Calls Grow for Spy Prevention Law in Japan Amid Rising Security Concerns
In addition, the document urges the government to introduce "a spy prevention law that aligns with international standards." Furthermore, it recommends drafting a national intelligence strategy to serve as a foundation for Japan's intelligence-gathering operations. The ruling LDP is reportedly considering incorporating the proposal into its campaign platform for the upcoming House of Councillors election this summer.
Following the meeting at the Prime Minister's Office, Sanae Takaichi told reporters:
"I got the sense that the Prime Minister shares a strong sense of urgency on this issue. He said, 'I'd like to study this carefully,' so I hope the government will begin taking concrete steps."
At a separate press conference, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi underscored the need to bolster counterintelligence efforts, stating: "We recognize that foreign intelligence agencies are conducting operations in Japan, and we are responding with appropriate measures."
He added that the government remains committed to further strengthening its capabilities in this area.
Earlier in May, Prime Minister Ishiba had also addressed the issue in the Diet, declaring: "We must assess whether our current human intelligence capabilities are sufficient. While protecting human rights, I recognize that further measures may still be needed to protect Japan's national interests."
Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya struck a more reluctant tone during a June 12 session of the House of Councillors Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense. In response to a question from Hirofumi Yanagase of the Nippon Ishin no Kai, Iwaya stated bluntly: "I am cautious regarding the enactment of what is commonly referred to as a spy prevention law." Minister for Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya
Referring to Takaichi's proposal submitted on May 27, Yanagase urged the government to act:
"I really hope this moves forward. But for 40 years, nothing has progressed. Minister Iwaya has consistently expressed negative views on the matter."
In response, Iwaya repeated the need for caution:
"Regarding the necessity of such a law, I believe it must be carefully considered from multiple perspectives, including respect for fundamental human rights such as the right to know. It's not that I oppose it, but I believe it requires a prudent approach."
He went on to say:
"We must seriously consider what measures are necessary to safeguard our national interests while also ensuring proper respect for human rights."
Pressed on why he remains cautious, Iwaya pointed to the heated controversy that surrounded the Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets:
"There was intense debate in the Diet at the time. The core of the discussion was whether adequate consideration was given to the public's right to know and basic human rights. The exact contents of a prospective spy prevention law remain unclear, but legislation of this kind must be approached with similar caution."
(Read a related article in Japanese )
Author: The Sankei Shimbun
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
a day ago
- National Post
Sharren Haskel: I am Israel's Canadian-born deputy foreign minister. Mark Carney is rewarding terrorist monsters
Article content The most popular candidate for president is Marwan Barghouti, who is in an Israeli prison on five counts of murder. Barghouti is not a member of Hamas but Fatah, but he is a terrorist too. Does Canada really want a Palestinian state on Israel's doorstep led by terrorists like Barghouti? Article content This is not the Canada the world once knew. On Nov. 29, 1947, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the partition plan, ending the British Mandate and providing for the establishment of a Jewish state after two millennia in exile. Lester Pearson, then a senior Canadian diplomat and later prime minister, played a vital role in achieving the consensus that led to the plan's adoption. Pearson maintained that any durable settlement in the region must include recognition of the Jewish people's right to statehood in their historic homeland — a position he described as a 'sine qua non' for peace. Article content For decades, Canada's policy reflected that principle, contributing to its reputation as a constructive and balanced actor in the Middle East peace process. The current decision to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state under certain predicates marks a significant departure from that long-standing approach. Prime Minister Mark Carney said earlier this year that any future Palestinian state should be 'Zionist.' Whichever imaginary Palestinian state Mr. Carney believes he is declaring recognition of, it certainly won't be 'Zionist.' There is time for Mr. Carney to change his mind, and I would urge him to do so. Article content Canada says its recognition hinges on the Palestinian Authority agreeing to significant reforms: overhauling its governance, holding 2026 elections without Hamas, and creating a demilitarised Palestinian state. It is difficult to see how these predicates could be fully met in practice, given the entrenched power structures and ongoing influence of Hamas. It is impossible that all the predicates will be met by mid-September, so Canada would potentially be rewarding Hamas with state recognition before any of these terms can be met. Article content History will judge this decision in the context of Canada's long-standing role in the Middle East. While Canada once acted as a constructive and respected partner in supporting peace and legitimacy in the region, this unilateral recognition risks undermining that legacy. Acting at a moment when our hostages remain in brutal Hamas captivity and tensions are extremely high, Canada sends a terrible signal that political symbolism and opportunism take precedence over practical and sensible diplomatic solutions, and that terrorism works. Article content Article content I am pleased the Toronto International Film Festival changed their mind, but the antisemitism that is flooding Canada must be taken seriously by both the federal and provincial governments. Canada must do more to counter this terrible change in societal values since October 7. Article content
