
Insight: Kosovo feels the pain of EU sanctions as election looms
But the venue has been dogged by financial problems and it was relying on a 1.5 million euro grant from the neighbouring European Union for renovations to its heating and drainage systems, according to its executive director, Ares Shporta.
Then on Oct. 7, Shporta received an email from EU officials saying the grant had been cancelled due to "ongoing measures imposed by the European Union on the government of Kosovo" - a reference to cuts to EU funding enacted in 2023 for what the bloc said was Prime Minister Albin Kurti's role in stoking ethnic tensions in northern Kosovo, which has a Serb majority.
"It shook the trust of the community in us, but also in the EU, which claims to be in support of cultural diversity," said Shporta in the lobby of the Lumbardhi, where a noisy space heater kept a smattering of patrons warm.
While the EU has not released a list of affected programs, two sources, including a senior diplomat, told Reuters more than a dozen projects totalling at least 150 million euros have stalled following the EU curbs. These include a 70-million-euro sewage treatment plant and a concert hall renovation. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity in order to speak candidly.
Pristina has downplayed the measures, but the fate of Lumbardhi and other projects identified by Reuters shows the impact on one of Europe's poorest countries.
The issue has resurfaced as Kosovo - which is majority ethnic Albanian but home to some 100,000 ethnic Serbs - prepares for elections on Feb. 9. And it could weigh on Kurti's chances of re-election, three analysts said.
Two private polls shared with Reuters showed Kurti's Vetevendosje party and coalition partners with around 40% of the vote - down from the 50.2% received in 2021. Some Kosovans are concerned at their country's isolation, according to political analyst Agon Maliqi.
"While most voters may be pleased that Kosovo has more control over the north, many might not be convinced that this is sustainable without international support," he said.
Some EU states want to lift the measures because they have not altered Kurti's policies and have hurt ordinary citizens, the senior diplomat and another official with direct knowledge of the situation told Reuters. But there is opposition from countries including Serbia-friendly France and Hungary.
The diplomat said the sanctions unfairly targeted Kosovo and not its northern neighbour Serbia, which has also played a role in inflaming tensions. But they added that there was no mechanism for rolling back the restrictions, despite their lack of efficacy.
An EU spokesperson described the measures as "temporary and reversible" but did not say which projects have been hit. They said that the EU would lift the sanctions if Kosovo de-escalated tensions in the north.
"Actions by the Kosovo Government...have so far not been conducive to this goal," the spokesperson said.
ETHNIC TENSIONS
Kosovo gained its independence from Serbia in 2008 with backing from the United States, which included a 1999 bombing campaign against Serbian forces.
The face of former US President Bill Clinton smiling from a billboard above a boulevard in central Pristina. Some Kosovan political parties still fly a US flag in their headquarters.
That alliance had been strained under Kurti, who has promised but failed to repair relations with Serbia, which would open up a path to joining the EU.
The 50,000 Serbs who live in north Kosovo do not recognise Pristina's institutions. Most see Belgrade as their capital and rely on it for wages, pensions and healthcare.
The EU has urged Pristina to establish an association of Serb municipalities to allow greater self-governance for Serbs. Fearing secession, Kurti has rejected the proposal and instead sought to erode Serbs' autonomy in the north.
The prime minister defends his policy, saying he has reduced crime, created jobs, promoted peace and pushed back against a more powerful aggressor in Serbia.
"We have not done this against the Serbs: we have done it against Serbia because it is against Kosovo and our nation," Kurti said in a campaign speech last month.
However, his move to install ethnic Albanian mayors in Serb majority areas, and to force ethnic Serbs to use Kosovan number plates on their cars, triggered the worst violence in a decade in 2023.
Despite the EU sanctions, Kurti persisted. His government outlawed the use of the Serbian dinar, closed Serb-run post offices and choked trade between the countries.
"Kosovo is isolated and penalized by the international community," said Vlora Citaku from the opposition Democratic Party of Kosovo, who served as Kosovan ambassador to the United States.
"Every major success that we have achieved in the last two decades - liberation, independence - has been achieved because we worked closely with allies."
It is unclear how the new US President Donald Trump's administration will react. But Richard Grenell, Trump's presidential envoy for special missions, gave a hint on Monday.
"Both Republicans and Democrats have criticised Kurti consistently for taking unilateral actions that destabilise the region," he wrote on X. "The international community is united against Kurti."
The US State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
ELECTION IMPACT
Kurti, a leftist and Albanian nationalist, has overseen some gains since coming to power in 2021. Unemployment has shrunk from 30% to around 10%, the minimum wage is up and last year the economy grew faster than the Western Balkans average.
Meanwhile, northern Kosovo feels as divided as ever. Education, healthcare, shops and cafes are segregated. Receipts from Serbian stores still give prices in dinar, not euros. Communities live apart - even the style of houses differ between the two groups.
Because Belgrade does not recognise Kosovo, it still pays salaries and pensions to Serbs there. But Serbs must return to Serbia to receive them since Kurti closed Serb-run post offices over the past year.
