
11 years on, Bharat is stronger and more inclusive
Congress leader P Chidambaram's assertion ('Eleven years: A critique', IE, June 15) that 'India is not a better, stronger, or fairer place today than it was in 2014' misrepresents the progress made under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership. His critique overlooks significant structural reforms, welfare initiatives, and India's enhanced global standing. While criticisms of governance are essential in a democracy, dismissing overall national progress due to ideological bias is not constructive.
Chidambaram claims the Modi government has ignored diverse views; however, India remains a vibrant democracy with an active media, judiciary, and opposition. It is important to note that on June 25, we will complete 50 years of the imposition of the Emergency. The National Democratic Alliance's success in three consecutive national elections showcases public confidence, not authoritarianism. Respecting alternative views does not mean allowing misinformation or threats to national security. No democracy permits unchecked liberty that undermines unity.
Economic Growth and Reform: A Fuller Picture
The article selectively compares GDP growth data while overlooking the macroeconomic shocks India has weathered, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, global energy price spikes, and geopolitical disruptions like the Russia-Ukraine war. These shocks affected global growth, not just India's.
From FY2014 to FY2025 (excluding Covid year FY21, negative growth, and FY22, recovery), India grew at an average of 7.1 per cent. During 2004-14 GDP growth rate was 6.7 per cent. In 2014, India was the world's 10th largest economy with a nominal GDP of Rs 112.3 lakh crore; the fifth largest in 2021 and the fourth largest in 2025 with a nominal GDP of Rs 330.7 lakh crore. Among the top 10 world economies as of 2025, India's economy grew the most in the last 10 years, exhibiting an over 100 per cent growth in GDP, as per the latest IMF estimates.
At the current growth rate projections, India will become the world's third-largest economy by 2028. As per an SBI report, per capita GDP has increased by 2.6 times since FY14. Per capita GDP at current prices stood at Rs 2.35 lakh in FY25, with a decadal CAGR growth of 9.1 per cent. Inflation, too, has been better managed, averaging around 4.6 per cent in the last 11 years compared to 7.5 per cent during the UPA decade. Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) as per percentage of GDP increased by 50 per cent in the previous 11 years. During UPA (2004-14), CAPEX was around 2 per cent of GDP. It increased to 3.1 per cent in FY 25. This reflects the government's improvement in the quality of spending. So, with high growth and low inflation in the past 11 years and future projections, Bharat is better for all.
Addressing Inequality and Justice
Since 2014, India has transformed from a fragile economy to a resilient global player driven by people-first policies, institutional reforms and digital innovation. A key aspect of this change is taxation: The basic income tax exemption limit increased from Rs 2.5 lakh in 2014 to Rs 12 lakh in 2025, boosting the middle class's disposable income. The abolition of the unproductive wealth tax in 2015 and the introduction of the GST in 2017 streamlined indirect taxes, enhancing efficiency and broadening the formal economy. By FY25, GST collections exceeded Rs 16.75 lakh crore, contributing to a projected tax-to-GDP ratio of 11.7 per cent, making the tax system simpler, faster, and fairer than it was a decade ago.
India's infrastructure reflected its economic growth, with national highway length increasing from 91,287 km in 2014 to 1,46,204 km by 2025. Significant projects like the Atal Tunnel and Chenab Bridge were completed. Rail track length addition more than doubled from 14,000 km (2004-14) to 31,000 km (2014-25), and electrification rose from 21,000 km (2004-14) to 41,000 km since 2014. Port turnaround time improved to 0.9 days, surpassing Singapore and the US. India moved up 16 spots in the World Bank's Logistics Performance Index from 2014 to 2023. Social schemes aligned with economic goals significantly impacted lives.
Ayushman Bharat covers 50 crore citizens with Rs 5 lakh health insurance, while the Jal Jeevan Mission expanded tap water access from 3.23 crore rural homes in 2019 to 15.6 crore in 2025. Swachh Bharat constructed 10 crore toilets, and the Ujjwala Yojana provided nine crore LPG connections. These reforms led to notable economic outcomes. As per the World Bank, extreme poverty fell from 27.1 per cent in 2011-12 to 5.3 per cent in 2022-23, lifting 26.9 crore citizens from extreme poverty. The Multidimensional Poverty Index dropped from 53.8 per cent in 2005-06 to 15.5 per cent in 2022-23.
