logo
Why the US Navy – and Denzel Washington – almost torpedoed Crimson Tide

Why the US Navy – and Denzel Washington – almost torpedoed Crimson Tide

Telegraph08-05-2025

The recent death of the great Gene Hackman allowed his millions of fans to reassess his storied career. Although most would consider his Seventies work, including The French Connection and Night Moves, to be his finest acting, there was still a great deal of residual affection for his character work throughout the Nineties and early Noughties. One film, and one performance in particular, stands out.
Hackman's appearance as the stern, upright submarine captain Frank Ramsey might have been a by-the-book antagonist part in the hands of a lesser actor, but Hackman manages to turn him into a truly fascinating and multi-faceted character, who ends the film with dignity and integrity intact. How this came to be, and how an always-prescient picture now looks even more timely, is testament to just how bloody good a film Crimson Tide is.
The major creative players – director Tony Scott and producers Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer – had had notable success nearly a decade before with the much-loved Tom Cruise vehicle Top Gun, which, amongst its other strengths and charms, essentially acted as a two-hour recruiting vehicle for the US air force. Crimson Tide could never be described as the same thing, replacing all-American jingoistic patriotism with a darker, morally complex dilemma at the core that resonates today, just as it did upon the film's original release in 1995.
The barely glimpsed villains are a group of Russian ultranationalists who have seized hold of nuclear weapons that they then use to threaten the United States and Japan. The crew of a nuclear submarine, the USS Alabama, receive contradictory orders while underwater. The first suggests that they should fire their weapons against the Russians, with a concomitant risk of beginning World War Three in the bargain, and the second, which is only partially received, appears to be a retraction.
Hackman's hawkish Ramsey, a military man to his core, prepares to obey orders and fire the missiles, while his more cerebral second-in-command, Denzel Washington's Lieutenant Ron Hunter, is convinced that the situation will only be worsened by following incomplete orders. The scene is therefore set for a genuinely fascinating and horribly tense battle of will. It's the kind of picture that Hollywood seldom makes these days, complete with two outstanding star performances by two of the finest actors in the industry.
When the film was first conceived, expectations were that it would be another rabble-rousing piece of propaganda – Top Gun underwater, if you will – and the US Navy were only too keen to offer as much assistance to the film-makers as they had done on the earlier film. Therefore, Scott, writer Michael Schiffer, Simpson, Bruckheimer and others were allowed access to the real-life nuclear submarine USS Florida in 1993, where they were permitted to watch the vessel go through many of the emergency routines and responses that the fictitious USS Alabama would in the finished film.
However, this access had been obtained through sleight of hand – some might call it plain lying – as the Navy had been given a misleading synopsis of the film. It was airily described as being a mixture of the other big submarine thriller of recent years, Hunt for Red October, and 2001: A Space Odyssey, and was said to be about a ship's super-computer going rogue and attempting to launch nuclear missiles while the crew desperately try to stop it.
It's not a bad premise (and sounds a lot like the central McGuffin in this summer's Mission: Impossible picture), but the Navy wished to make it clear that such a thing was impossible and that no computer, however advanced, would be able to accomplish anything by itself. Three decades later, with the inexorable rise of AI, it would be hard to make a statement so definitively.
Whether Scott, Bruckheimer et al had ever intended to make the picture as originally conceived or not, they soon dismissed any idea of a HAL-esque supercomputer and made sure that Schiffer's shooting script was far more realistic in nature. Unsurprisingly, this angered the US Navy, who withdrew all cooperation from the picture; they were particularly irked by the idea that the film would revolve around a mutiny taking place on board a military vessel, followed by a counter-mutiny. This was very much not the image of all-American competence that they wanted to portray, and had the film-makers not been both cunning and resourceful, the project might have foundered before it began.
As these discussions took place, the actors came together. 'The casting was interesting. 'Bruckheimer later said. 'We'd talked to Al Pacino and Warren Beatty; both were really interested but each wanted each other's role so that didn't work out. And then we went to Denzel and Gene Hackman.'
While Hackman was a bona fide leading man who had recently won an Oscar for his role in Clint Eastwood's Unforgiven, Washington was not then known for action or thriller roles; he had won an Oscar for Glory a few years before, but was probably best associated with his performance as the eponymous Malcolm X in Spike Lee's biopic.
Yet Washington's academic, thoughtful mien, as contrasted with Hackman's death-or-glory bluster, works perfectly in the context of the picture, allowing the two men to play off against one another, but also dodging many of the clichés and expectations of the picture. Most films would have Hunter being appointed against Ramsey's wishes, but Crimson Tide makes it clear that Ramsey has picked him as his XO, despite knowing full well that he has no previous combat experience, but instead is drawn to his thoughtfulness and considered approach.
Scott, who was coming off the hugely successful Quentin Tarantino-scripted True Romance, was also a more assured director than he had been when he made Top Gun. Although he had some significant flops in the late Eighties and early Nineties, including the Kevin Costner disaster Revenge and the Tom Cruise racing picture Days of Thunder, he had embraced a more go-for-broke approach with True Romance, helped immensely by man-of-the-moment Tarantino's witty, potent screenplay.
