Why a young Aussie has rejected a $1billion offer from Mark Zuckerberg
Andrew Tulloch, a University of Sydney graduate who grew up in Perth, spent more than a decade working at Facebook 's parent company before joining rival OpenAI.
In February, Tulloch co-founded AI start-up Thinking Machines Lab with former OpenAI chief technology officer Mira Murati. The company is now reportedly valued at US$12 billion (A$18.5 billion).
According to the Wall Street Journal, Zuckerberg tried to buy Thinking Machines Lab earlier this year, but Murati rejected his offer. Meta's CEO then attempted to lure the company's top talent, including Tulloch.
Tulloch was allegedly offered a US$1 billion (A$1.55 billion) pay package spread over six years, with the potential for even more through bonuses and stock performance.
However, the Perth-born 'genius' turned the offer down. Meta later told the Journal the reported US$1 billion figure was 'inaccurate and ridiculous.'
Mr Tulloch moved to the US in 2012 and spent 11 years at Facebook's AI company, where he rose to the role of distinguished engineer.
Mike Vernal, a former Facebook executive who worked with Mr Tulloch, said: 'He was definitely known as an extreme genius.'
In 2023, he moved to OpenAI, the research organisation behind ChatGPT, before joining former colleagues in forming Thinking Machines Lab this year.
The start-up cites its mission of making 'AI systems more widely understood, customizable and generally capable'.
Mr Tulloch was a vice captain at Christ Church Grammar in Claremont, Western Australia.
He achieved an ATAR of 99.95 in 2007 before graduating with first class honours and the university medal in mathematics at university in 2011.
He graduated with the highest GPA in the Faculty of Science.
The Australian worked at Goldman Sachs as a quant while studying at the University of Cambridge.
He completed a masters in mathematical statistics and machine learning before embarking on his career in AI.
Zuckerberg has a history of attempting to poach rival companies' employees.
OpenAI boss Sam Altman revealed in June Meta had offered US$100million bonuses ($155million) to his staff in an unsuccessful bid to convince talent to switch teams.
'I'm really happy that at least so far none of our best people have decided to take them up on that,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
4 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Speed camera warning: Drivers facing fines for more than speeding
Unlike traditional speed cameras that only monitor speed, the new cameras are smart devices that aim to crack down on distractions behind the wheel. Drivers caught by these new cameras could face major fines. Using a mobile phone while driving comes with a £200 fine and six penalty points on your licence. And if you are taken to court, the cost could rise to £1,000 or even £2,500 for a lorry or bus driver. While not wearing a seatbelt comes with a £100 fine, which could increase to £500 if prosecuted in court. Motoring experts from car repair financing firm Bumper said: 'The system uses a multi-camera setup to capture different views of the driver and passengers, with artificial intelligence analysing the footage to detect speed-related offences. 'However, any violations flagged by AI must still be reviewed and verified by police officers before fines are issued. 'Initial results suggest the technology is effective - within just a few weeks, the trial cameras caught 590 drivers without seatbelts and 40 using their phones. 'The programme has now expanded in 2024 to include 10 police forces across the country, covering areas such as Durham, Greater Manchester, and Sussex. 'With so many drivers caught not wearing their belts and on their phones, the results speak for themselves - the more drivers fined for these simple errors, the fewer accidents we'll see, making our roads a safer place for everyone.' No. There are no laws about visibility, so nothing is stopping an officer from operating in the dark. But they don't often choose to do this and maintain that being visible acts as a deterrent in its own right. Go Safe Casualty Reduction Officer, Gareth Thomas said: "Legally, we don't have to be visible. I could camouflage myself if I wanted to - but it's all about being fair, education and preventing an accident. Even if I parked my van and went for a walk somewhere, it would deter people from speeding right away." If drivers choose to flash to warn others about a speed van, they could be in breach of the law. Under section 89 of the Police Act 1997 it is an offence to "wilfully obstruct a constable in the execution of his/her duty". However, Gareth says while it is an offence, it is very difficult to prove. He said: "It doesn't bother me that people flash to warn them of the speed van - I just want to educate people and the van to act as a speed deterrent." It all comes down to the circumstances within which you were caught speeding, and how much you were more than the limit. The minimum penalty for being caught speeding on the UK's roads is a £100 fine. But Gareth explained in some circumstances, police can offer the option of attending a speed awareness course - an alternative to a fine and penalty points. Gareth, said: "An accredited course is far more likely to improve driver behaviour and consequently make our roads safer. "Courses are available to drivers who respond quickly to the 'notices' and who were driving at no more than 10 per cent, plus 9 mph above the posted speed limit." So for example, anyone travelling over 86mph on a motorway would not be offered the awareness course. Those who don't have a clean licence at the time of the office, or if you have been on the course in the last three years, it is unlikely you will be offered the awareness course as an option.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Albanese and Chalmers could take the Howard-Costello approach to tax reform. The conditions may never be better
