Ofsted chief inspector apologises for short notice on school inspection reforms
School leaders' unions have threatened to tell their members to quit as Ofsted inspectors unless changes are made to the timescale for inspection reform.
Speaking at the Festival of Education, Sir Martyn Oliver, chief inspector of Ofsted, said he was 'sorry' about the delayed timescale as he acknowledged it was 'difficult' for schools.
At the event at Wellington College, Berkshire, Sir Martyn called on school leaders to 'judge' him on the Ofsted's revised inspection model once it is published at the start of the academic year.
Last year, the Government announced that headline Ofsted grades for overall effectiveness for schools in England would be scrapped.
Previously, Ofsted awarded one of four single-phrase inspection judgments: outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate
Under proposed report cards, set out in February, schools could be graded across at least eight areas of a provision using a colour-coded five-point scale.
They would receive ratings, from the red 'causing concern' to orange 'attention needed', through the green shades of 'secure', 'strong' and 'exemplary' for each area of practice.
During the Q&A session at the event on Thursday, Sir Martyn suggested that Ofsted ratings can alter local house prices by thousands of pounds because parents 'value' them.
When asked whether Ofsted's new report cards could affect house prices, Sir Martyn said: 'Well, I don't know.'
But Sir Martyn, who used to be an academy trust leader, spoke of how he had supported two 'special measures' schools where he lived and the house prices 'shot up' after they received better Ofsted ratings.
He told the audience: 'They were both in special measures, both went outstanding, and the house prices went up £15,000 within a week.
'It does make a difference.'
Sir Martyn added that 'parents obviously put a value on it'.
Ofsted had planned to publish its formal response to its consultation on proposed inspection reforms in the summer term ahead of the changes coming into effect in November.
But Ofsted will now publish its full response in September due to the scale of the feedback it received.
When asked whether this delay was fair on school leaders, Sir Martyn said: 'I think that is difficult and again I'm sorry about that.'
On single-word judgments, he added: 'We've been doing something for 30-plus years in a single way.
'If I look at my phone, there will be pictures of people standing in front of their schools with balloons, with an O, an U, with a T – 'outstanding', and local newspapers up and down the country celebrate.
'It happens all of the time, and we're about to take that away and change it to something else that for more than three decades people are used to.'
Sir Martyn said: 'Here's a burning question, what's Rightmove going to do?'
Currently, Rightmove includes the Ofsted ratings for local schools in its listings for houses for sale.
In a speech at the event, Sir Martyn said children are increasingly receiving life lessons from influencers or 'AI-generated summaries'.
The Ofsted boss argued that classroom learning with human interaction 'has never been more important' as many children spend much of their lives online.
He said: 'Young people are growing up in an increasingly curated world in which their favoured influencers or corporate algorithms can have a disproportionate impression on their views and opinions.
'It's more important than ever that young people are able to lift their eyes from the screen and connect with their teachers, in person.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Hundreds of town centres to see more police patrols in crime ‘blitz'
Hundreds of towns will see an increased police presence as part of the Government's new crime 'blitz' to crack down on shoplifting and anti-social behaviour by 'thugs and thieves'. More than 500 towns across England and Wales have signed up to the Home Office's safer streets summer initiative, which will run to September 30, with more visible policing and stronger enforcement to 'restore confidence in policing'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said residents and businesses have a 'right to feel safe in their towns' but the last government left a 'surge' in crime. In a statement, she said: 'It's time to turn this round, that's why I have called on police forces and councils alike to work together to deliver a summer blitz on town centre crime to send a clear message to those people who bring misery to our towns that their crimes will no longer go unpunished.' She said part of the neighbourhood policing guarantee includes investment of £200 million this year to begin the recruitment of thousands of new neighbourhood policing officers. Speaking to members of policing and business sectors at Derby County Football Club's Pride Park Stadium on Thursday, Ms Cooper said every area will have 'named contactable officers for residents and businesses to be able to turn to'. Ms Cooper said: 'It's one of the most important things to restore confidence in policing is to have those neighbourhood police back on the beat dealing with those very crimes that cause so much problem. 'And if we don't see the police on the streets, then confidence is lost. And I think that is what's happened for far too long. 