logo
Schools relying on digital surveillance find security still takes a human touch

Schools relying on digital surveillance find security still takes a human touch

Four years ago, a sixth grader in Rigby, Idaho, shot and injured two peers and a custodian at a middle school. The tragedy prompted school officials to reimagine what threat prevention looks like in the district.
Now, student-run Hope Squads uplift peers with homemade cards and assemblies. Volunteer fathers patrol hallways through Dads on Duty. A team of counselors, social workers and probation officers gathers to discuss and support struggling students. Thanks to a new cell phone ban, students are talking to each other more. The positive results of these combined efforts have been measurable.
'We've helped change … lives,' said Brianna Vasquez, a Rigby High senior and Hope Squad member. 'I've had friends who have been pulled out of the hole of depression and suicidal thoughts because of (the Hope Squad).'
___
The Education Reporting Collaborative, a coalition of eight newsrooms, is investigating the unintended consequences of AI-powered surveillance at schools. Members of the Collaborative are AL.com, The Associated Press, The Christian Science Monitor, The Dallas Morning News, The Hechinger Report, Idaho Education News, The Post and Courier in South Carolina, and The Seattle Times.
___
America's educators are working to prevent harm like Rigby's shooting. Many U.S. districts have turned to technology — especially digital surveillance — as the antidote. Not everyone is sold on that approach, as there can be issues, including with privacy and security. Without broad agreement on which strategies work best, some districts are trying a combination of technology, on-the-ground threat assessment teams and mental health supports.
Jennifer DePaoli, a senior researcher at the Learning Policy Institute who has studied school safety, said a multi-pronged approach is 'very sensible.'
'People are the solution'
In Rigby, educators lean toward human interaction. Artificial intelligence and digital surveillance systems are perhaps less likely to identify who's eating alone at lunch or withdrawing from friends.
'It's all about culture,' said Chad Martin, superintendent of Jefferson County School District in Rigby. 'It starts with that – just having a friend, having a group of friends, having a connection somewhere.'
Rigby school leaders use technology to detect threats, including an app, STOPit, which allows students to anonymously report safety concerns, and surveillance software that monitors students' keystrokes for troubling terms. Martin said those are helpful but must be used in concert with human-led initiatives.
The district's version of a threat assessment team has been one of the most impactful tools, Martin said. In monthly group conversations, school staff may realize that a student who's been missing class has a parent who was recently arrested, for example.
'Everybody has a little piece of information,' Martin said. 'The goal is to put those people in the same room and be able to paint a picture that can help us support kids.'
Although Idaho doesn't mandate the use of in-school threat assessment teams, 11 states do. In 2024, the National Center for Education Statistics reported that 71% of U.S. public schools have a threat assessment team.
A leading model, used by thousands of districts, is the Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines (CSTAG). These were developed by forensic clinical psychologist Dewey Cornell after he spent years studying homicides committed by children or teens, including school shootings. He said digital surveillance technology can offer schools 'an illusion of safety and security.'
With CSTAG, teams made up of school staff members use a multi-step process when threats emerge. The group might suspend or relocate a student while conducting mental health screenings, facilitating a law enforcement investigation and developing a safety plan.
If implemented correctly, Cornell said, this approach is less punitive and more rooted in intervention. Cornell co-authored a recent study in Florida, where threat assessment teams are mandatory, finding 'low rates of school removal and very low rates of law enforcement actions.'
'If you're a school counselor and you can work with a troubled kid and help get them on the right track, you're not just preventing a school shooting, but you're more likely to be preventing a shooting that would occur somewhere else and maybe years in the future,' he said.
Threat assessment teams aren't immune from scrutiny. Complaints have emerged about them operating without student or parent knowledge, or without staff members to represent children with special needs, and about discrimination against Black and Hispanic students. The Learning Policy Institute's DePaoli said more research is needed on whether they successfully identify threats and provide students with appropriate support.
Utah's Jordan School District uses the CSTAG model. Travis Hamblin, director of student services, credits the 'human connection' with strengthening how the district handles threats, boosting student safety and well-being.
Earlier this school year, it received an alert through Bark, a digital monitoring tool that scans students' school-issued Google suite accounts. It flagged a middle schooler who'd uploaded a hand-drawn picture of a gun.
Through the CSTAG decision-making process, the threat assessment team avoided unnecessarily escalating the situation by determining the student didn't intend any harm, Hamblin said. They chalked it up to immaturity and asked the student to refrain from such drawings.
The district employs someone — a former administrator and counselor — to field the Bark alerts and communicate with school staff. Administrators from every Jordan school have undergone threat assessment training, along with select staff members.
'A digital tool for us is a tool. It's not the solution,' Hamblin said. 'We believe that people are the solution.'
Student- and parent-led efforts in Idaho
In Rigby, one of those people is Ernie Chavez, whose height makes him stick out in a hallway streaming with middle schoolers. He's with Dads on Duty, which brings in parents to help monitor and interact with students. Throughout the school, students reach out to Chavez for high-fives. On one February afternoon, he was greeted with applause and cheers.
Similarly, the district's Hope Squads, in place since 2021, have become an active presence on campus. The student-led coalitions, implemented in thousands of schools across the U.S. and Canada, aim to foster connection and reduce the risk of suicide.
'We refer … students every year to counselors, and those students go from some of the worst moments in their life (to getting help),' Vasquez said. 'We build the connection between adults and faculty to the student.'
Hope Squad members notice peers who seem down or isolated and reach out with a greeting or handmade card. We 'show them that we care and they're not alone,' said member Dallas Waldron, a Rigby High senior.
The groups also plan special events — like a week of mental-health activities. Sophomore Emilie Raymond said the shooting showed 'people need to feel included and they need to find that hope.'
Another change: a new cell phone ban. Before, students were 'sitting in the corners, isolated, staring at a screen,' said Ryan Erikson, Rigby Middle's principal. Now, 'they're playing games, they're goofing off … they're actually conversing.'
While the district's approach to stemming violence is robust, 'it's not perfect,' said Martin, Jefferson's superintendent. 'We're still going to have things come up that we haven't prepared for or weren't on our radar. But we address them and just try to do whatever we can to support kids.' ____ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Special Attorney Ed Martin checks out Tish James' ‘mortgage fraud' home
Special Attorney Ed Martin checks out Tish James' ‘mortgage fraud' home

