logo
Why a Democrat says he can beat Laurel Lee in Tampa congressional race

Why a Democrat says he can beat Laurel Lee in Tampa congressional race

Yahooa day ago
Another Democrat is stepping up to challenge Republican U.S. Rep. Laurel Lee.
Darren McAuley, a former Veterans Affairs doctor with about a quarter century of experience as a military flight surgeon, announced he is entering the race.
The married father of three says he's running first and foremost on affordability.
'I can win the district because Republicans have unfortunately made it clear that they are not going to do what's required to take care of people,' McAuley said in an interview.
Lee has represented Congressional District 15 — which covers part of Hillsborough, Polk and Pasco counties — since 2023. The area leans Republican and the seat is up for election in 2026.
McAuley criticized Lee's vote in support of President Donald Trump's signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which, among other things, made cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs and extended tax cuts from Trump's first administration. The bill is projected to explode the federal deficit. (Republicans have contended the economic growth encouraged by the tax cuts will offset the decrease in federal revenue.)
He also said Lee has not done enough to push back on Trump's stance on tariffs, which McAuley argues are going to lead to more expensive consumer goods for Central Floridians.
In response to McAuley's criticisms, a spokesperson for Lee defended her record.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act 'delivered real results for Central Florida families by stopping the largest tax increase in American history, eliminating wasteful spending, and protecting essential programs that our seniors and veterans rely on,' the spokesperson, Landon Hoffman, wrote in a text. Later, he added, 'What some call a 'trade war,' we see as a long-overdue defense of U.S. workers.'
Lee won reelection in 2024 by 12 points over Democrat and former Hillsborough County Commissioner Pat Kemp.
But that race was not without turbulence. After she was the only member of Florida's congressional delegation to endorse Gov. Ron DeSantis for president over Trump, Trump briefly and publicly explored endorsing a primary challenger to Lee in 2024. No such major challenger materialized, and Lee endorsed Trump for president after DeSantis dropped out.
Lee, who previously served as Florida's top election official, has filed to run again with the state, as have two other Democrats, Robert People and Jose Engell.
In a survey published on Ballotpedia, People, an Army veteran, said he's running to protect Social Security, expand access to abortion and increase teacher salaries nationwide. His federal campaign committee has raised about $8,700.
In that same survey, Generation Z candidate Engell said he's running on Medicare for All and paid maternity leave. A campaign committee supporting his run has not filed any receipts, federal campaign finance records show.
Although Congressional District 15 has long been coveted by Democrats, it's slipped away from them in recent election cycles. McAuley, who lives just outside the district, hopes to reverse the trend by showing voters he believes in common sense above party politics.
'What's bringing me into this race is seeing the caliber of leadership…lacking in Congress,' he said. 'We need to focus on serving the needs of the people.'
This story may be updated. Check back at tampabay.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

16% of voters approve of Trump's handling of Epstein files, poll shows
16% of voters approve of Trump's handling of Epstein files, poll shows

USA Today

time12 minutes ago

  • USA Today

16% of voters approve of Trump's handling of Epstein files, poll shows

A majority of voters disapprove of President Donald Trump's handling of the supposed files regarding sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to a new poll. The poll, released by Emerson College Polling on July 25, found more than 51% of respondents disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of the files. Just 16% said they approved. Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi both previously vowed to release Epstein's supposed client list, but the Department of Justice and FBI said on July 7 such files never existed. Some Republicans have pushed for more transparency around the case in the weeks since. This week, multiple reports said Bondi told Trump in May that he was mentioned in the files. The Emerson poll was released more than a week after a Quinnipiac University survey published on July 16 showed almost two-thirds of voters disapproved of the administration's handling of the Epstein case. In that poll, 17% of registered voters approved, versus 63% who disapproved. In addition to surveying voters about specific issues, Emerson's July poll found Trump's overall approval and disapproval ratings each increased one percentage point from the month prior, reaching 46% and 47%, respectively. How do Americans feel about Trump's handling of Epstein files? Poll offers insight Surveyed voters were asked, "Do you approve or disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files?" Sixteen percent of respondents said they approve, while more than 51% said they disapprove. Another 32% said they are neutral on the topic. Spencer Kimball, director of Emerson College Polling, said the poll's Epstein question was the "worst" result for Trump among any of the issues the survey asked about. "Sixteen percent approval is the lowest. 51% disapproval is the highest. So this is an issue where voters are not happy with how things are going," Kimball said. The poll was conducted between July 21-22 among 1,400 U.S. voters. It has a margin of error of ±2.5 points. Contributing: Phillip M. Bailey, USA TODAY Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at