From 2014 to 2024, India created 17.19 crore new jobs, compared to 2.9 crore in the previous decade, while the unemployment rate decreased from 6 per cent in 2017-18 to 3.2 per cent in 2023-24. Youth employability rose from 33.95 per cent in 2013 to 54.81 per cent in 2024.
A Stronger Bharat: Zero Tolerance Approach to Terrorism
India has taken significant steps to assert its zero-tolerance stance on terrorism, including the surgical strikes in 2016, the Balakot air strikes in 2019, and Operation Sindoor in 2025. Over the past 11 years, the government's firm and clear approach to internal security and counter-terrorism has demonstrated its unwavering commitment to prioritising national interest above all else.
India's presidency of the G20 was celebrated globally. Throughout this presidency, India positioned itself as the voice of the Global South, actively raising relevant concerns on international platforms. Additionally, border infrastructure has seen a rapid enhancement, with more roads and bridges built along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the last five years than in the previous 25 years combined. While neighbouring countries are undergoing political turbulence, India has successfully maintained economic and strategic partnerships through initiatives such as BIMSTEC, IPEF, the Quad, and the SCO.
However, it is important to acknowledge that Bharat still has considerable progress to make on the economic front. Over the past 11 years, we have made strides from 'ease of doing corruption' to 'ease of doing business.' Challenges remain, and in a country as vast as India, addressing one issue can often lead to friction elsewhere. Nonetheless, the last 11 years have illustrated what is possible when reforms are driven by a clear vision, effective policy, and a strong sense of purpose.
The writer is Part-Time Member (EAC-PM) and a Professor of Finance
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Don't pretend persecution when you are probed for corruption: Congress to KTR
Congress MP Chamala Kiran Reddy accused the BRS working president K.T. Rama Rao of indulging in theatrics and projecting himself as a victim to gain sympathy realising the corruption involved in Formula-E race. Speaking to reporters at Gandhi Bhavan on Monday, along with Rohin Reddy and Malreddy Ramreddy, he asked Mr. Rama Rao to stop playing the role of a film hero and behave like a responsible politician. 'The film dialogues uttered will not make you a film star like Mahesh Babu of the movie Bharat Ane Nenu and stop drawing inspiration from movie dialogues. ' The MP also took a jibe at KTR's apparent belief that going to jail will get him to the top post. 'You are not a revolutionary like Alluri Sitarama Raju or Bhagat Singh but a politician involved in corruption,' he reminded. 'Don't pretend as if you are persecuted while actually being probed for misuse of power and corruption.' Mr. Kiran Reddy claimed that KTR was linked to a series of controversial incidents abroad. 'KTR's close friend Kedar died mysteriously overseas. Another associate, Prabhakar Rao, fled to America. These things cannot be ignored,' he remarked.


News18
11 minutes ago
- News18
From Kashmiri Carpet To Silver Purse, PM Modi Gifts Handcrafted Artefacts To Cyprus Leadership
Last Updated: Prime Minister Narendra Modi commenced his five-day, three-nation tour on Sunday with a visit to Cyprus Prime Minister Narendra Modi showcased a gesture of cultural diplomacy during his visit to Cyprus by presenting exquisitely handcrafted gifts to Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides and First Lady Philippa Karsera. Prime Minister Narendra Modi commenced his five-day, three-nation tour on Sunday with a visit to Cyprus — marking the first Indian prime ministerial trip to the island nation in more than 20 years. He was welcomed at the airport by Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides. As a symbol of India's rich artistic heritage, PM Modi gifted a Kashmiri handmade silk carpet to Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides. Known for their intricate craftsmanship, these carpets are woven using centuries-old techniques by artisans in the Kashmir Valley. The piece presented features deep red tones, fawn borders, and traditional vine and geometric motifs. Of special note is its prized two-tone effect, giving the illusion of two different carpets depending on the angle and lighting. To First Lady Philippa Christodoulides, the Prime Minister presented a silver clutch purse from Andhra Pradesh, which is crafted using the traditional repoussé technique. The purse, adorned with floral designs, is inspired by temple and royal art. With a semi-precious stone centerpiece, ornate edges, and a regal curved shape, the purse reflects India's fusion of heritage artistry and modern design. PM Modi's Meeting With Cyprus President On Monday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi engaged in delegation-level discussions with Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides, focusing on strengthening bilateral relations across various sectors. Prior to the talks, he was given a ceremonial welcome at the Presidential Palace. The high-level meeting was attended by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval. PM Modi Receives Highest Honour During his official visit to Cyprus, PM Modi was bestowed with the country's highest civilian award — The Grand Cross of the Order of Makarios III. Grateful for the prestigious honour, PM Modi dedicated it to the enduring friendship between India and Cyprus. 'This honour is not just a recognition of me, Narendra Modi — it is an honour for 1.4 billion Indians. It is a tribute to their strength and aspirations," the Prime Minister said. He noted that the award also reflects an appreciation for India's culture, values, and the philosophy of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam — the world is one family. First Published: June 16, 2025, 19:13 IST


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kapil Sibal: ‘Delhi Police did not do its job… What was the need for CJI to forward Justice Varma report to govt?'
