Sarwar dodges question on potential welfare reform revolt
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has dodged questions about the brewing rebellion to the UK Government's welfare reforms.
Around 120 Labour MPs – including a reported 12 from Scotland – have put their names to an amendment which would block the welfare reform Bill.
But on Wednesday, Mr Sarwar refused to say if he supported the reforms or the rebellion against them.
When asked if he supports the Scottish MPs seeking to block the Bill at a live taping of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh, the Scottish Labour leader said: 'My position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform.
'We have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed.'
Mr Sarwar said there were 'many positives' in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, but added that there were 'still conversations to be had' about potential changes.
Pushed again on whether he supports the rebellion, Mr Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect.
'People are legitimately voicing their concerns, having those conversations.'
Pressed again on his view on the potential revolt, Mr Sarwar added: 'We have to support the principle of reform.
'What those reforms look like has to be balanced and has to be fair.'
Mr Sarwar stressed that he believed the best way out of poverty was through work, but said those who cannot work should be supported.
The most controversial part of the plans will see the eligibility of the personal independence payment (Pip) in England and Wales be reduced in a bid to save £5 billion.
Earlier on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner suggested that ministers were considering potential concessions to Labour MPs to stave off a rebellion.
'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable,' she said in an interview with ITV's Peston programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Baby boomers to open up even bigger wealth gap over working families
Baby boomer pensioners are set to get even wealthier under Labour as working families struggle, new analysis shows. Pensioners will be £1,500 better off on average over this parliament, research by the Resolution Foundation shows. The boost to pensioners' disposable incomes after inflation and housing costs means they will fare significantly better than other groups. Families with children will see no improvement to their incomes by 2030, in a blow to Sir Keir Starmer's promise to raise living standards across the country. Sir Keir has made delivering higher living standards a key 'milestone' for this parliament, promising in December to raise 'living standards in every part of the United Kingdom so working people have more money in their pocket'. When looking across all households, the Resolution Foundation said disposable income will only rise marginally by 1pc over five years, a cash boost of £300 that the think tank described as 'bleak'. Adam Corlett, from the Resolution Foundation, said: 'There are winners and losers within this weak outlook. Pensioner incomes [are] set to grow by a healthy 5pc over the rest of the decade, while the poorest half of the population are set to see their incomes fall.' The growing disparity between mainly retired baby boomers and younger families will further inflame a tense political debate about generational inequality. Boomers are the wealthiest generation, with the prospects for millennials and Gen-Zs underwhelming by comparison. It follows a period described by the Resolution Foundation as 'bust and boom' for living standards, with years of no pay growth followed by a sudden spurt last year. Mr Corlett said: 'The living standards story of the decade so far has been bust and boom, with Covid-19 and a cost of living crisis followed by a much-needed recovery last year. But the rest of the decade looks bleak.' He added: 'A stronger economy and the right policy interventions can brighten this outlook. Maintaining strong wage growth and returning to pre-pandemic employment levels would make middle-income Britain far better off, while ending the two-child [benefit] limit can lift living standards for poorer families.' The research found people who own their home outright – typically babyboomers – will be far better off in coming years than those still paying down their mortgage. Their incomes are on average set to rise by 3pc by the end of the decade. Mortgaged homeowners will meanwhile see their disposable incomes fall by 1pc, as they feel the slow burn of much higher interest rates than in the recent past. Improving fortunes for pensioners come after the Prime Minister was forced into a humiliating about-turn on winter fuel payment cuts for the elderly. The Resolution Foundation said Sir Keir could improve living standards for more people by ending the two-child benefit cap, a move that would raise average incomes for the poorest half of the country by £200. The number of children in relative poverty is set to hit a record 4.8m on Sir Keir's watch despite pledges to reduce it, the Resolution Foundation said. The think tank called for Sir Keir to fund the axing of the two-child cap by mounting a stealth raid on workers by extending the freeze on tax brackets. A Treasury spokesman said: 'Since July, real wages have grown more than in the entire first decade of the last government, our commitment to economic stability has helped interest rates to fall four times, we have protected working people's payslips from higher taxes, froze fuel duty, increased the national living and minimum wage and in the latest data, and real household disposable income per person is growing at its fastest pace in two years.'
