‘We really need that federal piece': city awaits Ottawa grants for housing projects as deadline looms
'Six out of the 10 projects that we've approved through our (Housing Accelerator Fund) capital grants (in) Round 1, which require a building permit by September of this year … are still awaiting approval from (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation) under the Affordable Housing Fund,' Lissie Rappaport, manager of the city's Housing Accelerator Fund office, said during Tuesday's executive policy committee meeting. 'The loan (portion) of that program has run out of funds. There's still money left in the grant program but most groups access both to make a project work.'
Rappaport told the committee her office is 'fully optimistic' the federal government will commit more money but it's not yet clear when that could happen.
SEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES
In late May, some groups proposing housing projects learned the federal Affordable Housing Fund's community housing development stream had been exhausted.
'Some of those projects may be late on that September deadline … It could be a risk for us to not meet our targets under this year,' she said.
In late May, some groups proposing housing projects learned the federal Affordable Housing Fund's community housing development stream had been exhausted.
Rappaport said the six affected projects she mentioned include a combined 680 housing units, and 464 of those are considered deeply affordable.
One of the affected projects aims to provide 154 housing units with affordable rents at 145 Transcona Blvd.
But a key proponent of that $46-million project said it is now in limbo.
'We've been pushing really hard from a political level to try to get support for this project,' said Stephanie Haight, director of development and construction for the Winnipeg Housing Rehabilitation Corporation.
Haight said the project would provide homes for vulnerable people who are facing homelessness or at risk of becoming homeless due to a physical disability.
The organization applied for CMHC funding to cover more than half its costs, seeking an $11.5-million grant and $14.8 million in long-term, low interest loans.
Haight said the project received a $5-million grant from Winnipeg's $122-million share of the federal Housing Accelerator Fund.
While CMHC has not provided written approval for the project, it would need that funding to succeed, Haight said.
'We have city support, we have provincial support and we really need that federal piece,' said Haight.
Mayor Scott Gillingham said he's confident the senior government will act on the issue.
'The federal government has already told us that that Affordable Housing Fund is an important fund. Even though it's fully subscribed, they've committed to my office that … they're working on either replenishing the fund or finding a way to make sure those projects still go ahead,' said Gillingham.
To secure federal Housing Accelerator dollars, the city made sweeping changes to its zoning rules, including allowing up to four housing units to be built on a single lot in most residential areas.
Gillingham said those changes will help attract more housing projects, long after current funding programs end.
'What those zoning changes are about is getting more housing built quicker. There are many projects that will never try to access or need federal or provincial funding to get built,' he said.
In an email, a CMHC spokesman noted the Housing Accelerator Fund and Affordable Housing Fund are not directly tied to each other. He also noted many housing proponents applied for the latter fund.
'With the significant demand for funding, CMHC continues and is committed to working with our clients and partners to process as many (Affordable Housing Fund) applications as possible. Further updates on (that fund) will be provided as they become available,' wrote David Harris.
Overall, the city awarded $25 million to 11 projects from its share of the Housing Accelerator Fund last year, while another 12 projects split $25 million of the funding in 2025.
Rappaport noted one of the 11 projects granted last year has now withdrawn its application for Housing Accelerator Funding, leaving the total for that year at 10 projects.
Wednesdays
Sent weekly from the heart of Turtle Island, an exploration of Indigenous voices, perspectives and experiences.
Westgate Developments Ltd. and LVDC Holdings Ltd. had planned to convert a commercial building at 125 Garry St. into a mixed-use apartment complex with 126 housing units, including 32 affordable ones.
The city and developer declined comment on the reasons that project won't proceed.
Rappaport said city staff will look at other options to invest the money allotted to that project, which could be offered to another applicant who didn't initially receive a grant.
joyanne.pursaga@freepress.mb.ca
X: @joyanne_pursaga
Joyanne PursagaReporter
Joyanne is city hall reporter for the Winnipeg Free Press. A reporter since 2004, she began covering politics exclusively in 2012, writing on city hall and the Manitoba Legislature for the Winnipeg Sun before joining the Free Press in early 2020. Read more about Joyanne.
