logo
North Koreans swim at huge new beach resort touted as boost for country's tourism

North Koreans swim at huge new beach resort touted as boost for country's tourism

Yahoo4 days ago
North Korea has opened a vast new beach resort, the Wonsan-Kalma eastern coastal tourist zone, to its citizens, state media reported on Wednesday, even as the country largely maintains its strict ban on foreign tourism.
The mammoth complex, which Pyongyang claims can accommodate nearly 20,000 people, is central to leader Kim Jong Un's strategy to bolster the nation's struggling economy through tourism. The resort, touted as North Korea's largest tourist complex, features facilities for open water swimming, water park slides, and various other aquatic activities.
However, the prospects for the Wonsan-Kalma zone remain uncertain. Observers suggest that with the country unlikely to fully reopen its borders or embrace Western tourists in the near future, its full potential as an international draw may not be realised.
Despite these broader challenges, the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported that the Wonsan-Kalma area commenced service on Tuesday, drawing a significant number of North Koreans who were seen enjoying the new attractions.
'The guests' hearts were filled with overwhelming emotion as they felt the astonishing new heights of our-style tourism culture blossoming under the era of the Workers' Party," KCNA said in a typical propaganda-driven dispatch.
Photos released by North Korean state media showed children with tubes and inflatable balls dipping into the sea, while others in colorful swimsuits beamed while sitting beneath red-and-white parasols.
Kim said at the opening ceremony last week the site would be recorded as 'one of the greatest successes this year" and called its opening 'the proud first step' toward realizing the government's policy of developing tourism. State media said North Korea has plans to build similar tourist zones around the country.
North Korea, however, hasn't said whether and when it would fully resume international tourism that is key to their success.
Since 2022, North Korea has been slowly easing the curbs imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic and reopening its borders in phases.
But Chinese group tours, which made up more than 90% of visitors before the pandemic, remain stalled while there are questions about ties between the two socialist neighbors. In February this year, North Korea allowed a small group of international tourists to visit its northeastern border city of Rason, only to stop that tour program in less than a month.
Since February 2024, North Korea has been accepting Russian tourists amid expanding military cooperation between the countries. But Russian government records seen by South Korean experts show a little more than 2,000 Russians, only about 880 of them tourists, visited North Korea last year, a number that is too small to revive North Korea's tourism.
Russia's Primorsky region, which borders North Korea, said last week that the first group of Russian tourists to the Wonsan-Kalma resort will depart on July 7 for a eight-day trip that includes a visit to Pyongyang.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US–China trade: 3 consumer sectors investors should focus on
US–China trade: 3 consumer sectors investors should focus on

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US–China trade: 3 consumer sectors investors should focus on

Brendan Ahern, KraneShares chief investment officer, joins Market Domination Overtime with Josh Lipton to discuss trade tensions between China and the US, highlighting areas investors should be focused on right now. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Who do you think Brandon has the leverage here, US or China? I I had a policy guy on this week on the show who said, he argued with Xi because he could take a much more longer term look. He is not worried about polling. Uh but what do you think, Brandon? Yeah, I think there's no winner in a trade war. Certainly, US consumers are the biggest losers, uh US retailers. Um at the same time, China, it is a very big country, uh re you know, not just geographically, but economically. And so yeah, there's parts of China that are not geared to export manufacturing at all. You know, we estimate that less than 3% of China's GDP is geared to the United States today. That that percentage has come down uh pretty dramatically as uh Asian countries as well as the uh EU European Union now are bigger trade partners. But I think ultimately there is no winner. And and these two economies are highly intertwined with one another. Business people are getting along with one another just fine. Why can't these diplomats take a page from the corporate world? So given these trade tensions, Brandon, right? These trade tensions, which as you argue, um, hurting everybody to some respects. How does that then Brandon inform your investment decisions? What Chinese sectors, industry names, do you want exposure to? Yeah, I mean, I mean certainly we believe that the Chinese government will pivot to raise domestic consumption to offset um export driven manufacturing where it's going to face a little bit of a of a headwind. Uh certainly just with the reprove in the trade war, you've seen some of the China PMIs have been uh rebounded quite nicely. But but in general, I think this is an area where President Trump and President Xi agree that China needs to do more around domestic consumption. So they're doing a lot of consumer subsidies. Those subsidies have been geared to auto, which includes electric vehicle and hybrid. More recently, it's electronics. So things like iPhones and mobile phones, smart watches, as well as home appliances. So, so I think those are three areas around consumption that as an investor, you want to be focused on when it comes to China today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Should you invest in Japanese stocks? UBS answers
Should you invest in Japanese stocks? UBS answers

