Chinese firms sell innovation bonds
Listen to article
Chinese banks, brokerages and private equity firms are among companies kicking off plans on Thursday to sell so-called sci-tech innovation bonds.
Beijing published detailed rules on Wednesday for a "technology board" in the bond market to fund innovation amid intensifying Sino-US rivalry.
Tech companies can already issue such bonds, but financial companies have become eligible under the new mechanism. China's central bank will provide low-cost funding to support bond sales, while local governments will help share losses in the event of defaults.
It represents China's latest effort towards technology self-sufficiency as Washington steps up curbs against Chinese tech advancement. It is also a boon to private equity and venture capital firms suffering from slow initial public offerings at home.
Industrial Bank, Guolian Minsheng Securities Co and Wuxi Venture Capital Group are among more than a dozen companies announcing plans to issue sci-tech innovation bonds on Thursday.
People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng said on Wednesday that nearly 100 companies are planning to sell such bonds to raise more than 300 billion yuan ($41.46 billion) in total, and he expects the list to grow further.
"Government support may help whet appetite of risk-averse bond investors," said Chen Yuting, analyst at Huafu Securities. "A booming market would in turn stimulate tech innovation." Industrial Bank said it plans to raise 10 billion yuan via bond sales to fund innovative businesses and technology-related loans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Japanese rubber futures lower on firm seasonal supply outlook
SINGAPORE: Japanese rubber futures weakened for a fourth straight session on Monday, hitting their lowest in more than a month, as seasonal harvesting firmed supply prospects. The Osaka Exchange (OSE) rubber contract for November delivery ended daytime trade 4.1 yen lower, or 1.39%, to 290.9 yen ($2.03) per kg. Earlier in the session, prices fell to 290.2 yen, the lowest since April 30. Global rubber futures ended last week sharply lower with the return of full production from the northern hemisphere following the end of the wintering season, Japan Exchange Group said in a report on Monday. Rubber crops usually undergo a season of low production from February to May before a peak harvesting period that lasts until September. Still, production in Yunnan has been reduced in the short term due to rainfall, though it is expected to return to normal in June, Chinese financial information site Tonghuashun Information said. Heavy rainfall has triggered flash floods and mudslides, damaged roads and destroyed buildings and bridges, wreaking havoc in China's southwestern Yunnan province over the long holiday weekend. On Friday, US President Donald Trump accused China of violating a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs and announced a doubling of worldwide steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%, once again rattling international trade. Meanwhile, global auto executives are sounding the alarm on an impending shortage of rare-earth magnets from China, which could force the closure of car factories within weeks and influence the intensity of automobile manufacturing, which involves using rubber-made tyres. The front-month rubber contract on the Singapore Exchange's SICOM platform for June delivery last traded at 157.1 US cents per kg, down 2.2%. China's financial markets are closed on Monday for a public holiday. Trading will resume on Tuesday, June 3.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Wall Street mixed after Trump's steel tariff threat
NEW YORK: Wall Street's main indexes were mixed on Monday after President Donald Trump said he plans to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, fueling more uncertainty around US trade policies. Trump said late on Friday he planned to increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50% from 25% starting Wednesday, just hours after he accused China of violating an agreement. Shares of US steel companies rose, with Cleveland-Cliffs jumping 23.6%, Nucor up 9.2% and Steel Dynamics 10.1% higher. However, shares of automakers fell. Ford was down 4.3% and General Motors was 4.7% lower. 'It's the continued uncertainty, not knowing whether the trade war is on or it's off,' said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research. 'Something new gets added, something gets postponed, so essentially it is that uncertainty reigns.' The increased levies risk deepening Trump's global trade war, and dousing enthusiasm in markets stemming from the US president's softer trade stance that drove a recovery in risky assets last month. A temporary relief on some levies on China and a rollback of steep tariff threats on the European Union, along with strong earnings and improving economic picture helped the benchmark S&P 500 log its best monthly performance in 18 months in May. Also fueling risk-off moves in global markets, Kyiv struck some of Moscow's nuclear-capable bombers on Sunday, renewing concerns around further escalation of the war. At 11:49 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 196.92 points, or 0.47%, to 42,073.15, the S&P 500 lost 9.21 points, or 0.16%, to 5,902.48 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 17.73 points, or 0.09%, to 19,131.49. Seven of the 11 major S&P 500 sub-sectors fell, with consumer discretionary declining the most with a nearly 1% fall. On the flip side, energy rose over 1% tracking a rise in oil prices. US-listed energy stocks advanced after producer group OPEC+ kept output increases in July at the same level as the previous two months. Most megacap and growth stocks fell, with Tesla, down 2.8% after it reported lower monthly sales for Portugal, Denmark and Sweden. Google-parent Alphabet also lost 1.7%. The Institute for Supply Management's (ISM) survey showed US manufacturing contracted for a third straight month in May and suppliers took longer to deliver inputs amid tariffs, potentially signaling looming shortages of some goods. Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Lorie Logan said that with the labor market stable, inflation running somewhat above target and the outlook uncertain, the central bank is keeping a watchful eye on a broad range of data to judge what response might be needed, and when.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