National Post
3 days ago
- National Post
From hotels, to wine and candy: Canada spent $170K to bring back women who joined Islamic State
The federal government spent more than $170,000 to bring Canadian women and their children back to the country after they went overseas to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, documents show. Article content As first reported by Global News, the documents, which were released under access to information legislation, contain details of the costs incurred when eight women, along with their children, were brought home from Syria. They include costs for business class air travel and hotel bills in Montreal that include wine, candy and chocolates. A number of the women have since been charged with terrorism offences. Article content Article content Article content On Friday, the Conservatives called for an investigation into the expenditures in a letter addressed to Jean-Yves Duclos, the chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, Global News reported. Article content Article content 'With Canadians lining up in food banks in record numbers and struggling with housing costs, the Liberal government must answer for why they spent $170,000 on lavish costs to repatriate reported ISIS criminals,' the letter reportedly says. Article content The first round of repatriations, completed in October 2022, cost $10,863, according to the documents from Global Affairs Canada. Canadians Kimberly Polman and Oumaima Chouay were returned to the country in that operation. Polman is facing terrorism charges and Chouay pleaded guilty last month to one charge of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. Article content The second operation, which occurred in April 2023, cost $132,746 in expenses for government staff and those returned to Canada. Article content Article content Not all the expenses are detailed in the documents, but the total cost includes $20,331 for 23 hotel rooms at the Marriott hotel at the Montreal Airport, including room-service bills and a catering tab of nearly $3,000. At the time, four Canadian women — three of whom were arrested upon arrival — and their 10 children were returned to Canada, The Canadian Press reported. Article content Article content That same room tipped $7 on an $8 coffee. Another room ordered $15 worth of children's ice cream, and a third ordered white, red and sparkling wine at $25 apiece. One room's food bill included two $24 smoked meat dishes.
CTV News
3 days ago
- CTV News
U.K. to prosecute more than 60 people for supporting banned pro-Palestine group
Demonstrators hold up a banner during a protest by Palestine Action group in London, Monday, June 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein) At least 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support' for the recently proscribed Palestine Action group, in addition to three already charged, London's Metropolitan Police said on Friday. 'We have put arrangements in place that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary,' the Met said in a statement. More than 700 people have been arrested since it was banned as a terrorist group in early July, including 522 people arrested at a protest last weekend for displaying placards backing the group -- thought to be the highest ever recorded number of detentions at a single protest in the UK capital. 'The decisions that we have announced today are the first significant numbers to come out of the recent protests, and many more can be expected in the next few weeks,' said Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson. 'People should be clear about the real-life consequences for anyone choosing to support Palestine Action,' said Parkinson. Demonstrators shout and gesture toward a police line during a protest by Palestine Action group in London, Monday, June 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein) Demonstrators shout and gesture toward a police line during a protest by Palestine Action group in London, Monday, June 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein) The first three people were charged earlier this month with offences under the Terrorism Act for backing Palestine Action, after they were arrested at a July demonstration. According to police, those charged for such offences could face up to six months imprisonment, as well as other consequences. 'I am proud of how our police and CPS (prosecution) teams have worked so speedily together to overcome misguided attempts to overwhelm the justice system,' Met Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said. In a statement following the latest mass arrests, Interior Minister Yvette Cooper defended the Labour government's decision, insisting: 'U.K. national security and public safety must always be our top priority.' 'The assessments are very clear -- this is not a non-violent organization,' she added. The government outlawed Palestine Action on July 7, days after it took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated £7.0 million (US$9.3 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to Britain's indirect military support for Israel amid the war in Gaza. Britain's interior ministry has insisted that Palestine Action was also suspected of other 'serious attacks' that involved 'violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage'. Critics including the United Nations, Amnesty International and Greenpeace have slammed the proscription as legal overreach and warned that the ensuing arrests threaten free speech. The U.K.'s Liberal Democrat party said that it was 'deeply concerned about the use of terrorism powers against peaceful protesters'.
