Viktor Gerashchenko, governor of Russia's bank who was dubbed ‘the worst central banker in the world'
Viktor Gerashchenko, who has died aged 87, was a gruff Soviet-era central banker who in 1992 was appointed to head the Russian central bank under the country's first post-Soviet president, Boris Yeltsin; however, his insistence on recklessly printing roubles, and the cheap credits he handed out to weak Russian banks, fuelled hyperinflation in which millions lost their savings, earning him the sobriquet 'the worst central banker in the world' from the Economist magazine.
Gerashchenko's support came mainly from the old nomenklatura who saw him as holding the line against reformers in the Yeltsin administration. It was all very well, Gerashchenko remarked, for reformers to fall back on 'hackneyed quotations from Western textbooks on macroeconomics,' and he denied any link between the bank's overheated printing presses and rampaging inflation, which he claimed was caused by insufficient production.
Effectively confirming administration charges that he was running his own economic and social policy, he observed that the bank could hold inflation to nothing, but only at the cost of 'unrestrained unemployment and the absence of social safeguards for the jobless'. Therefore, it chose to print more money.
Gerashchenko was fired in October 1994 after the rouble lost about 30 percent of its value in one day – 'Black Tuesday'. While a few pundits remained hopeful that Russia might still build the foundations of a market-based democratic order, the economy continued to deteriorate under Gerashchenko's three successors, and in 1998, when the country defaulted on its debt, Gerashchenko was called back.
Over the next four years, helped by a huge devaluation of the rouble and high oil prices, he was credited with presiding over an economic recovery in which the rouble stabilised againt the dollar, Russia ran a large trade surplus and inflation was kept in check. But the central bank remained unreformed, remaining a byword for pedantic but ineffective regulation and turning a blind eye to the behaviour of the well-connected, while running a murky web of foreign subsidiaries.
In March 2002, with Russia now under President Vladimir Putin, Gerashchenko resigned from the bank. In 2004 he became chairman of the board of the oil company Yukos, which had been acquired from the state by the Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky in the mid-1990s.
By the time Gerashchenko arrived, Khodorkovsky was awaiting trial on charges of fraud, though his main transgressions appear to have been his outspoken criticism of the Putin administration and his political ambitions, 'crimes' which saw him imprisoned for a decade and eventually forced into exile.
Gerashchenko claimed to have been appointed as 'a go-between for the Kremlin and Khodorkovsky', but during his time as Yukos chairman (2004-07), most of the company's assets were seized and transferred for a fraction of their value to state-owned oil companies. 'The f---ers nicked it,' he said.
Yet Gerashchenko, widely disliked as a Communist-era apparatchik, offered little political threat to Putin. In 2003 he was a co-founder of Rodina ('Motherland') party, a nationalist coalition seen as pro-Kremlin, and was elected to the state Duma. In 2004 the Kremlin was said to have asked him to play the part of challenger to Putin in the presidential elections of that year. Ultimately, however, he was refused registration by the Central Election Commission owing to a technicality.
Viktor Vladimirovich Gerashchenko was born in Leningrad on December 21 1937. His father was a leading banker who became deputy chairman of the State Bank, and thanks to his father's connections Viktor rose rapidly in the Soviet banking system.
At the age of 28 he became director of the London-based Moscow Narodny Bank the first Soviet foreign bank. In 1982, he moved to work in the Vneshtorgbank, responsible for Soviet foreign trade and in 1989 he became the last chairman of the State Bank of the USSR. According to a US Congressional report, he may have been involved in funding of espionage and terrorist operations.
