Middle East Funding Gaps Risk Delaying Startups' IPO Ambitions
'There is a massive funding gap in the Series B stage,' Sweid said in an interview on the sidelines of the Fortune Most Powerful Women International Summit in Riyadh. 'Without that changing, you won't get to the stage of scale the company and then IPO.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Perplexity's $34.5bn bid for Google Chrome strictly a power move?
Artificial intelligence start-up Perplexity AI has made an unsolicited $34.5bn (£25.4bn) all-cash offer for Google's Chrome browser, in a move that some analysts say is as much about signalling intent as it is about striking a deal. The San Francisco-based company revealed the bid on Tuesday, reported Reuters, claiming it had secured backing from several large venture capital funds to finance the offer in full, although it did not name them. Chrome, launched in 2008, is used by more than three billion people worldwide and remains a cornerstone of Google's control over online search. The timing is notable, with Perplexity's approach coming our just weeks before US District Judge Amit Mehta is expected to outline remedies in a major antitrust case the Department of Justice (DOJ) won against Google last year. The DOJ has proposed that Chrome be divested to restore competition, though Google has vowed to appeal, describing the remedies as 'extraordinary' and 'overboard'. Strategic positioning in the AI search race Perplexity, valued at $18bn in its latest funding round, is one of a wave of AI-powered search challengers seeking to disrupt the traditional search market. Founded in 2022, the firm's search engine provides AI-generated direct answers alongside links to source material, and in July it launched Comet, its own browser built on the same open-source platform as Chrome. In its bid, Perplexity pledged to keep the open source platform, Chronium, invest $3bn in Chrome over two years, retain most of the browsers' staff and, notably, keep Google as the default search engine. Ben Barringer, global tech analyst at Quilter Cheviot, said the offer 'is as much about making a statement as it is about securing a deal', noting the $34.5bn price tag 'is widely seen as undervaluing Chrome' and could be the start of a broader price discovery process. The move also highlights the growing strategic value of browsers in the AI era. 'Whoever owns the gateway to the web holds influence over how information is accessed, prioritised, and trusted', said Alon Yamin, co-founder and chief executive of Copyleaks. Whether the bid is a realistic attempt or a calculated show of strength, analysts expect any forced Chrome sale to attract multiple suitors like OpenAI and Yahoo, if regulators push ahead. But Google is likely to fight any divestment through a lengthy appeals process, potentially delaying such a decision for years.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Carnival Corporation vs. Viking Holdings
Key Points Carnival and Viking are both leaders in the cruise industry but have different niches. Viking just had its IPO in June and has been on a tear ever since. Carnival has a higher debt load but a much lower valuation. 10 stocks we like better than Carnival Corp. › The cruise industry is an interesting one from a stock market perspective. During the pandemic, these companies had to take on a huge amount of debt and sell equity, diluting their shareholders, to raise cash and ride out COVID-19. But in the post-pandemic world, the cruise industry has been incredibly strong, initially due to "revenge" travel and the need for experiences. But even after inflation and interest rates spiked in 2022, the cruise industry held up very well, showing perhaps a longer-term growth trend. Cruising is also a more efficient form of travel than staying in hotels, which have gotten more expensive. Despite the strong recent results, these companies are still digging themselves out of their debt holes, which could lead to further upside as they pay down debt and de-lever their balance sheets. Two leaders in the space are Carnival (NYSE: CCL), the oldest publicly traded cruise stock, having been on the stock market since 1987, and Viking Holdings (NYSE: VIK), the newest public cruise stock, having just had its initial public offering (IPO) in June. Which is the better buy today for those looking to play the continued recovery of cruise stocks? The experienced veteran or new kid on the block? Both companies are hitting it out of the park There appears to be great strength across the cruise industry, with both companies posting terrific recent numbers. Off of a very strong 2024, Carnival grew revenue 9.5% last quarter, but with a massive inflection in profitability as adjusted (non-GAAP) earnings per share more than tripled. Not only that, Carnival CEO Josh Weinstein noted that Carnival had already achieved its 2026 SEA Change operational and financial targets it had set for itself two years ago, 18 months ahead of schedule. Those targets included operational goals around sustainability, the important profit-centered metrics of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) per available lower berth day (ALBD), and return on invested capital (ROIC). As of the second quarter of 2025, EBITDA per ALBD had grown 52%, and ROIC had more than doubled to 12.5% over just the past two years. That's really impressive, owing to Carnival's pricing actions, capacity restraint, and a focus on costs. But Carnival isn't the only cruise company reporting impressive results. In its first quarter, Viking impressed investors with revenue growth of 24.9% on the back of a 7.1% increase in net yields and a 14.9% increase in capacity. Net