
Sarawak Metro earns fourth ISO certification with anti-bribery accreditation
Abdul Aziz (centre) witnessing the presentation of the ISO 37001:2016 certificate to Mazli (second right) by Shahrizan, as SEDC group corporate services division chief Rakayah Hamdan (left) and SEDC group investment chief Zainnurain Othman look on
KUCHING (May 21): Sarawak Metro Sdn Bhd has strengthened its reputation for integrity and transparency by earning the International Organisation for Standards (ISO) certification for its Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS).
This latest achievement marks the company's fourth ISO accreditation in just two years.
In a press release, Sarawak Metro said the ISO 37001:2016 ABMS certificate was formally presented to its chief executive officer Mazli Mustaffa by Sirim Sarawak regional director Shahrizan Mohammad Sahmoni during Sarawak Economic Development Corporation's (SEDC) Governance, Integrity, and Anti-Corruption Reinforcement Module Course held here on Monday.
SEDC chairman Tan Sri Datuk Amar Dr Abdul Aziz Husain, who also serves as chairman of Sarawak Metro, witnessed the presentation.
In his remarks, Abdul Aziz highlighted that the accreditation reflects the organisation's dedication to strengthening integrity and transparency in its operations.
'This is in line with the values that SEDC has instilled in all of its subsidiary companies,' he stated, while commending Sarawak Metro's perseverance in overcoming challenges throughout the certification process.
'May this recognition be an inspiration and guide for all the other SEDC subsidiaries to achieve continuous excellence,' he said, while pointing out that Sarawak Metro's success in attaining the ABMS certification was the result of the organisation's planned and phased implementation throughout 2024.
Aside from strengthening integrity and transparency, through the ISO 37001:2016 ABMS certification, Sarawak Metro also aimed to enhance good governance throughout the entire organisation.
The consultancy and development process for the ISO 37001:2016 commenced in August 2023 and was completed at the end of last year.
Meanwhile, in early 2023, Sarawak Metro simultaneously attained three internationally recognised standards – ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System; ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management System; and ISO 45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management System. Anti-Bribery Management System ISO accreditation lead Sarawak Metro
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
MACC to file application to forfeit Ilham Tower
MACC seized Ilham Tower yesterday for the second time. (Website pic) PETALING JAYA : The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission will file an application to forfeit the Ilham Tower in Kuala Lumpur next week, says its chief, Azam Baki. Azam said the forfeiture application would be filed under Section 55 or 56 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (Amla), Utusan Malaysia reported. Section 56 of Amla provides for the forfeiture of property where there is no prosecution, if a High Court judge is satisfied that the asset was the subject-matter or evidence relating to the commission of an offence under the Act, the proceeds of an unlawful activity, or the instrumentalities of an offence. MACC first seized the 274m-tall tower owned by the late Daim Zainuddin and his family under the MACC Act in December 2023. It previously said it could seize the tower for up to 18 months pending investigations. Yesterday, it announced it had seized the tower again, this time under Amla. Daim's widow, Naimah Khalid, plans to challenge the seizure in court. Last month, MACC opened eight new investigation papers into 'high-value' assets linked to Daim and his family members after receiving new information from overseas.