Viktor Gerashchenko, born December 21 1937, died May 11 2025
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Asian shares slide as Russia-Ukraine conflict, OPEC+ output plan push oil prices higher
HONG KONG (AP) — Asian shares sank on Monday and oil prices jumped as trade tensions and the Russian-Ukraine conflict ratcheted up geopolitical uncertainty. Hong Kong's Hang Seng plunged more than 2% as Beijing and Washington traded harsh words over trade. U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement that he will double tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% layered on still more worries for investors. A report over the weekend that China's factory activity contracted in May, although the decline slowed from April as the country reached a deal with the U.S. to slash President Donald Trump's sky-high tariffs, further undermined market sentiment. Markets in mainland China were closed for a holiday. Oil prices rallied after OPEC+ decided on a modest increase in output beginning in July. It was the third monthly increase in a row. U.S. benchmark crude oil gained $1.60 to $62.39 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international standard, was up $1.41 at $64.19 per barrel. Moscow pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones just hours before a new round of direct peace talks in Istanbul and a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed more than 40 Russian planes deep in Russia's territory, Ukraine's Security Service said on Sunday. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 2.2% to 22,778.45 as China and the U.S. accused each other of breaching their tariff agreement reached in Geneva last month. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 lost 1.6% to 37,356.97, while the Kospi in Seoul fell 0.4% to 2,686.17. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 retreated 0.2% to 8,416.00. On Friday, Wall Street closed its best month since 2023. The S&P 500 retreated less than 0.1% to end at 5,911.69 and the Dow industrials Jones Industrial Average edged 0.1% higher to 42,270.07. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.3% to 19,113.77. Gap weighed on the market even though the retailer reported stronger profit and revenue for the latest quarter than analysts expected. The company behind Banana Republic and Old Navy fell 20.2% after saying tariffs on imports from China and other countries could add up to $300 million to its costs this fiscal year. It has strategies set to mitigate up to half of that before it hits its profits. Hopes had largely been rising that the worst of such worries had passed, which in turn sent stocks rallying, after Trump paused his tariffs on both China and the European Union. A U.S. court then on Wednesday blocked many of Trump's sweeping tariffs. That all sent the S&P 500 in May to its first winning month in four and its best since November. But the tariffs remain in place while the White House appeals the ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade, and the ultimate outcome is still uncertain. Friday's most influential losses came from several Big Tech stocks. Nvidia fell 2.9% to give back some of its gain from earlier in the week after it topped analysts' expectations for profit in the latest quarter. It was the single heaviest weight by far on the S&P 500. On the winning side of Wall Street was Ulta Beauty, which rose 11.8% after the retailer reported stronger sales and profit than analysts forecast. It also raised the top end of its forecasted range for revenue this fiscal year even though CEO Kecia Steelman called the operating environment 'fluid.' In the bond market, Treasury yields eased after a report showed that the measure of inflation that the Federal Reserve likes to use was slightly lower in April than economists expected. A separate report from the University of Michigan said that sentiment among U.S. consumers was better in May than economists expected. Sentiment improved in the back half of the month after Trump paused many of his tariffs on China. In currency trading early Monday, the U.S. dollar fell to 143.55 Japanese yen from 143.87 yen. The euro inched up to $1.1364 from $1.1351.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Trump pardon Diddy and end his trial?
Sean "Diddy" Combs is being tried in a New York courtroom for racketeering and sexual trafficking. Could that daily drama vanish instantly if President Donald Trump pardoned the embattled rapper? "Yes, it could," says Brian Kalt, law professor at Michigan State University College of Law, who focuses on legal issues and the presidency. According to Kalt, Trump — who appears to be in the middle of a pardoning spree — would be within his presidential rights to extend a preemptive pardon to fellow New Yorker Combs, who has been described by witnesses so far as violent and abusive. "These are federal charges (against Combs), so that's the main limit. The matter has be federal, it has to be criminal vs. civil, and related to something that's already been done," says Kalt. "But the person doesn't have to even be charged yet, or convicted. The Supreme Court has said preemptive pardons are OK." Trump weighed in on the possibility Friday, May 30, in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." 