yields are essentially the direct profits per customer, equaling net revenues per available passenger cruise day minus the costs of travel commissions, transportation, and onboard costs. Viking's management also forecasted good times ahead, noting that it was basically sold out for 2025, and 37% of capacity was already booked for 2026 -- ahead of where the company was with forward bookings at this point last year. But Viking's debt picture looks much better than Carnival's So, both companies appear to be on a good path operationally. But for the foreseeable future, these companies will be devoting most or all of their profits to paying down their COVID-era debt. On that front, Viking appears to be in a much better position. Today, its debt sits at 2.0 times its trailing EBITDA as of March 31, while Carnival's debt-to-EBITDA ratio sat at a higher 3.7 times as of May 31. It's not entirely clear why Viking came out of the pandemic with a lower debt load than Carnival. It could be that since Viking was a private company before 2020, it hadn't taken on the leverage to repurchase stock as aggressively as Carnival had done as a public company in the years leading up to the pandemic. It could also have something to do with each company's business model. Carnival is largely in the business of ocean cruises all over the world across a number of brands. Viking is largely engaged in river cruises, mostly in Europe, and focuses on older cruise enthusiasts, who tend to be less economically sensitive. Viking also has ocean cruises, but those ships totaled only about 12% of its capacity last quarter. But Viking's valuation has already taken off On the back of strong results, both stocks have done well in recent months. However, Viking has done extraordinarily well, with the stock having appreciated 150% from its June $24 IPO price to $60 as of this writing. Carnival has also had a strong recent run, with the stock up nearly 23% on the year. Still, Viking's run has caused its valuation to soar much higher than Carnival's, with a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and forward enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV-to-EBITDA) ratio of 24.5 and 16.9, respectively. Meanwhile, Carnival is much cheaper, trading at a forward P/E ratio of 15.3. And while Carnival does sport a higher debt load, even its forward EV-to-EBITDA ratio, which accounts for debt, is much lower, at 8.8 times this year's EBITDA estimates. Getting what you pay for As it stands now, it appears that investors are paying fairly for what they're getting. Viking's less-risky business model and lower debt load have led to a much higher valuation. And since it's in a better balance sheet position, it's also able to expand capacity faster than Carnival, as evidenced by last quarter's growth rates. Meanwhile, Carnival looks cheaper on all metrics, significantly so, but it also has a debt load nearly twice that of Viking's relative to each company's EBITDA. And because it has to pay down its debt, management isn't expanding capacity as fast as it probably would otherwise. Thus, each stock could still be a buy if you believe in the continued strength of the cruise industry. Viking may be the better play for growth-oriented investors, with its near-25% growth rate and relatively lower risk. But for value investors, Carnival may be the better play here, as its lower valuation could get a rerating as the company continues to pay down its sizable COVID-era debt load, which would de-risk its story. Do the experts think Carnival Corp. is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Carnival Corp. make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Billy Duberstein and/or his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Carnival Corp. and Viking. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Carnival Corporation vs. Viking Holdings was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Revealed – Wage Offer From Saudi Club Neom To Inter Milan & France Star
Saudi Pro League club Neom are ready to offer Inter Milan defender Benjamin Pavar wages of €8 million net per season. This according to today's print edition of Turin-based newspaper Tuttosport, via FCInterNews. Recent reports have suggested that Inter are ready to sell Benjamin Pavard. Inter signed Pavard two years ago from Bayern Munich. And the France international has certainly had his part to play, helping the Nerazzurri to the Serie A title in his first season at the club. But perhaps Pavard, who turns thirty next season, is not in line with the future of Inter's project. The likes of Galatasaray and Lille have shown an interest. And it is not just these European clubs who have reportedly identified Pavard as a target. From the Saudi Pro League, Neom have also reportedly emerged as suitors for the 2018 World Cup winner. Neom Ready To Offer Inter Defender Benjamin Pavard €8M Net/Season MILAN, ITALY – APRIL 16: Benjamin Pavard of FC Internazionale applauds the fans as he warms up prior to the UEFA Champions League 2024/25 Quarter Final Second Leg match between FC Internazionale Milano and FC Bayern München at San Siro on April 16, 2025 in Milan, Italy. (Photo by) According to Tuttosport, Galatasaray and Lille would struggle to meet Inter's asking price for Pavard. The Nerazzurri certainly aren't going to let the Frenchman leave for less than €20 million. That is the amount that Inter would need to bring in to avoid taking a capital loss. However, Neom would have no trouble paying that amount for Pavard. Meanwhile, the Saudi club are also prepared to put big wages on the table to tempt the player himself. They are reportedly offering around €8 million net per season.
