Breakthrough Alzheimer's Blood Test Explained By Neurologists
Whether you're noticing changes in your memory that are affecting your daily life, caring for a loved one recently diagnosed with dementia, evaluating a patient as a physician, or simply worried about someone close to you, the recent FDA clearance of the Lumipulse blood test for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is a significant development that you should be aware of. Here's what you need to know about this Breakthrough Alzheimer's blood test.
The Lumipulse G pTau217/β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio test is designed for the early detection of amyloid plaques associated with Alzheimer's disease in adults aged 55 years and older who are showing signs and symptoms of the condition. If you've witnessed a loved one gradually lose their memories due to the impact of amyloid plaques in their brain, you understand how important a test like this can be.
The Lumipulse test measures the levels of two proteins—pTau 217 and β-Amyloid 1-42—in plasma and calculates the ratio between them. This ratio is correlated with the presence or absence of amyloid plaques in the brain, potentially reducing the need for more invasive procedures like PET scans or spinal fluid analysis.
Dr. Phillipe Douyon, a neurologist and author of '7 Things You Should Be Doing to Minimize Your Risk of Dementia,' notes that the Alzheimer's Association has reported that 50-70% of symptomatic patients in community settings are inaccurately diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. In specialized memory clinics, this misdiagnosis rate drops to 25-30%. 'Having a test that provides early and accurate insights into the cause of someone's dementia could be a massive game changer,' says Dr. Douyon.
This new test follows the recent FDA approval of two medications, lecanemab and donanemab, which are highly effective in removing amyloid from the brain. Clinical trials have shown that these treatments can slow the progression of dementia. Currently, to qualify for these medications, patients must undergo expensive examinations, such as a brain amyloid PET scan or a lumbar puncture to analyze their spinal fluid. Many patients, however, do not have access to PET imaging or specialist care.
'A blood test makes diagnostic procedures more accessible and benefits underserved populations,' says Dr. Haythum Tayeb, a neurologist at WMCHealth. 'It also enables earlier and more personalized care planning, even before formal treatment begins. This empowers patients and their families to make informed decisions sooner,' Dr. Tayeb adds.
While this blood test may improve access to care for patients from communities lacking neurology and other specialty services, it is recommended to use it only for individuals experiencing memory problems, rather than for those who are asymptomatic. 'Given that there is no specific treatment indicated for asymptomatic persons, there is a risk of introducing psychological harm at this stage,' warns Dr. James Noble who is Professor of Neurology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and author of Navigating Life With Dementia. 'Healthy approaches to lifestyle will remain central in adulthood whether or not someone has a positive test, and that advice will not really change,' adds Dr. Noble.
Living a healthy lifestyle can significantly enhance brain health, regardless of whether a person has an abnormal accumulation of amyloid in their brain. Key factors include regular exercise, following a healthy diet such as the Mediterranean diet, getting adequate sleep, engaging in social and cognitive activities. These practices are all essential for maintaining cognitive function. Additionally, taking steps to protect your hearing may help reduce the risk of developing dementia.
Anyone experiencing memory loss should consult their medical provider for an evaluation. The provider can conduct basic cognitive testing and determine if a referral to a specialist is necessary. If the individual meets the criteria for testing, the lumipulse blood test should also be considered.
'Looking across the wide landscape of medicine, many other conditions benefit from early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. There is no reason to believe that Alzheimer's disease will be any different' says Dr. Noble. Indeed, screening for diseases like colon cancer, breast cancer, and high blood pressure has significantly extended the average American lifespan. Imagine how much our lives could change if we could screen for Alzheimer's dementia in the same way. This would be particularly useful for patients at higher risk due to age or family history.
Providing earlier intervention for Alzheimer's disease could potentially reduce amyloid buildup in the brain, help preserve memories, and allow individuals to live more independently at home, rather than in nursing homes.
