Deputies find 1 million child porn images on hard drives seized from Forsyth Co. man's home
Elvis Beltran Pineda was arrested in January in Operation Bytedown, a statewide operation sponsored by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation's Internet Crimes Against Children Unit.
The operation focused on peer-to-peer networks that collectors of child pornography use to download and trade movies and images with others in the network.
On March 3, detectives obtained 15 additional warrants for Pineda.
Two of those warrants were for distribution of child sexual abuse material and 13 of them were for possession of child sexual abuse material.
The Forsyth County Sheriff's Office Warrant Unit arrested Pineda at his home.
He was booked into the county jail without bond.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
TRENDING STORIES:
Couple found dead inside Atlanta apartment after SWAT standoff, victim's son charged with murder
Child found wandering Fayette County daycare parking lot after being left asleep on bus
1 arrested in hazing death of college student pledging DeKalb-based fraternity
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hypebeast
an hour ago
- Hypebeast
Louisiana Attorney General Sues Roblox Over Child Safety
Summary In a major legal challenge to the online gaming industry, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has filed a child protection lawsuit againstRoblox. The lawsuit, filed in a state court, alleges that the popular platform has failed to protect child users from online predators and harmful content. NBCreported, Attorney General Liz Murrill in Louisiana's 21st Judicial District has sued the California-based video game company for 'intentionally or recklessly designing a platform with no age verification process, allowing Roblox's tens of millions of users to easily create accounts with fake birthdays.' According to the lawsuit, Roblox has created an environment where sexual predators 'thrive, unite, hunt and victimize kids.' The state's complaint specifically alleges that the company lacks effective age verification, allowing adults to easily pose as children. It also points to the existence of inappropriate in-game 'experiences' that remain accessible to minors. The lawsuit's claim states that Roblox, through its lack of safety features, 'provides the perfect place for pedophiles.' In a statement, Murrill said the company has 'prioritized user growth, revenue, and profits over child safety.' The lawsuit seeks to hold Roblox accountable for its alleged negligence, demanding stricter security measures and seeking penalties. In response,Robloxhas stated it 'categorically disputes' the allegations, asserting that it has implemented rigorous safeguards and invests substantial resources in detecting and preventing inappropriate released a statement categorically disputing the allegations and defending its extensive efforts in child safety. The company argues that the lawsuit's claims are inaccurate and mischaracterize its that it has invested thousands of hours and millions of dollars in a comprehensive safety ecosystem, which includes a global team of moderators, AI-powered systems, and industry-leading safety tools to detect and prevent inappropriate behavior. It asserts that its platform has a zero-tolerance policy for sexual content and that its 'experiences' are built to be safe and accessible for players of all also highlighted its commitment to working with industry peers and safety organizations to continually improve online safety for children. This legal action is one of several lawsuitsRobloxhas recently faced over its child safety measures.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Indiana school banned a mom for trying to protect her child. She's right to sue.
An Indiana mother's lawsuit against her children's school district raises important questions about parents' First and 14th Amendment rights. It's back-to-school season, and parents and kids around the country are prepping for the inevitable transition from summer fun to the fall grind. For one Indiana mom, the stakes are higher than normal. Nicole Graves has sued her school district, Whitley County Consolidated Schools in Columbia City, Indiana, in federal court with help from the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. She alleges that her First and 14th Amendment rights were violated in a series of interactions with school administrators. All four of Graves' children still attend district schools, and she's rightly concerned – given how she's been treated – about potential retaliation from the administration. Here's what happened: According to the Goldwater Institute, in April 2024, Graves' seventh-grade daughter 'filmed her school bus driver walking up and down the aisle, smacking his belt against his hand with his pants falling and his underwear visible.' After that incident on her daughter's school bus, Graves set up a meeting with the school principal. She recorded the meeting because she wanted an accurate record of what transpired. When Graves wasn't satisfied with what the principal said, she posted the recording on social media. That angered school administrators, who contacted her via letter and told her she broke school policy by recording the meeting without permission. Even though Graves had been unaware of the policy, she was banned from school grounds and restricted in her communication with staff, unless she got written permission from the superintendent's office. Trump is right about homeless camps: Make them 'move out, IMMEDIATELY' | Opinion 1st Amendment protections go beyond speech alone, lawsuit says While that absurd punishment has expired, the lawsuit seeks to overturn the ban on recording, which remains in place. 'This is not fun for me,' Graves told the Indianapolis Star. 'This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for. But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district.' The complaint argues that the school's recording policy and the no-trespass and communication orders violate the First Amendment, 'which protects the right to record government officials in the performance of their duties.' Adam Shelton, the Goldwater staff attorney working with Graves, says these kinds of recordings fall squarely under the First Amendment. 'The First Amendment protects more than just speech, it also protects conduct that is inherently expressive and conduct that cannot be divorced from the speech creation process, like recording,' Shelton observed on X. 'This is especially true in situations involving parents and school officials.' Opinion: Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad triggers liberals. She looks good. They don't. Parental rights around the country are at stake While Democrats and teachers unions may think they know what's best for children, that's simply false. Parents do. This lawsuit also alleges that the school district violated Graves' constitutional right to direct her children's education. 'The orders also violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which protects the fundamental rights of parents to control and direct the education and upbringing of their children,' the complaint states. 'This right is the oldest right that the Supreme Court has recognized as one of the 'liberties' protected by the due process clause.' Parents, not progressives, know their kids best. They should control education. | Opinion Graves' case reminded me of one I've written about before, regarding another Midwest mom who was shunned by her child's school district. Sandra Hernden of Michigan sued her school district in 2022 for violating her constitutional rights. She had complained to the school board about its COVID-19 policies in 2020, and board members responded by contacting her employer and then reporting her to the Biden administration's U.S. Department of Justice (remember how the DOJ went after parents as 'domestic terrorists'?). Hernden's case is ongoing. Steve Delie, an attorney with the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation that is representing Hernden, made oral arguments in June before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Even if we assume there was no monetarily compensable injury, you're still talking about government officials taking advantage of their elected positions of power to silence opposition,' Delie told the court. 'That can't be the way society functions.' No, it can't. Kudos to these moms for their bravery and for standing up for parental rights everywhere. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques
4 hours ago
Qantas fined $59M for illegal pandemic layoffs
MELBOURNE -- A judge on Monday fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59 million) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labor laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney-based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AU$121,212,000 ($78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AU$90 million ($59 million), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AU$125 million ($81 million) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. "I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families," she said. 'Over the past 18 months we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AU$50 million ($33 million) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AU$40 million ($26 million) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling, which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless and we won,' Kaine added. Qantas has admitted illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been canceled.