'Nobody's asked': President Trump doesn't rule out pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs Typically, one of the last gestures from an outgoing president is a pardon. In President Joe Biden's final days in office, he famously pardoned his son, Hunter, convicted of federal gun felonies and federal tax charges. At the end of Trump's first term, he granted clemency to political allies such as Roger Stone, found guilty of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and related offenses. But pardons can take place during a president's term, says Kalt. The right was established in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which among other things gives the president "power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Kalt says the power to pardon is derived from the British monarch's historic right and stems from a recognition that criminal law was often too harsh, and it was important to have a safety valve. "The president was the best person to be that safety valve because of his political accountability," he says. But that's where things get murky, he adds, noting that Republican lawmakers "don't appear willing to hold the president accountable" for granting pardons, meaning they aren't costing him in terms of political capital. In contrast, President Gerald Ford's controversial pardoning of disgraced President Richard Nixon was perceived so negatively "that it probably cost Ford re-election in 1976," Kalt says. In just over 100 days since taking office, Trump has issued pardons to a broad range of personalities. They include Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the reality show "Chrisley Knows Best," who were convicted in 2022 of swindling $36 million from Atlanta banks and being tax evaders, and rapper NBA YoungBoy, who in 2024 was sentenced to two years in prison for weapons possession. He also pardoned former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, convicted of wire fraud and extortion, and Jan. 6 participant and "Bob's Burgers" actor Jay Johnston. The reason many presidents issue pardons at the end of their terms is precisely to avoid political fallout, says Kalt. In that sense, Trump's brash approach suggests he has no concerns about such ramifications. "I don't agree with these pardons on their merits, but the fact that he did them when he is politically accountable as opposed to slinking out the door does add some legitimacy to them in that sense," he says. "With pardons, you don't need Congress, you wave your magic wand and it happens. You can see the appeal for a president, particularly one like Trump." One can also see the appeal for those such as Combs, whose ordeal could end instantly should Trump's pardon "wand" wave his way. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Trump pardon Diddy? Trial could end, experts say


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Poland Exit Polls Show Donald Trump-Backed Candidate Narrowly Ahead
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Exit polls for the Polish presidential election show populist Karol Nawrocki, who is also President Donald Trump's preferred candidate, with a narrow lead of 51 percent to 49 percent. Full results are expected later on Monday, with only 55 percent of the votes counted by early Monday morning local time. Why It Matters Right-wing parties in Europe experienced a surge in support over the past couple years, starting with Geert Wilders's victory in the 2023 Dutch parliamentary election, and accelerated by major gains in the 2024 European parliamentary elections. Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election marked a major advance for right-wing groups, which have grown emboldened and have sought to once again borrow from Trump's playbook to secure further victories, including policies and ideological lines. Sunday's election will determine whether the country continues along Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's pro-European path or shifts toward nationalist policies reminiscent of those championed by Trump. The president and prime minister must work together to pass legislation, making their alignment key. Tusk on Friday claimed that Russian hackers had targeted the websites of ruling coalition parties, just days ahead of the election, according to the Kyiv Independent. What To Know Nawrocki, a conservative historian with no previous political experience and supported by the Law and Justice Party, went head-to-head with Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski. Key issues include judicial reforms, abortion rights, and EU relations. Trzaskowski represents the pro-European Civic Coalition, while Nawrocki is aligned with nationalist and traditionalist views. Nawrocki holds a slender lead over his rival in what experts have noted as a marked shift from an initial exit poll released just after voting ended at 9 p.m. on Sunday night. Karol Nawrocki, candidate for the 2025 Polish presidential election supported by Poland's right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party, flashes the victory sign in front of supporters as exit polls were announced on tv during their... Karol Nawrocki, candidate for the 2025 Polish presidential election supported by Poland's right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party, flashes the victory sign in front of supporters as exit polls were announced on tv during their election night event at the Mala Warszawa Theatre in Warsaw, Poland, during the second round of the presidential elections on June 1, 2025. More Wojtek Radwanski/AFP via Getty Images In that poll, Trzaskowski had 50.3 percent of the vote, but the poll had a two percent margin of error, according to Politico. Trzaskowski attempted to hold that poll as a small victory, telling supporters that they would soon hear the phrase "razor-thin" everywhere as results continued to trickle in from various districts. "If everything is confirmed we will immediately get to work," Trzawkowski said. However, Nawrocki has remained defiant, telling his supporters that he will "win and save Poland!" "We will win, that difference is really so tiny," he said, as his supporters chanted "president of Poland." Nawrocki's victory would serve as a sharp rebuke from voters about Tusk's government by electing a president who could pose a major legislative hurdle to any policy aspirations the prime minister has. What People Are Saying Piotr Buras, ECFR: "Right wing and far-right candidates gathered as many as 54 percent of votes—this is the most surprising result. "The campaign in the next two weeks will be very polarizing and brutal—a confrontation of two visions of Poland: pro-EU, liberal and progressive versus nationalist, Trumpist and conservative."