logo
Reddit ropes in Sachin Tendulkar as brand ambassador

Reddit ropes in Sachin Tendulkar as brand ambassador

NEW DELHI: Social media platform Reddit on Wednesday announced Indian cricket legend Sachin Tendulkar as its brand ambassador.
Sports fans will now have exclusive opportunities to engage with Tendulkar in Reddit communities, the company said in a statement.
Through his official Reddit profile, batting icon Tendulkar will share personal reflections, match insights, and exclusive content.
"In the coming months, Tendulkar will also appear in a new marketing campaign for Reddit in India as well as other markets throughout the world," the statement said.
On his association with Reddit, Tendulkar said, "For me, cricket has always been about that pure connection with people, on and off the field.
In getting to know Reddit, what stands out is the sheer passion that brings its communities together," Reddit Vice President International Growth, Durgesh Kaushik said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian Archery League set for October launch
Indian Archery League set for October launch

The Hindu

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Indian Archery League set for October launch

The much-anticipated franchise-based Indian Archery League is finally set to take off in October at the Yamuna Sports Complex in New Delhi with six city-based teams, Archery Association of India treasurer Joris Paulose Ummacheril confirmed on Tuesday. Initially conceptualised in 2020, the league had to be shelved due to lack of sponsors. However, the AAI has now secured sponsors and is currently in discussions with broadcasters, including Sony Sports and JioHotstar, to roll out the league this year. This will be the world's first franchise league in archery and the federation is hopeful of a strong response that will go a long way in developing Indian archers, who are still chasing their maiden Olympic medal. 'Everything will be finalised by the end of this month, and we are hopeful of launching the league in the October window. We are calling it Indian Archery League but the name is not yet finalised,' Jose told PTI. ALSO READ | Kisik Lee set to coach Indian recurve archers ahead of 2028 Olympics Three teams -- from Delhi, Hyderabad, and Bengaluru -- have already been finalised. The remaining franchises will be decided soon. Each franchise will adopt a city, depending on ownership and league plans. Each team will consist of eight archers -- four in recurve and four in compound -- with two men and two women in each category. It will be mandatory for each team to include two overseas archers, Joris said. 'We've seen how the IPL has revolutionised Indian cricket, and we are confident this league will do something similar for archery,' another AAI official said. Related Topics Archery

Hrithik Roshan, Sussanne Khan Are Still 'Soulmates' Even After Divorce: Zayed Khan
Hrithik Roshan, Sussanne Khan Are Still 'Soulmates' Even After Divorce: Zayed Khan

News18

time30 minutes ago

  • News18

Hrithik Roshan, Sussanne Khan Are Still 'Soulmates' Even After Divorce: Zayed Khan

Last Updated: Zayed Khan revealed why Hrithik Roshan and Sussanne Khan share a friendship despite divorce. Despite being divorced, Hrithik Roshan and Sussanne Khan maintain a friendship and co-parent their kids. They have also introduced their new partners to one another, and their social media posts are proof that they are supportive of each other's lives. Zayed Khan, Sussaane's brother, recently reflected on their 'modern family' dynamic and revealed why his sister and her former husband still share a healthy bond. Speaking of Hrithik and Sussanne's amicable relationship, Zayed told Siddharth Kannan, 'If you take everything else out of the equation, what's the most important thing that you have with your partner? Trust. Understanding. And compatibility, in some sort of way. If you haven't taken that and put it on a higher pedestal than everything else, then there's something just blatantly wrong." He explained, 'I mean, did you get married for fame? Did you get married for money? If you got married for all of these things, then you're bound to have massive, massive problems, especially at the time of a divorce. But if you met your soulmate, right? You married your soulmate. Okay. And things went on. Water went under the bridge. Your soulmate is still there." He continued, 'I don't know about everybody else. But for us, we are highly evolved in understanding such situations. And quite honestly, I don't care what anybody else thinks. We are happy that everybody is happy. We were a good family. We have children to look forward to. We've got so many better things to look forward to than all this." Zayed also spoke about Sussanne's current boyfriend, Arslan Goni and said, 'He's a cool kid, man. I think he's a sweetheart. He's full of life and energy. He's always smiling and happy, and he wants to do fun things. Yeah, man. He's good. Of course, he's younger than me, but he's good." Hrithik Roshan and Sussanne Khan, both prominent figures in the Indian entertainment industry, married on December 20, 2000, in a private ceremony at the Golden Palms Resort in Bangalore. They ended their 14-year marriage in 2014. Despite their separation, they have maintained a strong, respectful relationship, co-parenting their two sons, Hrehaan and Hridhaan, and continuing to support each other in their personal and professional lives.

BCCI suffer massive setback as court dismisses petition against Kochi Tuskers in ₹538 cr arbitral awards case
BCCI suffer massive setback as court dismisses petition against Kochi Tuskers in ₹538 cr arbitral awards case

Hindustan Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

BCCI suffer massive setback as court dismisses petition against Kochi Tuskers in ₹538 cr arbitral awards case

The BCCI were dealt a massive setback on Tuesday, as the Bombay High Court upheld arbitral awards exceeding ₹538 crore in favour of the owners of now-defunct IPL franchise Kochi Tuskers. A single judge (Justice R.I. Chagla) presided on the BCCI vs Kochi Cricket Private Limited and others case, and dismissed the Indian cricket body's challenge to the arbitral awards. The judge ruled that the court could not act as an appellate authority over the arbitrator's findings. The court observed, 'The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is very limited. BCCI's endeavour to delve into the merits of the dispute is in teeth of the scope of the grounds contained in Section 34 of the Act. BCCI's dissatisfaction as to the findings rendered in respect of the evidence and/or the merits cannot be a ground to assail the Award.' The Kochi Tuskers franchise was first given to a consortium led by Rendezvous Sports World (RSW), and then it was later operated by Kochi Cricket Private Limited (KCPL). The team participated in only one season (IPL 2011), then the BCCI terminated the franchise in September 2011, due to a breach of franchise agreement, citing failure to furnish a 10 percent bank guarantee. It was also reported that there was also many internal disputes between owners. Meanwhile, the KCPL stated that the delay was due to unresolved problems, which consisted of stadium unavailability, regulatory approvals on shareholding and also a reduction in the number of IPL games. Amid the delay, the BCCI and KCPL were in contact for many months, with the Indian cricket body also accepting various payments. But then suddenlu, the BCCI terminated the franchise, and also encashed a prior guarantee issued by RSW Both KCPL and RSW initiated arbitration proceedings in 2012, and the tribunal ruled in their favour in 2015. It awarded ₹384 crore to KCPL for loss of profits and RS 153 crore to RSW for wrongful encashment of the bank guarantee, and also alongwith interest and legal costs. The BCCI contested the tribunal's decision, and stated that it exceeded its jurisdiction and misapplied legal principles. Also, according to the BCCI, KCPL's failure to give the bank guarantee was a fundamental breach, justifying termination. It also contested the award of both loss of profist and wasted expenditure, citing that the damages were excessive and in breach of the contract. RSW's arbitration claim was also challenged under the Indian Partnership Act. The KCPL and RSW argued that BCCI had waived the guarantee deadline effectively, which made the termination unjustified. The court found no grounds to interfere with the arbitral findings, and stated, 'The arbitrator's conclusion that the BCCI's termination of the Kochi franchise was a repudiatory breach of contract would call for no interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.' The court also added, 'Thus, based on these material facts and documents on record, the finding of the learned Arbitrator that BCCI waived the requirement under Clause 8.4 of the KCPL-FA for furnishment of bank guarantee for 2012 season on or before 22nd March, 2011 cannot be faulted.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store