It was therefore unsurprising that Scott brought many of his collaborators on that film with him, including James Gandolfini (who was cast as Hackman's unstintingly loyal right-hand-man, alongside a pre-Lord of the Rings Viggo Mortensen as Washington's lieutenant) and composer Hans Zimmer, whose work on the film would rank amongst his greatest scores. But it was Scott's (and the producers') decision to bring Tarantino along that would lead to a schism at the heart of the picture.
Most big-budget Hollywood pictures, then and now, use a variety of well-paid script doctors to contribute dialogue and ideas, but Crimson Tide was unusually public about the three writers who were recruited, although none of them were credited. Chinatown creator Robert Towne was brought on board to write intellectually scintillating discussions about honour and free will in armed service, and Schindler's List's Steve Zaillian helped shape the respective characters of Ramsey and Hunter.
Tarantino, meanwhile – by far the hottest screenwriter in Hollywood after the success of Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction – was hired primarily to inject his own brand of pop cultural idiosyncrasy, which explains why characters have apparently surreal discussions about the Silver Surfer and Star Trek. (The character name 'Russell Vossler' is a reference to Tarantino's friend and former video store co-worker Rand Vossler.) As he proudly said: 'I wrote a lot of the dialogue for Crimson Tide and [Hackman] said that my dialogue is as wonderful as anyone's ever said it was…it was a dream to go to the Cinerama Dome and watch Gene Hackman do my stuff.' Bruckheimer said that Tarantino's rewrite 'knocked it out the park.'
However, he did not mention Washington, and the reason for this omission was a much-documented feud between the two men. While on set, Tarantino came up with an idea for the film's conclusion, which was a straightforward lift from True Romance and Reservoir Dogs: a group of heavily armed man all pointing guns at one another in an increasingly tense situation.
At the centre of this Mexican stand-off, the Ramsey and Hunter characters have a charged discussion about, of all things, horses, in the form of Lipizzaner stallions. 'Some of the things they do defy belief,' Ramsey says. 'Their training program is simplicity itself. You just stick a cattle prod up their ass and you can get a horse to deal cards.' Pointedly, he remarks that the horses are all white, only for Hunter to respond: 'They are not from Portugal; they're from Spain and at birth, they're not white; they're black.'
It's effective in the context of the scene, if slightly heavy-handed, but Washington was deeply unhappy at the dialogue in its original form, which he considered racist. Tarantino had already elicited controversy in his own pictures for what many saw as white-man appropriation of African-American terms and language (something that he tacitly made amends for in his next picture, Jackie Brown) and Washington, angered by this taking place on a film in which he was the only lead actor of colour, called Tarantino out on set.
The surprised writer asked if they could go somewhere more private for their discussion, only for Washington – who has always had a reputation for speaking his mind strongly – to respond angrily ''No, if we're going to discuss it, let's discuss it now.' The dialogue was then altered to Washington's specifications, but the argument led to a lengthy feud between the two men, who have never worked together since. But the actor did say in 2012 that ''I buried that hatchet. I sought him out 10 years ago. I told him, 'Look, I apologise.' You've just gotta let that go. You gonna walk around with that the rest of your life? He seemed relieved.'
Yet on-set tensions were only one part of the difficulty during production. When the Navy withdrew their support, the film-makers reached out to other countries, and the French Navy were willing to assist with technical assistance, including the use of the aircraft carrier Foch. Yet some of the filming required skilful guerrilla activity. When the Alabama prepares to sail to sea – in one of the film's most memorable scenes, as Hackman's stirring speech is accompanied by Zimmer's equally stirring music – the crew had to shoot against the backdrop of the decommissioned USS Barbel, which had been sold for scrap and was about to be destroyed.
And in the scene when the Alabama submerges, the crew obtained clandestine footage of a real-life nuclear submarine setting out to sea by dint of waiting at the naval base at Pearl Harbour until one set off; amazingly, this was not illegal, perhaps because the Navy had never considered the likelihood that any film company would do such a thing.
In any case, the finished picture was released on May 12 to laudatory reviews. Roger Ebert's comments that 'This is the rare kind of war movie that not only thrills people while they're watching it, but invites them to leave the theatre actually discussing the issues' were typical, and many critics were pleasantly surprised that a Tony Scott picture could deal with intellectual and moral dilemmas with real gusto. Although, naturally, there are also big explosions and thrilling scenes of missile combat with rogue Russian submarines.
The film has continued to be a much-loved highlight in the careers of everyone involved with it, and began a lengthy collaboration between Scott and Washington that only ended with the director's death by suicide in August 2012. And at a time when nuclear conflict between nations seems even more possible than three decades ago, it has a chilling resonance that only increases year after year, too. As Hunter says at one point: 'In my humble opinion, in the nuclear world, the true enemy is war itself.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kim Kardashian accidentally reveals something very strange inside her $60M mansion
Kim Kardashian accidentally reveals something very strange inside her $60M mansion

