Rutherglen soldier's impressive transition from ceremony to combat readiness in a day
Pte Aaron Cameron of 5 SCOTS, The Royal Regiment of Scotland went from Edinburgh Castle to Lithuania.
A soldier from Rutherglen has made an impressive transition from formal ceremonies to full operational readiness in Lithuania – in just over a day.
Pte Aaron Cameron of 5 SCOTS, The Royal Regiment of Scotland was one of the soldiers who took part in the historic installation of the new Governor of Edinburgh Castle.
He played a unique role in the ceremony, stationed above the castle's drawbridge to verify the identity of Lord Lyon, the Governor's representative, as part of the formal proceedings.
And within 24 hours, he had swapped his ceremonial uniform for combat gear and prepared for his deployment to Lithuania for Exercise IRON WOLF.
The soldiers from Balaklava Company, 5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland (5 SCOTS), gave F1 pitstop teams a run for their money after making the turbocharged transition from the formal pomp of the historic military ceremony at Edinburgh Castle to full operational readiness in such a short space of time.
Pte Aaron was just one of the soldiers on ceremonial duties at 6.30pm on Wednesday for the installation of the new Governor of Edinburgh Castle. By Thursday evening, he was fully packed, prepped and ready to board military transport for Exercise IRON WOLF, a three-week deployment in Lithuania alongside their armed forces.
The formal ceremony at Edinburgh Castle, a tradition dating back to the year 1106, saw 5 SCOTS joined by the Grenadier Guards and the Band of the Royal Regiment of Scotland to mark the installation of Major General Robert Bruce – a former Colonel of The Regiment – as Governor.
Pte Cameron held a unique role in the installation, positioned above the drawbridge of the Castle to verify the identity of Lord Lyon, the governor's representative, as part of the formal proceedings.
'I've never seen the view from that part of the castle before,' he said. 'It was something different and interesting – I've not done anything like it.'
As soon as the ceremony concluded at 7.30pm, the soldiers returned to barracks to begin the rapid shift from kilts to combat mode.
'Even though we do both of them, they are very different experiences and require a very different mindset,' said Pte Cameron. 'But you kind of just get back into the swing of it.'
Originally scheduled to deploy at 3am on Thursday, the soldiers' departure was slightly delayed but despite the change, the transition was already in full swing.
Exercise IRON WOLF will see 5 SCOTS working alongside a Lithuanian Battle Group in a validation training exercise designed to strengthen NATO cooperation and battlefield readiness.
The Royal Regiment of Scotland (SCOTS) is the senior line Infantry regiment of the British Army. Formed on March 28, 2006, and it was founded on the fighting heritage of historic Scottish Infantry Regiments representing over 390 years' continuous service to the crown. Their motto is 'Nemo Me Impune Lacessit' (No one provokes me with impunity) – shared with the Order of the Thistle, Scotland's highest order of chivalry.
Since its formation, The Royal Regiment of Scotland has deployed to almost every theatre of operations the British Army has been involved in; conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia and Northern Ireland, supporting peace operations in Cyprus, West and North Africa, disaster relief in the Caribbean and giving support to UK Civil Authorities to deal with wild-fire, flooding and the Covid-19 pandemic. In recent years, SCOTS soldiers have had key roles in NATO Response Forces, partnered US forces in training in the US and Europe.