Largest U.S. homebuilder: Housing market shift ‘still pointing towards' bigger incentives
Largest U.S. homebuilder: Housing market shift ‘still pointing towards' bigger incentives

Fast Company

time12 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Largest U.S. homebuilder: Housing market shift ‘still pointing towards' bigger incentives

Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter. On Tuesday, D.R. Horton—America's most valuable and largest homebuilder, with a $46 billion market capitalization and ranked No. 123 on the Fortune 500—reported its third-quarter earnings for the three months ending June 30. While D.R. Horton's earnings didn't wow investors, the fact that there wasn't an accelerated softening beyond what homebuilders— including D.R. Horton —had already reported earlier this year was enough for some Wall Street investors to buy back into homebuilder stocks. For today's piece, we're going to take a closer look at D.R. Horton's earnings and the commentary its executives provided during Tuesday's earnings call. Incentive spending is helping D.R. Horton's home sales hold steady D.R. Horton's net new orders, by its fiscal Q3 (the three months ending June 30th): Q3 2018 —> 14,650 Q3 2019 —> 15,588 Q3 2020 —> 21,519 Q3 2021 —> 17,952 Q3 2022 —> 16,693 Q3 2023 —> 22,879 Q3 2024 —> 23,001 Q3 2025 —> 23,071 D.R. Horton continues to see weakness in Florida While D.R. Horton's national net orders were pretty much flat year-over-year, there was a -10.1% year-over-year drop in its Southeast division. That division includes Florida—which D.R. Horton once again acknowledged remains on the softer/weaker side. 'There's been a lot of a change [weakening] in the dynamic in the Florida markets. And perhaps most so there. Other markets continue to be consistent performers where there's been limited inventory and limited development of lots. And housing production continues to see strong demand in those markets,' D.R. Horton chief operating officer Michael Murray said during their earnings call on July 22, 2025. North (13% of D.R. Horton's Q3 2025 net new orders): Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin East (21%): Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee Northwest (6%): Colorado, Oregon, Utah, and Washington South Central (27%): Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas Southwest (10%): Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, and New Mexico Southeast (24%): Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi D.R. Horton's average sales price moves sideways D.R. Horton's average sales price in Q3 2025 ($369,600) was -7.3% below the third-quarter peak in Q3 2022 ($398,800). It's possible that some of the drop in average sales price is due to shifts in product and geographic mix. Instead of outright price cuts, D.R. Horton has preferred to offer bigger incentives this cycle, such as mortgage rate buydowns. Regardless, D.R. Horton's average sales price confirms that upward pricing momentum has stalled in many markets. D.R. Horton's incentive spend has caused margin compression D.R. Horton reported a 21.8% gross margin on homes for Q3 2025. That's down from 24.0% in Q3 2024; however, it's unchanged from its Q2 2025 gross margin (21.8%). The fact that the margin didn't further compress quarter-over-quarter is why some investors bought the stock back. However, D.R. Horton acknowledged that, looking ahead, the ongoing housing market softening still points towards a bit higher incentives. 'Our commentary really over the last year has been that incentives have been increasing. That's been the main driver for the gross margin decline over the last year. Our operators are striving every day to strike the best balance between hitting pace and maintaining margin in each community to maximize returns. And so they're using all the levers they have with incentives to try to balance that. And so we have seen the pace of incentive cost increases and the pace of margin decline moderate a bit over the last couple of quarters and then this quarter it held flat sequentially [quarter-over-quarter],' Jessica Hansen, head of investor relations at D.R. Horton, said during their earnings call on July 22, 2025. Hansen added that: 'But the trend is still pointing towards a bit higher incentives, and we don't see significant offsets to that, though we will continue to work on costs on the construction side.' On Tuesday, D.R. Horton told investors expect Q4 2025 gross margins to come in between 21.0% and 21.5%. Labor hasn't been an issue for D.R. Horton yet despite the increased ICE crackdown 'From labor availability, it's plentiful. We have the labor that we need. Our trades are looking for work. And that's why you've seen sequential and year-over-year reduction in our cycle time. Because we have the support we need to get our homes built. And, you know, given those efficiencies, reductions in stick and brick [costs] over time. Some of that is from design. And efficiency of the product that we're putting in the field. And some of that is just from the efficiency of our operations,' D.R. Horton CEO Paul Romanowski said during their earnings call on July 22, 2025. Tariffs haven't coincided with higher stick-and-brick costs—but lumber tariffs are something to watch On Tuesday, D.R. Horton told analysts that stick-and-brick costs are down 2% year-over-year and down 1% quarter-over-quarter. Note: My understanding is that 'stick-and-brick costs' include direct construction costs of building a home on-site using traditional wood materials like lumber ('sticks') and masonry materials like concrete ('bricks'). These costs include both materials (e.g., lumber, drywall) and labor (plumbers, roofers, etc.). Although the White House hasn't included Canadian softwood lumber on their broader tariff list, the U.S. government is preparing to more than double the duties on Canadian lumber imports. As a part of its annual review, the U.S. Department of Commerce plans to raise the tariff on Canadian lumber from 14.45% to 34.45%. The U.S. Department of Commerce argues that Canadian lumber is being unfairly subsidized and sold below market value in the U.S. 'It [higher duties on Canadian lumber] will have some potential impact, but we've not quantified that. I know it is a significant step up in the tariff rates, I think, going to effect next month. But, you know, we're buying some percentage of that wood and there's some substitutionary product that would be available as well. Based on where that pricing ultimately settles,' D.R. Horton chief operating officer Michael Murray said during their earnings call on July 22, 2025. Homebuilder stocks got a little bounce following D.R. Horton's earnings Following the earnings reports from D.R. Horton and PulteGroup on Tuesday, Wall Street gave homebuilder shares a slight bounce. While the move doesn't return shares to the highs reached around September 2024, it could signal that some on Wall Street believe homebuilder margin compression is losing momentum. The super-early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is tonight, July 25, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.