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kim Kardashian accidentally reveals something very strange inside her $60M mansion

Kim Kardashian shared several new images to Instagram on Sunday that were taken inside her $60M Hidden Hills, California mansion. The ex-wife of Kanye West had on no makeup as she tried on new SKIMS designs. 'Love finding closet pics in my phone,' the The Kardashians star wrote in her caption. The snaps looked benign at first, but on closer inspection, one single portrait stood out. But it was not because of what Kim looked like, but rather what her surroundings were like. In one of the photos the 44-year-old reality TV star accidentally revealed a strange thing in a bathroom as she wore a NY Yankees cap and had on a tank top with sweatpants. It was behind her as the mother-of-four was being tended to by a tattooed stylist wit fingerless gloves on. Can you tell what it is? Hint, it is on the left. It's a very large window inside her shower. That means that when the law school graduate strips off her clothing to wash up in the shower, the outside world can see her nude form. The window hits at the hip level, so plenty could be seen. Smarty, there is a tree outside her window which can keep prying eyes out as long as a drone doesn't fly by. It also helps that she has a gated property with plenty of security to keep anyone from looking into her shower. Still, most people would not have been comfortable with a window in a shower that has no drapes or blinds. There doesn't seem to be a tint on the window either, though knowing Kim, she may be able to hit a button that makes the window turn foggy. Even with the large window, the bathroom is a dream as it is large and a nice neutral tone. In the past, Kim has been knocked for the sink-free island in her bathroom. Years ago she shared a photo of the island and fans flipped that there was a faucet but no sink. Turns out there is a sink on the island but because the tone is a nude color, it was hard to see any depth. There is also a large bathtub and a huge mirror in her bathroom. These photos have been shared after Kim had a dramatic May that forced her to show up at the Paris robbery trial. Kardashian said she 'will never forget what happened' to her during the Paris robbery. After eight people were found guilty by a Paris court of crimes connected to the gunpoint robbery of Kim in 2016, she said she is 'deeply grateful to the French authorities for pursuing justice in this case'. Kim added in a statement to PEOPLE: 'The crime was the most terrifying experience of my life, leaving a lasting impact on me and my family. While I'll never forget what happened, I believe in the power of growth and accountability and pray for healing for all. I remain committed to advocating for justice, and promoting a fair legal system.' Her attorneys Michael Rhodes, Léonor Hennerick and Jonathan Mattou added in their own statement that Kim 'appreciates the Court's decision and once again thanks the French authorities for treating her with great respect throughout the process'. They went on: 'It has been a long journey from that terrible night back in 2016 to her standing courageously in a historic Paris courtroom to confront these criminals. It is also hard to tell what this silver box is between two pairs of gladiator heels Kim sat for this portrait as she wore a suede jacket and long skirt 'She looks forward to putting this tragic episode behind her, as she continues working to improve the criminal justice system on behalf of victims, the innocent, and the incarcerated seeking to redeem themselves.' The eight suspects who were found guilty will all walk free due to the fact that they have served time previously. According to CNN, Judge David De Pas called the sentences 'quite lenient'.

