logo
Contributor: NPR faces a real threat in defunding fight that's coming

Contributor: NPR faces a real threat in defunding fight that's coming

Yahoo14-03-2025
In February, Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency put the nation's public radio network on notice. 'Defund NPR,' he wrote on X. 'It should survive on its own.' Musk's tweet was the latest indication that the Trump administration intends to alter the way the broadcaster operates. In January, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr announced an investigation into the legality of underwriting — the public media equivalent of advertising. Meanwhile, the Department of Defense ordered NPR and other news organizations to give up their offices at the Pentagon. Breitbart News will occupy NPR's space.
During its 55-year history, NPR's funding scares have come almost on schedule, heralded by the arrival of a new Republican administration (Ronald Reagan, 1981), a rightward shift in the Congress (Newt Gingrich, 1995) or a decision by network executives that angers conservatives (the firing of commentator Juan Williams, 2010).
The previous threats have been serious, but none as serious as what's unfolding now.
The network is vulnerable. In 2024, former NPR business editor Uri Berliner posted an essay on the Free Press substack site accusing the organization of adopting a left-wing stance in which 'race and identity' were 'paramount.' NPR pushed back, but the 'bias' allegations received extensive coverage. Simultaneously, the network has been losing its audience. It started during the pandemic, as commuters who had tuned into 'Morning Edition' and 'All Things Considered' abandoned drive-time for radio-free walks down the hall to home offices. Listenership dropped — from an estimated 60 million in 2020 to 42 million in 2024.
Read more: PBS and NPR on edge over FCC letter and Trump budget scrutiny
In mounting its defense, NPR should look back at its earlier wins and losses.
By far the worst incident sprang from the recommendation of a Reagan-appointed panel to cancel the entire budget of the Corp. for Public Broadcasting, the agency that oversees both NPR and PBS. Although David Stockman, Reagan's budget czar, ultimately opted for a less drastic 25% cut, Frank Mankiewicz, then president of NPR, viewed even the lower amount as potentially ruinous.
In 1982, Mankiewicz tried to free NPR from government funding altogether by monetizing a number of embryonic online delivery systems that would beam stock reports, sports scores and news headlines to handheld devices while transmitting NPR shows to home computers and inventory and pricing information to business customers. The technology, however, had yet to be fully developed. Within a year, Mankiewicz was gone and NPR was $9.1 million in debt.
The CPB bailed out NPR, but not before extracting concessions. Since the network's founding in 1970, it had received grants from the agency to pay for programming. Now, the grants would go to NPR stations, enabling them either to continue buying 'Morning Edition' and 'All Things Considered' from the network or shows such as 'Marketplace' from independent suppliers.
Read more: Commentary: Documentary on Washington Post's former publisher reminds us there's one way forward for media
NPR executives bemoaned the change but the advantage of giving federal money to the stations became apparent in 1995 after Gingrich, the newly elected speaker of the House, announced plans to 'zero out' the CPB. Where in the past this proposal would have been seen as a threat to NPR and PBS, it was instead seen as endangering beloved local stations. 'If you were attacking NPR,' a network executive later said, 'you were attacking your own community.' When an amendment to eliminate CPB funding came up in the House, it lost by a two-to-one margin.
By 2010, when NPR dismissed Williams, the media world was beginning to fracture in ways that anticipated the current environment, and the firing of a conservative commentator became a litmus test. NPR's rationale for letting Williams go, which was that he'd made what it considered Islamophobic remarks while appearing on Fox News, fell flat. Fox lambasted NPR and handed Williams a $2-million contract. NPR investigated the executive who fired Williams and she resigned. Jon Stewart mocked the network on 'The Daily Show' with a reference to a gentler public radio commentator: 'NPR, you just brought a tote bag full of David Sedaris books to a knife fight.'
In 2011, the Republican-controlled House — responding to the firing of Williams and to a later controversy involving a right-wing video sting that captured an NPR executive seemingly agreeing to publicize shariah law — voted 228 to 192 to defund the network. The Democratic-controlled Senate, however, did not go along. President Obama, who signed the bill that kept the funding alive, nevertheless aimed a barb at NPR during that year's White House Correspondents Dinner: 'I was looking forward to new programming like 'No Things Considered.' '
The defunding effort shaping up in 2025 promises dangers harder to joke about. During his first term, Trump stated that the CPB should be defunded. In his second term, he is unleashing an assault on the very idea of public agencies.
NPR's defense will likely be that since it now gets just 1% of its budget from the government, it presents no threat to the national purse. But it's not that simple. According to its own reporting on 'All Things Considered,' while the stations indeed get more government money than does NPR itself, they end up spending a lot of it for NPR programs. With a president who openly despises the mainstream media, and with all branches of government in Republican control, the CPB will not be coming to the rescue.
Yet there are reasons to hope that NPR will survive. First, regardless of Berliner's critique, NPR has always been a source of ground-breaking journalistic practices and superb reporting. It has established a solid foothold in American culture.
In 1972, NPR named Susan Stamberg host of 'All Things Considered,' making her the first woman to front a national news show. In 1973, NPR assigned reporter Josh Darsa to the Russell Senate Office Building to cover the Watergate hearings. No other broadcaster had a reporter in the room each day. In 2003, NPR was the only American broadcast network to keep a correspondent (Anne Garrels) in Baghdad during the aerial assault that launched the Iraq War. NPR's current efforts are similarly strong, whether they be dispatches by Jerusalem reporter Daniel Estrin about the conflict in Gaza or those by Berlin reporter Rob Schmitz about threats to NATO. Ari Shapiro, now the cohost of 'All Things Considered,' recently contributed a thorough piece from Panama about reaction to Trump's stated hopes to reclaim control of the Panama Canal.
Another reason for hope is that as opposed to 1995 — or even to 2011 — the American media landscape is in such poor shape that NPR is more necessary than ever. Across the country, print journalism has imploded. Commercial TV and radio news operations are also in decline. Especially in red states, NPR is sometimes the only source of local news. True, people everywhere now get information from cable channels, random websites or social media, but many still want what NPR offers.
As Bill Siemering, the creator of 'All Things Considered,' put it in the organization's 1970 mission statement:
'In its journalistic mode, National Public Radio will actively explore, investigate, and interpret issues of national and international import. The programs will enable the individual to better understand himself, his government, his institutions, and his natural and social environment.'
This is as good an idea now as it was more than half a century ago. Today's political climate, however, is even harsher than that during Richard Nixon's embattled presidency. In the coming fight, NPR will not only need more than a tote bag of David Sedaris books. It will need to rally support at the national and local level. It will need to bring a knife.
Steve Oney is a Los Angeles-based journalist and the author of 'On Air: The Triumph and Tumult of NPR,' published this week.
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth says DC National Guard will not be involved in law enforcement functions but he'll ‘have their back' if they need to ‘temporarily detain' criminals
Hegseth says DC National Guard will not be involved in law enforcement functions but he'll ‘have their back' if they need to ‘temporarily detain' criminals