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Special Attorney Ed Martin checks out Tish James' ‘mortgage fraud' home

Department of Justice Special Attorney Ed Martin was spotted in Brooklyn Friday inspecting Tish James' multi-family residential property that is at the center of a federal mortgage fraud investigation. Martin, conspicuous in a beige trench coat, visited the Clinton Hill brownstone a week after being appointed by Attorney General Pam Bondi to run parallel mortgage fraud probes into the New York attorney general and her fellow Trump-deranged Democrat, California Sen. Adam Schiff. Grand juries in Virginia and Maryland are currently weighing criminal indictments for James and Schiff respectively over allegations they falsified property records to secure favorable loan terms. 3 Department of Justice Special Attorney Ed Martin was seen at the Clinton Hill section in Brooklyn, NY, inspecting the home of New York Attorney General Letitia James. Gregory P. Mango James' Brooklyn property at 296 Lafayette Avenue is classified as a five-unit dwelling, but James is alleged to have misrepresented the building on mortgage applications, building permits, and filings for government assistance as having only four units. The alleged misclassification allowed her to qualify for loans with better interest rates and lower down payments through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are only available for properties with four or fewer residential units. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! At the time Martin was inspecting the property on Friday afternoon, there was one doorbell visible at the main entrance and an additional four door bells at a side entrance, with weathered labels signifying '1 Floor,' '2 Floor,' '3A,' and '3B.' A neighbor confronted Martin and an unidentified colleague as they were standing out the front of the property and asked them what they were doing. Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters 'Tell me why you're here,' said the middle aged blonde in navy gym shorts and black tank top. 'We know who lives here . . . You're not here about the houses. You're here because of who lives here. It's my neighborhood. It's my block. I have a right to know what you guys are doing.' Martin replied: 'I'm just happy to be on a block looking at houses . . . I'm just looking at houses, interesting houses. It's an important house.' 3 James' property located at 296 Lafayette Avenue is classified as a five-unit complex, but James allegedly misclassified the unit on mortgage applications, claiming the building only had four units. New York Post 'It's not,' retorted the neighbor. 'It's just like every other tract house on this block that was built by developers.' 'They're beautiful, beautiful neighborhood,' Martin told her, before walking away. The investigation into James' real estate holdings began in April when Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department. Pulte alleged James may have 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire government backed assistance and loans and more favorable loan terms' by claiming a Norfolk, Virginia, home she bought in 2023 would be her 'principal residence' while acting as New York AG, and that the property she owns in Brooklyn was her second residence. 3 The misfilings have led James to be granted loans with better interest rates and lower down payments. New York Post The case also includes allegations that James and her father signed mortgage papers listing themselves as 'husband and wife' to meet lending rules. Both James and Schiff deny any wrongdoing. 'Bill Pulte and his FHFA team got this started with his criminal referral,' Martin said last week. 'And as Tish James and Adam Schiff always say: 'Nobody is above the law.' ' Special attorneys are empowered to conduct criminal proceedings, including grand jury investigations and prosecutions, usually in sensitive or high-profile cases, and can operate outside the district where the case is pending.