*Don't miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Why Scotland joining Efta or EEA is infinitely preferable to the EU
Since then, there has been an understandable desire expressed by many to rejoin the EU after independence, though how that is delivered remains to be seen. However, the debate thus far has not fully addressed other options: notably membership of Efta/the EEA, at least in the medium term. Efta is the European Free Trade Association. It was formed in 1960 as kind of an economic waiting room prior to EU accession. The UK was a member of Efta before 1973 when it passed legislation to become a member of the EU. Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Lichtenstein never left the waiting room, and currently comprise Efta. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed The EEA is the European Economic Area. This was a treaty signed in 1992 which enabled all the EU states and the Efta members (excluding Switzerland) to be part of the single market. This requires all members of the EEA to respect the four freedoms of movement – workers, goods, services, and capital. Switzerland has a series of bilateral treaties with the EU under which it must abide by these four freedoms, but it is much more complicated than EEA membership. I have attended two biennial seminars of the Efta/EEA council in Brussels, and was struck by the positive engagement between all EEA members, Efta and the EU. There is this slogan against Efta membership that Scotland would be 'rule takers, not rule makers'. This ignores the fact that within the EEA treaty, all EEA states must be closely consulted on any change in EU law pertaining to the EEA agreement. On many occasions, Efta/EEA members engaged in the process early and had a positive formative influence on the law. READ MORE: Assa Samake-Roman: What if we are wrong about reasons for rise in far-right support? While Efta/EEA members do not have a vote on laws, I asked Efta members if they had ever had EU laws forced on them against their will. They couldn't think of any such occasions. Many smaller EU states feel they have no influence at all. Upon a 'democratic event' affirming majority support for independence, Scotland could apply to join Efta. While I cannot speak on their behalf, I can safely say there is great support among Efta officials for Scottish membership. The three Efta/EEA members would then lobby to get an independent Scotland into the EEA. Again, I cannot speak on their behalf, but when I last spoke with Efta officials they saw no impediment to Scotland joining Efta and the EEA within a few short months. Compare this to the EU accession process. This could easily take 10 years. EU law (the acquis) comprises 35 chapters, all of which would need to be reflected in Scots law, and Scotland would have to demonstrate that it has the institutions in place to apply EU law. It doesn't, because the 'Scottish' civil service is merely an appendage of the UK state. File photo of a Yes for EU rally at the Scottish parliamentAll 27 EU member states have veto power at any stage in the process. Think Spain and Catalonia. At the recent SSRG conference in Dunfermline, we held a panel on Efta/EEA membership. I was in touch with @YesforEU, and asked if any known prominent advocate for Scotland in the EU would be willing to speak. We got zero responses. There seems to be a contrived prevailing assumption that, because Scots voted to remain in the EU in 2016, rejoining the EU after independence would be easy and preferable to Efta membership. I was in touch with a well-known purportedly pro-indy corporate lobbyist, who after changing his mind, assured me that the EU membership 'polled' better than Efta/EEA, therefore independence should be automatically linked with EU membership. However, that assumes Scots are well-informed about the pros and cons of membership of both, and can make an informed decision. This debate has yet to be held. This ignores the many independence supporters who, despite the Scottish vote to remain in 2016, take a dim view of EU membership. As an American with UK citizenship through my Scottish father, I have been able to carve out a career as a university teacher in France. When I came to France in 1995, I felt a genuine optimism towards the economic objectives of the EU, and have benefited from it. My view of the EU has changed drastically since then. The musician Frank Zappa famously remarked that '[US] Politics is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex'. Regrettably, the same can increasingly be said of the EU and Nato, which are becoming indistinguishable. At the same time, the EU is increasingly authoritarian. Whether you agree with them or not, look at how Viktor Orban in Hungary and Robert Fico in Slovakia have been threatened because of their opposition to the EU approach to Russia and Ukraine. It also managed to get Calin Georgescu eliminated in Romania as a presidential candidate because he dissented from Ursula Von der Leyen's orthodoxy. Kaja Kallas is the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security PolicyAnd don't get me going on the incompetence and stupidity of Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign minister. She is openly Russophobic, speaks about defeating and carving up Russia, and laments that if the EU cannot defeat Russia, how can it defeat China? Does Scotland want to join THAT EU? What happens when that bile is directed at Scotland if it dissents from EU-manufactured consent? Maybe, over time, the EU leadership will regain some sanity, get back to its original economic purpose and stop violating its members' sovereignty and cultures. Until then, Scotland should join Efta/the EEA, recoup and exercise its popular sovereignty, and let the EU sort itself out. Whether it does or not, Scotland will be much better off as an Efta/EEA member, and will be warmly welcomed. Later, there is no obstacle to joining the EU, if that is what Scots democratically decide. Dr Mark McNaught is the founder of the Scottish Sovereignty Research Group and Maître de Conférences at the University of Rennes 2, France