New York Post

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Hegseth says DC National Guard will not be involved in law enforcement functions but he'll ‘have their back' if they need to ‘temporarily detain' criminals

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday detailed when Washington, DC residents can expect to see National Guard troops patrolling the nation's capital and what they'll be allowed to do to combat crime in the city. The Pentagon chief said Guardsmen from DC and 'other states' will be deployed to the district 'this week and in coming weeks' and act as 'force multipliers' for local and federal law enforcement, in an interview on Fox News' 'The Ingraham Angle.' 3 Hegseth said it will be up to Trump how long the National Guard remains on the streets of Washington, DC. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'Under Title 32, which is the authorization they'll be using, they have broad latitude, but they're not going to be involved in law enforcement functions,' Hegseth continued, likening the military's role in DC to the June deployment of National Guard and US Marine service members to Los Angeles to protect federal law enforcement from protesters during immigration raids. 'They will be standing right alongside our federal agents, like they were in Los Angeles. They're going to be proactive. If you take an action or a shot at them, there will be a consequence,' he said. When asked by host Laura Ingraham what National Guard troops will do if they see a crime in progress, Hegseth responded, 'They can come alongside and assist law enforcement.' Advertisement 'What if law enforcement isn't on that corner?' Ingraham pressed. 'I will have their back to ensure they can take the necessary action to protect citizens of DC and to protect themselves,' the defense secretary said. 'There's no rogue law enforcement going on from the National Guard,' Hegseth insisted. 'But there's also the application of common sense.' 3 Hegseth likened the DC mobilization to the deployment of some 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to Los Angeles earlier this summer. Getty Images Advertisement 'We're not going to have the National Guard just sitting there … seeing a crime committed [and] not do something about it.' 'You can help somebody interdict, temporarily detain, like we did in Los Angeles, and hand over to law enforcement those types of things,' he continued. 'The National Guard can be trained to do that.' President Trump activated 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marine service members to California in June amid violent anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. By July 1, nearly all of the National Guard members and Marines had been released, with around 300 still in the city. Advertisement 3 Hegseth indicated that Guardsmen in DC would be able to 'temporarily detain' individuals if they see a crime in progress and local police aren't around. Allison Bailey/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Hegseth did not say how many Guardsmen would be activated in DC, or how long they will patrol the city. 'I would call this 'conditions-based,'' he said. 'I would say it's a situation where we're here to support law enforcement, and the more we can free them up to do their job, the more effective they can be.' 'I don't know – weeks, months? What will it take? That's the president's call, but we're going to be there for him to execute as swiftly as possible.' The president has direct control over DC's National Guard, unlike every other unit, which is under the authority of state governors. Trump signed an executive order Monday mobilizing the DC National Guard as part of an effort aimed at 'restoring law and order in the District of Columbia.' 'Washington, DC, should be one of the safest, cleanest and most beautiful cities anywhere in the world,' Trump said of his plans, 'and we're going to make it that.'

