US government proposes easing some restrictions on drones traveling long distances
'This draft rule is a critical step toward enabling drone operations that will enhance safety, transform commercial services, and strengthen public safety with drones as a force multiplier,' Michael Robbins, president & CEO of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International trade group, said in a statement.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The rule spells out the circumstances drones can be used under 400 feet under while working to ensure they don't disrupt aviation and cause problems around airports, Federal Aviation Administration Administrator Bryan Bedford said. The drones will be required to have collision-avoidance technology to keep them away from planes and other drones. And the rule will only allow drones up to 1,320 pounds — including their payloads.
'The issue hasn't been that America just can't innovate, America can't create, America can't build amazing drone technology. It's that we've had a bureaucracy in place that makes it incredibly incredibly difficult for innovators to actually innovate,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said.
Advertisement
The rules are designed to address the way modern drones are being used today.
'While the technology has rapidly advanced over the last decade, our regulatory framework in the United States has failed to keep pace,' said Linda Ellman, CEO of the Commercial Drone Alliance group. 'Drone operators must navigate a labyrinth of ill-suited regulations designed for crewed aircraft.'
President Trump issued executive orders in June directing the Transportation Department to quickly get this rule out. The orders also included restrictions meant to help protect against terrorism, espionage and public safety threats.
Drones are already used in a variety of ways, including bolstering search and rescue operations, applying fertilizer, inspecting power lines and railroad bridges, and even delivering packages.
But the war in Ukraine has highlighted how drones could be used in a military or terrorist attack — a concern as the World Cup and Olympics approach in the US There also have been espionage cases where drones have been used to surveil sensitive sites. And White House officials said drones are being used to smuggle drugs over the border, and there are concerns about the potential for a disastrous collision between a drone and an airliner around an airport.
The FAA consulted with the Department of Homeland Security as it developed this rule to make sure security concerns are addressed. The government will accept comments on the new rule over the next 60 days before finalizing the rule likely sometime later this year.
Advertisement
Duffy and Bedford said they hope having regulations in place can help prevent problems like earlier this year when a small drone collided with a 'Super Scooper' plane that was fighting wildfires raging through Southern California. The drone punched a hole in the plane's left wing, causing enough damage that officials grounded the aircraft for several days to make repairs.
Authorities tracked down the 56-year-old drone operator, who pleaded guilty to a federal charge of recklessly flying his aircraft. The man admitted he launched his DJI quadcopter to observe fire damage over the Pacific Palisades neighborhood, despite the FAA having restricted drone flying in the area, according to court records. The operator lost sight of the drone after it flew about 1.5 miles from where he had launched it. And that's when it struck the 'Super Scooper.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Fashion capital? World Cup? American Airlines just added new flights at MIA
Travelers will soon have a new way to get from Miami to the financial and fashion center of Italy, and they can start booking tickets next week. American Airlines is adding non-stop, daily service between MIA and Milan, betting on the appeal of its culture and wealth even as record numbers of Americans are already traveling to Europe and crowding its largest cities. Starting in March 2026, American says it will be the only carrier offering l offer non-stop service between MIA and Milan. The flights, on a Boeing 787-7, will be year-round, starting March 29, American announced on Thursday. Milan is also central for those looking to travel throughout Italy, whether Venice or the Ligurian coast, home to Cinque Terre. It's also an easy train ride to much of the rest of Europe including the South of France. The announcement comes about two months after American started daily service between MIA and Rome. That first flight departed MIA on June 5 after a festive celebration at the gate in terminal D attended by Italian diplomats, Miami-Dade County officials and curious passengers. It left one month earlier than originally planned due to increased demand. American also said on Thursday it's trying to get ahead of next year's World Cup and will increase service between MIA and Buenos Aires Ezeiza Airport to as many a three daily flights next spring and summer. That will happen between May 21, 2026, and Aug.t 3, 2026. That's up from the usual two daily flights during those months. Plane tickets will be available starting Aug. 11, 2025, on the airline's website or mobile app. The 2026 World Cup opens June 11 in Mexico City and concludes July 19 in New Jersey. In between, Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens will host seven matches. But the draw won't take place until December, meaning fans won't know until then which team is playing where. Still, Lionel Messi who led Argentina to win the last World Cup in 2022, plays for Inter Miami and lives in South Florida with his family, making the region appealing to his compatriots. The new flights come as total passenger volume has fallen at South Florida's major airports for the first time in years, the Miami Herald reported this week. During the first half of 2025, which ended June 30, the number of passengers passing through Miami International Airport decreased 1.4% to 28.5 million compared to the first half of 2024. That hadn't happened since 2017, excluding the pandemic year of 2020. American Airlines despite having its largest summer schedule in its history out of MIA saw 2% fewer passengers in the first half of this year. And there's been a drop in arrivals at MIA from Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru. Still, Argentines are one group increasing their travel to South Florida. And American Airlines continues to be bullish on the region. It has about 15,000 employees based at MIA.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's threats of using military on US soil are getting more real
