UK enforces online age checks to protect minors
Under the new rules, to be enforced by Britain's media watchdog, websites and apps hosting potentially harmful content will be held responsible for age checks using measures such as facial imagery and credit cards.
Around 6,000 pornography sites have agreed to implement the curbs, according to Melanie Dawes, chief executive of British regulator Ofcom.
Other platforms such as X, which is facing a dispute over similar restrictions in Ireland, must also protect children from illegal pornographic, hateful and violent content, she noted.
"We've done the work that no other regulator has done," Dawes told BBC Radio. "These systems can work. We've researched that," she said.
Around 500,000 youngsters aged eight to 14 encountered pornography online last month, according to Ofcom.
The long-awaited new rules, which aim to prevent minors from encountering content relating to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, as well as porn, stem from a 2023 Online Safety Act.
It imposes legal responsibilities on tech companies to better safeguard children and adults online and mandates sanctions for those who fall short.
Rule-breakers face fines of up to £18 million ($23 million) or 10 per cent of their worldwide revenue, "whichever is greater", according to the government.
Criminal action can also be taken against senior managers who fail to ensure companies follow Ofcom information requests.
The measures are coming into force now after the sector and the regulator were given time to prepare.
'Different internet'
Children will "experience a different internet for the first time," technology secretary Peter Kyle told Sky News, adding he had "very high expectations" for the changes.
In an interview with parenting forum Mumsnet, he also said sorry to youngsters who had been exposed to harmful content.
"I want to apologise to any kid who's over 13 who has not had any of these protections," Kyle said.
Rani Govender, of the child protection charity NSPCC, said it was "a really important milestone that we're finally seeing tech companies having to take responsibility for making their services safe for children".
Children are frequently "stumbling across this harmful and dangerous content," she told BBC News.
"There will be loopholes," Govender noted, insisting it was still "right that we're introducing much stronger rules to make sure that that can't continue to happen".
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government is also considering introducing a daily two-hour limit for children on social media apps.
Kyle said he would announce more plans for regulating the sector for under-16s "in the near future".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Jess Glynne calls out Trump administration for using Jet2holidays jingle to promote ICE deportations
Jess Glynne has publicly criticised the Trump administration after the White House used her 2015 hit 'Hold My Hand' in a meme promoting ICE deportations. The British pop singer responded early Wednesday morning to a social media post made by the White House's official X account, which featured her song in a Jet2-style meme referencing the removal of undocumented immigrants. 'This post honestly makes me sick,' Glynne wrote on her Instagram stories. 'My music is about love, unity, and spreading positivity — never about division or hate.' The meme in question showed handcuffed individuals being escorted onto a plane, captioned: 'When ICE books you a one-way Jet2 holiday to deportation. Nothing beats it!' When ICE books you a one-way Jet2 holiday to deportation. ✈️🎶 Nothing beats it! — The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025 The meme format drew from a viral trend where users overlay 'Hold My Hand' onto various mishap clips, parodying the Jet2holidays advert. However, Glynne objected to the repurposing of her song to promote state-led deportations, calling it deeply inappropriate. The Trump administration's use of social media has frequently leaned on memes and trolling. In response to criticism, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told the Independent: 'There is nothing more unifying and positive than deporting criminal illegal aliens and making American communities safer. The memes will continue until every criminal illegal alien is removed!'
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Recognition with resolve?
Listen to article A significant diplomatic shift is underway in Europe. In a matter of weeks, two of the continent's most influential powers — France and the UK — have signalled their intent to formally recognise the State of Palestine. Besides, 14 other Western nations have called on countries worldwide to move to recognise a Palestinian state. While such recognition has long been demanded by a majority of the world's nations, its adoption by Western powers marks a notable departure from the decades-old policy. Belated as it may be, this shift could have far-reaching implications for the Palestinians' pursuit of justice and statehood. French President Emmanuel Macron has stated that France will recognise Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September. Just days later, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer added urgency to the matter, telling his cabinet that the UK would follow suit — unless Israel takes "substantive steps" to end its war on Gaza. Starmer was also careful to reaffirm that "there is no equivalence between Israel and Hamas" and reiterated the UK's demands of Hamas: that it must release all hostages, sign a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that it will play no role in the future governance of Gaza. Both the French and British announcements, as well as the recognition call from 14 other Western nations, come amid deepening tensions. The war has already killed tens of thousands, displaced millions and left Gaza's civilian infrastructure in ruins. Aid convoys have been attacked, and access to food and medicine remains dangerously limited. That such developments have also drawn criticism from Israel's traditional allies points to a growing disillusionment with a conflict that has long been treated as an intractable exception to international norms. Recognition, in itself, does not bring peace. It does not end occupation or stop military aggression. But it does serve as a powerful political statement - that the international community can no longer justify its inaction with platitudes about timing and negotiations.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
UK rejects criticism that move to recognise Palestinian state rewards Hamas
LONDON: Britain on Wednesday rejected criticism that it was rewarding Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. The sight of emaciated Gaza children has shocked the world in recent days and on Tuesday, a hunger monitor warned that a worst-case scenario of famine was unfolding there and immediate action was needed to avoid widespread death. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline for Israel, prompted an immediate rebuke from his counterpart in Jerusalem, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of their 2023 cross-border attack. Britain, France, Germany to hold Gaza 'emergency call' Friday: UK U.S. President Donald Trump said he did not think Hamas 'should be rewarded' with recognition of Palestinian independence. Asked about that criticism, British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander - designated by the government to respond to questions in a series of media interviews on Wednesday - said it was not the right way to characterise Britain's plan. 'This is not a reward for Hamas. Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death,' she told LBC radio. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' France announced last week it would recognise Palestinian statehood in September. Successive British governments have said they would recognise a Palestinian state when it was most effective to do so. In a televised address on Tuesday, Starmer said that moment had now come, highlighting the suffering in Gaza and saying the prospect of a two-state solution - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Israel - was under threat. Starmer said Britain would make the move at the U.N. General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, made clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank and committed to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution.
