Centre to roll out special programme for remediation of 44% of legacy waste within a year
NEW DELHI: With less than a year remaining to meet its target of zero dumpsites, the Union govt will roll out a special programme on August 15 for the remediation of 44% of legacy waste in urban areas within a year.
The Centre will also provide incentive to states and cities to set up more solid waste treatment plants.
Speaking at an event on Swachh Survekshan, housing and urban affairs minister
Manohar Lal Khattar
said remediation of legacy waste in big cities is a huge challenge. 'We will roll out a special Accelerated Dumpsite Remediation Programme for one year starting Aug 15. The focus will be on reducing the legacy waste and increasing the waste processing capacity.
There will be incentive for setting up solid waste treatment plants under this programme,' he said.
Sources said the details of the scheme are being worked out, with the ministry receiving feedback from state urban development ministers on Thursday.
At the launch of
Swachh Bharat Mission 2.0
in 2021, the govt had set a target of making cities free of all legacy landfills by 2026. Around 50% of land under legacy dumpsites has been freed so far, Khattar said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gurgaon's problem is it's remote-controlled from Chandigarh, Rao Inderjit Singh says at TOI Townhall
When Rao Inderjit Singh said "we don't have the autonomy we need", the audience nodded in appreciation and agreement. It was a nod both to the minister's candour as well as his ability to get to the nucleus of the problem that affects a Gurgaon resident all year – the city's acute infrastructure and governance problem. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now There are few who know and can read the city as well as Singh, who is currently serving his sixth term as MP from Gurgaon and his third stint as a minister in the central govt led by Narendra Modi. So, when a question came on the city's governance, Singh's diagnosis was quick and precise. Despite the presence of senior state govt functionaries in the city and frequent visits by both the current and former CMs, key decisions regarding Gurgaon's future, he observed, continue to be made in Chandigarh. "Gurgaon is remote-controlled from Chandigarh," he said, speaking at the second edition of TOI's #WeMakeGurgaon Townhall, held on Saturday at Indiabulls Centrum Park in Sector 103. In a conversation that covered a spectrum of subjects, from the city's rain miseries to his own political career, the Union minister offered a forthright and wide-ranging address, candidly acknowledging deficiencies and also laying out his vision for what is to come in the months and years ahead. Speaking about the "Chandigarh-centric approach" that slows down decision-making in a city that helps generate the bulk of the state's revenues, Singh said, "Even when the CM is in Gurgaon, the files still have to go to Chandigarh." He acknowledged that Gurgaon contributes 60-65% of the state's total revenue but struggles to receive proportional attention in terms of development funds and infrastructure support. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "When we contribute this much, we are right to expect a fair share in return," he said. Recalling the tenure of former CM Manohar Lal Khattar, Singh mentioned the move to set up a grievance redress committee as a positive step, which remains active and its results visible. "But administrative limitations persist," he said. "Even Nayab Singh Saini, who now leads the grievance committee, shows interest in Gurgaon. But the problem is not intent — it is structure. We still lack the leeway to take decisions on the ground," Singh said. The minister went on to underline Gurgaon and south Haryana's deep-rooted political loyalty to BJP, seen in the consistent support for the party in both state and national elections. "These constituencies have made it possible for BJP to form the govt. Our voters here deserve more focus, more attention, and more support. And not just because they vote for us but because their needs are real, urgent and growing." To a question on whether Haryana should consider making Gurgaon its capital, Singh responded by saying it was an impractical idea. "Not a chance," he said. "Gurgaon is already bursting at the seams. We don't have enough water, infrastructure or public services to absorb that level of institutional expansion. Before we talk about a capital, we need to upgrade our current systems." However, he added, "Given our legal infrastructure and population of professionals, I believe Gurgaon should house a high court". Singh mentioned progress on highways, arterial roads and flyovers, all designed to ease the city's notorious traffic problems and improve inter-sector mobility. But there are major gaps still, he admitted. Waterlogging and inadequate sewerage systems continue to plague many areas, especially during monsoon. "Basic issues still remain. But we're actively working on them. These are not being ignored," he assured. Asked if Gurugram Metropolitan Development Authority (GMDA), created with the vision of enabling unified urban planning for a city with too many agencies and little coordination, had, in his opinion, fulfilled its purpose, Singh said it continues to evolve and holds significant promise. "The intention behind GMDA was to bring Gurgaon under a single development umbrella. It's a work in progress, but we've taken the first steps towards autonomy. " For representatives of RWAs in new sectors around Dwarka Expressway who were