Trump suggests he'll know if Putin wants a peace deal with Ukraine soon into their meeting
Trump suggests he'll know if Putin wants a peace deal with Ukraine soon into their meeting

Chicago Tribune

time12 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Trump suggests he'll know if Putin wants a peace deal with Ukraine soon into their meeting

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Monday that he expected to determine mere moments into his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin this week whether it would be possible to work out a deal to halt the war in Ukraine. 'At the end of that meeting, probably the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made,' Trump said at a White House press conference that he called to announce plans for a federal takeover of Washington's police force to help combat crime. He said he thought Friday's sitdown with Putin in Alaska would be 'really a feel-out meeting.' Trump added that 'it'll be good, but it might be bad' and predicted he may say, 'lots of luck, keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal.' Putin wants to lock in Russia's gains since invading Ukraine in February 2022 as Trump presses for a ceasefire that has remained out of reach. Trump's eagerness to reach a deal has raised fears in Ukraine and Europe about such an agreement favoring Russia, without sufficient input from Ukraine. Trump has alternately harshly criticized both leaders after promising — and so far failing — to swiftly end the conflict. Trump on Monday ducked repeated chances to say that he would push for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to take part in his discussions with Putin, and was especially dismissive of Zelenskyy and his need to be part of an effort to seek peace. He said the Ukrainian president had been to 'a lot of meetings' without managing to halt a war that Russia started. Trump also noted that Zelenskyy had been in power for the duration of the war and said 'nothing happened' during that time. He contrasted that with Putin, who has wielded power in Russia for decades. Trump said that, after his meeting with Putin, 'The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin' but it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' European allies have pushed for Ukraine's involvement, fearful that discussions could otherwise favor Moscow. To that point, Trump said he would call Zelenskyy and European leaders after his discussion with Putin to 'tell them what kind of a deal — I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal.' Trump spent the early part of his administration decrying Zelenskyy, even suggesting he was a dictator because his country has not held elections during the war. Zelenskyy was hounded out of the Oval Office in February after Trump and Vice President JD Vance suggested he hadn't been grateful enough for U.S. support. More recently, Trump has expressed frustration with Putin that Russia hasn't appeared to take a push for a ceasefire more seriously, and softened his tone toward Zelenskyy. His comments Monday suggested he might have had another change of heart. 'President Putin invited me to get involved,' Trump said. He noted that he thought it was 'very respectful' that Putin is coming to the U.S. for Friday's meeting, instead of insisting that Trump go to Russia. 'I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that can be made for both parties,' Trump said. The president repeated that any major agreement could involve land swaps, without elaborating. He had threatened Moscow with more economic sanctions if more isn't done to work toward a ceasefire, but suggested Monday that, should Friday's meeting be successful, he could see a day when the U.S. and Russia normalize trade relations. Putin is expected to be unwavering in his demands to keep all the territory his forces now occupy and to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, with the long-term aim of returning it to Moscow's sphere of influence. Zelenskyy insists he will never consent to any formal Russian annexation of Ukrainian territory or give up a bid for NATO membership. Putin believes he has the advantage on the ground as Ukrainian forces struggle to hold back Russian advances along the 1,000-kilometer (600-mile) front. On the front lines, few Ukrainian soldiers believe there's an end in sight to the war. With the Europeans and Ukrainians so far not invited to the summit, Germany sought to prepare by inviting Trump, Zelenskyy, the NATO chief and several other European leaders for a virtual meeting on Wednesday. The German chancellery said the talks would seek additional ways to pressure Russia and prepare for peace negotiations and 'related issues of territorial claims and security.' Steffen Meyer, spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said the German government 'has always emphasized that borders must not be shifted by force' and that Ukraine should decide its own fate 'independently and autonomously.' Earlier, a Ukrainian drone attack killed one person and wounded two others in a region some 260 miles (418 kilometers) east of Moscow. Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses intercepted and destroyed a total of 39 Ukrainian drones overnight and Monday morning over several Russian regions as well as over the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014.

Likely Pennsylvania gov candidate slams Shapiro over rumored presidential ambitions
Likely Pennsylvania gov candidate slams Shapiro over rumored presidential ambitions

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

Likely Pennsylvania gov candidate slams Shapiro over rumored presidential ambitions

Shapiro is considered a top potential presidential candidate in 2028, but has not said whether he will run for the White House. The video seemed intended to signal that Garrity would mount a more aggressive campaign against Shapiro than his past rivals. Far-right state Sen. Doug Mastriano lost to Shapiro by 15 points in 2022, after raising little money and airing few TV ads. Mastriano is considering another gubernatorial bid and remains popular with the MAGA base. 'I can tell you on the record that this may be both the first ad of 2026 and 2028,' Garrity adviser John Brabender told POLITICO. 'And that it's just a start.' The battleground state of Pennsylvania will host a gubernatorial race and as many as five competitive House races as Democrats grasp for control over the lower chamber in the midterms next year. Garrity, a combat veteran in her second term as treasurer, is seen by state GOP insiders as the best Republican candidate to challenge Shapiro. Mastriano's potential bid has alarmed President Donald Trump's advisers and Pennsylvania Republicans .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store