The great Oasis ticket war rocked the industry - but has anything changed since?
Most of us were probably in the same place: glued to our computers and sitting in queues with over 500,000 other people, praying for a ticket.
As the hope of seeing the Gallagher brothers live dwindled, fans across the UK realised ticket purchasing had become the wild west, from scalping to climbing costs.
Politicians got involved as Prime Minister Keir Starmer blasted the debacle as 'not fair' after fans realised the eye-watering price of resale tickets.
At the time, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said: 'After the incredible news of Oasis' return, it's depressing to see vastly inflated prices excluding ordinary fans from having a chance of enjoying their favourite band live.
'This Government is committed to putting fans back at the heart of music. So we will include issues around the transparency and use of dynamic pricing, including the technology around queuing systems which incentivise it, in our forthcoming consultation on consumer protections for ticket resales.'
So, almost a year on and with Oasis' tour well underway, has anything actually changed in the ticketing world?
After making their way through a stressful and potentially scalper-filled queue, Oasis fans were faced with a tough decision: cough up double the face value or abandon all hope.
Dynamic pricing became the centre of a huge backlash as Ticketmaster, the site most people use, pushed up the price due to the tickets being 'in demand'.
Fans were not warned before the sale that the gig tickets would be dynamically priced, with the decision reportedly in the hands of artists' teams.
Oasis denied knowing that demand pricing would be applied, with the feature removed for later sales for gigs outside of the UK. Fans who paid dynamic prices were not refunded the difference.
Unfortunately, we're still in a position where surge pricing on tickets is legal, although some small changes are being made.
As of April, the Digital, Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC Act) bans the use of 'drip pricing' across every industry, so say goodbye to that sneaky booking fee added on at the end.
Under this, the Competition and Markets Authority have the 'ability to decide when consumer law has been infringed and impose fines for poor corporate practice of up to 10% of worldwide turnover.'
Another positive step is that the industry bosses appear to have taken note of the sheer anger felt towards dynamic pricing and any artist who allows it to be used. https://www.instagram.com/p/DMlnvMANtU1/
The price surges are still around, but it seems to have fallen out of fashion for new tours (for now).
Keeping fans sweet is one of the most important things for touring artists, so never underestimate the power of complaining incredibly loudly on a national scale.
If you didn't make it through the queue before tickets sold out, your attention will have turned to the world of resale tickets.
Prices plucked out of thin air, fake tickets, scammers rife — this is where fans are hoping to see some serious clamping down from the government.
Good news, the promised consultation on this is moving ahead. Bad news is it's still in very early stages, with recent calls for fans to have their say in a consultation.
Gareth Griffiths — director of partnerships and sponsorship at Virgin Media O2 — told Metro: 'While the consultation earlier this year was a crucial first step toward reclaiming fairness in live music; with no news yet on legislation music fans continue to be at the mercy of touts making millions.'
He shared that O2's latest research suggests some touts are flogging tickets at 500% above face value. They previously revealed this is costing music fans an extra £145m per year.
A cap on prices has been widely supported, including by O2's 'Stamp It Tout' campaign, meaning resellers would be limited to a potential 30% inflation on face value (no word on if that includes dynamic prices).
Viagogo, one of the largest resellers, is concerned that this will drive sellers onto social media in hopes of securing a bigger profit and create more fraud.
They cited We Fight Fraud's investigation into Premier League ticket-buying in March, which found that three out of four tickets purchased on social media were either fake or never arrived.
Offers to buy tickets are rife on X, popping up immediately while sales are still going on.
A 25% chance of a real ticket is incredibly bad odds when you're paying hundreds for a ticket, but social media is much harder to legislate than legitimate resale businesses.
Laws like the percentage resale cap, which has been proposed in the UK, are already in place in Ireland and Victoria, Australia, with effectiveness a mixed bag.
Ireland has not had any tout prosecutions since the ban on selling above face value in 2021; meanwhile, cases of fraud are said to be up 13.8% according to research by Bradshaw Advisory.
However, on the other side of this, their resale sites aren't flooded with inflated ticket prices, and you can get genuine face value tickets after general sale.
Viagogo noted that the prices do fluctuate, with tickets as low as £75 for Beyoncé before her UK shows, while the average Oasis ticket in the two weeks leading up to the first Cardiff gig was £255.
It also pointed out that Ticketmaster's domination over primary sales isn't helping the situation, something the CMA seems to agree with as it launched legal action against the company this month.
Viagogo said: ' ' The solution to fix the ticketing industry requires collaboration with government, consumers and the entire ticketing industry. The path forward starts with opening the primary ticketing market to competition.
'Without it, there is no incentive to innovate or improve the ticket-buying experience for fans. When you allow fair competition, regulated platforms can compete with each other, naturally driving prices down and benefit fans. A healthy, competitive market must be built on an open retail distribution model that champions transparency and gives consumers genuine choice on their terms.'
However, FanFair Alliance campaign manager Adam Webb told us: 'Support for a price cap is clearly gaining momentum. What we now need is action.'
Gareth added: 'It's important that government does not lose momentum and responds to the wishes of music fans with swift action.
'At O2, we're calling for a clear and enforceable 10% cap on the resale of tickets above face value – one that both incentivises fans to resell fairly when they can't make a show, and disincentivises touts from operating at an industrial scale.
'This is the only way to protect the UK's live music industry and ensure tickets stay in the hands of real fans.' More Trending
Praising Lisa Nandy for reaffirming the law was moving forward, Adam concluded: 'Come on then. Let's get on with it.
'Let's make the UK's live market the best in the world. Let's get cracking.'
Metro has reached out to Ticketmaster and Lisa Nandy for comment.