Did you solve it? The deductive decade – ten years of Monday puzzzles
Did you solve it? The deductive decade – ten years of Monday puzzzles

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Did you solve it? The deductive decade – ten years of Monday puzzzles

To celebrate ten years of this column, this morning I selected ten puzzles from the Monday Puzzle archives. Here they are again with solutions. Click on the solutions to be taken to the original columns, which have full explanations. 1. Bat and ball Three friends (A, B and C) are playing ping pong. They play the usual way: the winner stays on, and the loser waits their turn again. At the end of the day, they summarise the number of games that each of them played: A played 10 B played 15 C played 17. Who lost the second game? Solution A 2. Tricky trams Why are the tram's overhead cables positioned to make a zigzag, rather than straight line? Solution The metal structure on the roof of the tram, the pantograph, rubs against the cable as the tram moves forward. If the cable was in a straight line, it would rub the same point on the pantograph, which would begin to fray. But if the cable is in a zigzag, the rubbing happens evenly across the top of the pantograph, and the pantograph wears down less quickly. 3. Read the question 3. What is never odd or even? Solution 'never odd or even' is a palindrome, i.e. it reads the same back to front. 4. Catch the cat A straight corridor has 7 doors along one side. Behind one of the doors sits a cat. Your mission is to find the cat by opening the correct door. Each day you can open only one door. If the cat is there, you win. If the cat is not there, the door closes, and you must wait until the next day before you can open a door again. If the cat was always to sit behind the same door, you would be able to find it in at most seven days, by opening each door in turn. But this mischievous moggy is restless. Every night it moves randomly either one door to the left or one to the right. Although if it is behind the first or last door, it has only one option for where it can move. How many days do you now need to make sure you can catch the cat? Solution ten days 5. Mystery number I have a ten digit number, abcdefghij. Each of the digits is different, and a is divisible by 1 ab is divisible by 2 abc is divisible by 3 abcd is divisible by 4 abcde is divisible by 5 abcdef is divisible by 6 abcdefg is divisible by 7 abcdefgh is divisible by 8 abcdefghi is divisible by 9 abcdefghij is divisible by 10 What's my number? [To clarify: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, and j are all single digits. Each digit from 0 to 9 is represented by exactly one letter. The number abcdefghij is a ten-digit number whose first digit is a, second digit is b, and so on. It does not mean that you multiply a x b x c x…] Solution 3816547290 6. Disappearing cub This picture has not been doctored. Explain why the reflection has a yellow lion cub. Solution: The cub is camouflaged by a cleverly-coloured flap 7. Crazy triangle Show that there is a triangle, the sum of whose three heights is less than 1mm, that has an area greater than the surface of the Earth (510m km2). Solution Here's one: 8. Deck dilemma Your friend chooses at random a card from a standard deck of 52 cards, and keeps this card concealed. You have to guess which of the 52 cards it is. Before your guess, you can ask your friend one of the following three questions: is the card red? is the card a face card? (Jack, Queen or King) is the card the ace of spades? Your friend will answer truthfully. What question would you ask that gives you the best chance of guessing the correct card? Solution It doesn't matter. In all three cases, your chance of guessing the correct card is 1 in 26. 9. The question with no question (a) All of the following. (b) None of the following. (c) Some of the following. (d) All of the above. (e) None of the above. [Just to reassure you, nothing has been omitted here.] Solution (b) 10. Triangle fold Find a way to fold a square piece of paper into an equilateral triangle. The triangle can be of any size. Solution Here is one way, that uses the side length of the square as the side length of the triangle. I hope you enjoyed these puzzles. I'll be back in two weeks. Sources: 1. Adrian Paenza, 2. Kvantik magaizine, 3. Des MacHale, 4. New York Times. 5. John Conway, 6. Matt Pritchard, 7. Trần Phương, 8. Henk Tijms, 9. Parabola, 10. The Paper Puzzle Book. I set a puzzle here every two weeks on a Monday. I'm always on the look-out for great puzzles. If you would like to suggest one, email me.