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour rebels at risk of losing seats over Starmer's benefits cuts
Dozens of Labour rebel MPs could lose their seats to Sir Keir Starmer's welfare cuts if benefit claimants turn against the Government, analysis shows. The Prime Minister is facing the biggest rebellion of his premiership over cuts to Universal Credit and personal independence payments (PIP), which are paid to benefit claimants with disabilities. The plans, estimated to save £5 billion a year, have caused uproar on the Labour benches after the Government published an impact assessment that admitted the reforms could push 50,000 children into poverty. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed a rebel amendment to abandon the plans, which could force a defeat of the Government if they are supported by the Conservatives. Telegraph analysis shows that 51 of the rebel MPs have smaller majorities than the number of PIP claimants in their constituency, sparking fears of mass defeats at the next election. The data suggest that Sir Keir will struggle to convince many of the rebels to back his welfare reforms, because they are concerned about losing their seats. MPs have long complained that while Labour pushes through its agenda in Parliament with its large majority, constituents confront them at the weekend with concerns about Sir Keir's policies. Meanwhile, Reform UK has made significant gains in many of the so-called Red Wall marginals, many of which are poorer than the average. Labour MPs say that constituents elected the party on the promise of protecting the lower-paid and vulnerable, and Sir Keir risks driving those voters away with his reforms. The MPs on the Telegraph list include Neil Duncan-Jordan, one of the rebel ringleaders, who has a majority of 18, and Tan Dhesi, one of the most high-profile signatories to the amendment. Others include Ian Lavery and Jon Trickett, veteran rebels who are unlikely to be convinced to back the Government by threats from the Labour whips. Cat Eccles, the Labour MP for Stourbridge, who is also on the list, said on Wednesday that she would be willing to lose the party whip over the vote. She told Times Radio that the number of MPs willing to vote against the Government was 'much bigger than we imagine'. The analysis shows that constituencies with large numbers of PIP claimants are also more likely to be marginal with Reform UK, which has been ahead of Labour in the polls since April. In seats where there are more PIP claimants than the MP has a majority, the average lead Labour has over Reform is 21 per cent, compared with 36 per cent in other seats. One MP who is at risk of losing their seat because of the reforms said that Labour rebels were 'responding to issues that have been raised in their own constituencies', adding: 'That's how democracy is meant to work.' 'There is a correlation between where the rebels are and constituencies where Labour is in first [place] and Reform is in second,' the MP told The Telegraph. 'But it's more to do with the fact that there are so many benefit claimants.' Labour's reforms to PIP will reduce the eligibility criteria for the benefit, which the Office for Budget Responsibility says is likely to lead to one in four current claimants losing their entitlement. PIP is a separate benefit to Universal Credit and is designed to pay for the additional cost of daily life for disabled people. But Sir Keir has said the system 'doesn't work as it is' and must be reformed, to reduce a ballooning benefits bill that is set to increase by £18 billion in the next five years. Ministers have defended the cuts with statistics that show the rising cost of PIP is 'unsustainable' and that 1,000 new people receive it every day. But cutting benefits is considered a sacred cow by many Labour voters, who have interpreted the plans as a betrayal of the party's principles by Sir Keir. Prof Sir John Curtice, the veteran pollster, told The Telegraph: 'While support for the increasing welfare benefits have gone down, there is still little support for cutting it. 'Among Labour voters, twice as many think it's too difficult to claim benefits as say it is too easy. 'Whatever the potential impact on those with disability benefits, there's a wider thing that it's not really something that most Labour voters are expecting.' Luke Tryl, the director of the non-profit More in Common, said that Sir Keir was facing the twin challenges of many seats with low majorities and a broad coalition of different voters who are difficult to please at once. 'It is not an easy coalition to keep happy on tough issues like this, and it is also an unwieldy coalition,' he said. 'It is much easier to keep a broad coalition together in easier times. But the whole mantra of this government, as they have said themselves, is about choices, and making choices means picking parts of the coalition to win or lose.'