A version of this article was first published on July 27, 2025.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: Noel and Liam Gallagher's brother Paul Gallagher, 59, charged with rape
MORE: Has anything changed since the great Oasis ticket war?
MORE: Liam Gallagher's powerful words for Ozzy Osbourne in Oasis Wembley show tribute
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 minutes ago
- Spectator
Labour accused of ‘social engineering' over working class internships
Well, well, well. It transpires that in plans to make Whitehall more working class, civil service internships will only be offered to, er, students from low income families. The Cabinet Office has said that only those from 'lower socio-economic backgrounds' will be able to apply to Whitehall's internship scheme – with eligibility based on, um, what jobs their parents did when they were 14. Good heavens… Currently the summer scheme is up to two months long, and open to undergraduate students in the last two years of their degree, allowing them to shadow civil servants, write briefings and take part in policy research. Those deemed successful will then be put forward for the Civil Service Fast Stream graduate programme. From next summer, however, only those from poorer backgrounds – with parents who are receptionists, plumbers or van drivers – will be accepted. Speaking to the Beeb, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden insisted: We need to get more working-class young people into the Civil Service so it harnesses the broadest range of talent and truly reflects the country. Government makes better decisions when it represents and understands the people we serve. The Tories have hit out at the move, criticising Sir Keir Starmer's Labour lot of 'leftist social engineering'. Shadow cabinet office minister Mike Wood added: 'We believe in opportunity based on what you can do, not where you come from. We all want to see greater opportunity for working-class young people. But this scheme sends the message that unless you fit a particular social profile, you're no longer welcome.' Quite. Perhaps the government should have taken a leaf out of The Spectator's CV-blind internship scheme instead…
Spectator
6 minutes ago
- Spectator
Trump hasn't won the trade war
Maybe Trump doesn't always chicken out after all. Rapid trade deals with the UK, Japan, the EU and others in recent weeks may have given the impression that the trade war was essentially over. Today, though, comes Trump's Ardennes offensive, with immediate tariffs of 35 per cent announced for Canada. Other countries have been given a week to prepare for steep increases: India will be subject to 25 per cent tariffs, Taiwan 20 per cent and Switzerland – far from neutral in this particular conflict – 39 per cent. According to Trump, Canada has been singled out for harsh treatment because it has failed to cooperate on the flow of fentanyl across the border. Trump also hinted that he was punishing Canada for recognising Palestine, but then he has just done a trade deal with the EU in spite of France taking the same action, and didn't make any trade threats to Britain in spite of Keir Starmer saying this week that the UK will recognise Palestine in September if Israel does not meet certain conditions. It seems rather more likely that Trump is saying: look, other countries have yielded and agreed to one-sided trade deals with the US – I'm going to carry on beating you about the head until you agree to do the same. But will they? So far, the countries which have agreed to Trump's rather rough and ready trade deals have acted as if the benefits of a trading relationship with the US are one-way – they have more to lose than the US if a deal cannot be struck. But of course that is not always true. Taiwan, for example, produces over 90 per cent of the world's high-end microchips, which are implanted in just about every device manufactured in the US. What benefit does it bring America if those chips are in future taxed at 20 per cent? There is a strange dislocation in attitudes towards Trump's tariffs. Those who insist he has a very clever strategy and is winning tend also to be people who, in any other context, are in favour of low taxes. But a tariff is just a tax like any other – it adds costs to business and so suppresses economic activity. If tariffs are set at modest levels, it may be worth putting up with tariffs' depressing effect in return for the revenue they raise. Raise them above a certain level, however, and revenue will start to decline as business activity is discouraged – the classic Laffer effect. US growth may have proved more resilient than many feared it would be after Liberation Day, but it is certain that tariffs on raw materials and components are a negative influence on US manufacturing industry. A country does not 'win' by taxing its imports more than other countries tax its exports – if it did, the US would be one of the poorest countries in the world while many African countries would be startlingly rich. The US has done brilliantly well out of a regime of low import tariffs – as has Singapore, one of the few countries which, prior to Liberation Day, imposed even lower tariffs than did the US. But even if you do think that imposing higher tariffs than your trading partners amounts to 'victory', it is far from clear that Trump will emerge the eventual winner. Some countries may have yielded to him, but others are clearly holding out, and may well make the calculation that the US has more to lose from a trade war than they do. This war has a long way to run yet.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'
Donald Trump's call to 'incentivise' North Sea oil production should prompt an urgent Downing Street meeting, the shadow Scottish secretary has said. Andrew Bowie called for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. The US president was in Scotland earlier this week and during his visit he described the North Sea as 'a treasure chest for the United Kingdom', and warned fossil fuel taxes make 'no sense'. He also took aim at 'some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen', referring to wind turbines off the coast near Aberdeen. Mr Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for a meeting in London to explore the effects of oil and gas policies. He referred to the windfall tax on the profits made from extracting UK oil and gas, introduced by the previous Conservative government in 2022 and retained until 2030 by Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves. In his letter to Sir Keir, Mr Bowie wrote: 'As president Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment. 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' Mr Bowie, who is the Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?' During his visit with Sir Keir, Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social website: 'North Sea Oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. 'They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'we don't want you'. 'Incentivise the drillers, fast. A vast fortune to be made for the UK, and far lower energy costs for the people.' Speaking at his Turnberry golf resort in South Ayrshire, Mr Trump said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Sir Keir at the time said oil and gas are 'going to be with us for a very long time, and that'll be part of the mix, but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear'. Aberdeen has been chosen by the Government to host the headquarters of GB Energy, a state-owned company set up to accelerate the rollout of renewables.