Another advantage of using a blood test like the Lumipulse blood test is the ability to inform a patient that their memory loss is unlikely to be due to Alzheimer's disease. While a negative blood test does not entirely rule out an Alzheimer's diagnosis, it does make it less probable. This could prompt the medical provider to conduct further testing to identify a more accurate cause for the patient's memory loss. It is reasonable to anticipate that additional blood-based biomarkers for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease and other dementias will be available in the future. Perhaps one day, there will be a dementia panel blood test that can be sent off to provide early diagnosis of a wide range of dementias.
Alzheimer's blood testing is not only beneficial for individuals, but it also represents a significant advancement for research. Doctors and scientists can more easily identify individuals in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease, which accelerates clinical trials for new medications. This increased diagnostic accuracy can enhance the effectiveness of Alzheimer's clinical trials, as it ensures that patients enrolled have more reliable diagnoses. Consequently, new and more effective treatments could be developed and made available more quickly.
The Lumipulse Alzheimer's blood test marks a pivotal moment in our approach to this disease. While patients may still need confirmatory testing through brain imaging or spinal fluid analysis, this blood test enables the medical community to adopt a more proactive, precise, and personalized strategy for diagnosing and treating patients with dementia. This simple blood test brings us one step closer to earlier answers, better care, and renewed hope for millions of people facing the uncertainty of dementia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. to Participate in the Wells Fargo 2025 MedTech Innovation Spotlight
MINNEAPOLIS, May 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (NYSE: INSP) (Inspire), a medical technology company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative, minimally invasive solutions for patients with obstructive sleep apnea, announced today that its management team will participate in the Wells Fargo 2025 MedTech Innovation Spotlight on Friday, June 13, 2025. Inspire is scheduled to present at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The presentation will be accessible via a live webcast here. A webcast replay of the presentation will be available for two weeks following the presentation in the Event Archive section of Inspire's Investor website at About Inspire Medical SystemsInspire is a medical technology company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative, minimally invasive solutions for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Inspire's proprietary Inspire therapy is the first and only FDA, EU MDR, and PDMA-approved neurostimulation technology that provides a safe and effective treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. For additional information about Inspire, please visit Investor and Media ContactEzgi YagciVice President, Investor Relationsezgiyagci@ in to access your portfolio
CNET
16 minutes ago
- CNET
Is the '137 Club' the Best Way to Cook Steak? Reddit Says Yes, So I Tried It
If there's one thing I use my sous vide immersion circulator for most, it's steak -- and I'm always looking for new ways to level up my skills. Often, this means trying new cooking strategies I find on the r/sousvide Reddit community. One curious phenomenon has commenters proclaiming that 137 degrees Fahrenheit is the best temperature for cooking steak sous vide. The cooking hack allegedly yields the best flavor and texture. Ribeye is the most common cut in many discussions, but I've seen recommendations on cheaper cuts of beef like chuck steak and New York strip. A Reddit search reveals over 125 threads on the aptly named "137 Club." So I dug deeper to look at the science behind this cooking trend and, of course, tried it for myself. The science of cooking the perfect steak I seasoned every steak identically with salt, granulated garlic powder and cracked black pepper. John Carlsen/CNET Ahead of my test, I hit the books. My first instinct was to consult Modernist Cuisine by Nathan Myhrvold, Chris Young and Maxine Bilet, which is one of the most comprehensive resources on the science of cooking. With a list price that usually tops $500, over 2,400 pages across six volumes and no digital version, this is easier said than done. Fortunately, I found a copy of the more compact Modernist Cuisine at Home in Brigham Young University's collection near my home. ("More compact" is a relative term since it's also huge.) Thankfully, Modernist Cuisine at Home has an entire section about cooking steak, including the sous vide method. Vacuum sealing the steaks overnight allowed the seasoning to work as a marinade. John Carlsen/CNET The book groups cuts of steak into two categories: tender (filet, tenderloin, New York strip, ribeye, T-bone and so on) and tough cuts (chuck, skirt, hanger, flat iron, flank and so on). Tender cuts typically cook at lower temperatures, with the authors and their lab generally preferring a medium rare doneness