
U-turn as Trump administration agrees to keep Washington police chief in place
The order came after officials in the nation's capital sued on Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the capital's police.
The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under full control of the federal government.
The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense scepticism from a judge over the legality of Ms Bondi's earlier directive, but she also signalled the administration would continue to pressure DC leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws that limit co-operation between police and immigration authorities.
In a social media post on Friday evening, Ms Bondi criticised DC attorney general Brian Schwalb, saying he "continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety", but she added: "We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser."
Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late on Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department had already eased some restrictions on co-operating with federal officials facilitating Mr Trump's mass deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws.
In a letter sent on Friday night to DC citizens, Ms Bowser wrote: "It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across DC has created waves of anxiety."
She added that "our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now", but added that if Washingtonians stick together, "we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy - even when we don't have full access to it".
The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Mr Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week.
As the weekend approached, signs across the city - from the streets to the legal system - suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more
The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before US District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law is not likely to grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably gives the president more power than the city might like.
"The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control," said Judge Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise.
A lawyer for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide.
The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally.
It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major US cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed.
The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but DC has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973.
Mr Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Mr Trump has suggested he would seek to extend it.
Ms Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came after Ms Smith had told officers to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop.
The Justice Department said Ms Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of "sanctuary policies", which generally limit co-operation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
23 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Zelensky returns to site of stunning Oval Office shouting match
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky returns to the Oval Office today for the first time since a spectacularly tense exchange with US President Donald Trump saw their talks cut short and question marks raised over future US support. At the 28 February meeting, Mr Trump and US Vice President JD Vance berated Mr Zelensky on live television, accusing him of being ungrateful for US aid provided since Russia's invasion three years prior, and pressing for quick negotiations to end the war. The hostile confrontation marked a turning point in Kyiv-Washington relations, which had been warm under former US president Joe Biden, and raised fears that Mr Trump would cut off US military support. The scene quickly devolved at the end of a long question-and-answer session with the press. Mr Vance accused Mr Zelensky of being "disrespectful" and displaying ingratitude for Mr Trump's diplomatic efforts, after the Ukrainian leader expressed scepticism that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be trusted given his repeated violations of earlier agreements. As Mr Zelensky defended his position in his non-native English, Mr Trump was enraged by the Ukrainian leader's suggestion that while the United States was currently far from the fighting, "you will feel it in the future" if they appeased Mr Putin. "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel," railed Mr Trump, before adding: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now." As tempers flared, Mr Vance demanded Mr Zelensky thank the United States for the billions provided to Kyiv in military aid. "Have you said 'thank you' once?" he asked. When Mr Zelensky attempted to respond, he was silenced by Mr Trump. "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble," said Mr Trump, cutting Mr Zelensky off. The Ukrainian leader left the White House shortly after, without signing a mineral rights deal that was a key reason for his visit. In the ensuing days, the United States temporarily cut off military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, heightening European fears that Mr Trump would side with Mr Putin in trying to end the conflict. Leaders met at Vatican and NATO summit However, much water has since flowed under the bridge. Mr Trump, who has in the past expressed his admiration for Mr Putin, began to lose patience with the Russian leader, as Moscow kept up its military offensive even as US special envoy Steve Witkoff engaged in feverish diplomacy to achieve a ceasefire. In April, Mr Trump met with Mr Zelensky at the Vatican, and accused Mr Putin of "tapping me along" without delivering on promises. Days later, Ukraine and the United States finally signed a minerals deal, which Mr Trump had earlier referred to as compensation for US aid. The two leaders also met face-to-face in June on the sidelines of the NATO summit at The Hague. On Friday, Mr Trump met with Mr Putin in Alaska to discuss the Ukrainian conflict, promising to run any proposals by both Ukraine and its European allies before agreeing to a deal. Shortly after the Putin summit, Mr Trump invited Mr Zelensky to the Oval Office. Perhaps wary of the contours of the previous diplomatic dust-up, Mr Zelensky quickly said he was "grateful for the invitation". European leaders will join Mr Zelensky in Washington today, seeking above all else to prevent another Oval Office meltdown - but also to coordinate on the path toward peace negotiations, especially on how to prevent any future Russian invasion. On the latter front, the Trump administration says it is now open to providing Ukraine security guarantees, a shift hailed yesterday by Ukrainian and European leaders. Mr Zelensky is expected to meet one-on-one with Mr Trump first, before they are joined by European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, a European government source said.


Irish Examiner
23 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
David McNamara: Are economic statistics still trustworthy?
