logo
What do police on the front line make of plans to stop the boats?

What do police on the front line make of plans to stop the boats?

Times11 hours ago
Nicolas Laroye, a veteran of France's border police, spent more than a decade patrolling the coast around Dunkirk in search of migrants. Now he shares the frustration of colleagues who have taken over what has become a near impossible task.'Of course we want to stop the migrants,' he said, as we sat in a cafe. 'But we know that they will keep trying and trying and that in the end they will all get through.'Times have changed since the days when those hoping to reach England lurked in small groups around the ports or the entrance to the Channel Tunnel hoping to stow away in the back of lorries. Back then, 20 years ago, there were far fewer of them and they always came quietly. 'In ten years I never experienced any violence. We didn't even need to handcuff them,' Laroye said.
Now, most evenings, hundreds can gather at one of the wide beaches that line the 70-mile stretch of coast between Dunkirk and Boulogne-sur-Mer. Dozens are ready to board each dinghy, which often wait for them in shallow water: the so-called 'taxi boats'. When the police, often heavily outnumbered, try to intercept them, things can turn ugly in the time it takes reinforcements to come.
'Imagine a situation when you have 50 of them waiting to get on a boat,' said Laroye, 55, who for the past few years has been on secondment to Unsa, a police trade union.
'They have paid thousands of euros and can see the English coast in the distance in front of them, and three police officers turn up and try to stop them from getting on board. Often they will start pelting the police with stones. They have their shields but I know colleagues who have still got hurt.
'It can start when they are still walking down the road. Their aim isn't to hurt the officers. They just don't want to be stopped from getting to the beach.'
Regular police — whether from the border force or units that are increasingly drafted in — are forbidden from speaking directly to the media.
But they can make their feelings felt through Laroye and others seconded to the various police trade unions permitted to speak on their behalf.
The impression they give is growing frustration among officers on the front line tasked with preventing migrants from crossing.
There is also anger at accusations from Britain that they do not do enough to stop migrants, in part because of French operating procedures that have hitherto barred them from interfering with a boat once it is in the water, for fear of endangering those packed on board.
Stopping the 'small boats' is certain to dominate President Macron's talks with Sir Keir Starmer during his state visit to Britain this week. The government appears to be pinning its hopes on plans by the French to change the rules, allowing officers to stop migrant dinghies even when they are at sea — provided they are within 300 metres of the coast.
For this reason, Downing Street seized on footage shot by the BBC on Friday near Boulogne-sur-Mer showing police from the Compagnie de Marche, a specialist unit trained to deal with public disorder, charging into shallow water and slashing the sides of a dinghy. Onboard were dozens of scrambling migrants. No 10 called it a 'significant moment' that could have a 'major impact' on smuggling gangs.
A further eight boats, carrying a total of 517 people, nevertheless made it successfully across the English Channel on that day alone, according to Home Office figures.
This took the numbers so far this year to a new record of just over 20,000, a 50 per cent surge over the same period last year, despite Starmer's vow last July to 'smash the gangs' and 'stop the boats'.
• Labour's first year: is Keir Starmer keeping his promises?
The French interior ministry declined to confirm a change of tactics. A spokesman said six officers, 'detecting immediate danger', intervened at about 8.30am French time in a 'proportionate manner' to 'avoid any risk to the passengers', adding: 'No one was injured or required emergency care.'
It followed a similar incident on June 13, further north near Gravelines, when two officers also from the Compagnie de Marche waded into waist-deep water to prevent migrants boarding a waiting 'taxi boat'. The local prefecture cited a 'need to safeguard human life', which it said 'takes precedence over all other considerations'.
The scenes raised eyebrows among police themselves. 'Officers are weighed down with kilos of kit,' said Laroye. 'If they get knocked over by a wave they may not be able to get up.' Even the slightest drop of corrosive salt water will destroy the gun that French police routinely carry strapped to their waist.
Authorities already appear to have been quietly changing their rules of engagement in recent years, according to French media reports, although it has failed to make a dent in the numbers.
Internal memos issued by the maritime prefecture of the Channel and the North Sea dated November 2022 and 2023, seen by the television station TV1, authorise forces to intervene at sea to control 'taxi boats', provided they are less than 200 metres off the coast and do not carry more than than three people — presumably the smugglers waiting to pick migrants up.
• The asylum seeker who became London's £12m migrant smuggler
Police officers who will have to implement the new rules have poured cold water on British hopes that they will make a substantial difference.
There is a difference between slashing a boat in shallow water and doing so 100, 200 or 300 metres out to sea, according to Julien Soir, a police officer and official with Alliance Nationale Police, a rival union.
'If we want to intervene in this 300-meter range, we would have to have enormous resources,' he explained. 'You need boats, you need people who are trained, you need a lot of things.'
Officers also fear they could face prosecution if migrants die as a result of their intervention. 'If you intercept a taxi boat and make someone fall out and drown, then you as a policeman will be held responsible,' said Régis Debut, a colleague of Laroye's at Unsa.
'The charities would have a field day', he added, in reference to vocal groups that champion the interest of migrants.
Meanwhile thousands of migrants, largely from the Middle East, Afghanistan and Africa, continue to arrive on the French Channel coast where they sleep rough while waiting to cross.
Most evenings, around 7pm or 8pm, columns of people can be seen walking from one encampment near Gravelines, apparently on their way to a meeting point in the dunes behind the beach that has been given to them by the smugglers.
Often they will take a bus from a terminal in front of the nearby out-of-town shopping centre. 'A whole group of them will get on and then suddenly get off at a stop in the middle of nowhere,' a driver waiting there said.
The boats leave from a different point each evening as the traffickers, part of what — with crossings costing up to €5,000 per person — has become a major multimillion pound business, strive to stay one step ahead of the police.
The next morning those that have failed make the journey back to their tents. I encountered one such group on Friday, clutching flimsy life jackets. 'The police stopped us just as we were trying to board,' said one angry Iranian man. Similar scenes are repeated up and down the coast.
Others are picked up by police, either on the streets or on buses, and taken in to have their identity checked and nationality established. Many, though, are from countries that refuse to take back their citizens and so are then released, giving them the chance to attempt the crossing again.
@Peter_Conradi
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action 'sets up a secret website' to recruit new members as support of terror group becomes criminal offence
Palestine Action 'sets up a secret website' to recruit new members as support of terror group becomes criminal offence

