
Australia's Defence Budget Up Just 0.8 Percent in Real Terms Over the Last Decade: Analysis
Australia's defence spending over the last 10 years has stagnated, and new funding commitments unlikely to make a difference for years to come, a new report says.
The federal government's latest defence budget announcements listed an 'additional $50.3 billion' of spending over the next 10 years with an 'additional $10.6 billion invested over the forward estimates.'
In addition, $1 billion of spending would be brought forward 'to enable Defence to acquire capabilities faster,' making a total of $57.6 billion over the coming decade.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the pledge was in contrast to the previous Coalition government, which had 'secretly ripped' $20 billion out of the defence budget.
But an analysis by Strategic Analysis Australia (SAA) shows that under both Labor and Coalition governments, the real buying power of the funds has been eroded by inflation, and in real terms only equate to a 0.8 percent increase.
And while it raises the proportion of defence spending from 2.03 to 2.05 percent of GDP, that's still well short of the government's National Defence Strategy (NDS) target of 2.4 percent by 2033/34.
Related Stories
4/1/2025
3/24/2025
The funding analysed is allocated to the Department of Defence, the Australian Signals Directorate, and the Australian Submarine Agency.
Despite acknowledging that, "over the next two decades, we face greater security uncertainty and complexity, globally," the 2016 Defence White Paper made no funding provision for dealing with it, according to a report from Strategic Analysis Australia.
The 2016 Defence White Paper (DWP) outlined 10-years funding up to 2025/26 with the Morrison government's 2020 Defence Strategic Update (DSU) extending that until 2029/30, essentially at the same rate of growth.
'By and large, both Coalition and Labor governments have delivered the funding set out in those documents,' the SAA report, titled, 'Defence 2025: Dollars and Decisions,' says.
'Using the last Budget year before the 2016 DWP as our starting point, the defence budget has grown from $31,151 million to $58.989 million in nominal terms, or 89.4 percent.
'Real growth, which takes inflation into account, is a better way of assessing the scale of growth and is still a substantial 41.5 percent. Defence funding has also grown from 1.88 to 2.05 of GDP.'
But over that period, governments have regularly reassigned funding to new priorities.
'Changing priorities is the prerogative of governments,' SAA says, 'But most of them require Defence to fund the new measures out of its existing resources, and we rarely hear what's been given up to find the money.'
This argument was mirrored by retired Major General Adam Findlay, who said the extra $50 billion headlined by Labor, was only a gradual increase in funding and that within the Australian Defence Force funding has
Additional ADF priorities also include military support for Ukraine and efficiency dividends. The 2023/24 Budget included $924 million for Pacific engagement, and the 2024/25 estimates included $972.8 million for workforce retention measures.
Australia's Minister of Defence Richard Marles (C) and Minister of Defence Industry and Capability Delivery Pat Conroy (R) announce the accelerated delivery of Australia's first High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) at the Australian International Airshow in Avalon on March 24, 2025. The country's acquisition of the HIMARS system was accelerated after a 2023 Defence Strategic Review.
Photo by WILLIAM WEST/AFP via Getty Images
'The most substantial measure over the past decade was the REDSPICE cyber program contained in the previous Coalition government's final Budget in March 2023,' the report says.
'That transferred nearly $1 billion per year ... from the Department of Defence to the Australian Signals Directorate to enhance cyber capabilities.
'This may be a good use of the money, but REDSPICE's impact is $981.4 million in 2024/25 and $974.9 million in 2025/26 that isn't available to acquire or operate military capabilities. The cumulative effect of those changes is now considerable.'
Inflation Not Adequately Accounted For
Aside from having to do more within the budget they're given, the Defence Force—like the rest of Australia—has also been affected by inflation and 'hasn't been compensated for that.'
The 2016 White Paper was developed on the assumption that inflation would be within the Reserve Bank's target zone of 2 to 3 percent per annum. But since the pandemic, inflation has been significantly higher, and that has eaten into the value of every dollar allocated to defence.
The impact of inflation on the defence budget (A$, 2019–20 real dollars)
2019/20
2020/21
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
2026/27
Pre-COVID buying power
39,246
40,882
43,334
45,792
48,318
50,079
50,912
52,077
Current buying power
39,246
41,199
42,856
43,371
45,015
46,676
47,069
48,060
Buying power loss ($)
0
316
-478
-2,421
-3,303
-3,403
-3,843
-4,017
Buying power loss (percent)
0.0
0.8
-1.1
-5.3
-6.8
-6.8
-7.5
-7.7
The current year's funding shortfall is 7.5 percent, or a $3.8 billion annual loss in buying power, and a cumulative $13.1 billion since 2019/20.