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Plans for new nuclear reactors in Scotland brought forward
The plans and the plant owner's stance are revealed in the first part of our new series which is launched today with our sister title the East Lothian Courier. The GMB Scotland union has brought forward the sector estimates as it called on the Scottish Government to lift its moratorium on new nuclear. It has called for an 'urgent review the potential of new nuclear plants to cut emissions, secure energy supplies, and boost economic growth'. The union, one of the biggest across the energy sector, is urging ministers to lift the ban on new nuclear power in Scotland and convene an expert summit to discuss its potential to 'underpin the drive to Net Zero and create thousands of skilled, well-paid jobs and apprenticeships'. GMB Scotland said that industry-based research shows potential for two new large-scale reactors at Torness and direct station wages would equate to £90-100 million with £30-35m additional spending on contractors. However, the tension between Holyrood and Westminster is clear, with the UK Government pointing towards funding but adding that 'the Scottish Government continues to block any movement on this safe, green energy that would turbocharge the Scottish economy'. The Scottish Government stood firm and signalled research showing a potential 80,000 renewables jobs in Scotland within 25 years. EDF, the French state-owned energy giant and operator of Torness, told The Herald the site is suitable for new nuclear, but that it respects the Scottish Government stance and instead is concentrating on England. Torness is currently a significant site. Based on EDF's 2024 financial results, it generated more than a fifth of the UK's total nuclear output and more of its nuclear earnings in this country. It comes as the UK Government announced £14.2 billion for the creation of the Sizewell C plant south of the Border. The UK Government and EDF jointly own more than 80 per cent of the Suffolk site that will provide 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. Ed Miliband, UK energy secretary, promised a 'new golden age' of nuclear power with the announcement. The news brought the new nuclear debate again to the fore as Torness moves towards its decommissioning. EDF said: 'If you consider the [Torness] site, in isolation from government policy, it would be suitable for new nuclear. There is available land, good road, rail and grid connections and it has a community which is used to hosting nuclear. 'However, we respect that the Scottish Government doesn't support new nuclear just now, so EDF is focussing its nuclear development ambitions on England and expanding its renewables business in Scotland.' The company manages eight UK nuclear power station sites and owns five of the eight designated new nuclear sites. Paul Forrest, Torness station director. (Image: Gordon Terris) The news is revealed as we examine the impact of the planned closure site near Dunbar which has around 500 staff and around 200 full-time contractors, the surrounding community and the region's economy as it moves towards shut-down. Paul Forrest, Torness station director, said it is 'a valuable asset to the UK' that has contributed more than £16bn to the economy since generation started in 1988. He said: 'Torness Power Station continues to play a significant role in EDF's UK operations. It is one of five generating stations and, based on 2024's financial results, generated 21.5% of the UK's total nuclear output and contributed 22.6%to the Ebitda (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation) of UK's Nuclear Operations business. 'In March 2025, Torness achieved a cumulative generation total of 300 terawatt-hours since its commissioning, that is enough to power every Scottish home for 36 years and solidified its status as Scotland's most productive low-carbon asset. 'Torness is a high performing site which has met its output targets for four out of the last five years and is on plan for this year.' READ MORE: Nuclear power wins vote of confidence as life of last Scottish plant extended He said that 'beyond that, it is a vital part of the East Lothian community', adding: 'Through construction and generation, thousands of local people have developed highly skilled, well-paid careers at the station. 