After 2 months, bookstore damaged by tornado is back in business
'It was no doubt a disaster yet at the same time just an opportunity for us to sprout and grow again,' said Lance Taylor, the Director of Operations for the store.
Alabama House passes grocery tax cut bill
The new location is on Washington Street, just around the corner from its original location on Marion.
'Since 1955 CEI has been providing things for folks here in Athens, for Christians especially and we want to keep it going,' Taylor said. 'Here we are in 2025 and it's kind of a fresh start in some ways.'
Taylor said it was almost midnight on December 28 when he was awakened by a shocking text message from a neighbor who informed him that the entire roof of the bookstore was lying in the middle of Marion Street.
Thousands of books were thrown across the floor and its brick walls crumbled to the ground.
Protesters call for more support for veterans on second day of Huntsville-area protest
'It was nearly a total loss on inventory, a near total loss on electronics and computers systems and things like that,' Taylor explained.
Taylor told News 19 that there was an estimated more than $500,000 in damages to the interior contents of the store from the storm.
After months of countless hours of repurchasing and restocking, a caring community is thankful for the store's return.
'It's very good that they are staying in business because they have been around for quite a while and it's just a part of this area,' said John Donavan, a regular customer at CEI.
'People have shown that they care about us, and they want to keep doing business with us and we really appreciate that,' Taylor said.
Taylor is hopeful that the original building can be renovated for use.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI chairman compares AI to the dot-com boom: There's lots of 'snake oil' but some 'real value being created'
OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor compared the AI boom to its dot-com predecessor, saying that there was lots of "snake oil." There's also "very real value being created," Taylor told the "ACQ2" podcast. Taylor said that "dot-com" often brings to mind failures like and not the success stories, like Google. Within the AI boom — or bubble, as Sam Altman called it at a recent dinner — there will be winners and losers. Some will likely soar like Amazon did out of the dot-com days; others may flounder like In the late 1990s, the stock market reached new heights, propelled by the rise of digital-first companies. The dot-com bubble eventually burst, sending companies like Webvan and into bankruptcy. That era also spawned some of the tech mammoths we still use today, like Amazon and eBay. OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor thinks that era and the AI boom have a lot in common. On the "ACQ2" podcast, he said that the dot-com boom is often remembered only for the companies left in the rubble after the bubble burst. "If you say dot-com, people come back with failures," Taylor said. "If you look at the S&P 500 now and you look at the amount of value from companies created in that, one could argue that actually almost all of the exuberance and hype was totally warranted." 25 years later, some of the "magnificent seven" tech stocks can be traced back to that time period. Amazon went public in 1997 and weathered the dot-com bust; Google was founded during the boom, but didn't go public until after. Some mark Microsoft's 2001 antitrust ruling as the top of the bubble. "It, in fact, did change commerce in fundamental ways," Taylor said. "It did change the financial system in fundamental ways. It changed everything." AI has been buoying the market in a similar way. VCs are pouring billions into AI startups, and Big Tech is investing tens of billions into AI infrastructure, talent, and related capex. In July, Nvidia became the first company to hit a $4 trillion market cap on the back of AI companies' demand for its GPUs. Morgan Stanley recently predicted that AI productivity gains could lead the S&P 500 to gain up to $16 trillion. The market fervor has led some skeptics to call AI a bubble — and compare it to the dot-com era before it. Tech guru Erik Gordon told BI that "more investors will suffer than suffered in the dot-com crash, and their suffering will be more painful." Altman himself compared AI to a bubble at a recent dinner attended by reporters. "When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth," Altman said, according to The Verge. "Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes. Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes." "Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money," Altman reportedly said in reference to AI startups comprising "three people and an idea" that receive massive investments. "We don't know who, and a lot of people are going to make a phenomenal amount of money. My personal belief, although I may turn out to be wrong, is that, on the whole, this would be a huge net win for the economy." Taylor takes a similarly positive spin on the bubble question, comparing it to the dot-com boom. He referenced jokes about the word "agentic" being overused. "You have a lot of snake oil," he said. But there are also real, sustainable companies that Taylor predicts will stick around. Unsurprisingly, he pointed to the seismic growth of ChatGPT, which sported 100 million users just over two months after its app launch and remains dominant on the App Store. Taylor also pointed to AI software companies that serve the B2B market, like Lovable, a vibe coding platform for creating apps and websites. "I think there's very real value being created here," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI chairman compares AI to the dot-com boom: There's lots of 'snake oil' but some 'real value being created'