'Those aren't small numbers, and Defence receives no budget adjustments to compensate for inflation,' Strategic Analysis Australia says. 'Even if inflation returns to historical norms—as the Budget papers predict—that loss of buying power will continue.'
While the current government has increased defence funding by $50.3 billion over the decade, nearly all of it was 'dedicated to the funding gap between the cancelled Attack-class submarine program and the nuclear-powered submarine enterprise [AUKUS], plus some going to the government's new general-purpose frigate program. Only $1 billion of the $50.3 billion was for new capabilities.'
And most of that is planned for well into the future.
'Defence got only $400 million of new money in 2024/25,' SAA points out. 'That was essentially the only new funding for that year since the 2016 DWP and represented a mere 0.7 percent increase.'
A decade of increased expectations from government, inflation, and the costs of AUKUS meant the new funding was insufficient, and 'something had to give. $72.8 billion in previously planned projects were cancelled or delayed over the coming decade.
'Nothing has changed significantly since 2016,' the report concludes. 'It's only when we get to 2027/28 (the back end of the next term of government) that we see any noticeable divergence between the old and new plans. That's when the $3.8 billion (now down to $3.6 billion) cuts in. For now, we're still stuck in a spending plan that dates back to an earlier, very different era.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Dorsey Lawyers and Practices
MINNEAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--International law firm Dorsey & Whitney LLP announced today that 39 of its practices and 91 of its lawyers across 11 of its U.S. offices were ranked by Chambers and Partners in its annual survey, Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business 2025. Dorsey's Cannabis Law, Corporate/M&A, ERISA Litigation, International Trade: Export Controls & Economics Sanctions, Mining & Metals, and Native American Law practices were ranked on the national level. Share In addition to the practices ranked at the state level, the Firm's Cannabis Law, Corporate/M&A, ERISA Litigation, International Trade: Export Controls & Economics Sanctions, Mining & Metals, and Native American Law practices were ranked on the national level. Dorsey Attorney Rankings Chambers ranked the following individual Dorsey lawyers in its latest guide: National Kimberley Anderson – Mining & Metals Christopher Doerksen – Mining & Metals Skip Durocher – Native American Law Andrew Holly – ERISA Litigation Justin Huff – International Trade: CFIUS Experts Wells Parker – Mining & Metals Michael Pignato – Native American Law: Finance Sativa Rasmussen – Cannabis Law: Western United States Richard Silberberg – International Arbitration: Arbitrators Mary Streitz – Native American Law Lawrence Ward – International Trade: CFIUS Experts; International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions Anchorage Michael Mills – Corporate/M&A Bankruptcy/Restructuring Bonnie Paskvan – Corporate/M&A Native American Law Boise Richard Hall – Natural Resources & Environment Steve Hardesty – Corporate/Commercial Nick Taylor – Corporate/Commercial Elijah Watkins – Litigation: General Commercial Denver Charlene Krogh – Intellectual Property Lee Osman – Intellectual Property Greg Tamkin – Intellectual Property Des Moines Josh Hughes – Labor & Employment William Miller – Labor & Employment; Litigation: General Commercial Kirk Schuler – Litigation: General Commercial Minneapolis Theresa Bevilacqua – Litigation: General Commercial Brian Burke – Corporate/M&A Ross D'Emanuele – Healthcare Beth Forsythe – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Michelle Grant – Litigation: General Commercial Cam Hoang – Capital Markets: Debt & Equity Kathryn Johnson – Construction Jocelyn Knoll – Construction James Langdon – Litigation: General Commercial Jay Lindgren – Real Estate: Zoning/Land Use Michael Lindsay – Antitrust Edward Magarian – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigation John Marsalek – Corporate/M&A John Marti – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigation David Meyer – Real Estate Ryan Mick – Labor & Employment Marcus Mollison – Real Estate Robert Olson – Real Estate F. Matthew Ralph – Antitrust Melissa Raphan – Labor & Employment Robert Rosenbaum – Corporate/M&A Eric Ruzicka – Construction J. Mike Sevilla – Immigration Zev Simpser – Energy & Natural Resources Jaime Stilson – Antitrust Alyson Van Dyk – Real Estate Jonathan Van Horn – Corporate/M&A RJ Zayed – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigation Missoula Steve Bell – Litigation: General Commercial Courtney Ellis – Corporate/M&A Erin McCrady – Corporate/M&A Dan Semmens – Corporate/M&A New York Bruce Ewing – Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright & Trade Secrets Nicholas Pappas – Labor & Employment Phoenix Norman James – Environment Rob Kort – Healthcare Law Brian Moll – Corporate/M&A Dawn Meidinger – Environment Ryan Rosensteel – Real Estate Salt Lake City Alan Bell – Corporate/M&A Bryon Benevento – Litigation: General Commercial Matthew Bethards – Intellectual Property Mark Burghardt – Natural Resources & Environment Nathan Canova – Public Finance Matthew Durham – Labor & Employment Brett Foster – Intellectual Property L. Grant Foster – Intellectual Property Richard Hall – Natural Resources & Environment Megan Houdeshel – Natural Resources & Environment Catherine Lake – Intellectual Property Milo Steven Marsden – Litigation: General Commercial Chris Martinez – Litigation: General Commercial David Marx – Corporate/M&A Mark Miller – Intellectual Property Wells Parker – Natural Resources & Environment Bryan Pratt – Intellectual Property Marcus Simon – Intellectual Property Layne Smith – Corporate/M&A Nolan Taylor – Corporate/M&A Gage Zobell – Natural Resources & Environment Seattle Kerry Lee Andken – Intellectual Property Ieva Aubin – Immigration Marisa Bavand – Construction Michael Droke – Labor & Employment Kimton Eng – Intellectual Property Kendall Fisher – Tax Geoff Godfrey – Intellectual Property Mike Grace – Construction Shawn Larsen-Bright – Litigation: General Commercial Washington, DC Margot Laporte – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Dorsey Practice Rankings Chambers ranked the following Dorsey practices in its latest guide: Nationwide Cannabis Law Corporate/M&A: Highly Regarded Mining & Metals ERISA Litigation International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions: Highly Regarded Native American Law Anchorage Corporate/M&A Real Estate Native American Law Boise Corporate/Commercial Denver Intellectual Property Des Moines Litigation: General Commercial Labor & Employment Minneapolis Antitrust Capital Markets: Debt & Equity Construction Corporate/M&A Energy & Natural Resources Immigration Intellectual Property Labor & Employment Litigation: General Commercial Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Real Estate Missoula Corporate/M&A Litigation: General Commercial Natural Resources & Environment New York Corporate/M&A: Highly Regarded Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright & Trade Secrets Phoenix Real Estate Salt Lake City Corporate/M&A Intellectual Property Litigation: General Commercial Natural Resources & Environment Seattle Construction Corporate/M&A Intellectual Property Litigation: General Commercial Tax Chambers surveys and interviews clients and lawyers across the United States to determine which firms and attorneys are considered leaders in their field. Rankings assess key qualities in the legal field, including technical legal ability, professional conduct, client service, commercial astuteness, diligence, and commitment. About Dorsey & Whitney LLP Clients have relied on Dorsey as a valued business partner since 1912. With locations across the United States and in Canada, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, Dorsey provides results-oriented, grounded counsel for its clients' legal and business needs. Dorsey represents a number of the world's most successful companies from a wide range of industries, including banking & financial institutions; development & infrastructure; energy & natural resources; food, beverage & agribusiness; healthcare & life sciences; and technology.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Judge blocks Trump administration Job Corps centers' suspension
A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration from suspending operations at Job Corps centers across the country. U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter, an Obama appointee, temporarily halted the government from taking further steps to eliminate the program, which offers free education and vocational training in addition to housing for disadvantaged young people ages 16 to 24. In late May, the Department of Labor announced it would end operations at the centers, citing a 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' 'We remain committed to ensuring all participants are supported through this transition and connected with the resources they need to succeed as we evaluate the program's possibilities,' Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement at the time. However, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the Trump administration, including the National Job Corps Association, said suspending the program is illegal. 'It contravenes the statutory provisions governing Job Corps and DOL's own regulations concerning the program, and it is fundamentally irrational,' the plaintiffs wrote, according to court documents. 'Shuttering Job Corps will have disastrous, irreparable consequences, including displacing tens of thousands of vulnerable young people, destroying companies that have long operated Job Corps centers in reliance on the Government's support for the program, and forcing mass layoffs of workers who support the program,' they added. Congressional leaders have echoed the same sentiments. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) said the move to suspend operations at the centers is a step in the 'wrong direction' adding that it would exacerbate her state's workforce shortage, lock students out of good-paying jobs and hurt Wisconsin's economy. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) agreed. 'Congress appropriated funding for Job Corps, and the Trump Administration can't just decide to not spend it because they want to make room for tax cuts for billionaires,' Baldwin said.


Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Tusk's Coalition Closes Ranks After Polish Election Defeat
Poland's ruling coalition sought to turn the page on the crisis sparked by the defeat of its candidate in presidential elections, vowing to rejuvenate the pro-European Union alliance halfway through the parliamentary term. 'The coalition is in good shape,' Deputy Prime Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz, the leader of the Polish Peasants Party, told reporters Thursday following a meeting of leaders from the ruling alliance. 'Emotions were high but we found common ground.'