around 133 F in most cases. In contrast, the recommendations for tough cuts hover around 144 F to 149 F, which the book implies is a more traditional roast-like result: think tender and flaky rather than extra juicy. Douglas Baldwin's masterclass A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking, cites multiple scientific papers that suggest the best tenderness results with beef lie somewhere between 120 F and 150 F, with specific mention of 131 F to 140 F for cheaper, tougher cuts of beef. This appears to be the sweet spot for converting tough collagen into smooth, flavorful gelatin. Additionally, Modernist Cuisine at Home suggests that ribeye, a tender cut of meat, turns out best after three hours at 133 F. There are small differences between the resources, but both seem to validate the 137 Club as a catchall method for steak. The steaks barely fit in the container I use for my sous vide bath, but I made it work with some strategic spacers and weights. John Carlsen/CNET While I wasn't able to track down the founding member of the 137 Club, I know that the term started gaining steam in April 2020, at least on Reddit. If I had to guess why 137 F became the magic number, it probably comes down to preference for the first person who tried it -- they might have liked it more medium than medium rare. After all, 137 degrees falls in the aforementioned temperature range, with a margin of error in case the temperature of the sous vide bath fluctuates during cooking. In this case, the temperature could vary by 3 degrees either way without affecting the results too heavily. My research ends here, but I doubt I'll be the last person wondering where it all came from. The experiment We all tried three samples with a simple survey asking about the texture, flavor and anything else that stood out. John Carlsen/CNET Now that we know that there's some science behind the 137 Club, it's time to test. I originally intended to test it with ribeye, which frequently comes up in 137 Club threads. It has a great balance of fatty tissue that supposedly renders better at a higher temperature. Instead, I found tender 1-inch T-bones on sale, which will work just fine. The main purpose was to see if there were any noticeable differences in the cooking. There were five taste testers: myself and four others who I'll refer to as Annette, Lauren, Hank and Nora. None of us had tasted the 137 F method before. Steak A: Grilled This was also the fastest cook because it required practically no additional prep beyond seasoning. John Carlsen/CNET I grilled Steak A in the traditional style, using a timer and a meat thermometer to reach an internal temperature of 131 F. (I aimed for 129 F, but grills are fickle things.) It took about 7 minutes. All of us agreed the traditional grilled steak was the least tender of the three steaks. As expected, the inside of the steak wasn't as consistent as with the sous vide steaks. However, it was juicy and the outside seared perfectly because I didn't have to worry as much about ruining the sous vide steaks. Nora even said it was her favorite: "Most flavor, I can taste each seasoning." Steak B: Sous vide at 129 F for 60 minutes I learned to sous vide steak at 129 F, so it was a good comparison point. John Carlsen/CNET I cooked Steak B with my normal sous vide method of 129 F for 60 minutes. (Note: I usually do 120 minutes, but shortened it due to time constraints.) Crucially, this steak lies outside the temperature range mentioned earlier. Since the experiment was at a family member's house, I chose to sear the sous vide steaks on the grill, which isn't as precise or powerful as my trusty blowtorch. Also, searing multiple T-bones with my small blowtorch would've taken an eternity. Likewise, I could've done a better job by not searing all three sous vide steaks at the same time. I bought four steaks in total, so there were two Steak Bs, with the thinner one turning out slightly more medium after searing. John Carlsen/CNET As a result, Steak B's crust was uneven and the flavor wasn't as pronounced as the grilled steak. The fat also didn't render as well as the other steaks. Everyone liked how soft this steak was, with one tester saying it fell apart in her mouth. Still, Steak B was the favorite option of three tasters: Annette, Lauren and me. However, it was the lowest-ranked steak for the other two respondents. Hank said it was "a little too different for my liking but still enjoyable." Meanwhile, Nora simply liked it but wrote "would not order again." I'll try not to take it personally. Steak C: Sous vide at 137 F for 60 minutes (also known as the 137 Club) In my case, I feel like it was a toss-up between Steak B (middle) and Steak C (left). John Carlsen/CNET I cooked Steak C at 137 F for an hour before keeping it warm in the 129 F bath with Steak B for another hour. Yes, the extra time affected the final result on Steak C, but seeing that many 137 Club threads suggest cooking for at least 120 minutes, I was fine adding a little more time. The sear turned out a little better than with Steak B. We all noticed that it wasn't as moist as the other sous vide steak, but it was extremely juicy. However, Steak C was flakier, more tender and seemed to have a deeper flavor because the fat