Newsom fears backdoor ban on AI rules
Newsom fears backdoor ban on AI rules

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

Newsom fears backdoor ban on AI rules

AROUND THE NATION Republicans in Congress rejected a push by some of their colleagues to temporarily ban states from regulating artificial intelligence in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — citing their confidence in state lawmakers and the importance of keeping the tech giants in check. But now some in California are worried Trump revealed a backdoor ban this week with his release of an AI Action Plan that says he'll deny federal funding for AI to states with rules that might hinder the funding's 'effectiveness.' Trump's comments afterwards suggested he would interpret that mandate broadly. 'You can't have one state holding you up,' he said at a Washington event. 'We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states, supersedes everybody.' Trump's attitude caught the attention of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, our colleagues in the Golden State reported. California has moved more quickly than other states to regulate AI. Newsom signed a bill last year that bars health insurers in the state from using AI to deny claims. 'Having failed to get his group of sycophants to approve an AI moratorium in his 'Big Beautiful Betrayal,' Trump now tries to force it on states,' Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in a statement. 'Trump might not care but the Governor will not let him endanger our most vulnerable citizens.' The backstory: The version of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act that the House passed in May would have barred states from regulating AI for 10 years. Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed similar language when the Senate took up the measure, but Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) tanked it, arguing that states needed 'to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI.' She said she feared the moratorium would give tech firms licence to 'exploit kids, creators, and conservatives.' MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. A new study by Harvard researchers says that a baby's sex might not be random but connected to the mother's age, genes and older siblings' sexes. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORLD VIEW The EU has joined the U.S. in scrutinizing citizens' exposure to fluoride, our colleagues across the pond report. This week, the European Food Safety Agency, an arm of the EU, updated safe fluoride intake levels, setting new limits but finding overall that the EU's drinking water doesn't pose health risks. In the U.S., Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to stop adding the cavity-fighting mineral to drinking water, as many water systems here do on the recommendation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dentists say Kennedy is making a big mistake. Compare and contrast: Nearly three-quarters of Americans drink fluoridated water, but few EU countries fluoridate — in fact, only Ireland and parts of the U.K. and Spain do — and the concentration of fluoride found in drinking water in European countries is usually less than 0.3 milligrams per liter. The CDC recommends a level of 0.7 mg per liter to prevent tooth decay. Kennedy, who says Americans can get all the fluoride they need from toothpaste and mouthwash, cites research finding higher levels of fluoride linked to lower IQ scores as justification for rolling back the agency's guidance. The EU officials said those studies had prompted their review. They set 'tolerable upper intake levels' from all sources, including drinking water, of 1 mg per day for infants, 1.6 mg per day for children ages 1-3 years, 2 mg per day for children 4-8 years and 3.3 mg per day for anyone over 8 years old.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store