Internal combustion at Tesla over low-cost EV
Some senior
Tesla
executives were alarmed last year when
Elon Musk
denied a Reuters report that the company had killed a planned all-new $25,000 EV that investors had expected to drive explosive vehicle sales growth, according to people familiar with the matter. "Reuters is lying," Musk posted on X, minutes after the story published on April 5, 2024, halting a 6per cent fall in Tesla's stock.
The executives knew that Musk had, in fact, canceled the low-cost vehicle, which many investors called the Model 2, and pivoted Tesla to focus on self-driving
robotaxis
, the people said. The company had told employees the project was over weeks earlier, Reuters reported, citing three sources and company documents.
Musk's post was so confusing to some senior managers that they asked him whether he'd changed his mind. Musk rejected their concerns and said the project was still dead, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
The executives' concerns, which haven't been previously reported, shed light on the company's struggle to deliver a low-cost, mass-market EV, considered a core promise of the company.
Some other Tesla executives were unconcerned about Musk's X post, said people familiar with the matter. The automaker keeps its product plans flexible, one person said, to respond to market conditions.
A year later, struggling with a dated lineup and falling sales around the world, Tesla has still not released the low-cost EV that Musk once called pivotal to the company's future. Neither Musk nor Tesla has explicitly confirmed killing an all-new model that investors and Tesla enthusiasts have long referred to as the Model 2 because it would slot in below the current cheapest model in Tesla's lineup, the $42,500 Model 3.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk deletes post claiming Trump appears in Epstein files amid ongoing feud
Elon Musk on Sunday deleted a controversial post in which he claimed that US President Donald Trump appears in the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that may signal a cooling of tensions after days of public sparring between the two billionaires. 'Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk had posted on X, the platform he owns, on Thursday. In a follow-up, he urged followers to 'mark this post for the future' because 'the truth will come out.' Both posts have been deleted. The accusation marked a dramatic escalation in Musk's ongoing feud with Trump, which began over the president's support for a controversial bill dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk, who has slammed the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination,' claimed it was rushed through without proper scrutiny and accused the administration of betraying EV makers like Tesla. Trump, speaking at a press briefing, dismissed Musk's concerns and said: 'Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money… I can understand why he's upset.' The feud spiralled after Trump said he was 'disappointed' in Musk. Musk fired back, saying, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51–49 in the Senate… Such ingratitude.' Live Events But hours after the Epstein claim, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman publicly urged Musk to reconcile with Trump. Musk's short reply — 'You're not wrong' — coupled with the deletion of the post, has been interpreted by some as a sign of de-escalation. — elonmusk (@elonmusk) Though Trump's name has appeared in various documents related to Epstein, including flight logs and contact books, no charges have been brought against him. The White House reportedly called Musk's comments 'an unfortunate episode,' while Trump, in a call with Politico , played down the spat, saying, 'It's going very well, never done better.' Musk has not explained why he deleted the post, but the timing suggests an attempt to contain the fallout from a claim that could have far-reaching political consequences.
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
It's the Republicans, not Musk, who are serious about cutting spending
Elon Musk and House Republicans both promised to tackle federal spending. It turns out only one of them was serious, and it wasn't Musk. Musk, who broke with President Trump this week after labeling Republicans' reconciliation bill a 'disgusting abomination," might claim some authority. As leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, he was the public face of Trump's assault on government. Remember him feeding the U.S. Agency for International Development into the wood chipper? Encouraging civil servants to quit or be fired? The chain saw? Musk loves the theatrical: He helped scuttle an omnibus spending bill last year mainly because of its page length. The DOGE cuts thrilled Trump's base, horrified Democrats and traumatized civil servants. But theatrical didn't mean substantive. Fire every civil servant and cut foreign aid to zero and you save about $300 billion. The deficit last year was $1.8 trillion. DOGE claims to have cut spending by $175 billion. But The Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and others found DOGE routinely overstated savings. Federal spending in the current fiscal year is actually up 9% from a year earlier. (Trump sent a slimmed-down budget to Congress last month that seeks to entrench some of DOGE's cuts.) The big money, as everyone except Musk and Trump seem to acknowledge, is in entitlements. Not fraud, waste and abuse, but checks correctly issued to eligible recipients. Such programs, including Social Security, health programs, food stamps and welfare, plus interest on the national debt, equal 73% of spending. Entitlements are infamously difficult to cut. Yet that's what House Republicans propose. Far from being full of 'crazy spending increases," as