Va. lawmakers reject latest Youngkin appointees to university boards
Gov. Glenn Youngkin speaks with members of the media in Virginia's Capitol on Jan. 13, 2025. (Photo by Charlotte Rene Woods /Virginia Mercury)
Senate Democrats rejected several appointees to Virginia's governing boards at various colleges on Monday, including former Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli and former state commerce and trade secretary Caren Merrick.
The Monday vote by the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee removed all eight appointees made by Gov. Glenn Youngkin. The move, which Democratic leaders attributed to differences in political values, now puts the decision to find replacements in the governor's hands once again.
'The work and the oversight that we have and as chairman of this committee is to provide accountability and oversight to our prestigious institutions to ensure that those bodies align with our values and what we see in the political climate today, especially coming out of Washington, trying to make their way into our commonwealth,' said Senate Privileges and Elections Committee Chair Aaron Rouse, D-Virginia Beach. 'It is our job to stand up and protect those values, and that is what we are doing today.'
In a statement after the meeting, Rouse referred to Cuccinelli and the other seven appointees as 'MAGA extremists' and 'Project 2025 supporters,' who are opposed to Democrats' progressive ideals.
Cuccinelli's 'extreme' position on reproductive rights, his work Project 2025 — a conservative plan for how the country should operate under Republican control — and his 'hateful attacks' on LGBTQ Virginians prevented Rouse from lending his support to the governor's appointment for Cuccinelli to serve on the University of Virginia's Board of Visitors, the Democratic senator said.
'He's a Trump crony who is simply too extreme to have a role in shaping one of our commonwealth's flagship universities,' Rouse, who is running for lieutenant governor and facing five Democratic contenders, said of Cuccinelli.
Merrick was slated to serve at George Mason University under the governor's appointment.
The remaining seven nominees were to serve at Virginia Military Institute and George Mason, but they were all denied by the Democratic-controlled committee in an 8-4 vote. Three Senate Republicans were missing from the meeting.
In response to their colleagues' action, Sen. Glen Sturtevant, R-Chesterfield, and Sen. Bill DeSteph, R-Virginia Beach, defended the governor's appointees, highlighting that the group is made up of former public servants on the state and federal levels, military service members, and private sector leaders.
'There is nothing about any of these individuals that makes them unqualified to serve the commonwealth of Virginia in any of these positions,' Sturtevant said at Monday's meeting. 'These are all highly qualified appointees.'
DeSteph and Sturtevant also questioned why a joint subcommittee made up of members from both the Senate and House Privileges and Elections Committees had not met to review the statements and economic interests of the appointees, per state code. Rouse directed the question to the subcommittee's attorney who said he was not aware of if the subcommittee is active.
'We have to follow the law and what the law says,' Sturtevant said, adding that any motion on the appointees moving forward would be 'out of order,' 'improper' and 'not in compliance' with state law.
DeSteph, who was uncertain if the committee was properly formed, added that the state law says that there 'shall' be a subcommittee.
'This isn't a 'may.' This isn't a 'you can ignore this.' This is a 'shall,' DeSteph said. 'Normally, when something is in code that strict we kind of do it. Otherwise this is Step A before Step B.'
Staff was unable to determine when the subcommittee last met or how many of the governor's appointees have been confirmed. Rouse estimated hundreds.
No, FEMA Helene funds aren't going to undocumented immigrants, despite Youngkin appointee's tweet
Earlier this year, Democrats also blocked nine of Youngkin's appointees, including two Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors nominees.
In a June 9 letter, Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, D-Fairfax, wrote to all the heads of Virginia's public universities that state code requires all governing body members to be confirmed by the General Assembly, stating that they 'will not confirm individuals who do not possess the judgment, character, or willingness to follow the principles' he outlined in the letter.
Some of those principles require board members to understand their fiduciary duties, to commit to the independent governance of such institutions, and to avoid excessive partisan inclinations.