had more time to render out and interact with the meat. Juiciness was the deciding factor for the tasters who preferred the other sous vide steak. But Steak C certainly had fans and was very good, with Hank saying it was "the best of the three in my opinion." What's the verdict on the 137 Club? Despite juggling cooking times and completing three steak methods simultaneously, it's always so rewarding to share good food with family. John Carlsen/CNET I learned two things from this experiment. First, sous vide steaks cooked at 137 F are just as delicious as other methods. It also seems to render fat more effectively than lower sous vide temperatures with a slightly higher level of doneness. It's ideal when you have a few hours to let the water bath work its magic. This helps balance out some of the confirmation bias of the many positive sentiments on Reddit. Secondly, whether anyone likes the final result ultimately reflects their personal preferences and that's fine. While medium rare is very popular for a lot of people, there are individuals -- my wife included -- who prefer medium-well and well-done steaks. (In case you're wondering, she says well-done sous vide steaks are delicious and much more forgiving than on the grill.) A final bonus lesson is something I've experienced many times -- it's a blast to experiment when you find something interesting that's within your skills. Trying one thing doesn't mean giving up a treasured cooking method or a favorite meal, but it can open up your possibilities and help you find new ways to make great food.
Medscape
17 minutes ago
- Medscape
ADHD, Obesity Link May Depend on Where You Live
The well-documented link between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obesity in both children and adults has typically been attributed to individual traits and behaviors, with limited attention paid to environmental and social factors. However, a new study challenged this perspective, proposing that ADHD may contribute to obesity by reducing physical activity — a connection shaped by the urban environment in which a person lives. 'Our research reveals a surprising urban advantage: As cities grow, both obesity and ADHD rates decrease proportionally,' first author Tian Gan, a PhD student at the Center for Urban Science and Progress, NYU Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York, said in a news release. Larger cities may offer 'protective factors against these interconnected health challenges,' Gan added, citing access to better mental health care, education, and opportunities for recreation and physical activity. The study was published online in PLOS Complex Systems . Urban Impact While impulsivity — a core ADHD trait — has long been suspected to contribute to weight gain through poor food choices and reduced physical activity, this new study highlighted how an individual's urban environment can either amplify or dampen those risks. Researchers analyzed public health data from 915 cities in the United States using 'urban scaling' methods, which describe how features of cities change with population size. They observed that both obesity and ADHD prevalence decrease 'sublinearly' with population — meaning that as cities grow, the per capita prevalence of these conditions declines. At the same time, access to mental health care and higher education rises 'superlinearly,' growing faster than the population. In other words, larger cities seem to offer not just more services, but disproportionately more support for conditions linked to impulsivity, the authors theorized. But city size alone doesn't tell the whole story. Using advanced causal discovery methods, the researchers mapped a network of interrelated variables. ADHD prevalence was linked to higher physical inactivity, which in turn increased obesity. Access to mental health care helped reduce inactivity and indirectly lowered obesity risk. Higher prevalence of college education correlated with better mental health access and more physical activity. This causal map revealed a dynamic system in which impulsivity, health behaviors, and urban infrastructure interact — suggesting that city environments can either reinforce or weaken these effects. The link between ADHD and obesity was stronger in cities with fewer opportunities for physical activity or greater food insecurity and weaker in cities with better access to mental health care and higher education levels, they explained. To validate their findings, the researchers examined individual-level data from the National Survey of Children's Health, which included 19,333 US children. This analysis confirmed the city-level data: Children with more severe ADHD were more likely to be obese, especially when physical activity and household education were low. Taken together, the findings reinforce evidence that ADHD contributes to obesity and point to the urban environment as a potentially modifiable target for intervention, the authors said. 'These findings underscore the importance of city-level interventions in mitigating the impact of impulsivity disorders on the obesity epidemic,' Maurizio Porfiri, PhD, who heads the Center for Urban Science and Progress at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, added in the news release.