'If shoppers don't feel safe, they will stay home. People will just stay out of our town centres, and that heart of community will be lost. 'I think these kinds of crimes have been dismissed for too long because crime erodes the social fabric that binds us together and keeps communities strong. 'We've made town centres the very heart of the safer streets mission for this summer, taking back town centres from thugs and thieves – at the heart of that is rebuilding neighbourhood policing.' Half a million shoplifting offences in England and Wales were recorded by police last year, up 20% from 2023. In a statement, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'We are on the side of local businesses, and our plan for change is helping create the right conditions for our great British high streets to thrive. 'The safer streets summer initiative will play a vital role in achieving this by keeping footfall high, communities and those that work in them safe, and the economy growing.' Anthony Hemmerdinger, managing director of Boots, said: 'Retail theft alongside intimidation and abuse of our team members is unacceptable, so we welcome this additional support from Government and the police to strengthen shop worker protection.' Police and crime commissioners across England and Wales have developed local action plans with police, including in Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Humberside, Devon and Cornwall.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The surprising coastal city where millennials are snapping up homes
First-time buyers are flocking to Dundee as soaring house prices lock them out of southern cities, research shows. The average house price in the Scottish city is £174,047, according to Rightmove, and has only grown by 1pc since last year, making it an attractive destination for cash-strapped young people. Demand for properties in Dundee surged by 176pc in the past 10 years, the website said – the highest of any city. It was followed by Edinburgh and Doncaster, where demand surged by 91pc and 74pc respectively. Westport Properties, a management company, said Dundee offers 'affordability, culture and jobs, but has limited nightlife and weather challenges'. It also lacks the 'majesty of Edinburgh or the vibrancy of Glasgow'. Rightmove's research looked at the average demand in Britain's 50 largest cities between January and May 2015 and compared it with the same period in 2025. It found that demand for properties in Dundee had almost tripled in that time, and that the number of people looking to move cities had jumped by 16pc. Cameron Ewer, Savills' head of residential in Scotland, said the influx of first-time buyers in Dundee and other university cities could be students opting to buy rather than rent. He said: 'You may also see Scottish students who are reluctant to pay full fees in England increasingly deciding to study in Scottish cities. Scotland as a whole has also been benefiting from buyers coming from the South. 'The cost of living is also a lot higher in the South, and you can have a good quality of life in Scotland while also achieving good capital growth.' Colleen Babcock, of Rightmove, said: 'Comparing where we are now versus a decade ago, it looks like there's even more appeal from potential first-time buyers to live in cities. 'However, the data does show that it can vary quite widely from city to city, and it will also depend on how first-time buyer-friendly a particular location is in terms of the type of homes that are available for sale.' London was the only city where demand from first-time buyers had not increased in a decade, due to high property prices. Interest in coastal areas has also remained flat for a decade, Rightmove found, while demand for northern cities like Edinburgh has surged. Average homes in the Scottish capital sell for £337,922 – well within the £450,000 Lifetime Isa limit. Mark Dyason, of brokerage Edinburgh Mortgages, said successive tax raids on landlords had freed up properties to be snapped up by first-time buyers. He said: 'Amateur landlords have exited the market under this tax regime because they're seeing greater returns elsewhere.' Many of the first-time buyers Mr Dyason sees are young professionals working in the thriving finance and technology sectors. He added: 'It's a relatively small city with great culture, and it's a nice place to be – you can build a good career here. 'It's not central London, though. It's not unaffordable, but you still need a decent job and to be doing well to buy a property near the centre.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
There will be no second chance for Labour
