlanta can still make the playoffs. In the aftermath of their loss to Arizona, former Brave (and potential future Hall of Famer) Craig Kimbrell was called up from Triple-A to (hopefully) improve the bullpen, which currently has a 3.90 ERA and has converted only 10 of 21 save opportunities. After Thursday's game, Hall of Famer and Brave broadcaster said, 'If you were looking for rock bottom, this might be it.' Well, if so, there is nowhere else to go but up.


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees
As demand for master's and doctoral degrees surges, too few programs exist to support the students most often excluded—despite their potential. The United States stands at a crossroads. While innovation, competitiveness, and global leadership increasingly depend on highly educated workers, access to graduate education remains deeply unequal and underfunded. Over 60% of business and government leaders hold graduate degrees—with more than half in business and nearly a third in law. A 2020 report by Brint and colleagues found that 61% of top media figures and 78% of think tank and foundation leaders also held advanced degrees. In many leadership roles, graduate education is no longer a competitive advantage—it's a requirement. Demand is rising. A 2024 report from Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce projects that nearly 1 in 5 jobs will soon require an advanced degree. Among 'good jobs'—those offering middle-class wages of $43,000 or more—1 in 4 will demand graduate credentials. Yet access to graduate education remains deeply inequitable. Madeline Brighouse Glueck finds that parental education still shapes graduate enrollment, especially in high-investment, high-return programs like law, medicine, and PhDs. In medicine alone, over 75% of students come from the top two income quintiles. Even academically qualified first-generation and low-income students are often left behind. While families with financial and social capital can navigate elite admissions and cover soaring costs, others are shut out. The only federally funded graduate pipeline program is the McNair Scholars Program, which supports first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented undergraduates seeking PhDs. This program—and others like Upward Bound—are now at risk of being defunded. As the federal government grows increasingly hostile toward identity-based programs in higher education, the burden of promoting equitable access is falling to the private sector and nonprofit organizations. Yet only a handful of national nonprofits directly focus on this issue: These organizations are doing powerful work—but their combined reach can only serve a fraction of the students who deserve access. To meet the moment, coordinated investments are needed—not just in graduate preparation, but also in affordability, mentorship, and long-term support: Graduate education is not a luxury—it is a national imperative. If we want to lead in science, health, law, and business—and if we believe in opportunity—we must invest in the people who will lead those fields. Let's ensure that talent, not zip code or family background, determines who has a seat at the table. Change can't wait. The time to invest is now. —--------- Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today!


Motor Trend
29 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
The Cheapest Pickup Trucks You Can Buy in 2025 Aren't All Small
Almost across the board, pickup truck prices are creeping upward. Most of this is due to inflation (and more recently, tariffs), but formerly cheap trucks like the new generation Toyota Tacoma are going somewhat upmarket, while the price creep affecting the cheapest pickups like the Ford Maverick appears to be due to automakers capitalizing on unexpected success and, again, more recently, responding to tariffs. (The Maverick, like some other trucks on this list, is assembled outside of the U.S., which raises price pressure compared to home built options.) For now, the cheapest work trucks you can buy can still be had for under $40,000, but you don't need us to tell you that the versions of the most common full-size trucks most consumers buy are in the $50,000 to $60,000 range. Of course, the base price isn't the only metric by which to measure a truck, but it's an important one. If you want to explore other ways pickup trucks stack up against each other, MotorTrend 's proprietary algorithm provides the ultimate source of automotive data by combining over 75 years of our own instrumented performance, comfort, and efficiency testing on more than 5,000 vehicles. That data is fused with decades of expertise from former heads of design, engineering, and our own car buying experience experts. Built by statisticians and honed by automotive experts, MotorTrend 's Ultimate Car Rankings will assist in finding your perfect vehicle. But, you came here for cheap trucks, and here they are, the cheapest trucks you can buy in 2025: