Bewley's seek rent reduction for iconic Grafton St outlet from Johnny Ronan company at High Court
Mr Ronan's RGRE Grafton Limited has stated that the rent should actually be €1 million while a valuer called by the famous coffee company says it should be €518,000. The High Court has heard that prior to October last year, Bewley's had been paying €1.46 million for the same premises but that figure was reduced following a rental valuation by the Circuit Court.
The High Court appeal was taken by Bewley's Café Grafton Street Ltd (BCGSL) through Beauchamps solicitors, led by Simon Murphy, against the rent granted to RGRE Grafton Limited, which owns the building located at 78-79 Grafton Street, Dublin 2.
RGRE Grafton have cross-appealed the decision. The difference between the two sides' figures over a five-year rental period amounts to over €2.5M.
The case centres on the methods behind the valuations of both sides.
The court has been told that BCGSL held the lease on the building from 1987 for 35 years, a deal that expired in August 2022.
BCGSL then received a new tenancy under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1980.
In October, the café had its annual rent cut in half following a ruling by Judge Jennifer O'Brien, who ruled it should have to pay a rent of more than €738,000 per year.
That figure was later adjusted to €747K – still a 50% drop to the previous €1.46 million being paid.
The Circuit Court found that this fairly represented what a willing tenant would pay and a willing landlord would take for the premises as of August 2022 over a five-year lease term and that BCGSL was entitled to almost €1M for rent paid since the expiry of the previous lease.
Advertisement
Both sides are appealing the decision of the Circuit Court.
Fergus Crosse, an expert valuer retained by BCGSL, has told the High Court that improvements to the Bewley's building made by BCGSL also meant that the gross rent should be reduced. Mr Crosse is of the opinion that the statutory rental value of the property is €518K.
David Potter, a valuer with Savills, was retained by RGRE Grafton. He said the statutory rent should be €1M per annum.
Mr Crosse told Mr David Whelan SC, for BCGLS, that he employed a 'zoning' of arrears of the floor space at the café which meant that Zone A, closest to the entrance, would be the most valuable. Each tranche of zones was measured at 20 feet from the entry. Mr Crosse said he used comparator properties on Grafton Street in his analysis and that Zone B would be valued at 50% of Zone A and that Zone C would be valued at 50% of Zone B.
Mr Potter said that an 'overall' view was more effective in determining the rent and that the use of the zoning model in this case led to a 'misvaluation'.
Mr Potter said that the use of the zoning model meant that the restaurant floor space far from the door was now valued at a lower rate by Mr Crosse which 'undervalued' the restaurant area.
'Bewley's space at the back is big money, it's the main restaurant,' said Mr Potter.
'It can't be valued as if it is the cheapest, worst space. Zoning undervalues it significantly, as if the rear is ancillary, but it is not – it is a really attractive restaurant,' he said.
Mr Potter said that a valuation of €24 per square foot of the restaurant area while the staff room in nearby McDonald's restaurant was valued at €60 per square foot amounted to a 'fundamental misvaluation'.
Mr Potter said he was valuing the property as a restaurant and not a restaurant-retail use agreement and said that Dublin City Council previously gave an opinion that it would prefer the use of Bewley's to be maintained as a restaurant and not a retail outlet.
The case continues before Ms Justice Sara Phelan.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Extra.ie
a day ago
- Extra.ie
Minimum wage increase for two work sectors
Good news for workers in the construction and security industry after new minimum wage rates were set. The wage increased for those in the security sector in July, with an increase seen for construction workers from the start of the month. The increase in construction was by 3.4%. Good news for workers in the construction and security industry after new minimum wage rates were set. Pic: Getty Images Now, those 18 and over are entitled to €15.41 per hour in the security division. This increase from €14.50 came into effect from July 22, 2025. For construction, the change came into effect from August 1, with improved pension contributions and sick pay benefits also due to the Sectoral Employment Order (Construction Sector) 2024. Sectoral Employment Order (SEO) can set the pay, pension or sick pay scheme for workers in a particular sector with the law on SEOS set out in the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act 2015. For construction, the change came into effect from August 1, with improved pension contributions and sick pay benefits also due to the Sectoral Employment Order (Construction Sector) 2024. Pic: Getty Images From August 1, the minimum rate of pay increased by 3,4% with pension and sick pay also amended under the order. Further changes are set to come into effect from August 1, 2026. An SEO is started as a request to the Labour Court to review issues like pay, pension or sick pay. The court then makes a recommendation to the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment who then sign the SEO making it legally binding across the sector. Meanwhile the changes in the security came following a new Employment Regulation Order (ERO) for the sector. EROs set the minimum rates of pay and conditions of employment for workers in the security sector as well as the cleaning sector and early learning and childcare. Employers cannot give wages less than that outlined by the ERO, with any breaches of an ERO to be reported to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). Citizens Information also states that if you are covered by an employment agreement or order, the details may be included in your contract of employment.