Independent Rajya Sabha MP and former Congress leader Kapil Sibal has been part of two impeachment processes against senior judges. In 1993, Sibal had defended then Supreme Court judge V Ramaswami during his impeachment motion hearing in Parliament, while in 2018, he was the one who read out the impeachment motion in the House against then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra. As the government prepares to move on an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma, Sibal speaks at length on why he does not think the case against the High Court judge stands. Excerpts: Before I answer that, why has the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha not moved on an impeachment motion signed by 55 members of Parliament (in the case of Allahabad High Court Justice Shekhar Yadav) for six months? Does it take that long to verify signatures, especially when the case against Justice Yadav is open-and-shut? The communal (speech) of the judge is evident. The speech has not been denied by the judge… The government clearly wants to save the judge… Also, why did the Rajya Sabha Chairman write to the Chief Justice not to proceed with the in-house inquiry (against Justice Yadav) based on information available in the public domain? The same logic should have been used by the Chairman to stop the in-house inquiry against Justice Varma. The Opposition should insist that impeachment proceedings be commenced against Justice Yadav before the case of Yashwant Varma is taken up. The case is unlike any other in the past. Why do I say that? In the case of Justice Ramaswami, what were the allegations? That he ordered a certain carpet of a certain dimension, but what was found in the oval dining room was not consistent with the dimensions ordered. That was a matter of record, requiring no further evidence. He had allegedly installed many air conditioners, bought new furniture, enjoyed the benefit of two residences, in Chennai and Chandigarh. Facts relating to all this were matters of record…. Whether such financial profligacy amounted to proven misconduct or not was the only question to be answered in the course of the debate on the motion (in Parliament). Take the case of Justice S K Gangele, who was accused of sexual harassment. That required an inquiry, not an investigation. The inquiry under the Judges Inquiry Act, 1964, exonerated him. So the motion failed. In the case of Justice Soumitra Sen, he resigned before the vote on the impeachment. The charge against him related to misappropriation of funds when acting as a receiver, appointed by the Calcutta High Court. Again, the facts in relation to the funds were not in dispute. In the case of Justice A K Ganguly, the Judges' Inquiry Committee found that charges of sexual harassment prima facie disclosed an act of unwelcome behaviour. But no action was taken since by then he had retired. In none of the above cases was there a requirement for an investigation for facts to be established. But in this (Justice Varma's) case, you need an investigation, because there are no established facts, other than that there are videos showing burnt cash in the outhouse of the residence allotted to the judge. First, there is no evidence to discover how much cash was there. Mainstream media alleges, without any evidence, that there were four or six sacks… Who brought these and placed them there… no evidence. No mention of this in the evidence collected by the in-house (Court) committee. Mainstream media alleges, again without any evidence, that a sum of Rs 15 crore was there… Who counted them, only the media knows. No such evidence before the committee… The outhouse was beyond the boundary wall, separating the residence from the outhouse and staff quarters. The CRPF was located at the main gate, with no direct view of the outhouse. There was also a back gate where there was no security. So who put the cash in the outhouse? How much cash was there? Whether it was genuine or fake… all that has to be investigated. What did the fire service officers do after they reached the spot; what did they do after they extinguished the fire? They should have wondered how such a fire can be the result of a short circuit in a room with only one fan and a tubelight. Did they tell the family members about the presence of cash? In fact, there is no evidence that they did… Was (Justice Varma's) daughter close enough to see what was in the outhouse? She was asked to stay a distance from the outhouse, from where she could not see what was inside. Neither personnel of the Delhi Police nor members of the Fire Service Department told any member of the family and those present in the house that they discovered burnt cash. They never told the Judge's PS. Why did the Delhi Police not seize the alleged half-burnt cash? The tape showed that remnants of cash were present. You needed only one note with a serial number to figure out which bank it came from. Much could have been inferred after that. Why did the Delhi Police not do that? Why did they not cordon off the premises? Why did they not keep a vigil throughout? Why did they not lodge an FIR?