Hertz AI Charges Family $195 Even After Employee Found No Damage To Returned Car
Hertz AI Charges Family $195 Even After Employee Found No Damage To Returned Car

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Hertz AI Charges Family $195 Even After Employee Found No Damage To Returned Car

Hertz is in the news again because of the AI-powered scanners the rental car company now uses to find damage on cars after they're returned in order to charged customers for that alleged damage. Of course, you can't forget about the processing and administrative fees, either. After all, why shouldn't a $250 charge actually cost you $440? The bad news is, it doesn't sound like Hertz plans to stop with this AI nonsense. Now, if you screw up and actually damage a rental car, that's one thing. You or your insurance should expect to pay for that. But that also doesn't sound like what happened to Kelly Rogers when she and her husband rented a minivan in Atlanta recently. As the New York Times explains: When they returned the car in Atlanta, they inspected it and saw no damage. A Hertz employee inspected the vehicle upon its return as well, they said, and did not flag any damage. But once the couple had passed through airport security, they received a notification via the Hertz app that its automated system had detected a dent in the passenger-side front door. They were charged $195: $80 for the damage and $115 in fees, including those incurred "as a result of processing" the damage claim and the "cost to detect and estimate the damage" that occurred during the rental. Hertz offered to reduce the charge to $130 if they paid within one day. That's a lot of money for "damage" an employee had already said they didn't see, but at least they were offered a discount if they paid quickly. A Hertz spokesperson also told the Times the company had reviewed the incident and confirmed the dent was new. Rogers, however, reportedly still finds it difficult to believe, telling the newspaper, "It could have been a shadow. We were pulling it up on the app, and we're like, 'This is so bananas.'" Read more: The Least Reliable Cars, Trucks And SUVs You Can Buy In 2025, According To Consumer Reports You Have Other Options Maybe Rogers or her husband really did return the minivan with an imperceptibly small ding in it. Maybe they didn't. But it still sucks to be told there's no damage, only to get charged for damage some computer program allegedly found after the fact. Especially since we know AI is wildly unreliable and regularly gets even the most basic stuff wrong. Just look at what happened to the MyPillow guy's lawyers when they used AI to do their jobs for them. And that's far from the only story about faulty AI software getting people in trouble. Heck, if you ask Google, its AI thinks my name "appears to be a typo." Hertz isn't the only rental car company toying with the most annoying new technology. Sixt uses an AI software called Car Gate, the Times reports. Avis has also been toying with AI since 2019, but told the Times the process remains "human-led." Hertz has had a rough few years in the customer satisfaction department. It almost had a customer arrested for putting too many miles on an "unlimited mileage" rental. It's also the same Hertz that had customers wrongly arrested on charges of stealing rental cars they didn't actually steal. Then, after getting a new CEO, Hertz got sued again for having customers wrongly arrested. Eventually, Hertz agreed to a $168 million settlement over those wrongful arrests. I've reached out to Hertz for a comment, but I have yet to hear back from them. I'll be sure to update this post with their statement. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