'The General Assembly takes seriously its oversight responsibilities regarding Virginia's public universities,' Surovell wrote. 'Should any Board of Visitors fail to exercise appropriate independent judgment or allow external influences to compromise their fiduciary duties, the General Assembly will not hesitate to examine the situation and take whatever legislative action may be necessary.'
The letter went on to remind university heads that they are accountable to the General Assembly and that the boards must exercise independent judgment and are not obligated to the directives of the governor.
'Virginia is proud to maintain one of the strongest public higher education systems in America,' the letter states. 'Our commonwealth is home to some of the nation's oldest and most prestigious institutions, and they deserve governance that is independent, principled, and focused solely on their academic mission and service to the commonwealth.'
State legislators are now considering other university BOV nominees, a process that is slated to continue through the end of the year.
If Youngkin plans to appoint new members to fill expiring seats, he has until the end of his term in January.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
20 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump's $1,000 baby bonus idea takes a leaf out of Warren Buffett's wealth-building playbook
President Donald Trump wants the next generation of Americans to be stock investors from birth — an idea that could easily have come from Warren Buffett. The US leader's so-called Trump Accounts are part of his proposed " One Big Beautiful Bill," a huge package of tax and spending legislation that's been approved by the House of Representatives and is now under Senate scrutiny. If passed, the government would open a tax-deferred investment account for every newborn citizen born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028, and seed it with $1,000. Each child's guardian would be in charge of their account, able to deposit up to $5,000 a year into it, and allowed to invest in broad US index funds that don't use leverage and minimize fees and expenses. Withdrawals wouldn't be allowed until the age of 18, and the account would automatically terminate when the holder is 31. "This will afford a generation of children the chance to experience the miracle of compounded growth and set them on a course for prosperity from the very beginning," the White House said on its website, highlighting endorsements from the CEOs of Dell, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and Altimeter Capital. The bosses of Arm, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Robinhood have also signaled they're willing to contribute to the Trump Accounts of their employees' children. 'Start young' Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, has long recommended investing from a young age in a low-fee, broad-market index fund and holding for the long run as the most reliable way to build wealth over a lifetime. "Start young," Buffett told a shareholder who asked how to become a multibillionaire during Berkshire's 1999 meeting. He explained that "the nature of compound interest is it behaves like a snowball of sticky snow. And the trick is to have a very long hill, which means either starting very young or living to be very old." Buffett, whose net worth now exceeds $150 billion, said at the 2001 meeting that saving $10,000 by the time he turned 21 gave him a "huge, huge headstart" in life. It meant he could afford to get married and have kids while still having spare money to invest. "While he hasn't commented directly on government-funded stock accounts for newborns, the investing logic behind such a proposal aligns with his core principles," Lawrence Cunningham, the author of "The Essays of Warren Buffett" and the director of the University of Delaware's Weinberg Center, told Business Insider. "Buffett would likely agree that giving more Americans a long-term stake in the market — especially through low-cost vehicles like the S&P 500 — is both financially sound and socially beneficial," Cunningham said. The Berkshire chief, who bought his first stock at age 11, turns 95 in August, meaning he's been compounding his wealth for more than eight decades. Buffett has repeatedly said more than 99% of his wealth is in Berkshire stock, which he's owned since the 1960s. 'Eighth wonder' David Kass, a finance professor who's been following Buffett closely for nearly 40 years, told BI that Trump's program could help to reduce wealth inequality by "encouraging additional savings, providing more of a safety net, promoting financial literacy, and exposing everyone to a stake in corporate America while experiencing the 'eighth wonder of the world' — compounding." Berkshire declined to comment. It's worth noting that even if the program launched as planned and every American child owns a piece of the stock market from birth, lower-income parents might struggle to invest the maximum $5,000 a year into the account, allowing kids with more affluent parents to quickly pull ahead. Children from wealthier families might also have additional savings accounts and assets, other advantages such as access to better healthcare and education, and significant inheritances in their future, limiting the potential for a single government payout and account to narrow the wealth gap. Yet Buffett might still see the plan as a step in the right direction. He has long heralded compounding over decades as the secret to wealth creation, as it can turn even a small amount into a fortune. For example, a $1,000 investment that compounds at 8% annually for 65 years would be worth nearly $160,000.
CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
On his 79th birthday, President Trump is getting a military parade – and millions of expected protestors
As a military-style parade rolls through Washington, DC, on Saturday – President Donald Trump's birthday – millions are expected to take to the streets to form what organizers believe will be the strongest display of opposition to the administration since the president took office in January. More than 1,800 protests across all 50 states are planned through the No Kings movement, which organizers say seeks to reject 'authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarization of our democracy.' The mobilization was planned as a direct response to Trump's military parade in celebration of the 250th anniversary of the US Army – which coincides with his 79th birthday. In recent days, all eyes have been on Los Angeles, where Trump has deployed the National Guard and Marines in response to massive protests decrying immigration sweeps – an extraordinary move that protest organizers say has only served to mobilize participants to speak out against authoritarianism. Prev Next Demonstrators have since been protesting immigration action in cities across the nation, including New York, Seattle, Chicago, Austin, Las Vegas and Washington, DC, while the administration has doubled down on its display of military force against its own citizens. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has suggested that the order used to federalize the National Guard to Los Angeles could make way for a similar response to protests in other states. And Texas Gov. Greg Abbott deployed the state's National Guard this week ahead of planned protests, including a 'No Kings' event in San Antonio on Saturday. Missouri's governor, Mike Kehoe, also activated the state's National Guard on Thursday 'as a precautionary measure in reaction to recent instances of civil unrest across the country.' 'We respect, and will defend, the right to peacefully protest, but we will not tolerate violence or lawlessness in our state,' the Republican governor said in a statement. Following the Hands Off! and 50501 protests this Spring, Saturday's demonstrations won't be the first nationwide rejection of Trump's policies – but organizers expect it to be the largest. 'Even conservative estimates say that 3.5 million people turned out for the Hands Off mobilization in April. That's already 1% of the population of the US,' Ezra Levin, co-executive director of Indivisible, the organization backing the No Kings movement, told CNN in a statement. 'No Kings is on track to exceed that by millions more. This is historic.' Officials have estimated Saturday's parade, which will flaunt 7 million pounds of machines and weaponry through Washington, DC, on the president's birthday, could cost up to $45 million. Protest organizers are keeping the planned rallies out of the Capitol, hoping to pull focus away from the spectacle. Instead, a flagship rally is being held in Philadelphia Saturday, as No Kings events are planned to kick off in every state of the nation – some with dozens of local events planned. More than 200 protest events are planned in California, and organizers are expecting especially big turnouts in Phoenix, Houston, Atlanta, Charlotte and Chicago, according to the No Kings website. There are also a number of protests planned across the nation through other groups, meaning the turnout against the Trump administration could be even larger than projected. On Wednesday evening, No Kings organizers spoke to more than 4,000 people on a Zoom call – many of them local hosts for Saturday's protests – preparing them for the intense weekend ahead. 'If you show up on site, and you feel completely overwhelmed by the numbers – first of all, congratulations,' one organizer said. The leaders offered advice for the hosts and those serving as 'marshals' for the events, people specially designated to help address safety concerns and keep the peace on Saturday. Attendees role-played scenarios with hypothetical characters – a participant frustrated that not enough action is being taken to get out the group's message, a right-wing protestor there to harass attendees – emphasizing safety and non-violence. They offered some basic tips for Saturday: deescalate, empathize, listen, never touch a cop. With the political temperature rising in response to immigration sweeps and the use of the National Guard to reign in demonstrations, many of the nation's cities are already seeing protest activity ahead of Saturday. Meanwhile, local and state authorities have been doing their own prep work. Multiple local officials are warning that violence by protest participants this weekend will not be tolerated. South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who characterized the expected protesters as 'radical anti-American groups,' warned that those who attack law enforcement or destroy property will be prosecuted. Other leaders have been more welcoming to protests. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, has said his city will protect people's right to assemble, while ensuring residents' day-to-day lives aren't disrupted. 'The right to protest peacefully is central to our democracy, and the NYPD is committed to ensuring that people can always exercise that right safely,' New York City's Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said on X this week, as people in the city took to the streets to protest the Trump administration's immigration action. Protest organizers say they have been in touch with local officials ahead of Saturday's events, in an effort to make sure the gatherings run safely and smoothly. The aim, they emphasize, is not violence, but rather to send a clear message to the president on his birthday: 'In America, we don't do kings.' CNN's Dianne Gallagher contributed to this report.
Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
CNN security analyst defends Kristi Noem, agents who restrained Sen. Padilla
CNN security analyst and former FBI agent Josh Campbell defended Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the agents Thursday who forcibly removed Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., during his viral outburst. Video of the incident showed Padilla trying to walk up to Noem while she was speaking at a podium during a press conference in Los Angeles about the riots. Padilla simultaneously attempted to shout over Noem, but law enforcement stepped in and forcefully stopped Padilla's advance. Padilla was eventually taken to the ground and handcuffed, the video showed. Fox News reporters who were present said Padilla appeared to be detained for a period of time. Padilla identified himself in the midst of the altercation. "I know we are in a politically charged climate, but from a law enforcement perspective, this was neither the fault nor the responsibility of DHS Secretary Noem," Campbell argued. "She's in the middle of a press conference. There's someone who interrupts and then makes it clear by his movements that he is not going to comply. He's taken out. Again, I don't think any of that was her responsibility." Earlier, he explained how the story could be divided into three distinct moments that will be scrutinized in the days to come. "First, you have the DHS secretary who was addressing the press," he said. "This was not a Q&A period, and she was interrupted. She was interrupted by someone who was speaking very loudly. And so her security detail confronts what we obviously now know to be the senator. And at that point, he is now going to be escorted out. You can't interrupt something like that that's already in progress without having those consequences." Campbell explained one key moment when security agents at the event realized Padilla would refuse to comply. "But the second incident, in my view, happens the moment — as officers are trying to lead him out — he then turns and walks back towards kind of into those agents," Campbell said. "At that point, from a security detail perspective, we're taking this person out against their will. We've asked the person — and again, this is all happening very quickly — but the moment he then turns into them, they realize this is not someone who is going to comply." The third incident, he noted, was when the agents had the senator handcuffed on the ground. "Now there will be big questions raised about those kinds of tactics," Campbell said. "Were there other options that were available to the federal agents as well — as the FBI police officer there — who is responsible for security in that FBI building? What they do is they actually order him to his knees and then quickly shove him down to the ground where he is then handcuffed." This incident, which has drawn outrage from Padilla's fellow Democrats, will face some scrutiny, he warned. Campbell also noted that Padilla's status as a senator did not make any difference in that particular room and to those agents. "In fact, that would have been special treatment for him if they had allowed him to continue to interrupt, you know, very loudly, this press conference," he said. An FBI spokesperson said Padilla was detained after being "disruptive." "During a press conference today held at the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office, Senator Alex Padilla was detained by members of the U.S. Secret Service assigned to Secretary Noem's detail when he became disruptive while formal remarks were being delivered," the spokesperson said Thursday. "Secret Service Agents were assisted by FBI Police who are in Los Angeles at this time. Senator Padilla was not wearing his senate security pin; however, was subsequently positively identified and released." A DHS spokesperson said Padilla was told "repeatedly" to back away, and "did not comply" with officers' commands. "[Secret Service] thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately," the spokesperson said.