Meanwhile, the closure of some border crossings to Serbian goods has choked trade, forcing others to cross the frontier to buy medicines prescribed by Serb-run hospitals.
Serb pensioner Dragoljub Ivic, 65, who lives in Gracanica, a Serb-run municipality near Pristina, has to go back to Serbia every month to collect his 500-euro pension. The trip alone costs 50 euros, he said - 10% of his monthly allowance.
"In Kosovo, the people are paying for the politics," said Ivic, who saves money by keeping to one room in his modest house, which he heats by opening the door of his wood-fired oven.
He says tensions are far worse now.
"They want to force the Serbs from Kosovo."
POLLUTED WATER
People of all ethnicities are feeling the hit from the EU sanctions.
The EU had pledged 70 million euros to build the first sewage treatment plant to clean Pristina's trash-clogged canal system. That plan is stalled, said Pristina deputy mayor, Alban Zogaj.
"After decades we were finally resolving the issue of treating sewage water which is polluting the river of Sitnica, one of the most polluted rivers in Europe."
Raw sewage is released into the canals. Their banks are lined with abandoned kitchenware, boxes and bottles. When it rains and the water rises, overhanging trees become festooned with sheets of hanging plastic.
Sewage flows near the house of local resident Sanije Thaci, who cannot open her windows because of the smell.
"I have no words to describe what we are going through," said Thaci, who stood next to one canal's rushing grey stream.
"As you can see, there is no solution to be seen."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Europe's trade deal with the US was dead on arrival – it needs to be buried. Here's how to do it
Ursula von der Leyen's Turnberry golf course deal has been rightly called a capitulation and a humiliation for Europe. Assuming such an accord would put an end to Donald Trump's coercion and bullying was either naive or the result of a miserable delusion. The EU should now steel itself and reject the terms imposed by Trump. Is this deal really as bad as it sounds? Unfortunately, it is, for at least three reasons. The blow to Europe's international credibility is incalculable in a world that expects the EU to stand up for reciprocity and rules-based trade, to resist Washington's coercion as Canada, China and Brazil have, rather than condoning it. Economically, it's a damaging one-way street: EU exporters lose market access in the US while the EU market is hit by more favoured US competition. Core European industrial sectors such as pharma and steel and aluminium are left by the wayside. The balance also tilts in the US's favour in important sectors such as consumer goods, food and drink, and agriculture. Tariffs tend to stick, so this is long-term damage. The EU even gives up its right to respond to future US pressures through duties on digital services or network fees. To top it off, von der Leyen's defence and investment pledges (for which she had no mandate) go against Europe's interest. The EU's competitiveness predicament is precisely one of net investment outflows. As international capital now reallocates under the pressures of Trumponomics and a weakening dollar, the case for Europe to become a strategic investment power was strengthening. Von der Leyen's promise of $600bn in EU investment in the US is therefore disastrous messaging. How could this happen? All EU member states wanted to avoid Trump's 30% tariff threat and a trade war, but none perhaps as much as Germany and Ireland, supported by German carmakers and US big tech firms. Yet Irish sweetheart digital tax deals, as well as BMW and Mercedes's plans to move production hubs to the US (also to serve the EU market), cannot be Europe's future. EU governments were distinctly unhelpful in building the EU's negotiating position. But in the end, it was von der Leyen who blinked and she has to take responsibility. Her close team took control in the closing weeks and went into the final meeting manifestly prepared only to say yes, which made Trump's steamrolling inevitable. Let's think of the counterfactual: if von der Leyen had stepped into the room and rejected these terms, Trump's wrath and some market turmoil may have ensued. But ultimately it would very likely have come to a postponement, a new negotiation and, at some point, a different deal that would not be so lopsided or unilaterally trade away deep and long-term European interests and principles. Instead, von der Leyen became a supplicant to a triumphant Trump. The situation is reminiscent of the final rounds of the Brexit negotiations five years ago when von der Leyen similarly was giving in to unacceptable demands from Boris Johnson, only to U-turn under pressure from a steelier EU chief negotiator and a quartet of member states. Today, von der Leyen runs Brussels with a strong presidential hand and has largely done away with internal checks and balances inside the commission. That is her prerogative and her style, but the upshot should not be weak, ineffective and unprincipled dealings on Europe's major geopolitical challenges, from Trump to Gaza. The 'deal' in Scotland is in reality an unstable interim accord. Nothing is yet inked or signed; Washington and Brussels are already locking horns on its interpretation and negotiations on the finer (and broader) points are ongoing. The 27 EU governments will inevitably get involved as the final deal needs to be translated into an international agreement and EU law. Some big powers – Germany and Italy seemingly – are on board, reluctant or not. However, internal political dynamics may change their calculations. Opposition parties and rightwing contenders who are a real political threat to leaders in Germany and France are already lambasting the deal. Unless von der Leyen strikes a dirty bargain with the member states, the European parliament will also have a say. The longtime chair of its trade committee, Bernd Lange, has set the tone for how the deal would be viewed there, calling it 'asymmetry set in stone' and even 'a misery'. As details seep out on what von der Leyen has really agreed toand what the US expects from the EU, and all the consequences become clear, an already unpalatable deal may become even more so. Weakening US economic data and returning stock market jitters show that Trump's negotiation footing is fragile. His new tariff threats come with new extensions, up to 90 days in the case of Mexico, as his position is overstretched. For Europe, the lesson from the Brexit negotiations – one that von der Leyen ought to have grasped before now – is that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. There is now an opportunity for EU governments and the European parliament to course correct and salvage something from this train wreck. Georg Riekeles is the associate director of the European Policy Centre, and Varg Folkman is policy analyst at the European Policy Centre


Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
IMF lowers bar for Argentina reserves accumulation, next review due after local October elections
NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The International Monetary Fund lowered the bar for Argentina's reserve accumulation targets through 2026 in its $20 billion program and removed a review that was due before the country's October legislative elections as detailed in a report published Friday. Net international reserves accumulation targets were lowered through 2026, leading to a steeper accumulation curve as the 2027 target was kept in place. "The NIR accumulation target for end-December 2025 has been lowered to mainly reflect the initial shortfalls, which are gradually being addressed through the agreed corrective actions," the report said. The announcement came a day after the IMF board completed the first review of the $20 billion program approved in April. Disbursements of around $14 billion have been made for Argentina so far as part of this new program. "While early efforts to re-access international capital markets are commendable, Argentina's capacity to repay its Fund obligations remains subject to exceptional risks and continues to hinge on strong policy implementation to improve reserve coverage and sustain market access (at more favorable terms) by the time repayments to the Fund come due," said the report from IMF staff.


The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Deal or no deal? World leaders walk tightrope in tariff negotiations with Trump
It was grip-and-grin time for Ursula von der Leyen as she sat across from Donald Trump in Scotland last week, with the two announcing a deal for 15% tariffs on European imports that would avert a transatlantic trade war – but came at a stiff price for the 27-country bloc. After committing to a unilateral US raise on tariffs that came on the heels of a Nato commitment to increase defense spending to 5% of national GDPs, von der Leyen then thanked Trump 'for his personal commitment and his leadership to achieve this breakthrough'. 'He is a tough negotiator, but he is also a dealmaker,' she said, as the US president beamed. The EU was one of just a number of parties to strike a deal with Trump before his temporary pause on new tariffs came to an end this week. And like many others, the guiding principle for the EU appeared to be: it can always get worse. 'This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances,' Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade chief, said. Others had a far bleaker interpretation of the dynamics, as Trump has wielded the threat of sky-high tariffs to cudgel his trading partners into submission. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission,' wrote the French prime minister, François Bayrou. Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán put it another way: 'It was Donald Trump eating Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast,' he said on his podcast. Later, he called her a 'featherweight'. World leaders have been forced to adopt a position of appeasement and pragmatism as they've approached the Trump administration, which has swung between imposing staggering tariffs on imports and then announcing last minute pauses and exclusions that suggest there is little rhyme or reason to the White House's tariff strategy. But the key factor for Trump appears to be taking whatever he can get. Countries across Asia exporting to the US were quickest to begin negotiating new trade deals with the White House. Vietnam was desperate to cut a 46% tariff imposed on the country, and Trump early last month announced that he had negotiated a 20% rate with Vietnamese negotiators. Except, it turned out, they believed that they had negotiated an 11% rate, Politico reported. And treasury secretary Scott Bessent this week admitted that he had never seen the deal, which the Vietnamese authorities have never confirmed. Trump reportedly used the trade threats along with other incentives in order to broker a recent peace between Thailand and Cambodia after fighting broke out along the border between the two countries. He soon announced a 19% rate – a significant cut from 49% for Cambodia and 36% for Thailand – which appeared more motivated by international politics than trade considerations. But while many countries in the region will breathe a sigh of relief as they avert sky-high tariffs, some see a new danger in the arbitrary redrawing of the US's trade relationship with the world. 'What we felt during this negotiation is that the US trade environment is fundamentally changing,' South Korean trade minister Yeo Han-koo said shortly after a deal was made to tariff imports at 15%, down from a threatened 25%. The two sides had made a verbally agreement but had not made a formal draft, he said, because the deal had to be struck so quickly. 'I think we are entering a new normal era,' he said. 'So, although we have overcome this crisis, we cannot be relieved, because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again.' Leaders who have stood up to Trump are having the hardest time. Among others, Trump has focused his ire on Canada, which he has blamed for the fentanyl crisis in the US, a charge that Canada's prime minister Mark Carney has rejected. Trump on Friday announced that he would raise tariffs on Canada, a top trading partner, to 35%, as tough negotiations between the two sides continued. Carney, who had coined the elections slogan 'Elbows up, Canada' as a signal of defiance against Trump's tariff and annexation threats, said he was 'disappointed'. 'While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong,' Carney said.