As Scammers Up Their Fraud Game, Consumers, Banks, And Law Enforcement Must Respond
As Scammers Up Their Fraud Game, Consumers, Banks, And Law Enforcement Must Respond

Forbes

timea day ago

  • Forbes

As Scammers Up Their Fraud Game, Consumers, Banks, And Law Enforcement Must Respond

Technology may make fraud easier—thanks to social media—but it may also be the way to stop it. getty Fraud schemes and scammers are increasingly making headlines, with some scratching their heads to figure out why—and how to stop it. A recent study conducted by BioCatch, a global company focused on solving next-generation digital identity challenges through examining behavioral biometrics, might offer some clarity. The survey found that 81% of Americans cited artificial intelligence (AI) as contributing to more sophisticated financial crimes, with social media (75%) and the dark web (73%) playing key roles in the equation. That data was pulled from a BioCatch survey of 800 senior fraud, anti-money laundering (AML), and risk and compliance professionals across 17 countries on five continents. The survey was an attempt to better understand how financial institutions are fighting fraud and financial crime, the impact of emerging technologies on the dark economy, and the level of collaboration among competing institutions, law enforcement, and governments. The impact on consumer wallets is significant. Nasdaq's Global Financial Crime Report estimates that $3.1 trillion in illicit funds moved through the world's financial system in 2023. Scams and fraud added up to $485.6 billion in projected losses. Of those moves, U.S. victims have taken a beating: the U.S. ranks second globally for major fraud losses. That likely explains why, in the U.S., almost all of those surveyed agree that combating activities that encompass the dark economy is important. So what can be done to stop it? Many professionals aren't quite sure. Most of those surveyed (83%) believe that their financial institutions are winning the fight against fraudsters, while only 56% believe their individual efforts have an impact on combating financial crime. That may not tell the whole story. Matt O'Neill, a former Secret Service agent, says there's a real disconnect between losses and what banks are prioritizing. Fraud losses hit individuals in the pocketbook, not banks. The banks aren't materially affected, and there hasn't been a real push to pivot from the status quo. While U.S. banks may trust technology, they don't trust each other, O'Neill explains. That means there's no meaningful sharing of information. That's a break from behaviors other countries where statistics suggest that when other countries share at scale, their losses are decreasing. (Part of the reluctance to share information may come from consumers. While 32% of those surveyed in the U.S. consider data privacy regulation as one of the main inhibitors to sharing data with other banks, 30% worry about the potential for misuse. These numbers are higher than global averages.) Nearly all (93%) of those surveyed consider their organization to be effective in fighting financial crime, and four in five of those surveyed say their banks have incorporated behavioral analysis into their technology stack to detect financial crime. Those numbers may sound impressive, but O'Neill says that criminal networks are actually outpacing banks while banks are still playing catch-up. The Role Of Law Enforcement Despite an increase in reports of fraud, law enforcement agencies are reaching out to banks less often. That means there may not be a unified effort to stop scammers. And, tellingly, it makes a real difference where the fraud happens—even when banks do contact local law enforcement, not all law enforcement have the means, ability, and time to respond to sophisticated scams and attacks. The majority of Americans working in financial crime prevention believe that law enforcement should do more when a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is filed. By law, national banks are required to report known or suspected criminal offenses, transactions over $5,000 suspected to involve money laundering or violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), and transactions of $25,000 or more involving a criminal violation, even if no suspect is identified. The level of follow-up from those SARs may be inconsistent across banks and across demographics. Banks also report that they don't receive regular contact from law enforcement about their investigations into criminal activity. When it does happen, the contact tends to be less frequent than on a monthly basis. Customer-Focused Communications On the consumer side, banks and other financial institutions have tried to boost awareness about the potential for fraud, often by creating awareness campaigns. But Seth Ruden, Senior Director of Global Advisory at BioCatch, notes that can only go so far. 