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
The Indo Daily: Secret messages, codewords and a phone smashed with an axe – The Irishman caught in 'biggest corporate espionage case of the century'
Earlier this year a spy trail of secret messages, codewords and a phone smashed with an axe unfolded in front of the High Court in an extraordinary tale of alleged corporate espionage. The story of Dublin man Keith O'Brien made international headlines when his employer, a major US HR services firm, set a 'trap' to identify how confidential information was being leaked – and the saga is not over yet. His 13-page confession was read to the High Court, where he told how he spied on his multinational employer for a rival for a fee of over €5,000 a month. That is, until he was caught. In an affidavit filed with the High Court, Keith O'Brien, who was global payroll compliance manager of Rippling, said he was induced into spying and passing sensitive company information to the CEO of rival US firm Deel Inc. The admission was disclosed during an application to join Deel, its French chief executive Alex Bouaziz and two solicitors working for Deel – Italian national Andrea David Mieli and UK-based Asif Malik – as co-defendants in corporate espionage proceedings taken by Rippling against Mr O'Brien last month. The Commercial Court heard Mr O'Brien passed on screenshots from Rippling's Slack messaging system to Mr Bouaziz, who was described as a billionaire, over the course of several months and was paid for this via Revolut and in cryptocurrency. Today, on the Indo Daily, Fionnán Sheahan is joined by Irish Independent legal affairs editor Shane Phelan and Sunday Independent senior correspondent Maeve Sheehan, to discuss how a payroll compliance manager was allegedly recruited as a corporate spy – and where the intrigue will go next.


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
An Coimisiún Pleanála reopens appeal over Phoenix Park apartments plan
An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) has reopened an appeal over a 106-home development next to the Phoenix Park after the High Court quashed its decision to grant planning permission for the complex. The proposed development, which has been sought by Linders of Smithfield Limited, is made up of 96 apartments in two blocks and 10 duplex apartments in a third block, at Quadrant House on Chapelizod Road. The large residential development (LRD) application was made in July 2023, seeking permission to level the Chapelizod Road site and to construct three residential blocks ranging from three to five storeys. The development, which was proposed to have a gross floor area of 9,786.5sq m, was to include a residents' gym, a cafe, a communal work space and a basement car park with 84 parking spaces. The development was not set to include any childcare facilities. Despite a series of objections from local residents, the Chapelizod Residents Association and Friends of the Phoenix Park, Dublin City Council granted permission. READ MORE Four separate appeals were lodged, with Chapelizod Tidy Towns' appeal being brought to ACP, which noted that 'particular concerns [were] raised about childcare provision and lack thereof', but planning permission for the development was affirmed after ACP found it to be in line with the Dublin City Development Plan. The case against ACP was brought before the High Court in early 2024 by Friends of the Phoenix Park, a group of local parents that noted their concerns that the development will further overload childcare provision in the area. The group is made up of parents whose children attended a childcare centre which was located on the site of the proposed development until it closed in June 2023. The childcare centre, which was described as 'integral' in an affidavit submitted by the group, was said to provide a significant number of care spaces. The national planning body conceded the case in January 2025. Its representatives admitted it had 'failed to give adequate reasons for its conclusion that the development was in compliance with the density provisions of the Development Plan with specific reference to the issue of public transport capacity'. Acting on behalf of ACP, Byrne Wallace Shields LLP suggested the court quash the order granting the planning application and issue an order that it pay the costs of the applicant, Friends of the Phoenix Park, and the costs of the court. Mr Justice Richard Humphreys quashed the decision in March, sending the case back to ACP. The planning commission is set to make a decision on the matter by December 4th.