Every piece of reporting Joyanne produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
2 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Rick Bell: Alberta, the rest of us wait for Carney to do something
Article content And Elbows Up is now a punchline to a joke. It hasn't aged well. Article content At best, it is an oddity like one of those teen dances from decades ago. Let's all do the Hand Jive! Article content Carney is a politician not a messiah or a comic book superhero. If and when Canada gets a deal with Trump it won't be because Canada yelled the loudest or threatened the most or declared war on the U.S. Article content A deal will come because Carney is not doing what the mob wanted. Article content In Alberta, our fate awaits. When will Carney take the handcuffs off the oilpatch and strengthen Canada's economy in these trying times with the U.S.? Article content Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre was in Calgary. He tries to explain Carney. Article content 'For the last ten years Mark Carney was a net-zero, keep it in the ground green fanatic. He said he wanted to keep at least half our oil in the ground. He's testified against the Northern Gateway pipeline. He supported all the carbon taxes. He's publicly spoken in favour of the electric vehicle mandate,' says Poilievre. Article content Article content Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, flanked by members of parliament, speaks in front of workers and a fracking pump at EnQuest Energy Solutions in Calgary on Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025. Article content 'He's tried to present himself as some big change because he looks and sounds different than Justin Trudeau but he has supported all of the same policies.' 'What he's doing right now is ragging the puck and trying to drag people along into believing he will one day do something. But he hasn't done anything other than hold a lot of meetings and make a lot of bold statements.' Article content For the guy who says he wants to build baby build we wait for action from Carney. Article content Alberta is losing patience. Rebecca Schulz, the environment minister in Premier Danielle Smith's government, echoed that sentiment in a recent interview with your scribbler. Article content When is Carney announcing he will dump the nasty laws holding back the Canadian economy, a move Premier Smith has been pushing hard, as has Poilievre? Article content Article content At the risk of Carney plagiarizing Poilievre, why does the prime minister not just repeat the following. Article content 'We can't wait until everybody is onside.' Article content 'There are some people out there who don't believe Elvis is dead. You can't get everybody to agree on any basic fact, even the basic fact we need a pipeline.'
Toronto Sun
4 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Greener steel arrives in Canada to a market in turmoil and future unclear
Published Aug 10, 2025 • 5 minute read Steam rises as water is poured over hot steel at Algoma's Direct Strip Production Complex in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., on Wednesday, March 14, 2018. Photo by Justin Tang / THE CANADIAN PRESS TORONTO — Like some superhero channelling the power of lightning, Algoma Steel Inc. has started using the heat cast off by the arcs of powerful electric currents to make greener steel. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Electric arc furnaces are nothing new — the technology is more than a century old, and there's already a few in Canada — but Algoma is calling the achievement of production from its first of the kind furnace last month a win as it faces an existential threat from U.S. tariffs. 'We have reached a truly pivotal milestone for Algoma and the Canadian steel industry,' said chief executive Michael Garcia on a recent earnings call. 'Despite the uncertainty that the trade war has unleashed, this achievement reinforces our confidence in our transformation strategy.' Part of that strategy has been to dramatically reduce emissions in an attempt to differentiate its products; it even trademarked Volta as the name for its cleaner steel that it plans to produce from a mix of low-emission iron feed and scrap metal. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But experts say the project is coming online as the market for green steel, and the metal more generally, faces turmoil from tariffs and price pressures, making it unclear what financial advantages producers may get from the big upfront investments needed. 'The question is, will the demand be there? Is there going to be sufficient demand in North America for green steel?' said Chris Bataille, who researches the steel transition as an adjunct research fellow at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy. 'The U.S. was starting to move fairly quickly in terms of moving to electric vehicles and to cleaner steel and everything else under the last administration, but now we've got a complete U-turn.' Steel emissions had been a priority in the U.S., and remains one in Canada, because using coal to produce steel is so emissions intensive. Globally, steel production makes up about eight per cent of carbon emissions, according to the International Energy Agency. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But while it makes sense from an emissions perspective, buyers willing to pay a premium for the more eco-friendly steel have mostly been limited to the auto sector, said Bataille. European automakers have been paying a premium of as much as 40 per cent for the cleaner material, since they can use it for marketing while only adding a little to the end cost of a car, but the more important building sector has been more hesitant, he said. There is still demand in Europe, a region Canada has looked to diversify its exports, but with tariffs causing disruption there too it's not clear how much potential there is, said trade expert Tommaso Ferretti. 'There is a structural demand in Europe, but to what extent that structural demand will remain in place, it's a big question mark,' said the assistant professor at the University of Ottawa's Telfer School of Management. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Garcia himself has warned that Algoma doesn't see much potential to sell to Europe, or anywhere else internationally. 'We can put our steel on an ocean-going ship here in Sault Ste. Marie, but getting it to an export customer in Europe or elsewhere, there just aren't those opportunities right now. I don't think that there'll be a lot of those opportunities going forward, to be frank,' he said. The challenges help explain why the other flagship green steel project in Canada, at ArcelorMittal's Hamilton, Ont., operations, is stuck in neutral. The company made a big show of announcing in 2022 that it was moving ahead with a $1.8-billion project to move to green steel _ but the last updates show the project is still at the engineering stage, with a spokesperson confirming there are no new milestones to report. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Wider oversupply issues in the industry that have pushed down prices is part of the problem, as are doubts about policies like carbon pricing, said Bataille. 'There's some uncertainty about how fast the transition will go. … It's just a difficult business to make a buck, to be honest.' ArcelorMittal said in its latest sustainability report in April that it doesn't expect green steel projects to be economical until the 2030s, and that policies will be needed to address the high capital and operational costs. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Federal and provincial governments in Canada have already stepped in to help out with capital costs. Algoma received $420 million to help cover the more than $880 million cost of its project, while ArcelorMittal was offered $900 million to help ease its overall costs. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But unlike Algoma, ArcelorMittal's plans also include building a plant in Hamilton to remove oxygen from iron ore using hydrogen, rather than coal — a process that remains expensive, leading to several recent project cancellations. ArcelorMittal itself just cancelled two green steel projects in Germany in June, citing high electricity prices, while last year it noted the future of several other of its European steel projects is unclear because 'there is limited willingness among customers to pay premiums for low-carbon emissions steel.' Cleveland-Cliffs, which bought Hamilton-based Stelco Holdings Inc. last year, recently shelved plans for green steel conversion at a U.S. plant that already had US$500 million in government funding secured. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Lourenco Goncalves, chief executive of Cleveland-Cliffs, cited the lack of clear hydrogen supply as part of the reason for cancelling the project. He said on a July earnings call that plans to revamp the operation using existing resources, including 'beautiful coal,' generates a very good conversation with the current U.S. Department of Energy. Ferretti worries that the pressures the industry is facing will also mean less investment in research and development to try and bring costs down. He said there needs to be even greater collaboration between the public and private sector for the critical industry to chart a path forward. 'The real question in fact is to see … the collaboration between the companies, the steel manufacturers, Canadian government, and their ability to reinvent themselves.' For Bataille, that path could include using Canada's vast renewable energy and iron ore deposits to build a direct reduction plant for processing closer to the source, and then shipping the already oxygen-reduced iron around the world. 'You could triple the value of those exports,' said Bataille. 'So on the one hand we face headwinds and the Chinese overcapacity continues, but on the other hand, I think there's new possibilities open in shipping green iron places that, you know, we hadn't considered before.' Columnists Columnists Sunshine Girls Sports Toronto & GTA
National Post
5 hours ago
- National Post
A skeptic's take on the housing crisis: 'The developer is the good guy'
Article content 'If you're saying that the problem is, we're not adding enough housing to existing neighbourhoods, and if we would only get rid of zoning regulations, everything would be fine, you need to have proof of that,' Patrick asserts. 'And when you look around for proof,' he says, 'you find that there really isn't any.' Article content The most obvious example, he suggests, is the city of Vancouver, where urban boundaries have not expanded in generations. 'So all the housing that has gone into Vancouver,' he explains, 'has been essentially infill housing that has been accepted through changes and zoning ordinances.' Article content Vancouver has tripled the number of housing units since the 1960s, Patrick reports. What's less well known, he says, this densification hasn't just been achieved by building high-rises in the city's downtown; the rest of the city has accepted over 50 percent of the housing units in lower density formats (basement suites, duplexes, triplexes, four-storey buildings along corridors). Article content Article content 'That housing, advanced by me and others, was based on partly the premise that this would lead to affordable housing,' he says. 'We tried really hard. We tripled the density. We tripled the number of housing units within the same footprint,' he reports, 'and as a reward for our heroic efforts, we have the highest home prices, when measured against average regional incomes of any place in North America, and the third highest home prices in the world.' Article content So he's warning the feds, and anyone else who will listen: 'If you think the solution is just to get rid of the restrictions on zoning and let towers be built basically everywhere, which is what the Vancouver strategy is now, you're gonna be disappointed.' Article content In his 2024 book, 'Broken City,' Patrick explains what's happening. 'It turns out that the issue here is not the building, it's the land under the building,' he argues. When a city allows for additional density, that changes the financial value of the dirt on the proposed building site. Thus, he reports, 'If you go from allowing a one-storey building to allowing a 10-storey building, you get a 1,000-percent increase in the price of the land.' Article content Article content 'So the market is really a market-per-square-foot of the building,' he explains, 'and by adding density, it doesn't change the value of that square foot. What it does change is the value of the land underneath that building.' Article content 'As the authorized use of land is increased,' Patrick elaborates, 'the value of the land is going up and up and up, and it, unfortunately, goes up more or less in measure to what the market is allowing for that built price.' Article content The increase in land values created by up-zoning and densification are not going to the municipality, Patrick suggests. 'That's what's so tragic about it, about the whole thing,' he contends, 'the policy makers are saying (and I think many of them actually believe it), that this will help the community and it's actually harming the community. It's really helping the land speculators.' Article content And Patrick makes clear: The land speculator is different than the developer. 'The developer is the good guy,' he says, chuckling. 'They build a building. The building has social value. What doesn't appear to have social value is the land, and the speculation part of it, which is preventing us from adjudicating land rights to the benefit of the community.' Article content 'The way things are unfolding now,' he continues, 'is that real estate nationally constitutes about 25 per cent of the gross domestic product in Canada, and that's way too high a level. And it's all structured on the idea that real estate values cannot go down … We're seeing it here in Vancouver, where the real estate industry is begging for additional federal local and provincial assistance because of the downturn.' Article content The current collapse of the market for small condo units makes it obvious that the investor community has soured on the profit potential of this product, Patrick explains, stranding these assets in a financial limbo. 'It is very strong proof that the driver for real estate in Canada has for many years been 'housing as investment' vs. 'housing as homes,'' he says. 'This distortion elevated the price of urban land making it impossible for developers to build housing for families at a price they can afford.' Article content Basically, we're doing the wrong thing, Patrick concludes: 'We're going in and giving away land rights, hoping that that will lead to affordability. We shouldn't do that, because it doesn't work. But what we can do is give away land rights, insisting on affordability.' Article content
