4 South Lanarkshire schools to take part in pilot for free meals
The four local schools which will take part during the 2025-26 school year are:
Calderglen High School
Trinity High School
Lesmahagow High School
Larkhall Academy
If your child attends one of the schools listed above, is in S1-S3 and you receive the Scottish Child Payment you should apply for the free school meal pilot scheme using the online form.
If you already receive free school meals, you do not have to reapply.
Council leader Joe Fagan has saluted the initiative which offers a helping hand to families in different areas.
He said: 'I welcome the news that hundreds of pupils across South Lanarkshire will be able to receive this vital assistance.
'Extending free school meals to secondary school pupils in need through this pilot can help us realise that.
'As part of this scheme, we are now able to open the option of healthy and nutritious school meals to more young people each day of the new school year.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
6 hours ago
- Daily Record
Glasgow homeowner ordered to demolish sun room by council after neighbours moan
Gerard Caughey appealed to the Scottish Government in a bid to overturn the rulings, but they have now been upheld. A Dennistoun homeowner has been ordered to remove a sun room and two wood-burning stove chimneys from their C-listed property. Glasgow City Council served two enforcement notices on a flat at 1 Seton Terrace as officials said the structures, installed without permission, were out of character and affecting neighbours. The owner, Gerard Caughey, appealed to the Scottish Government in a bid to overturn the rulings, but they have now been upheld. A sun room, or orangery, was built in 2018 as an extension to the mid-19th century two-storey flat while the two flues — for a wood-burning stove within a workshop in the garden — were installed in a lane to the back of the property. Council officials said both the flues and the sun room require planning permission while listed building consent is needed for the extension. They ordered their removal in November last year following 'various' public complaints, as the flues have 'a direct impact on the amenity of the neighbouring properties' due to smoke. Officials also said the sun room does not 'protect the listed building's appearance' or 'complement the… period, style and character'. But Mr Caughey, who claimed he was only aware of one complaint, appealed. A reporter was appointed by the Scottish Government to investigate the case. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A representative for the owner said he had reinstated a single-storey extension at the same 'height and scale' as an original orangery, which had been part of the property when it was purchased in the 1990s but was removed as it was in 'a dangerous condition'. The appeal argued the extension had been completed six years before the enforcement notice was issued and that it protected the listed building 'due to its similarity to what was there originally'. It added 'quality' Spanish hardwood had been used and a 'sympathetic approach' was taken. The owner's appeal also claimed the council had failed to respond to a query about retrospective planning applications, and a prior enforcement notice relating to the flues had been dismissed. A letter of support for the extension was provided by Brian Johnston, planning convener on Dennistoun Community Council. It stated the work had been 'carried out with a sympathetic regard for the original building' and the 'workmanship, design and materials' were of 'high quality'. In response, the council said the previous notice was not withdrawn and the flues are not 'a sufficient distance' from neighbouring properties, so a planning application would be refused. It added permission for the extension also wouldn't be granted, as it is 'incongruous with the listed building and contributes to overdevelopment of the rear area'. The council believes removing the 'unauthorised structure would restore the character of the listed building by restoring the rear wall of the building to its original unobscured state'. The reporter, Simon Bonsall, found permission was required in both cases and that breaches of planning control had occurred. He upheld the enforcement notices. Mr Bonsall also refused to grant listed building consent for the extension. He concluded: 'While the effect of the orangery on the setting would not be harmful, I consider that the orangery through its design, location and materials would… not be in keeping with the character of the listed building. 'I consider that the removal of the orangery… would restore the character of the listed building to its state prior to the orangery having been built.' The owner can challenge the rulings at the Court of Session, but only on a point of law.