The firing of a little-known labour statistician by US President Donald Trump has brought to the fore an ongoing debate amongst economists — that is, whether macro statistics are becoming unreliable as the response rates to key surveys decline. In the US, major revisions to the benchmark payroll jobs survey are quite common and are typically shrugged off by investors and grumpy forecasters, whose models then require tweaking. In some cases, the revisions can completely shift the narrative of an economy, as was the case when US payrolls were recently revised sharply lower for May and June, precipitating a fall in interest rate expectations and a decline in the dollar. Response rates to this key survey have fallen sharply to 30-40% at present from as high as 70% in the period before the pandemic. However, despite President Trump's assertions of political bias, the revisions in the past few years to the payroll survey have been in both directions, with few signs of bias in the data. Nonetheless, covid appears to have left a lasting impact on the ability of statisticians to collect data across the world, with another example being the UK's labour force survey, which the Office for National Statistics has placed a large health warning on. The response rate to this survey has fallen from a pre-covid rate of 50% to just 10% at present. While the revisions in the US payrolls survey still appear to be random, the UK survey is demonstrating what economists might call 'systematic error'. In the absence of robust national statistics, a new cottage industry of private labour market data has emerged, which policymakers in the Bank of England, who have been struggling to get a gauge on wages and inflation, now rely on. In Ireland, the concentration of a small number of very large multinationals often renders initial estimates of GDP useless, but we have also seen large revisions to our labour force survey, including the sharp upward revision in unemployment recently. Emerging 'frontier' series, which use administrative data rather than relying on surveys, might become more reliable and prevalent in the future. For example, a new payroll employment series pulls data directly from the Revenue's PAYE system in Ireland, which gives a timelier estimate of the number of employee numbers. This series has been signalling a cooling of Irish jobs growth in 2025, which the official labour force survey might now belatedly show when the latest revisions are published later this week. The key takeaway is that economies are becoming more complex and harder to measure in real-time, with emerging trends such as AI having the potential to upend how we live and work in the years to come. Spare a thought for the beleaguered statistician in an ever-changing world. David McNamara is Chief Economist with AIB


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump says Zelenskyy can stop war with Russia ‘almost immediately' ahead of talks
Donald Trump said Volodymyr Zelenskyy could end the war with Russia 'almost immediately' as the Ukrainian president and European leaders including Keir Starmer prepared for crunch White House meetings. The US president suggested Mr Zelenskyy would have to accept there was 'no getting back' Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, and Ukraine would not be allowed to join the Nato alliance. Mr Starmer and other European leaders will seek to persuade Mr Trump not to push for a settlement which rewards Vladimir Putin's aggression and to get US security guarantees for any military peacekeeping force from the so-called 'coalition of the willing'. Those joining Mr Starmer include France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland. Nato chief Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen are also attending. In a message on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump said President Zelenskyy 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight'. He said there would be 'no going into Nato by Ukraine' – keeping its neighbour out of the alliance and its mutual defence pact has been one of Russia's key aims. But Mr Starmer, along with other Nato leaders, has said Ukraine is on an 'irreversible path' to membership of the alliance. Mr Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff has suggested that measures similar to Nato's Article 5 mutual defence provision could be offered by the US without Kyiv joining the alliance. Mr Witkoff, who took part in the talks between Mr Trump and Russian president Mr Putin last week, said it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called it 'game-changing'. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato,' Mr Witkoff told CNN. Mr Zelenskyy said any peace deal must be lasting 'not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East – part of Donbas – and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack'. He said: 'Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace.' I have already arrived in Washington, tomorrow I am meeting with President Trump. Tomorrow we are also speaking with European leaders. I am grateful to @POTUS for the invitation. We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably. And peace must be lasting. Not… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 18, 2025 At the White House, Mr Zelenskyy is expecting to face calls from the US president to concede to full Russian control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two mineral-rich regions of Ukraine that are mostly occupied by Vladimir Putin's forces. In exchange for these demands, the Russian president would reportedly withdraw his forces from other areas of Ukraine and accept the Nato-like guarantee designed to prevent him launching further incursions. Ahead of their Oval Office encounter, the allies are likely to be mindful of the previous occasion Mr Zelenskyy visited Mr Trump in the White House. February's public spat, which saw Vice President JD Vance accuse Mr Zelenskyy of not being thankful enough to the US, resulted in American aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted. Mr Trump will again host Mr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office before a separate meeting with the European leaders.