among those in the audience, this was an opportunity to voice their grievances before their MP. Lack of public transport, erratic sanitation services, frequent water shortages, and poor road maintenance were the four main problems they brought up. Singh listened, took notes, and assured them he would take these up with the appropriate departments. "I will personally follow up," he said. "Your voices matter." Many in the audience said this was the first time they had been able to speak directly to their elected representative in such an open and public forum. "I'm here to listen and I will act. I may not be able to solve everything immediately, but I promise you will be heard," was Singh's message to them. As the conversation moved to his long political career, and whether he might hang up his boots as he has hinted before, Singh dismissed a question on whether he would turn his attention to state politics with a shake of the head. Does he see himself as a future CM contender? "The chief minister's chair is a bed of thorns," he said with a smile. "I'm 75 years old. I have no ambition to pursue that path." His political journey, he said, would continue in whichever direction the party deemed fit. But he made it clear he had no plans to contest another Lok Sabha election. "I think it's time for someone else. If the party insists, I will follow its directive, but my own preference is to step aside from electoral politics." He made it clear that stepping away from Parliament would not mean stepping away from public service. "Being an MP ties me to Delhi and central responsibilities. Many of the issues Gurgaon faces are local and require state-level coordination. It's frustrating not to be able to give them the attention they deserve. I'm not going anywhere. I'll continue to serve, just perhaps in a different capacity." For residents who packed the venue to listen to him, Singh had a message: "The Gurgaon of tomorrow will only thrive through cooperation, transparency and sustained civic involvement. "
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Clean mobility crossroads: Why states side with EVs over hybrids
India's push for clean mobility is hitting a fork in the road, as states increasingly diverge from the Centre's approach to supporting all types of clean vehicles. The growing divide, evident in automobile policies in various states, has also set the stage for intense lobbying, as rivals vie for policy support. At the central level, the view is to treat electric and hybrids equally when it comes to incentives. But states are having different thoughts. Key states like Maharashtra, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh have decided to reserve incentives for battery EVs (BEVs) in their automobile policies for 2025, a Mint review found. Chhattisgarh recently tweaked a 2022 policy to explicitly remove incentives for hybrids. While Uttarakhand and Delhi had toyed with incentives for hybrids in their draft policies, the former is now reconsidering its position, a person aware of the matter said. State choice 'In Para 3 of the said rule, the phrase 'Hybrid electric vehicles will be eligible to receive 50% of the purchase incentive amount given to a fully electric vehicle' should be replaced with 'No subsidy will be given to any type of hybrid vehicles'," Chhattisgarh government said on 29 May. Union ministers have backed equal treatment for both EVs and hybrids. "Under the FAME-II Scheme, EV and hybrid versions of electric four-wheelers were allowed for incentivization. Similarly, in the case of the PM E-Drive scheme, a hybrid version of e-ambulances, that is, electric plug-in hybrid & strong hybrid, shall be incentivized," Union heavy industries minister H.D. Kumaraswamy said in a June 6 interview. Union road minister Nitin Gadkari too has backed both hybrid and ethanol-powered cars. While EV makers demand incentives should be reserved for zero-tailpipe emission vehicles, hybrid makers say their vehicles are far more fuel-efficient than conventional ICE vehicles, and that they serve as a bridge to a cleaner future. Few takers According to analysts at HSBC Global Research, at the end of 2024, only five states and union territories had incentivized sales of hybrid vehicles, which included Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Chandigarh and Chhattisgarh. With the withdrawal of hybrid incentives in Chhattisgarh, the number has reduced to four. Incentives by Delhi and Uttarakhand haven't been implemented yet, with final EV policy notification expected in months ahead. With states charting their own course to clean mobility through targeted policies, the hybrid lobby led by Maruti Suzuki has locked horns with the EV lobby led by Tata Motors and Mahindra and Mahindra. 