… Why was all this not done? They looked into what? They never looked into why the Delhi Police didn't do what they were supposed to do? The committee said that is not part of their remit… They didn't look into how members of the Fire Services Department conducted themselves… I have great regard for each of (the judges), but if they were asked to hold an inquiry, they should have looked into issues which (were) obvious. Without a full-fledged inquiry, they concluded that as cash was allegedly found as reflected in the taped videos, and the judge could not explain who the cash belonged to and who put it there, therefore, the cash found must have been placed there with his tacit/explicit knowledge. They do not conclude that the cash belonged to the judge… In the absence of any investigation, how do you make somebody culpable for something that he says he is not aware of? There has to be evidence to show that the cash was moved on such and such day, at such and such time… Somebody will have to unload, placing it in the outhouse… Qua the quantum too the committee has rendered no finding. On March 23, how did some television channels find some burnt notes on the road?… That is nine days after the event. I hope they have kept the notes because maybe there is a serial number which can provide some evidence of their origin. I say with some sense of responsibility that he (Justice Varma) was perhaps one of the finest judges of this court (the Delhi High Court). There was never a whiff of any wrongdoing here, or for that matter, when he was in Allahabad. No. In-house is an in-house procedure for the Supreme Court. In fact, I wonder what was the constitutional necessity for (then) Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna – an absolutely outstanding judge – to forward the report to the government. Members of Parliament have to be agitated enough, independent of the in-house procedure, about the conduct of a judge of the higher judiciary and, if they are convinced… then alone a motion for his removal should be moved. We did this in the case of Justice Misra (facing allegations of misbehaviour and misuse of authority). We Members of Parliament based our findings on facts… Such a motion should then be dealt with by a judges' inquiry committee constituted under the 1964 Act. In this case, the MPs have no facts to go by other than alleged burnt cash, without knowing its origins. You are using an in-house procedure to supplant an inquiry without a motion, and you want to remove the judge. Just look at the facts. On the 14th of March, a fire broke out around 11.30 pm. The daughter of the judge hears a blast and goes to the site along with the house staff. When the door is opened, the fire flares up, so they back off. Neither the CRPF nor anybody else comes to help… She is the one who calls the fire services people. The Delhi Police comes thereafter. The fire is doused. The police don't do a thing… They – neither the Fire Services Department nor the Delhi Police – inform the family that cash was found. The judge returns on the 15th. He goes to meet his mother, comforts her. He doesn't go to that site at that point… The committee surprisingly presumes that (this is) because he knew that cash was there and that it belonged to him. The judge is not aware that cash was found at the site till the 17th, when the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court shows him the tape. He is, of course, shocked. Thereafter on the 20th of March, the Judge (Varma) is transferred. He doesn't protest against the transfer. Again, the inquiry report holds that he should have protested and, because he did not, it is evidence of guilt. On March 25, the in-house procedure starts, which does not associate the judge in any substantial way. They examine the fire services people, the Delhi Police, CRPF… they issue him (Justice Varma) a show-cause notice. He files a reply on April 30, and requests that he be given a hearing, which was afforded to the judges concerned in all previous cases. That hearing is not given. What is said in his reply is not countered, and a report is given on the 4th of May, possibly because Chief Justice Khanna was to retire soon thereafter… They may inquire if they find the evidence sufficiently compelling. But again, this case requires an investigation. In my view, the Supreme Court itself, because he (Justice Varma) is a judge of the High Court, should direct the Secretary General to lodge an FIR and set up an investigating agency, an SIT, of chosen officers… The Delhi Police has already bungled and not done its job. Clearly, from statements made by the Law Minister and others, they wish to remove the judge even in the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing… The judge will have no confidence in any police investigation under the control of the government… There are other unanswered questions. Even the inquiry report says that the keys (of the outhouse) were accessible to anybody living on the premises… Incidentally, there was a liquor cabinet there which was locked. So you have to assume that the judge was more concerned about the liquor than the kind of cash that the mainstream media said was found there. We are not at that stage at all, and the judge has not asked me to appear for him… The issues raised by me are questions that any thinking person must ask before destroying somebody's career and reputation. The government is using this flimsy information to demoralise the judiciary, to take forward their agenda of an NJAC (National Judicial Appointments Commission) in which the final authority for appointing judges to the superior courts is the government… The whole idea seems to be to get the nation to believe that the judiciary is corrupt and therefore we need to change the system… I hope and I trust that the Opposition will not let it happen.