Within the AI boom — or bubble, as Sam Altman called it at a recent dinner — there will be winners and losers. Some will likely soar like Amazon did out of the dot-com days; others may flounder like In the late 1990s, the stock market reached new heights, propelled by the rise of digital-first companies. The dot-com bubble eventually burst, sending companies like Webvan and into bankruptcy. That era also spawned some of the tech mammoths we still use today, like Amazon and eBay. OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor thinks that era and the AI boom have a lot in common. On the "ACQ2" podcast, he said that the dot-com boom is often remembered only for the companies left in the rubble after the bubble burst. "If you say dot-com, people come back with failures," Taylor said. "If you look at the S&P 500 now and you look at the amount of value from companies created in that, one could argue that actually almost all of the exuberance and hype was totally warranted." 25 years later, some of the " magnificent seven" tech stocks can be traced back to that time period. Amazon went public in 1997 and weathered the dot-com bust; Google was founded during the boom, but didn't go public until after. Some mark Microsoft's 2001 antitrust ruling as the top of the bubble. "It, in fact, did change commerce in fundamental ways," Taylor said. "It did change the financial system in fundamental ways. It changed everything." AI has been buoying the market in a similar way. VCs are pouring billions into AI startups, and Big Tech is investing tens of billions into AI infrastructure, talent, and related capex. In July, Nvidia became the first company to hit a $4 trillion market cap on the back of AI companies' demand for its GPUs. Morgan Stanley recently predicted that AI productivity gains could lead the S&P 500 to gain up to $16 trillion. The market fervor has led some skeptics to call AI a bubble — and compare it to the dot-com era before it. Tech guru Erik Gordon told BI that "more investors will suffer than suffered in the dot-com crash, and their suffering will be more painful." Altman himself compared AI to a bubble at a recent dinner attended by reporters. "When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth," Altman said, according to The Verge. "Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes. Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes." "Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money," Altman reportedly said in reference to AI startups comprising "three people and an idea" that receive massive investments. "We don't know who, and a lot of people are going to make a phenomenal amount of money. My personal belief, although I may turn out to be wrong, is that, on the whole, this would be a huge net win for the economy." Taylor takes a similarly positive spin on the bubble question, comparing it to the dot-com boom. He referenced jokes about the word "agentic" being overused. "You have a lot of snake oil," he said. But there are also real, sustainable companies that Taylor predicts will stick around. Unsurprisingly, he pointed to the seismic growth of ChatGPT, which sported 100 million users just over two months after its app launch and remains dominant on the App Store. Taylor also pointed to AI software companies that serve the B2B market, like Lovable, a vibe coding platform for creating apps and websites. "I think there's very real value being created here," he said.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Chicago residents blast ‘monstrosity' Obama Presidential Center as displacement fears grow
Chicago community leaders and longtime residents say the Obama Presidential Center risks washing away the neighborhood's fabric, warning that proposed luxury developments tied to the project could price out families who have long called the South Side home, according to a report. They also say the sprawling 19.3-acre site in historic Jackson Park, with its 225-foot-tall concrete museum, has become an eyesore that disrupts the natural landscape and all locals are getting in return for the unsightly structure is soaring rents and higher tax bills. Advertisement 'This is a monument to one man's ego,' Steve Cortes, a longtime Chicagoan and former advisor to President Donald Trump, told the Daily Mail. 'Look at the Reagan Library. It's beautiful. This? There are almost no windows. What are they hiding? And this Brutalist cement look in a city known for its incredible architecture.' The Obama Foundation secured a 99-year lease for the public parcel for $10 in 2018 and promised to revitalize the area. Obama said at the time that the project did not intend to displace residents, adding that its overseers are trying to balance boosting jobs and economic development in the area while maintaining and protecting existing affordable housing. Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, who represents much of the working-class neighborhood surrounding the site, fears that locals are being priced out. 'Every time large development comes to communities, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for. This was no different, and we're living what is actually happening,' Taylor told the outlet. 