It's been evident for a long time that President Donald Trump is quite fond of the idea of dispatching the US military on domestic soil. It's one of the outcomes that those who are wary of Trump's more authoritarian tendencies fear most, because of the Pandora's box it could open. It appears he's getting closer and closer to making that longstanding aspiration a reality. Trump has floated this idea repeatedly over the years and has taken some bona fide steps toward it in his second term. That includes increasingly militarizing the border. And two months ago, he took a limited but significant step of sending not just the National Guard but also active-duty troops – Marines – to Los Angeles to guard federal buildings amid protests. It was the first time in 60 years that a president had done such a thing without a request from a governor. Given the violence in Los Angeles wasn't nearly as rampant or widespread as Trump advertised it, that raised the prospect that he was testing boundaries. His move to call in the troops, for example, is the subject of ongoing litigation that heads to trial next week. More broadly, it also tested Americans' tolerance for the military on US streets. Top officials in Trump's first administration seemed to successfully dissuade the president from such drastic steps. But those people are apparently gone. And there are increasing signs that Trump aims to press forward. Twice in just the last two days, he has proposed using the military for domestic law enforcement – even in the absence of a significant, imminent threat of something like riots. On Tuesday, Trump asserted more control of the upcoming 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles than presidents usually have. And he quickly floated using the military to protect the Games, while name checking two of his favorite Democratic targets – California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. 'We'll do anything necessary to keep the Olympics safe, including using our National Guard or military, OK?' Trump said. 'I will use the National Guard or the military – this is going to be so safe – if we have to.' By Wednesday, Trump expanded his recently pushed idea to federalize law enforcement in Washington, DC, to include using the National Guard in a more active role. CNN reports the administration is making plans to increase the presence of federal law enforcement, including Guard troops. 'And what a shame. The rate of crime, the rate of muggings, killings and everything else,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'We're not going to let it – and that includes bringing in the National Guard maybe very quickly too.' What's particularly striking about these comments and moves is the lack of an imminent threat. Similar to Trump's proposal to use the military for an Olympics that is three years in the future, there is little evidence of extraordinary circumstances in DC that might historically lead to suggestions of such a response. Crime in the nation's capital is actually falling for the second straight year in the district. But Trump is floating this anyway. (The president's call has come as a former Department of Government Efficiency worker was assaulted in an attempted carjacking.) In addition, while Trump has floated the idea of federalizing law enforcement in DC before – he did so often in 2023 and early 2024, when he was out of office – the National Guard aspect is new. It's not just his rhetoric, either. The administration last week took yet another step toward using the Guard for deportation operations, authorizing their deployments to immigration facilities. The move didn't yet authorize the Guard to participate in immigration raids, but it was yet another escalation in Trump's efforts to use the military in domestic law enforcement. It remains to be seen just how far he goes in using the military on US soil. Trump often floats ideas that don't come to fruition. There are also legal hurdles, with the most drastic steps legally requiring him to invoke the Insurrection Act. But he planted this seed years ago and has conspicuously upped the fertilizer of late. In 2020, there were many reports of Trump's often-privately expressed desired to use the military, particularly to crack down on racial-justice protests that sometimes turned violent. Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump floated using 10,000 active-duty troops in DC, and that top White House adviser Stephen Miller floated sending as many as 250,000 troops to the US-Mexico border. By 2023, Trump signaled that he would break with historical practice – and possibly the law – by not deferring to governors and local officials on calling in the military to deal with unrest. 'The next time, I'm not waiting,' Trump said. (He followed through on that threat in Los Angeles this year. A trial next week will determine whether he broke the law in doing so.) Back then Trump also signaled he would use the military for his mass deportation operation. By late in the 2024 campaign, he began building up the supposed menace of the 'enemy within' – supposedly nefarious forces inside the US – that he said 'should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.' And by the time Trump made the call on sending the Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, he began asserting that this might be the start of a very different new normal. 'We're going to have troops everywhere,' he said. It might be time to start taking that prospect more seriously.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
As Miami-Dade's budget woes grow, some call to cancel World Cup subsidies
Last year, Miami-Dade County agreed to spend $46 million to host the 2026 World Cup games at Hard Rock Stadium — including about $25 million for things like police presence and paramedic overtime. Now, as the county faces a more than $400-million budget deficit for the same year, some elected officials and other community members are questioning the plan. State of play: Last month, Mayor Daniella Levine Cava outlined cuts of up to 35% for some departments and the merger of others to offset the deficit. One merger — the Department of Cultural Affairs into the Public Library System — resulted in a proposed 50% cut to the county's cultural grant funding, or about $12.8 million, a loss many argue will decimate the city's arts community. Meanwhile, FIFA is projected to generate more than $10 billion from the games, The Athletic reported. The latest: Last month, County Commission Vice Chairman Kionne L. McGhee called on the county to halt all funding for the FIFA games and return the funds, demanding they be reallocated to support community programs that were hit by the proposed budget cuts. In a news release, McGhee said he was "proud to support" bringing the games to Miami, as it would "drive economic growth," but the recent proposal for cuts to local initiatives "changes everything." "When our residents are facing the loss of programs that keep communities alive, safe, and dignified, spending millions on FIFA stadiums and events becomes indefensible. I can no longer support it," he wrote. The other side: "When we're looking at a $400 million-plus deficit in our budget, yes, it raises the question if we should claw back some of that money, but we can't forget that the county asked for this," Miami-Dade County Chairman Anthony Rodriguez said during a recent podcast appearance. "This is something the county applied for," he said. "We wanted it. We asked for it [and] we got it. Now we've got to support it." The intrigue: At another town hall earlier this week, Levine Cava said commissioners could vote to reduce the subsidy, but didn't say if she'd support doing so.