STV News
18 hours ago
- STV News
Homeowner ordered to remove sunroom and two wood-burning stove chimneys
A Dennistoun homeowner has been ordered to remove a sunroom and two wood-burning stove chimneys from their C-listed property. Glasgow City Council served two enforcement notices on a flat at 1 Seton Terrace. Officials said the structures, installed without permission, were out of character and affecting neighbours. The owner, Gerard Caughey, appealed to the Scottish Government to overturn the rulings, but they have now been upheld. A sunroom, or orangery, was built in 2018 as an extension to the mid-19th-century two-storey flat, while the two flues — for a wood-burning stove within a workshop in the garden—were installed in a lane to the back of the property. Council officials said both the flues and the sun room require planning permission while listed building consent is needed for the extension. They ordered their removal in November last year following 'various' public complaints, as the flues have 'a direct impact on the amenity of the neighbouring properties' due to smoke. Officials also said the sun room does not 'protect the listed building's appearance' or 'complement the… period, style and character'. But Mr Caughey, who claimed he was only aware of one complaint, appealed. The Scottish Government appointed a reporter to investigate the case. A representative for the owner said he had reinstated a single-storey extension at the same 'height and scale' as an original orangery, which had been part of the property when it was purchased in the 1990s but was removed as it was in 'a dangerous condition'. The appeal argued the extension had been completed six years before the enforcement notice was issued and that it protected the listed building 'due to its similarity to what was there originally'. It added that 'quality' Spanish hardwood had been used, and a 'sympathetic approach' was taken. The owner's appeal also claimed the council had failed to respond to a query about retrospective planning applications and dismissed a prior enforcement notice relating to the flues. A letter of support for the extension was provided by Brian Johnston, planning convener on Dennistoun Community Council. It stated the work had been 'carried out with a sympathetic regard for the original building' and the 'workmanship, design and materials' were of 'high quality'. In response, the council said the previous notice was not withdrawn and the flues are not 'a sufficient distance' from neighbouring properties, so a planning application would be refused. It added that permission for the extension would also not be granted, as it is 'incongruous with the listed building and contributes to overdevelopment of the rear area.' The council believes removing the 'unauthorised structure would restore the character of the listed building by restoring the rear wall of the building to its original unobscured state'. The reporter, Simon Bonsall, found that permission was required in both cases and that breaches of planning control had occurred. He upheld the enforcement notices. Mr Bonsall also refused to grant listed building consent for the extension. He concluded: 'While the effect of the orangery on the setting would not be harmful, I consider that the orangery through its design, location and materials would… not be in keeping with the character of the listed building. 'I consider that the removal of the orangery… would restore the character of the listed building to its state prior to the orangery having been built.' The owner can challenge the rulings at the Court of Session, but only on a point of law. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
South Wales Guardian
a day ago
- South Wales Guardian
Scottish ministers urged to rethink ‘poor decision' on guga hunt licence
Animal welfare campaigners at OneKind said the practice – known locally as the guga hunt – is 'grisly' and 'cruel'. The group is urging the Scottish Government and its nature agency NatureScot to reverse the licence, which currently permits 500 of the infant birds to be culled. The guga hunt has been an annual tradition in Ness, north Lewis, since the 15th century, with 10 men setting out for the rocky island of Sula Sgeir 40 miles away. Uninhabited by humans, the island is home to thousands of pairs of breeding gannets, with the men spending two weeks there in August, taking the birds from open cliffs using a pole and noose, before the creatures are gutted, salted and preserved in brine. Traditionally the preserved birds are said to have formed an essential part of the winter diet for the people of Ness, but guga is now regarded as a delicacy by some, although it is said to be an 'acquired taste'. A NatureScot spokesperson said it recognises the 'cultural significance of the guga hunt', adding this was 'reflected in the provision to licence this traditional activity through the Wildlife and Countryside Act'. They added that 2025 is the first year it had received a licence application from the Men of Ness – who carry out the guga hunt – since 2021. The spokesperson continued: 'We have thoroughly assessed the application taking into account survey data and population analysis and we have granted a licence with a limit of 500 birds. 'This is significantly fewer than in previous years where up to 2,000 have been granted. 'This revised limit for 2025 safeguards the sustainability of the Sula Sgeir gannet population and allows for its continued recovery following avian flu.' However OneKind chief executive Jason Rose said: 'Snatching wild baby birds from their nests and bashing their heads in, using the excuse of tradition, will appall and embarrass most people in the Western Isles and across Scotland. 'There is simply no need for this cruel activity to take place. We live in a modern society where we have many more choices about where our food comes from. 'The guga hunt is a grisly story from history that should be left in books or a museum. 'The Scottish Government and its nature agency have made a poor decision. 'Do they really think this kind of cruel and unnecessary activity is how anyone wants Scotland to be seen in the year 2025? 'OneKind will be writing to both NatureScot and Scottish ministers asking them to rethink. It's not too late to save these beautiful wild bird chicks.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