The ANC were the first to coin the slogan 'make the country ungovernable' as they sought to depose the apartheid government in South Africa. An unruly people would weaken the centre, extract concessions and push tensions until they became contradictions. From there, you get the real prospect of regime change. Britain remains a relatively prosperous and secure nation. But it is becoming palpably less governable by the day. This is not confined to one party or leader. The lifespan of prime ministers and their cabinets are getting shorter. Parliament is sovereign once again, but it does not feel that way. Successive governments have failed to grip the centre and act decisively to overcome Britain's malaise. This is the task that falls to Labour. These are not easy times in which to govern. The Government has little room for manoeuvre. The bond markets are tetchy, gilt yields are higher than they have been for decades, pushing up the cost of borrowing. The failure of the leadership to shave £5 billion off welfare spending only increases the nervousness. Scleroticism has taken hold in seemingly every institution. How have we got here? And how can Labour get us out of it? From the 1990s through to 2016, the political class on both Left and Right was characterised above all by complacency. These were the fat years. Growth was good, largely because of a booming services economy centred on London and the south east in general and the City of London in particular. This growth enabled New Labour's economics of redistribution that supported the country's heartlands. After years of hardship, Blair's model seemed to finally bring the warring factions of the country back together again. The 2008 crash should have shaken the political class out of its complacency, exposing the precarity of our heavily financialised economy and the malaise that lurked beneath the surface of our now fragile economic model. While services had grown, our productive capacity had been denuded. Strategic industries had been closed down, outsourced or sold off to foreign investors. Regions once massaged by public sector employment opportunities and welfare found these tools were no longer powerful enough to smooth the cracks left by deindustrialisation. The recession marked the juncture at which Britain began to decline relative to the US and most other European nations, yet it prompted little critical reflection. Austerity was the coalition government's answer – and it was an expensive one. Huge structural weaknesses in our economy were reduced to a matter of simple accounting. Investment dried up and infrastructure could not keep pace with maddeningly high levels of immigration. Growth, productivity and real wages flatlined. Complacency was still the order of the day for a political class who had grown decadent and far-removed from the real conditions of the country. Whatever else it may have done, the vote to leave the European Union punctured this complacency. Blue Labour had been warning since 2009 that all was not well in the body politic, that lurking beneath the glitzy New Labour veneer social disaffection was growing. Blue represented melancholia as much as conservatism. Now all was out in the open: the disconnect between the political class and the country it sought to govern; the towns that had been left behind, their economic purpose in a global economy obscure; and the dysfunction of government, parliament and our public institutions. The Conservatives proved incapable of exiting this quagmire. The 2019 government began with an 80-seat majority and ended in ignominy and an announcement of a new fund for chess players. Lacking the will or confidence to take on Treasury orthodoxy, immigration trebled and levelling up was abandoned. The civil service was left unreformed. Growth continued to stagnate as judicial overreach and regulatory constraints made building impossible. A few brief spasms aside, inertia replaced complacency as the defining feature of our political class. As little as a year ago, you could still find echoes of complacency in the political and media class when they spoke of Labour's election win as a victory for the 'grown-ups'. But fixing a broken political system, a dysfunctional state and a stagnant economy requires more than a clean suit and tie. It has taken Labour one year to discover what took the Conservatives 14 years: that Britain, its economy and its institutions, are barely functioning. Too many in Labour defined themselves solely in opposition to the Conservatives and thought a new Government need only focus on 'delivery', with a few technical fixes here and there. Others wanted to reduce the task of governance to a form of altruism for those in need. Their vibes-based politics has no resonance in the country, no acknowledgment of the hard reality of trade-offs in a low growth economy, and no solutions for Britain's malaise. If there is a divide in Labour it is not between Left and Right, New Labour or Blue Labour, but between those who understand the severity of the country's situation and those who do not. The future success of this Government depends on this understanding. It must be an insurgent on behalf of the people, willing to grip the centre and take on its own party and the scleroticism of our institutions as it rebuilds a shattered country, shifting resources to the productive economy, to build, make and grow, driving social and economic development, radically reducing immigration and speaking for the whole country as one people united in a shared national identity and purpose. This is the choice facing Labour, the fork in the road in this inauspicious moment – a retreat into the comfort zone of liberal progressivism confined to the prosperous areas of the country, doing things for a client electorate, promising the impossible, or a striving for a radical rebuilding of the national economy, renewing our sovereign democracy and building our national revival on a broad, cross-class coalition. This way lies a second term and a new political settlement. The first year has not gone well, but there will be no second chance for Labour.