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Should you invest in Japanese stocks? UBS answers

-- Japan's stock market has climbed to new highs on renewed foreign buying, but investors should be cautious heading into earnings season, according to analyst at UBS. The TOPIX index broke above 2,800 last week, helped by momentum-driven gains and concerns among global investors about missing out. But UBS said the rally may not last, pointing to stretched valuations and weakening profit forecasts. 'We remain Neutral on Japanese equities as momentum-driven markets can reverse quickly,' UBS analyst Chisa Kobayashi said. Japanese shares have underperformed global peers this year, but the recent rebound has been led by sectors less exposed to trade tensions, such as tech services and utilities. Many of these stocks are now expensive, UBS said. The upcoming June-quarter earnings, due later this month, could mark a turning point. 'We expect that downward revisions of full-year guidance will be announced with 1Q results, marking the end of negative news'Exporters should cut full-year guidance, with chance of ending months of downgrades and setting a floor for expectations. That could open the door for a recovery in cyclical shares like autos and machinery, which have lagged. 'While these stocks may continue to outperform if the momentum market persists, from a risk-reward perspective, we believe undervalued, high-quality cyclical stocks offer better medium-term returns,' Kobayashi near-term gains seen possible, strong U.S. markets and share buybacks by Japanese companies may provide some support if sentiment shifts. UBS remains cautious overall but sees selective opportunities in undervalued companies, especially as corporate buybacks and resilient U.S. markets may limit the downside. Related articles Should you invest in Japanese stocks? UBS answers Who will win the battle of U.S. retail media? How did the hyperscale clouds do in Q1 2025?

Liverpool preseason fixtures in full and why Reds have shorter schedule ahead of title defense
Liverpool preseason fixtures in full and why Reds have shorter schedule ahead of title defense

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Liverpool preseason fixtures in full and why Reds have shorter schedule ahead of title defense

Liverpool is currently scheduled to play five preseason friendlies this summer, with the first set to take place in just over a month's time. The Reds will face Preston at Deepdale on Sunday July 13, when Florian Wirtz and Jeremie Frimpong — as well as any other new players that Liverpool signs — could make their debuts. Advertisement Liverpool then travels to Asia for friendlies agains AC Milan and Yokohama on Saturday July 26 and Wednesday July 30 respectively, before returning to England and hosting Athletic Bilbao in back-to-back friendlies on Monday August 4. The first game against Bilbao kicks off at 5pm BST, before the second game at 8pm BST; fans with a ticket are granted access to both games. READ MORE: Bayer Leverkusen targets Liverpool star in separate transfer to Florian Wirtz deal READ MORE: Jurgen Klopp already gave new Tottenham manager Thomas Frank the ultimate seal of approval While other teams in the Premier League might continue to play in friendlies into the following weekend ahead of the start of the league season on Friday August 15, Liverpool will be in Community Shield action against Crystal Palace on Sunday August 10. Advertisement Liverpool's preseason fixtures Jul 13: Preston v LFC (Deepdale) Jul 26: AC Milan v LFC (Hong Kong) Jul 30: Yokohama v LFC (Yokohama) Aug 4: LFC v Bilbao x2 (Anfield) Meanwhile, although Liverpool looks to be closing in on Germany international Wirtz, it seems it might not quite be a done deal yet. Reports on Tuesday suggested that an agreement had been reached with Bayer Leverkusen for a record $171 million transfer, with a medical set to take place in the coming days. However, those reports were quickly shot down by the highly respected journalist David Ornstein, who said that Liverpool and Leverkusen were still locked in talks as they tried to reach an agreement over Wirtz's move to Anfield. According to The Athletic, Liverpool is still speaking daily with Leverkusen, with talks in their final stages. What's more, contrary to recent reports, it's claimed that the Reds' second offer last week - worth around $153 million in total - was not rejected, with talks continuing in order to settle on a package suitable for both sides. Advertisement Liverpool is also said to have no intention of bidding as high as the $171M reported on Tuesday by the likes of Fabrizio Romano, while a medical is yet to be arranged.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store