'We're going to see rents go higher and we're going to see families displaced.' Advertisement 5 The Obama Presidential Center seen under construction on Aug. 17, 2024. The Washington Post via Getty Images She has pushed for protections such as affordable housing requirements around the site, tenant purchase rights and rental assistance to shield residents from displacement. She won some concessions in the 2020 agreement – whereby 30% of new units on city-owned land were to be affordable – but many of her broader demands, including a full Community Benefits Agreement (CBA), were not adopted. A CBA is a binding deal that requires developers to deliver protections such as affordable housing, local hiring or other safeguards to ensure big projects don't push out existing residents. 'The city of Chicago should have done a Community Benefits Agreement before the first shovel went into the ground, but they didn't,' Taylor said. 'We're going to see small landlords having to raise the rent. Their property taxes are going up and we're going to see development that is not inclusive to our community.' Advertisement 5 Chicago residents and community activists are afraid of the project displacing residents on the city's South Side neighborhood. TNS Residents point to a proposed 250-room luxury hotel as a symbol and a driver of economic pressures far beyond the scale of existing neighborhood development. Once a major luxury project is approved, surrounding property values typically spike and so its presence signals to investors and developers that the area is shifting toward wealthier clientele and away from its historically working-class, majority-Black base. The hotel's approval is still under review, and residents have held demonstrations calling for its rejection. The investment firm behind the project is headed by Allison Davis, a veteran real estate developer and lawyer who was Obama's first boss out of Harvard Law School. 'When you got people's rent going from $850 to $1,300 you're telling people you don't want them in the neighborhood,' said Dixon Romeo, an organizer with the Obama Community Benefits Agreement Coalition, told NBC Chicago at a demonstration in April. Advertisement 5 Former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama breaking ground at the site of the Obama Presidential Center on Sept. 28, 2021. Photo by KAMIL KRZACZYNSKI/AFP via Getty Images) Since ground was broken, construction has progressed at a snail's pace while costs have ballooned from an original estimate of $330 million to a 2021 foundation projection of $830 million – with no updates since then. The center, which aims to honor former President Barack Obama's political career, will also consist of a digital library, conference facilities, a gymnasium and a regulation-sized NBA court. It will also house the nonprofit Obama Foundation, which is overseeing the center's development. The scale of the project and the aesthetics of its centerpiece library have come in for criticism. 5 A rendering of the completed Obama Presidential Center. EPA Ken Woodward, an attorney and father of six who grew up in the area, called it a 'monstrosity.' 'It looks like this big piece of rock that just landed here out of nowhere in what used to be a really nice landscape of trees and flowers,' Woodward told the Daily Mail. 'It's over budget, it's taking way too long to finish and it's going to drive up prices and bring headaches and problems for everyone who lives here. It feels like a washing away of the neighborhood and culture that used to be here.' Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Kyana Butler, an activist with Southside Together who campaigned for a CBA around the Obama Center, shared similar sentiments with the outlet. 'It's pretty huge and monstrous,' Butler said. 'It could have been smaller in scale and cost a lot less money. We're all worried about the impact on the community.' Tyrone Muhammad, director of Ex-Cons for Community and Social Change, said, 'It's truly the Tower of Babel.' 5 The Obama Foundation received a 99-year lease for the land in 2018. TNS Advertisement 'Property taxes are going up so much that the owner of my building is saying she might just walk away.. I don't blame President Obama for all of this, but the people on his team may not have the best intentions for people in this area,' Muhammed, a 2026 Illinois Senate candidate, told the outlet. 'It's disingenuous and hypocritical to take park space away from people and then not involve them in what takes its place. The move violates common decency.' Fox News Digital has reached out to the Obama Center for comment. In May, President Donald Trump offered to help out with the development of the center and linked DEI to the construction problems. The project set out 'ambitious goals' for certain construction diversity quotas, with its contracts to be allocated to 'diverse suppliers,' 35% of which were required to be minority-based enterprises (MBEs). Advertisement 'Look, President Obama, if he wanted help, I'd give him help because I'm a really good builder and I build on time, on budget. He's building his library in Chicago. It's a disaster,' Trump said, adding that Obama was paying for prioritizing DEI over meritocracy. 'And he wanted to be very politically correct and he didn't use good, hard, tough, mean construction workers that I love, Marco,' Trump said, while addressing Secretary of State Marco Rubio. A $40.75 million racially charged lawsuit filed earlier this year by a minority contractor against the project's structural engineer shined a spotlight on the DEI-driven aspect of the project. The structural engineers claimed the minority contractor lacked sufficient qualifications and experience to perform its work, resulting in delays.