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Roundup: Europeans turn away from U.S. amid growing anti-American sentiment
LONDON, June 6 (Xinhua) -- While waiting in line outside Rome's iconic Gallery Borghese with his family, Polish tourist Antoni Furman shared why the United States is never on his holiday list. "Europe is much less crowded, and the U.S. tariffs on the European Union affect our pockets," he said. Furman represents a growing number of Europeans opting out of engaging with the United States. A wave of anti-American sentiment is sweeping across the continent, as U.S. policies strain the transatlantic relationship and influence everyday decisions - from travel choices to consumer behavior. Inbound travel to the U.S. is projected to decline by 8.7 percent in 2025, with the sharpest drops expected from Canada and Western Europe, according to Oxford Economics. Data from the U.S. National Travel and Tourism Office revealed that trips from overseas fell by 11.6 percent in March 2025 compared to the previous year. Visits from Western Europe alone plummeted 17.2 percent. Germany, Spain, and Ireland each saw declines exceeding 20 percent, while the United Kingdom and France recorded decreases of around 10 percent. Travel booking platform Omio reported a 16 percent increase in U.S. trip cancellations in the first quarter (Q1) year-on-year, with cancellation rates from the UK, Germany, and France nearing 40 percent. Tourism Economics, part of Oxford Economics, noted a 10 percent decline in European trip plans to the U.S. for the 2025 summer season. Oxford Economics pointed to several causes for the gloomy tourism outlook: trade tariffs targeting traditional allies, troubling media reports on border security, and controversial travel advisories. Adam Sacks, president of Tourism Economics, criticized the Trump administration's approach, noting that Trump's aggressive rhetoric toward the European Union (EU), Greenland, and Canada are all unforced errors, and have impacts on how people view the U.S. A British woman working in sports echoed this sentiment, saying, "I disagree with many of Trump's policies. The U.S. just doesn't seem like a positive place. I'd rather visit France - and I think most Brits complain about Trump's policies." Avoiding travel is just one of the many ways Europeans are rejecting American influence. From daily household goods to tech and media, European consumers are actively boycotting U.S. brands. In Denmark, a Facebook group titled "Boykot varer fra USA (Boycott goods from USA)" surged to 95,000 members by April. Similar initiatives emerged in Norway, Sweden, Germany, France, and Poland, urging consumers to favor European-made products. On Reddit, around 200,000 members of the BuyFromEU community share alternatives to American brands such as Netflix, McDonald's, and Apple - down to everyday items like socks, ketchup, and headphones. To support the movement, European developers have launched barcode-scanning apps to help consumers identify the country of origin for products. Many supermarkets now feature dedicated sections for European goods, with clear signage highlighting EU-made products. Goldman Sachs analysts warned that the U.S. could lose up to 90 billion U.S. dollars in revenue in 2025 due to declining tourism and mounting international boycotts. The resulting slowdown could modestly drag on the country's GDP, primarily through reduced foreign tourism. Trump has destroyed the reputation of the U.S., said Paul English, co-founder of travel website Kayak. He stressed that the reduction of travels to the U.S. is not only one more terrible blow to the country's economy, but also represents reputation damage that could take generations to repair.


New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Former MACC chief questions legality of second seizure of Ilham Tower
Former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad has questioned the legality of the second seizure of Ilham Tower, suggesting the move may exceed the bounds of Malaysian law. Now a practising lawyer, Dzulkifli pointed out that the asset had already been seized under Section 38(1) of the MACC Act on Dec 18, 2023. He said action under Section 38 requires the Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) to be satisfied that the asset in question - Ilham Tower - either constitutes the proceeds of, or is evidence related to, a corruption offence. "If no charges are brought or civil forfeiture proceedings initiated before June 17, 2025 - the end of the statutory 18-month period - it raises a fundamental question as to whether the original seizure was justified," he said in a statement today. Dzulkifli, the MACC's third chief commissioner, added that although the MACC Act and the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) operate under different legal frameworks, two overlapping seizure orders on the same property may be seen as an overreach of authority. "This is because legal powers must be exercised based on necessity, fairness, and proportionality," he said. It was reported yesterday that Ilham Tower, located on Jalan Binjai, had once again been seized by MACC. The commission said it had obtained approval from the DPP to seize the building, which is linked to the late former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin. According to the agency, the latest seizure was carried out via an Immovable Property Seizure Notice dated June 4, 2025, under Section 51(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (AMLATFPUAA). Dzulkifli said enforcement actions must be grounded in clear legal thresholds, not procedural convenience. "If AMLA is invoked merely to maintain control of the asset as the earlier MACC order nears expiry, it may undermine the rule of law and call into question the legitimacy of the original seizure," he said. He also noted that the absence of further action by June 18 would suggest that Ilham Tower was never genuinely linked to a corruption offence under the MACC Act. "This raises a critical question: why is there now a need for a new seizure order under Section 51 of AMLA? What new evidence, if any, justifies this action?" he asked. He added that the Ilham Tower case presents a significant test of how far enforcement and prosecutorial powers may be exercised within the law. "With the June 17 deadline approaching, all eyes are on the DPP's next move. Will there be a charge? Forfeiture? Or will the order lapse - signalling that the asset was wrongly targeted from the outset?" he said.