External financing in FY2025-26
One of the key indicators in the federal budget is the projected level of external financing to partly finance the budget deficit. The expectation in 2024-25 was that there would be total external financing inflow of approximately US$10.3 billion into the federal government account, excluding rollovers. Net of repayment the financing was expected to be US$2.3 billion. The Ministry of Economic Affairs has recently reported on the gross inflows up to the end of April 2025. They have aggregated to US$5.7 billion, equivalent to only 55 percent of the annual target. They should have reached 83 percent of the annual target by the end of April. The biggest shortfall is in commercial loans. The target is US$3.8 billion, whereas the actual loans received aggregate to less than US$0.8 billion. Given the enhanced risk perceptions of lending to Pakistan, it is not surprising that private creditors have reduced their exposure to Pakistan. The surprising outcome is the significant shortfall also in inflows from multilateral development agencies. The Asian Development Bank is, more or less, on target and has disbursed 76 percent of its annual commitment by April. However, the big shortfall is in the inflows from the World Bank. Only 51 percent of the annual target has been met up to April. The IMF Staff Report of the 17th of May, following the first review of the IMF Programme, contains estimates of the likely inflow of external financing by the end of 2024-25. These IMF estimates include the requirements of inflows to the private sector in Pakistan. The good news is that the expectation is of a gross inflow of US$18.9 billion, including rollovers, which will be $2.5 billion above the requirements of amortization of debt. The expectation is that the foreign exchange reserves of the SBP will rise by $4.5 billion by the end of 2024-25. US$2 billion will be the inflow from the IMF, which has already taken place. Consequently, the projection is that by end of June 2025, the level of foreign exchange reserves will reach US$14 billion. This will provide import cover of 2.8 months and put Pakistan in a somewhat more secure position. There is need, however, to appreciate that total external inflows, of both foreign direct investment and loan financing, will be significantly smaller in 2024-25. Inclusive of inflows into the private sector, the IMF estimate of the actual external financing of Pakistan is US$20.9 billion. This is 23 percent less than the total inflow of US$26.3 billion in 2023-24. We turn now to the outlook for 2025-26. The first part of the external financing requirement is the size of the current account surplus or deficit in the balance of payments. The IMF Staff report has projected a small deficit of US$1.5 billion. Exports are expected to show a growth rate of 5.4 percent, while imports are projected to increase by 3.4 percent. The turmoil in the global trade after the US announcement of higher tariffs is likely to adversely impact on the volume of global trade. Further, the shortfall in major crop outputs like cotton and wheat will raise the volume of agricultural imports. Also, if a target GDP growth rate of 3.6 percent is to be achieved then this will imply larger imports of inputs and capital goods. The IMF has been cautious about the level of remittances, which are likely to increase by 20 percent in 2024-25, and are the main reason for a near zero current account deficit. The expectation is that they will fall marginally in 2025-26. Also, only 3 percent growth is anticipated in interest payments and repatriation of profits. The latter may be significantly higher due to increase in risk perceptions about investment in Pakistan. Overall, there is the risk that there may be a larger deficit in the current account in 2025-26, which could approach US$4 billion, equivalent to almost 1 percent of the GDP. The balance of payments projections of the IMF for 2025-26 are based on a double-digit depreciation of the rupee. The projection of the level of amortization of external debt, both public and private, is of a significant increase of almost 18 percent. It is expected to rise from US$14.7 billion in 2024-25 to US$17.3 billion in 2025-26. Fortunately, repayment to the IMF will be less by almost $1 billion. Turning to the available financing, the IMF has been cautious about the projection of foreign direct investment in 2025-26. The expectation is that it will remain at the same level as in 2024-25 of US$2.1 billion. However, the tense security situation may lead to some postponement of investments in South Asia. Further, the IMF is also not expecting significant increase in the disbursement of loans in 2025-26. They are projected at $17 billion as compared to US$16.7 billion in 2024-25. Overall, the lack of optimism in the IMF projections is clearly indicated by the expectation that the available financing will be virtually the same as the total external financing requirement of US$19.3 billion. This is in contrast to the expected surplus of US$2.5 billion from sources other than the IMF in 2024-25. The assumption in the projections is that the IMF Programme will continue throughout 2025-26. Two reviews during the year will be successfully completed and Pakistan will meet the quantitative performance criteria and implement the agreed agenda of reforms. Uninterrupted continuation of the IMF Programme in 2025-26 will lead to a loan disbursement of $2 billion from the IMF. In addition, there will be some inflows from the resilience facility, which has not yet been included in the IMF projections. Overall, Pakistan's reserves are projected to increase by $2 billion. In addition, there could be other prospective financing of US$1.4 billion. Overall, the above IMF projections indicate a relatively high level of risk and uncertainty in the level of external financing in 2025-26. The requirement may be higher because of a larger current account deficit and the need for purchase of armaments. Foreign direct investment may be adversely affected by the security situation. On top of all this, Pakistan will have to continue performing well within the framework of the IMF Programme. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