'Generations of families have worked there, building their lives around the site, and the security that has brought has been a boon for the local economy.' Additionally, the company said, three further planned refuelling outages will bring in an extra 800 workers 'who come to the site spending money in hotels, restaurants, take-aways and with taxi firms while they stay here' each time. The 2030 decommissioning will happen in stages with the removal of spent fuel from the reactors taking about four years and will be carried out by EDF, which, at its other decommissioning facility at Hunterston B in Ayrshire, now at the defueled stage, employs around 250 moving forward to 'nuclear restoration services'. At this point it will take around 15 years to remove all the buildings from site, with the exception of the reactor building. It will be left in situ, in a state called 'safestore', for around 70 years, until the final clearance of square-mile site. The firm said it does not have 'visibility of figures that would allow us to make an assessment of whether renewables projects in the area will create those long-term employment opportunities on a like-for-like basis'. However, Mr Forrest said: 'There will be a range of retraining opportunities as the station moves beyond generation and we will use the experience from other defueling sites to support staff. 'For example, at Hunterston B people have been trained to take on project management roles, which the station needs more of now. People have also been supported to gain additional qualifications in HGV driving or electrical skills which are needed on site during defueling but can also be used to build a career outside of the nuclear industry. 'Now Hunterston B is getting ready to transfer to nuclear restoration services there are further opportunities for retraining to take on jobs the station will need during decommissioning like health physicists and waste technicians. We expect to see the same kinds of opportunities at Torness when it reaches this stage.' The new Sizewell C site in Suffolk. (Image: EDF) The latest Economic Impact of the Civil Nuclear Industry report, compiled by Oxford Economics and commissioned by the Nuclear Industry Association, shows the sector generated an extra £350m for the Scottish economy in gross value added (GVA) in 2024, up from £1.1bn in 2021, a 32 per cent rise, and much it from south of the Border. It reported: 'Scottish workers are playing a vital role in building the new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point C in Somerset and 170 Scottish firms have contracts to work on the new power station with over £280m spent with Scottish firms to date.' Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the NIA, said: 'Scotland is benefiting from the jobs and growth coming with new nuclear plants being built in England, but with no new nuclear of its own, Scotland will lose out on billions in investment and thousands of well-paid, skilled jobs. 'Scots have always been a significant part of the nuclear industry – with renowned engineers and physicists coming through the Scottish education system, but despite the integral role nuclear plays in keeping electricity in Scotland green, without future plants young Scots will lose out on those opportunities at home.' READ MORE: It said: 'We are promoting and exploring the potential of Scotland's renewable energy resource and its ability to meet our local and national heat, transport and electricity needs, while also contributing to meeting our ambitious emission reduction targets. 'By 2030 we aim to generate the equivalent of 50% of Scotland's overall energy consumption from renewable sources, and by 2050 we aim to have decarbonised our energy system almost completely.' It said it is backing the development of the hydrogen sector and carbon capture and storage, promoting the development of on and offshore wind, marine energy, geothermal energy, hydropower and hydrogen. A UK Government spokesperson said: 'Investing in nuclear power represents energy security and a gateway to thousands of skilled jobs. 'It would bring millions of pounds in wages and economic growth to communities all over Scotland. The Scottish Government continues to block any movement on this safe, green energy that would turbocharge the Scottish economy. As long as they maintain that position jobs and investment that could be coming to Scotland will head elsewhere." Gillian Martin, Scottish energy secretary, told The Herald: 'The Scottish Government is focussed on supporting growth and creating jobs by capitalising on Scotland's immense renewable energy capacity rather than expensive new nuclear energy which takes decades to build, creates toxic waste which is difficult and costly to dispose of. 'However, we recognise the significant value that Torness and its workforce has contributed to Scotland's economy and local community. 'Decommissioning Scotland's nuclear sites will take decades and will require the retention of a highly skilled workforce. Meanwhile, the significant growth in renewables, storage hydrogen, carbon capture and decommissioning are key opportunities for our future energy workforce in Scotland – with independent scenarios from Ernst and Young, showing that with the right support, Scotland's low carbon and renewable energy sector could support nearly 80,000 jobs by 2050.'
