Residents in ‘most policed area of Perth' enraged by minister's response
Enraged Inglewood residents near a trouble-plagued public housing complex have warned anti-social behaviour could escalate unless the West Australian government steps up efforts to clamp down on the issue.
Housing Minister John Carey was grilled about the Ninth Avenue complex during question time in parliament on Wednesday as residents watched on and at times heckled from the public gallery.
The 24-unit complex was bought by the WA government last year for public housing, but anti-social behaviour has become so bad that Police Minister Reece Whitby said it was now one of the most policed areas of Perth.
Speaking outside parliament after question time, Inglewood resident Melissa Molinari detailed some of the behaviour allegedly witnessed over the past five months, which included a jogger being chased with a butcher's knife; children being abused by tenants; bottles thrown at passers-by; and an Uber driver being bashed and having his car stolen.
Molinari said the government's response to date was not good enough, and the issues were escalating.
'It is distressing to see families and parents of families here right now whose children have been attacked on our streets, and [the minister] stands there and does nothing. It's disgusting,' she said.
'How many more people need to be attacked on the streets of Inglewood? How many more people have bottles thrown at them, chased with knives, before this government and this minister actually does something about it and hears our voices?
'What's going to happen when someone is killed on the streets of Inglewood? What then?'
Molinari said the Inglewood community was not against social housing, and many tenants in the complex were doing the right thing and were also victims of the small number of bad eggs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
In one awful decision, Albanese has revealed his do-nothing plan
It didn't take long for us to discover what a triumphantly re-elected Labor government would be like. Would Anthony Albanese stick to the plan he outlined soon after the 2022 election of avoiding controversy during his first term so he could consolidate Labor's hold on power, then get on with the big reforms in term two? Or would he decide that his policy of giving no offence to powerful interest groups had been so rapturously received by the voters, he'd stick with it in his new term? Well, now we know. The re-elected government's first big decision is to extend the life of Woodside Energy's North West Shelf gas processing plant on the Burrup peninsula in Western Australia for a further 40 years from 2030. What was it you guys said about your sacred commitment to achieve net zero emissions by 2050? You remember, the commitment that showed you were fair dinkum about combating climate change whereas the Coalition, with its plan to switch to nuclear energy, wasn't? So you're happy for one of the world's biggest liquified natural gas projects still to be pumping out greenhouse gases in 2070, 20 years after it's all meant to be over? Some estimate that the plant will send 4.4 billion tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, but that's OK because nearly all the gas will be exported. We won't be burning it, our customers will. (Though we don't quite know how we'll ensure their emissions worsen their climate but not ours.) To be fair, had the government failed to extend the project's licence, Woodside would have been ropeable and the West Australian branch of the Labor Party – which I sometimes suspect is a wholly owned subsidiary of the mining industry, or maybe the mining unions – might have seceded. But that's the point. If you want to govern Australia effectively – if you aim to fix our many problems – you have to be prepared to stand up to powerful interest groups. It's now clear Albanese isn't prepared to stand up, but still wants to enjoy the spoils of office. The strange thing is, according to our present law, the environment minister's power to end Woodside's franchise stems only from the project's effect on the environment, not on climate change. But this would have been no impediment to rejecting the continuation.
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
In one awful decision, Albanese has revealed his do-nothing plan
It didn't take long for us to discover what a triumphantly re-elected Labor government would be like. Would Anthony Albanese stick to the plan he outlined soon after the 2022 election of avoiding controversy during his first term so he could consolidate Labor's hold on power, then get on with the big reforms in term two? Or would he decide that his policy of giving no offence to powerful interest groups had been so rapturously received by the voters, he'd stick with it in his new term? Well, now we know. The re-elected government's first big decision is to extend the life of Woodside Energy's North West Shelf gas processing plant on the Burrup peninsula in Western Australia for a further 40 years from 2030. What was it you guys said about your sacred commitment to achieve net zero emissions by 2050? You remember, the commitment that showed you were fair dinkum about combating climate change whereas the Coalition, with its plan to switch to nuclear energy, wasn't? So you're happy for one of the world's biggest liquified natural gas projects still to be pumping out greenhouse gases in 2070, 20 years after it's all meant to be over? Some estimate that the plant will send 4.4 billion tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, but that's OK because nearly all the gas will be exported. We won't be burning it, our customers will. (Though we don't quite know how we'll ensure their emissions worsen their climate but not ours.) To be fair, had the government failed to extend the project's licence, Woodside would have been ropeable and the West Australian branch of the Labor Party – which I sometimes suspect is a wholly owned subsidiary of the mining industry, or maybe the mining unions – might have seceded. But that's the point. If you want to govern Australia effectively – if you aim to fix our many problems – you have to be prepared to stand up to powerful interest groups. It's now clear Albanese isn't prepared to stand up, but still wants to enjoy the spoils of office. The strange thing is, according to our present law, the environment minister's power to end Woodside's franchise stems only from the project's effect on the environment, not on climate change. But this would have been no impediment to rejecting the continuation.
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
Dorinda Cox's party switch highlights the defect in political defections
Political defections are not new. Indeed, they stretch back more than a century in this country. Billy Hughes was elected Labor leader in 1915. By retirement, he had represented six parties, the last being the Liberals. He never let party fidelity subsume personal conviction. Hughes is the par exemplar of the party hopper. It is not illegal to do so. Indeed, there are no remedies, or penalties, that can be ascribed or applied to anyone who does it. There should be – particularly for senators. A member of parliament is the representative of voters who put them there, and voters put them there because of what they represented to them. If a politician jumps ship midterm, voters are more than entitled to look askance at the move, even to feel outraged. This week West Australian Greens senator Dorinda Cox defected to the Labor Party, of which she had once been a member. Cox entered parliament four years ago to fill a casual vacancy, and won in the 2022 election as a Green. Her term runs until 2028. After the May 3 Labor landslide, she competed unsuccessfully for the Greens' deputy leadership, which was won by Mehreen Faruqi. On Monday, Cox said: 'During some deep reflection, what my values represent as a First Nations woman, as a proud West Australian, what it is that I would like to achieve in my political life and what you can't do from the crossbench is make change.' Loading Voters could read the preceding in light of her recent criticism of her new party's approval of the North West Shelf gas extension and its impact on Indigenous peoples' cultural and heritage rights. Of course, Cox is not alone in party-hopping. Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, as the Country Liberal Party's No.1 Senate selection, won in 2022 and sat with the Nationals, only to switch to sitting with the Liberal Party last month. She said at the time, 'I have always been led by the Australian people and will continue to do so.' Fellow First Nations senator Lidia Thorpe quit the Greens in 2023, and now sits as an independent. Before settling into her eponymous network, Jacqui Lambie had traversed the political landscape, from Labor and Liberal to the Palmer United Party. Fatima Payman left Labor last July, unhappy with the government's position on the war in Gaza. At the end of the '90s, Australian Democrats leader Cheryl Kernot defected to Labor. In 1996, Labor senator Mal Colston parted ways with the party after 21 years and sat as an independent after the party refused to back him for the position of Senate deputy president.