'We believe that government incentives should be directed toward technologies that require support to bridge a funding gap and accelerate innovation. Incentives are most effective when they help emerging technologies reach scale and maturity—particularly those that contribute meaningfully to long-term sustainability goals," a Tata Motors spokesperson said in response to queries on policy stance of state governments. Bridge to future Maruti Suzuki argues that promoting hybrids can reduce pure diesel and petrol vehicle sales, leading to an overall reduction in pollution. Rahul Bharti, senior executive officer, corporate affairs at Maruti Suzuki, said, "EV penetration in India is still around 3%. While all efforts should be made to maximize this, it still leaves 97% unaddressed. If we have to achieve the national objectives of decarbonization and oil import reduction, this 97% cannot be ignored. A technology like Strong Hybrid reduces CO₂ emission by 26-32% and improves fuel efficiency by 35-44% over pure petrol/diesel. However, it has a viability gap which needs to be addressed, as many countries of the world and many Indian states are already doing by incentivizing hybrids." The reluctance among states to include incentives for hybrid vehicles comes at a time when the automobile industry is locked in a sharp contest over a provision in Delhi's EV policy. Mint reported on 30 May that top automakers including Tata Motors, Mahindra and Mahindra and Hyundai Motor India Ltd had approached the heavy industries ministry and federal thinktank Niti Aayog after the Delhi government proposed to include incentives for hybrid vehicles on par with EVs in its upcoming EV policy. Tata Motors, MG Motor India, Mahindra and Mahindra and Hyundai Motor India are India's leading EV manufacturers. Maruti Suzuki, Toyota India and Honda Cars India are the only companies offering hybrids. Policy dilemma 'In India, the broader policy consensus so far has been not to incentivize hybrids, with most benefits reserved only for BEVs," said Nikhil Dhaka, vice-president at consultancy firm Primus Partners. As companies slug it out, independent experts are also split on whether or not to incentivize hybrid vehicles. '(Not incentivizing hybrids) could be a missed opportunity, especially since our EV infrastructure is still developing. Only a few states like Delhi and Uttarakhand have taken steps to support strong and plug-in hybrids by offering some incentives," Dhaka of Primus Partners said, adding hybrids can reduce fuel use and emissions right away, making them a useful option while India builds a stronger EV ecosystem. Sharif Qamar, associate director of transport and urban governance at The Energy and Resources Institute (Teri), differed. 'The objective of the EV policy is to cut down emissions of vehicles and also contribute to improving the air quality," he said. 'When it comes to the emission reduction objective, currently, only zero-tailpipe emission vehicles need to be prioritized. Incentives should be crafted to encourage players to move towards zero emission vehicles." Meanwhile, both hybrids and EVs have gained traction in India. In FY25, 107,000 electric cars and 83,000 hybrid vehicles were sold, both growing 18% each.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
GMDA must meet at least once a month, not once or twice a year, says Rao Inderjit Singh
Gurgaon: GMDA was established to emulate the Noida Authority model as a centralised body that would steer the city's development, Union minister and Gurgaon MP Rao Inderjit Singh said at TOI's #WeMakeGurgaon Townhall on Saturday. "Despite the intention of creating a one-window powerhouse, the existence of both the municipal corporation and GMDA, according to Singh, resulted in a lack of clarity regarding their respective areas of influence and administration. Conceived as a Noida Authority-like body, GMDA doesn't function as one. Formed in 2018, the development authority is now seven years old, so there's been enough time to steer it in the direction of its purpose. But the state govt has not quite been able to take it there. One of the main criticisms of GMDA is that its execution is slow and its contributions to the city's infrastructure improvements not very apparent. You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon Singh said when GMDA was formed, its CEO was allowed to sanction only projects up to Rs 50 lakh. Only recently, it was enhanced to Rs 2.5 crore. "The power of the MCG house (to sanction projects) was earlier Rs 2 crore only and now it has become Rs 10 crore. If you have a project which is over Rs 10 crore, it has to go to the minister, and if it is over Rs 25 crore, to the high-powered purchase committee sitting in Chandigarh. Now, this is a remote-controlled administrative setup with which I am not really very happy," said Singh, referring to the slowness of project execution in Gurgaon. In Noida, he added, Noida Authority operates through a single-window system. But Gurgaon is hobbled by multiple agencies, creating a complex administrative structure. Noida manages licences for residential colonies and plotted areas, while in Gurgaon, developers independently acquire land from farmers, aggregate it and then seek licences from the town and country planning department, said the minister, pointing out structural flaws in Gurgaon's governance. "Persistent flooding in Gurgaon stems from developers incorporating perennial waterways into their projects and constructing buildings upon them. With these natural water channels obstructed, water seeks alternative paths, resulting in widespread flooding throughout the city," he said. "Steps are being taken to establish a unified authority for issuing licences. There are concerns that the next developing city might face similar challenges as Gurgaon. It is crucial to avoid replicating the mistakes made in Gurgaon's development process in future urban expansion projects," he added. Singh also pointed out that GMDA has a meeting once a year or perhaps twice a year, which is not enough. "I mean, Gurgaon is generating so many problems every day. This is something that I'm trying to ask the chief minister to do. The GMDA meeting should not be held six-monthly. It should at least be held once a month. Even if the chief minister, who is the head of GMDA, cannot come, at least the officers should all convene once a month here in Gurgaon," said Singh.