Musk claims, the bill would reduce spending over the coming decade by $1.3 trillion, relative to current law, and that would be predominantly from entitlements, according to the Congressional Budget Office. So why does the bill add to deficits? Because it reduces revenues even more, by $3.7 trillion, by extending tax cuts enacted in 2017, then adding a bunch more. If Musk is upset about this bill adding to the national debt, it's the tax cuts, not the spending, he should be attacking. Healthcare is the single biggest source of federal spending growth. Since 2000, federal health programs, mainly Medicare, Obamacare, and Medicaid, have grown from 3.1% of gross domestic product to 5.6%. Given the aging of the population and rising medical costs, that is expected to grow. For years, budget hawks have pleaded with Congress to address this. Give Republicans some credit: They have. Past cost-cutting often meant paying providers less, and providers would then change their behavior. It's why so few doctors accept Medicaid. This time, Republicans are going the less popular but potentially more durable route of giving less money to beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office estimates policy changes under Trump will mean 16 million fewer people will have health insurance. Is that good or bad? That depends on your politics. Democrats and progressives think it is cruel. Republicans, though, could point out that many of those people entered the U.S. illegally or gained benefits because of discretionary or temporary program changes. For example, nearly a third of that 16 million is because Republicans aren't renewing a temporary expansion of Obamacare subsidies passed by Democrats under Joe Biden, and the Trump administration is tightening up enrollment and eligibility verification. A further half reflects changes to Medicaid eligibility, such as penalizing states that cover certain immigrants, verifying eligibility more often, or ending a loophole through which states and insurers extract more dollars from Washington. Five million people would lose Medicaid because of work requirements on able-bodied adult recipients without dependents. This provision is arguably the harshest: Many of those people can't or won't work because of personal circumstances or age, or can't process the necessary paperwork. There's lots for budget hawks to hate about the Republican bill. It leaves debt on track to hit records. It doesn't touch the big drivers of spending—Social Security and Medicare. It shifts costs, such as for food stamps, to the states. It lards the tax code with breaks that reward Trump's base rather than help economic growth, and sunsets them in 2028 to artificially reduce the cost. It front loads the tax cuts and back loads the spending cuts. Nonetheless, the proposed legislation is superior to anything Musk has done in one crucial respect: It is legislation. The Constitution gives the power of the purse to Congress. DOGE and Trump have largely trampled on that principle, gutting foreign aid, research and countless other programs without authorization or input from the public or their representatives. Republicans in Congress mostly stood by and let this happen. With this bill, they're taking back control of the purse. Perhaps they could make that a habit. Write to Greg Ip at
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bajaj Auto reports 9% YoY growth in two-wheeler sales in May 2025. Check export numbers
Recently, after posting its Q4 FY25 sales report, Bajaj Auto has posted sales numbers for the month of May. (Dado Ruvic/REUTERS) Check Offers Bajaj Auto recently posted results for the month of May 2025. The bikemaker achieved a total sales figure of 3,32,370 units in the period. Comparing it to the 3,05,482 units sold in May 2024 showcases a 9 per cent growth in two-wheeler sales. The export numbers showcased growth as well, going up 20 per cent from 1,17,142 units in May 2024 to 1,40,958 units exported in May 2025. Domestic sales numbers for Bajaj two-wheelers showed a slight recovery from the previous month, climbing by 2 per cent. The numbers stood at 1,40,958 vehicles sold in April 2025, in comparison, this figure stood at 1,17,142 units in the same period of 2024. April-May 2025 YTD numbers The YTD numbers for the bikemaker showcased negligible growth in the April-May 2025 reports. The manufacturer exported 2,70,280 two-wheeler units in the April-May 2025 period against 2,41,981 units in April-May 2024, a 12 per cent change. Domestically, the manufacturer sold 3,80,027 units from April-May 2025 as opposed to 4,05,290 two-wheelers in April-March 2024. Also Read : Indian EV industry looking at a major disruption by July over China's rare earth magnet delays, warns Bajaj Auto FY25 annual and Q4 FY25 results The homegrown automotive manufacturer also posted its sales report for FY 2025, showcasing a 3 per cent increment in domestic two-wheeler sales and a 13 per cent increase in exports compared to FY 2024 numbers. Bajaj sold 22,50,585 two-wheelers in India in FY24; this figure grew to 23,08,249 in FY25. Export numbers counted in at 14,77,338 units sold in FY24 and grew to 16,74,060 in FY25. Additionally, the manufacturer also announced figures for the fourth quarter of FY 2025, marking a 3 per cent uptick in overall two-wheeler domestic sales volumes. The change was mainly supported by the manufacturer's growing sales volumes in the export markets, with a 20 per cent increase Y-o-Y in Q4 2025. However, Bajaj's two-wheeler sales numbers saw a 7 per cent drop Y-o-Y in the domestic markets. Overall, Bajaj sold 39,82,309 two-wheelers in FY2025, out of which 5,01,096 were sold domestically and 4,42,467 were exported in the fourth quarter of 2025 alone. Check out Upcoming Bikes In India. First Published Date: 07 Jun 2025, 13:09 PM IST