Even before he announced plans for a roundtable to shape Labor's second term growth and productivity agenda, Anthony Albanese was managing expectations about what was to come. Speaking at the National Press Club, a month after a stunning election victory, the prime minister began publicly signalling his government would not be getting out over its skis. Explaining that some 'unexpected' decisions Labor had made in its first term were necessary responses to events at home and around the world, Albanese renewed his commitment to careful and considered government decision making. This included managing reform priorities ahead. 'The commitments the Australian people voted for in May are the foundation of our mandate, they are not the limits of our responsibilities or our vision,' he said. The PM could have distributed photocopies of that speech to the Canberra press gallery this week, when he was back in the expectations management game as the list of demands from stakeholders and vested interests grew longer and longer. In the past week alone, there was no shortage of ideas being offered up. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Unions called for a minimum 25% tax rate on high earners and family trusts, and changes to wind back generous negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions for property investors. The ACTU also wants a 25% levy on LNG exports and caps to limit diesel fuel rebate payments to big corporations. The Productivity Commission has already proposed slashing the company tax rate to 20% for firms with less than $1bn in annual turnover, representing about 99% of businesses. A 5% net cashflow tax would also be imposed on about 500 of the country's biggest businesses, including miners and supermarkets. Separately, the teal independent Kate Chaney suggested lifting the GST rate from 10% to 15%. She proposed food, education and health be added to the GST, with a new $3,300 rebate to adult Australians, to help low income earners cope. Business groups want a three-month tax review completed later this year, while campaigners including the former Treasury boss Ken Henry say long overdue reforms to the country's environmental laws should be used as a stepping stone to boosting productivity and growth. Faced with this rapidly expanding wishlist, Albanese on Thursday sought to adjust expectations. He said that ideas being proposed by stakeholders, participants and pretenders alike were still a long way from becoming proposals Labor was prepared to spend political capital on. 'Governments make government policy,' he said. 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election.' The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, agreed that final decisions would be made by ministers at the cabinet table. He went on to praise Albanese's considered, methodical approach to government, something which has led the overhaul of cabinet processes after Scott Morrison's constitutional power grab in the secret ministries saga. Chalmers said this week he didn't want to kill off ideas before the talks even begin. He gently reminded stakeholders that only proposals that were in the national interest, rather than sectional priorities, would get real consideration. They must also be at least budget-neutral and offer specific and practical outcomes. On the budget effect, he said some had embraced the challenge of not adding to spending better than others. He expressed gentle frustration with those advocating big-ticket ideas for their own industry. There is both opportunity and risk for Labor in the lopsided expectations game. Chalmers hopes a few immediate ideas could come out of the talks. He is chasing consensus on sclerotic regulation, sluggish building approvals, infrastructure upgrades and the energy system. And he could look to overdue developments such as road user charging for short term priorities. After Albanese opens the summit, presentations from the Reserve Bank of Australia governor, Michele Bullock; the Treasury secretary, Jenny Wilkinson; and the Productivity Commission boss, Danielle Wood, will help frame the talks. Equally, longer term work should emerge. Here is where tax reform should play a role, even if badly needed adjustments to the GST are off the table. With a thumping majority in parliament, Albanese and Chalmers could channel the competitive tension that often exists between treasurers and prime ministers to frame policies for the next election. The conditions will probably never be better. Like Paul Keating's 1985 tax summit – which brought about major changes still present in Australia's income tax system – big ideas need to be refined and debated, giving experts and the public the chance to assess them. The then prime minister Bob Hawke used the summit to dump Keating's preferred option of a broad-based consumption tax, but the 13-year Labor government remains the gold standard for reform. A decade later, after the 1997 budget, John Howard and Peter Costello agreed to keep open the option of taking a GST proposal. Having famously declared he would 'never ever' revisit the GST in opposition, the move surprised even some of Howard's closest advisers. The plan was discussed in a 13-hour cabinet meeting, which included the first ever PowerPoint presentation in the cabinet room. The pair eventually went public with the plan and spent months making the case, pushing it through parliament and eking out a narrow reelection victory in October 1998. Such an approach could suit the methodical and cautious Albanese, and the more ambitious Chalmers – who rarely speaks to the media without mentioning the big ticket spending built into the federal budget, including health, aged care, defence, the soaring NDIS and interest on national debt. Albanese plans to add universal childcare to the list, if the government can afford it. Back in June at the Press Club, Albanese called consultation and debate essential because, he said, change imposed unilaterally by governments rarely endures. Instead, Labor would use the term ahead to seek reforms that clearly serve the national interest and 'generate their own momentum'. 'Key to lasting change is reform that Australians own and understand,' the prime minister told assembled journalists. Meeting those expectations might just make or break this Labor government's claim to a legacy of lasting reform. Tom McIlroy is Guardian Australia's chief political correspondent
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Vivian's new Sydney apartment caps rent at 30% of her income. Is this the way to tackle Australia's housing crisis?