Ivanka Trump divides internet with UFC appearance alongside dad Donald as she flaunts her incredibly thin fame
Ivanka Trump divides internet with UFC appearance alongside dad Donald as she flaunts her incredibly thin fame

Daily Mail​

time34 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ivanka Trump divides internet with UFC appearance alongside dad Donald as she flaunts her incredibly thin fame

Ivanka Trump divided the internet after spending the evening with her father, Donald Trump, at a UFC match. On Saturday night, the first daughter, 43, and her family joined the president cage-side to enjoy the fight. Ivanka flaunted her incredibly thin frame for the outing, donning a long, tight white dress and white strappy sandals. The gown was strapless but had sleeves down her arms, which drew attention to her skinny shoulders. In a post shared to X afterwards, Ivanka uploaded an array pictures from the evening out - and many people had mixed feelings about her presence at the event. While dozens of people complimented her elegance and beauty, others weren't pleased with her attendance. 'Ivanka, you were absolutely stunning last night!' one user wrote. 'A huge thank you to the UFC fighters and champions for showing the love and respect we all share for you, President Trump!' Ivanka flaunted her incredibly thin frame for the outing, donning a long, tight white dress and white strappy sandals 'Nice to see you back alongside your father,' another said. 'Beautiful,' a third comment simply read. 'You're one of the world's most attractive women!' someone else penned. Another wrote: 'What an amazing night. Congrats Ivanka, you look amazing, good to see you.' However, not everyone was pleased to see the president and first daughter at the fight. Some even slammed her outfit choice, with one writing, 'You dress like you are going to prom. It's a UFC fight.' 'You're not going to ruin these vibes. I don't care who your dad is Ivanka,' another comment said. Ivanka also posted some adorable family snaps to her Instagram before heading to the fights. She posed alongside her husband Jared Kushner, 44, and their kids Arabella Rose, 13, and Joseph Frederick, 11. The family smiled ear-to-ear as they stood together in front of a white wall. 'Ivanka, you look extra gorgeous in these photos!' someone commented on Instagram. 'Always keeping it so classy. By the way, you and your daughter look more like sisters than mother-daughter,' someone else said about the duo. In the carousel of photos, the mom-of-three included a sweet mirror selfie that Arabella, who donned a chic black gown, took of the pair. Another picture captured the moment Ivanka and her daughter looked sweetly at one another. 'What a beautiful family!' someone shared. 'Your daughter is pretty like you,' another user wrote. Also during the evening, Trump treated UFC star Kayla Harrison to a rare kiss on the cheek after she leapt out of the cage to celebrate with him. Kayla tapped out Julianna Pena at UFC 316 to win her first world title with the promotion, and the Commander in Chief and his daughter Ivanka were both sitting cage-side for the bout. After exiting the Octagon to head back to the locker rooms, Kayla made a bee-line for the president - and got more than just a customary handshake from Donald. In an unusually intimate gesture, the 34-year-old was pulled in for a hug and then received a kiss on her right cheek, with Donald seemingly delighted to see her pull off the victory in New Jersey. The pair then posed for a photo, with the 78-year-old Donald again wrapping his arms around Kayla, while putting his left hand on her exposed stomach. Post-kiss and before she departed the arena, Kayla put her new belt over Donald's shoulder while the duo pointed at each other to get cheers from the crowd.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store