'Social engineering is so compelling,' he says, and efforts to combat it are not as effective as the tactics exercised by bad actors. Social engineering is a form of manipulation which relies on human psychology to direct behaviors. In this context, scammers may spend significant resources to convince potential victims to take certain steps like revealing personally identifiable information or transferring assets to a third party. To combat that manipulation, institutions need new controls to fight scammers, including those to alert potential victims. Oftentimes, banks may notice the potential fraud before the victim does, or before third parties do. But it may be too difficult to break the spell. Creating some friction at the consumer level could delay funds from being released. That, combined with the sharing of information between financial institutions, could be a difference maker. When funds leave an account, there's a narrow window of time before they're captured at the receiver bank. 'What if,' Ruden asks, 'we could connect in real time?' That could present an opportunity to stop or mitigate the damage. O'Neill agrees, suggesting that while precision analytics can be a real game-changer for banks, additional resources—including a human touch—can also make a difference. For example, when a potential victim is determined to send funds to a new payee, like a new romantic interest, asking the right questions could result in a pause in activity. Asking a question as simple as, 'Why would send money to someone you have never met before?' could trigger a conversation that could result in enough information to reveal that the payment is very suspicious. The key, of course, is to create friction without making it a competitive disadvantage. That, says Ruden, requires resources. Those on the other side of the equation—the fraudsters—are sophisticated actors and are willing to dedicate time and money to see a scam through. Fighting will require the same dedication from financial institutions. But it may well be the case that those spends are welcome since nearly two-thirds of those surveyed say they'd like to increase their investment in technology (those in the U.S. said so at a much higher rate than the global average). What Can Consumers Do? So much of fighting fraud still rests with the consumer. So, what can consumers do to protect themselves? O'Neill is quick to offer his advice, emphasizing, 'Never ever send money to anyone that you've never seen or touched before.' If you make a mistake, 'The cavalry isn't coming,' he says, noting that the likelihood is slim to recover the funds. 'There isn't a magic button to recover those funds,' so it's important to think it through. 'If it's going to hurt you to lose it, don't send it,' he warns. Ruden says that it's going to take a technology revolution to protect consumers. He thinks such a move should be welcomed, noting that it's in the interest of financial institutions and fiduciaries to help protect their customers. Some do a better job than others—and those are the organizations that consumers should seek out. 'Look for a culture of protection,' he advises, saying that consumers should keep an eye out for institutions that place an emphasis on fraud-fighting. This can mean existing trained fraud prevention teams or otherwise demonstrating a commitment to protect consumers through their business practices. Tax Rules For Losses If you are a victim of a scam, while you may not be able to recover your losses, you may be entitled to tax relief. Earlier this year, the IRS Office of Chief Counsel released a memo providing clarification on the deductibility of theft losses for scam victims. The memo was welcome for taxpayers who were confused about limits resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made another tweak. Under the TCJA, for the tax years 2018 to 2025, personal casualty and theft losses are deductible only to the extent that the losses are attributable to a federally declared disaster. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made the limits to losses permanent, with one exception: it has been expanded to include state-declared disasters. That means the theft loss deduction is still available for businesses and individuals who incur losses in transactions entered into for profit. There is no statutory definition of "a transaction entered into for profit." However, courts have determined that to meet the criteria, a primary profit motive is required. Next Steps As scammers develop new schemes to steal money and information from consumers (you can read about a new one here), the commitment to fraud prevention must evolve even faster. Understanding what kinds of scams exist and how they operate, as well as the roles that consumers, law enforcement, and financial institutions can play in mitigation and prevention, are all key. That means that education will continue to be a big part in stopping scammers. You can read the Biocatch global survey here. Forbes FBI Warns Scam Victims To Be On The Lookout For Fake Law Firms Offering To Help Recover Losses By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes IRS Issues Warnings On Tax Scams Driven By Bad Advice Often Found On Social Media By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes Some Scam Victims May Be Able To Deduct Related Losses On Their Tax Returns By Kelly Phillips Erb

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store