Hundreds of residents will soon move into a newly built block of inner Sydney apartments full of modern perks including induction cooktops, a nearby Metro train station, and rent capped at 30% of their household income. The Boronia apartments in Sydney's fast-developing inner south have been purpose-built to house people in need of discounted rent – and are among the kinds of projects experts say Australia needs to solve its housing crisis. Vivian Tran, 31, struggled to find a home for herself and her daughter, Lyla – private rentals were either snapped up before she could inspect them or outside her single-income budget. She was considering moving more than three hours north to Forster to live with her parents. But after successfully applying for a Boronia apartment, she'll now be living just 20 minutes away from the childcare centre where she works as a manager. 'That was very exciting when I received [Boronia's] email,' she says. 'It'd be nice to have our own space and start fresh and really start living our lives a little bit.' Low-income workers in care professions, older single women and others without homes or at risk of homelessness will be among those joining Tran in the five-storey complex. The 74 homes range from studio apartments to three-bedroom flats, overlooking a leafy courtyard and enjoying sunlight throughout the day. They're designed to be accessible and able to be retrofitted with handrails to allow residents to stay long term as they age, according to Khoa Nguyen, a project architect at Turner Studios. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'We're trying to design a place where you're proud to live,' Nguyen says. A key reason residents are able to stay is the 30% cap on rents, designed to be well within household budgets. For a worker with an after-tax income of $1,000 a week, or $52,000 annually, a two-bedroom apartment in blocks surrounding Boronia would cost their entire paycheck, data from shows. If that worker was approved for a similar apartment in Boronia, they may end up paying only $300 or so a week. Other affordable housing systems might charge 75% of the market rate, which would see the worker spending $750 of their $1,000 weekly income on their home. Boronia's system is best practice, according to Michael Fotheringham, the managing director of the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. 'When we talk about tackling the housing crisis, this is what it looks like,' Fotheringham says. 'That's 74 households that are able to actually have a more productive life,' he says. 'That's great. There are lots of other families that need it too.' About 452,000 Australian households live in social housing units but as many as 640,000 more may need housing support, according to federal agency Housing Australia's May report. The decade to 2024 saw the social housing stock rise by 24,000 nationwide, or 6%, the report found. But over the same period, there was a 66% rise in the number of people on public housing waitlists who had no home or were at risk of homelessness. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Permanent discounted rentals are more difficult to fund than for-profit developments, according to Leonie King, the chief executive at Boronia's provider, City West Housing. Boronia cost $66m to buy land and build but its operation will bring ongoing costs. 'Our purpose is to house people,' King says. 'It's not the standard development model where you build and then you sell and then you recycle [the proceeds]. You've got money tied up … you've got people who want a long-term home.' Dedicated social housing has fallen to just 4% of Australia's housing stock after construction slowed and old public housing was sold off, Housing Australia reported in May. It recommended governments fund providers to restore social housing stock to 1990s levels of 6% of all homes in Australia, then to 10% in the long term. The Albanese government's $10bn Housing Australia Future Fund (Haff) is funding 20,000 social housing units in the five years to 2029. The Haff and separate housing accord commitments are also funding the construction of 20,000 homes classified as 'affordable' although that can include more expensive options. Boronia and two other City West Housing projects secured funding from the Haff as well as state and local governments, allowing the provider to put money towards two more new developments. The Haff has not opened further funding rounds and is not committed to taking on new projects after 2029, leaving City West Housing and other providers uncertain about taking on new projects. 'The issue is, you eventually run out of cash,' King says. 'We're going to get two projects to shovel-ready, and we think we'll be able to solve the funding issue, but there's a bit of a leap of faith.'