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Palestine Action 'sets up a secret website' to recruit new members as support of terror group becomes criminal offence

Palestine Action has created a secret website to recruit activists in an attempt to thwart the Government's terror ban on the group. The organisation is directing its supporters to a secret platform under the name Direct Action Training. Under the website, which was registered late on Friday, just before the ban took effect at midnight, Palestine Action has been privately messaging potential recruits encouraging them to 'join the front line against Zionism', The Telegraph reports. The recruitment message, which was sent on the encrypted app Signal, declares: 'While Palestine Action is banned, we do not want this draconian move from the Home Secretary to deter your dedication to your solidarity with Palestine'. 'Direct action is for everyone, regardless of the name it falls under. We do believe that by staying focused and targeting the heart of the war machine again and again, the people will be able to shut the Zionist supply chain.' The website for Direct Training has its IP address in Iceland, which is not a part of any major international surveillance alliances and is known for its strong data protection laws. To register with the website, prospective recruits are required to fill out a form in which they are asked 14 questions ranging from their personal details to testing their 'dedication to the Palestinian cause'. The form also notes that training be aimed at 'dismantling the Zionist war machine in the UK'. The move comes after the Home Office on Friday welcomed a ban on Palestine Action, with the group failing to block its proscription as a terrorist organisation in a late-night legal bid. Lawyers representing co-founder Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, asked for the decision to be delayed at least until July 21. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Palestine Action argues it is a protest group that has never incited or encouraged violence, but does support civil disobedience. Activists protest against the continuing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country. Police on Saturday arrested almost 30 people on suspicion of terrorism offences after protesters gathered in Parliament Square holding signs supporting Palestine Action, just hours after a ban on the came into effect. Around two dozen people, including a priest, professor and an emergency care worker who is just back from Gaza, sat in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square on Saturday expressing support for the group, which is now a proscribed terrorist organisation. They held signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Shortly after their arrival, police officers could be seen engaging with the protesters and the Met said it had began making arrests. Several people were seen being carried away by officers. A spokesperson for the force said: 'Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. 'The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence. Arrests are being made.' They later added: 'A total of 29 arrests were made during this afternoon's protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. They remain in custody.' Campaign group Defend Our Juries said today's protest will be the first in a series of actions which will see activists take to Parliament Square every week. The Met Police issued a warning ahead of the protest, stating there are a number of events taking place in London this weekend and 'anyone attending should be aware that officers policing these will act where criminal offences, including those related to support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed'. Proscription makes it a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT) to invite or express support for an organisation through chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos, the Met said. It is also illegal to belong to the organisation or publish similar signs of support online. Police arresting protesters in Parliament Square were met with cries of 'Met Police you are puppets of the Zionist state' and 'leave them alone'.

Unless we live within our means, Reeves' teardrops will become a torrent - for her and the British people: STEPHEN GLOVER
Unless we live within our means, Reeves' teardrops will become a torrent - for her and the British people: STEPHEN GLOVER

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Unless we live within our means, Reeves' teardrops will become a torrent - for her and the British people: STEPHEN GLOVER

So that's it, then. After her unexplained tears in the Commons last week, Rachel Reeves has decided that taxes will have to go up again in the autumn Budget even though she previously said they wouldn't. The Chancellor told the Guardian newspaper on Saturday that it was impossible to rule out tax increases, which is a politician's way of saying they'll have to rise. She said that 'there are costs' after the welfare Bill was virtually abandoned last week.

Who gained from Rachel Reeves's tears? She did
Who gained from Rachel Reeves's tears? She did

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Who gained from Rachel Reeves's tears? She did

J esus wept: and that's the Gospel truth. He wept over the impending fall of Jerusalem. Moses wept: out of frustration with the flakiness of the Israelites. Elizabeth I wept with rage at the disloyalty of her councillors. Sorrow, frustration, rage … crying can signify many things. But a predominantly male political commentariat, startled by Rachel Reeves's tears at PMQs, has overlooked another function of public tears: as an act of aggression, a warning and a threat, a subtle indication of defiance. Tears can say, 'Watch it. You may push me too far.' This, I speculate, is what the chancellor was signalling to her boss as she sat beside him in the Commons. I might be wrong. Perhaps as her allies insist there was something very private. But in the absence of any indication as to its nature we can only guess, and mine is that there had been a bitter (and, indeed, 'personal') eleventh-hour head-to-head with the prime minister. Her tears probably embarrassed her, but weeping comes from somewhere deeper than the conscious mind: it can be an instinctive, passive-aggressive response to being thwarted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store