Daily Record
15 hours ago
- Daily Record
Lanarkshire MSP calls on Holyrood to make sure OAPs aren't left behind on winter fuel payments
More than 75 per cent of pensioners in England and Wales will be entitled to the new annual payment of up to £300 after the Labour government abandoned one of its first, and most controversial, policies. A Lanarkshire MSP has called on the Scottish Government to ensure local pensioners aren't left behind following the UK Government's u-turn on winter fuel payments. More than 75 per cent of pensioners in England and Wales will be entitled to the new annual payment of up to £300 after the Labour government abandoned one of its first, and most controversial, policies. Scotland has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their counterparts south of the border. Central Scotland list Labour MSP Monica Lennon said 'This is welcome news that will bring even more money to people in Lanarkshire – on top of the record funding settlement Labour delivered for Scotland in the budget. 'While the last Tory government left our public finances in chaos, Labour has made good progress cleaning up the mess it inherited. 'The Winer Fuel Payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'That's why we are urging the SNP not go ahead with plans that would unfairly hit poorer pensioners. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' Last July, Chancellor Reeves drew widespread criticism over cuts to the winter fuel payment - a lump sum of £200 a year for households with a pensioner under 80, or £300 for households with a pensioner over 80 - in a bid to save an estimated £1.4 billion. In response, the Scottish Government introduced a new scheme offering those in receipt of qualifying benefits like Pension Credit £200 or £300 depending on their age, and £100 for all other pensioner households. However, while the benefit for pensioners above the income threshold will be clawed back through tax, richer pensioners in Scotland will be able to keep the payment. Following the latest announcement from Westminster, Scottish pensioners who do not get pension credit but whose income is below that £35,000 threshold are expected to receive £100 less than if they lived in England or Wales. Shirley-Anne Somerville said Scotland introduced a winter heating payment for all pensioners because of the UK government's 'betrayal of millions of pensioners'. She said the Scottish Government welcomed the U-turn, but 'there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that'. The social justice secretary said: 'We have once again not been consulted on the policy and its implications in Scotland and will scrutinise the proposals carefully when they are announced. 'I would therefore urge the UK Government to ensure the Scottish government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible.'
Scotsman
16 hours ago
- Scotsman
Rachel Reeves spending review: When will the Chancellor announce the plans? What is a spending review?
The Spending Review will be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rachel Reeves is set to deliver her Spending Review on Wednesday in what could be a defining moment for the UK Labour government. The Chancellor will unveil the government's day-to-day spending commitments up to 2028-29, as well as the investment spending plans to 2029-30. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has announced a U-turn on winter fuel payment cuts. Picture: James Manning/PA Wire As such, the allocations will define not just the impact on Scots lives for the rest of this Parliament, but also shape Labour's chances of being re-elected, as well as their prospects in Holyrood. The Steamie newsletter brings unrivalled political analysis - subscribe here What is a spending review? Spending reviews occur every few years and is the process the government uses to set all departments' budgets for future years. This covers both the services the public uses every day, like the NHS, schools and transport, and also how the government will invest in areas such research, energy security and infrastructure to drive economic growth across the country. They account for 40 per cent of all public spending. The previous multi-year spending review took place in 2021 under Boris Johnson's Conservative administration. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What time will Rachel Reeves announce the Spending Review? The Chancellor will stand up in the House of Commons on Wednesday, June 11 after Prime Minister's Questions, at roughly 12.30pm. Once Ms Reeves has finished speaking, the review will be published on the UK government website, along with any accompanying documents. Forecasters will outline their response shortly after. What is likely to be included? Scottish pensioners now face being worse off than those in England and Wales after the UK government confirmed its U-turn over winter fuel payment cuts. A pensioner warms up a room in their house. Millions will again receive a winter fuel payment later this year following a U-turn announced by Rachel Reeves. | Getty Images The Chancellor announced on Monday an increase to the payment, worth up to £300 for each recipient. However, Scotland has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, with only those on pension credit receiving up to £300. The devolved policy will potentially leave hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their English and Welsh counterparts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK government has also confirmed it will commit to a multi-decade, multi-billion redevelopment of HMNB Clyde, An initial £250 million in funding has been allocated to the Faslane base - the home of Trident nuclear weapons - over three years. There is also an expectation the Chancellor will finally sign off on the Acorn project.
